Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States

While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of construction engineering and management 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735
Hauptverfasser: Algarni, Ayed Muhammad, Arditi, David, Polat, Gul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 735
container_issue 10
container_start_page 728
container_title Journal of construction engineering and management
container_volume 133
creator Algarni, Ayed Muhammad
Arditi, David
Polat, Gul
description While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30933371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30933371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_oRelO1TzJWnS6kHm2HQwmLDtHLI0xY6unUl68N-bsjGPnr7D-3zvCw9CMeBHwBye4vFqMh1hQWmSU85igrEYAaXPgGNBstEFGkDOaCIyTi7R4AxeoxvndhgD43k6QLO3rqqLZHkwVnmTrK1qXGlsVDXRvCmtct522nfWRJ-23RntXR_5LxNtmsqbIlr58Odu0VWpamfuTneINrPpevKRLJbv88l4kSjGuE804O2WG64pzrUhwCkUlGiRlinhQoDiWmUZYzmobEuAGFykBZSZJiHKNKND9HDsPdj2uzPOy33ltKlr1Zi2czL0UkoFBPD1CGrbOmdNKQ-22iv7IwHLXqCUvUDZe5G9F9kLlEFgDwSBoeH-NKWcVnVw0ejK_dXkQDlO08C9HLmAGblrO9sEA-eZf1Z-AZ1Dgmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>30933371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</creator><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><description>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEMD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building economics. Cost ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Project management. Process of design ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of construction engineering and management, 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76065,76073</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19136055$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arditi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><title>Journal of construction engineering and management</title><description>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building economics. Cost</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Project management. Process of design</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9364</issn><issn>1943-7862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_oRelO1TzJWnS6kHm2HQwmLDtHLI0xY6unUl68N-bsjGPnr7D-3zvCw9CMeBHwBye4vFqMh1hQWmSU85igrEYAaXPgGNBstEFGkDOaCIyTi7R4AxeoxvndhgD43k6QLO3rqqLZHkwVnmTrK1qXGlsVDXRvCmtct522nfWRJ-23RntXR_5LxNtmsqbIlr58Odu0VWpamfuTneINrPpevKRLJbv88l4kSjGuE804O2WG64pzrUhwCkUlGiRlinhQoDiWmUZYzmobEuAGFykBZSZJiHKNKND9HDsPdj2uzPOy33ltKlr1Zi2czL0UkoFBPD1CGrbOmdNKQ-22iv7IwHLXqCUvUDZe5G9F9kLlEFgDwSBoeH-NKWcVnVw0ejK_dXkQDlO08C9HLmAGblrO9sEA-eZf1Z-AZ1Dgmw</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creator><creator>Arditi, David</creator><creator>Polat, Gul</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><author>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building economics. Cost</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Project management. Process of design</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arditi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</au><au>Arditi, David</au><au>Polat, Gul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>728-735</pages><issn>0733-9364</issn><eissn>1943-7862</eissn><coden>JCEMD4</coden><abstract>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9364
ispartof Journal of construction engineering and management, 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735
issn 0733-9364
1943-7862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30933371
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Building economics. Cost
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
Project management. Process of design
TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Build-Operate-Transfer%20in%20Infrastructure%20Projects%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20construction%20engineering%20and%20management&rft.au=Algarni,%20Ayed%20Muhammad&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=728-735&rft.issn=0733-9364&rft.eissn=1943-7862&rft.coden=JCEMD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30933371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=30933371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true