Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States
While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of construction engineering and management 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 735 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 728 |
container_title | Journal of construction engineering and management |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Algarni, Ayed Muhammad Arditi, David Polat, Gul |
description | While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30933371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30933371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_oRelO1TzJWnS6kHm2HQwmLDtHLI0xY6unUl68N-bsjGPnr7D-3zvCw9CMeBHwBye4vFqMh1hQWmSU85igrEYAaXPgGNBstEFGkDOaCIyTi7R4AxeoxvndhgD43k6QLO3rqqLZHkwVnmTrK1qXGlsVDXRvCmtct522nfWRJ-23RntXR_5LxNtmsqbIlr58Odu0VWpamfuTneINrPpevKRLJbv88l4kSjGuE804O2WG64pzrUhwCkUlGiRlinhQoDiWmUZYzmobEuAGFykBZSZJiHKNKND9HDsPdj2uzPOy33ltKlr1Zi2czL0UkoFBPD1CGrbOmdNKQ-22iv7IwHLXqCUvUDZe5G9F9kLlEFgDwSBoeH-NKWcVnVw0ejK_dXkQDlO08C9HLmAGblrO9sEA-eZf1Z-AZ1Dgmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>30933371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</creator><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><description>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEMD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building economics. Cost ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Project management. Process of design ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of construction engineering and management, 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76065,76073</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19136055$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arditi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><title>Journal of construction engineering and management</title><description>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building economics. Cost</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Project management. Process of design</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9364</issn><issn>1943-7862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_oRelO1TzJWnS6kHm2HQwmLDtHLI0xY6unUl68N-bsjGPnr7D-3zvCw9CMeBHwBye4vFqMh1hQWmSU85igrEYAaXPgGNBstEFGkDOaCIyTi7R4AxeoxvndhgD43k6QLO3rqqLZHkwVnmTrK1qXGlsVDXRvCmtct522nfWRJ-23RntXR_5LxNtmsqbIlr58Odu0VWpamfuTneINrPpevKRLJbv88l4kSjGuE804O2WG64pzrUhwCkUlGiRlinhQoDiWmUZYzmobEuAGFykBZSZJiHKNKND9HDsPdj2uzPOy33ltKlr1Zi2czL0UkoFBPD1CGrbOmdNKQ-22iv7IwHLXqCUvUDZe5G9F9kLlEFgDwSBoeH-NKWcVnVw0ejK_dXkQDlO08C9HLmAGblrO9sEA-eZf1Z-AZ1Dgmw</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creator><creator>Arditi, David</creator><creator>Polat, Gul</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</title><author>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad ; Arditi, David ; Polat, Gul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-c10bb6e6c309ce21631d32c75f526771a6ca884491a8b212e0d5d1f8c21a68c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building economics. Cost</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Project management. Process of design</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arditi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Gul</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Algarni, Ayed Muhammad</au><au>Arditi, David</au><au>Polat, Gul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>735</epage><pages>728-735</pages><issn>0733-9364</issn><eissn>1943-7862</eissn><coden>JCEMD4</coden><abstract>While the infrastructure in the United States is in need of large and immediate investment, the funds provided by public agencies are not nearly sufficient to face such a challenge. Build-operate-transfer (BOT) is a delivery/financing system that can be a solution to this problem. In this system, a private sponsor finances the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of a public project for a specified concession period, at the end of which it transfers ownership to the government agency, hopefully after recouping its costs and achieving profits. A questionnaire survey of large municipalities and state departments of transportation was conducted to determine the extent to which they are using BOT in their large projects, to investigate the implementation of BOT, and the reasons why some government agencies avoid using BOT. The findings indicate that very few agencies use BOT. The reasons why most do not use BOT were reported by the respondents to be the availability of proven alternatives and enough funds, the existence of political barriers, and resistance to change both on the part of government agencies and private sponsors. When government agencies and private sponsors explore the use of BOT, they should avoid the pitfalls perceived by the respondents in this study.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9364 |
ispartof | Journal of construction engineering and management, 2007-10, Vol.133 (10), p.728-735 |
issn | 0733-9364 1943-7862 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30933371 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Building economics. Cost Buildings. Public works Exact sciences and technology Project management. Process of design TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Build-Operate-Transfer in Infrastructure Projects in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Build-Operate-Transfer%20in%20Infrastructure%20Projects%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20construction%20engineering%20and%20management&rft.au=Algarni,%20Ayed%20Muhammad&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=735&rft.pages=728-735&rft.issn=0733-9364&rft.eissn=1943-7862&rft.coden=JCEMD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(728)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30933371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=30933371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |