The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students
This study investigates persuasive strategies used in the writings of Iranian university students in the field of teaching English as foreign language (TEFL). The study utilized the 7 principles of persuasive strategies presented by Cialdini (The psychology of persuasion, Quill William Morrow, New Y...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psycholinguistic research 2024-10, Vol.53 (5), p.62, Article 62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | Journal of psycholinguistic research |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Monazzah, Fatemeh Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali |
description | This study investigates persuasive strategies used in the writings of Iranian university students in the field of teaching English as foreign language (TEFL). The study utilized the 7 principles of persuasive strategies presented by Cialdini (The psychology of persuasion, Quill William Morrow, New York 1984; Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade, Simon & Schuster, New York 2016), which include ‘reciprocity’, ‘commitment and consistency’, ‘social proof’, ‘liking’, ‘authority’, ‘scarcity’, and ‘unity’. The results indicate that strategies such as ‘liking’, ‘unity’, and ‘authority’ were used more frequently than other persuasive strategies. On the other hand, ‘scarcity’ was the least used strategy by the participants. Significant gender differences were also observed in the data. These findings have important pedagogical implications and suggest the need to incorporate persuasive strategies into instructional materials and teaching practices to enhance the persuasive writing skills of university students. Furthermore, gender differences highlight the importance of considering individual differences when teaching persuasive writing. Finally, the study discusses the pedagogical implications of these findings in the context of learning and teaching. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3092871401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3092871401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-ee7ab4aae687d3a4aa9861897419e44dbce523d65479a54a2ca83f7229eb90583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMotj7-gAsJuHEzmkweM3FXxBcICra4DOnMnZoyzdQkI_rvTVsf4MJVTuA75yb3IHREyRklpDgPlCgmM5LzjBJKZMa30JCKgmVSCLGNhoQokklFxADthTAn6V6WdBcNmKIsKTpEzfgF8MhH3DX4zjVtD66ybnaBr96XbeeTxI_gQ2-CfQP8FL2JMLMQsHU4JuuztzFBYe33xlnj8MQl1gcbP5Khr8HFcIB2GtMGOPw699Hk-mp8eZvdP9zcXY7usyoXMmYAhZlyY0CWRc1MUqqUtFQFpwo4r6cViJzVUvBCGcFNXpmSNUWeK5imb5ZsH51ucpe-e-0hRL2woYK2NQ66PmhGVF4WlBOa0JM_6LzrvUuvW1NpDpOrwHxDVb4LwUOjl94ujP_QlOhVC3rTgk4t6HULmifT8Vd0P11A_WP5XnsC2AYIy9WKwf_O_if2E3cAkks</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092523368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Monazzah, Fatemeh ; Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa ; Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Monazzah, Fatemeh ; Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa ; Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates persuasive strategies used in the writings of Iranian university students in the field of teaching English as foreign language (TEFL). The study utilized the 7 principles of persuasive strategies presented by Cialdini (The psychology of persuasion, Quill William Morrow, New York 1984; Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade, Simon & Schuster, New York 2016), which include ‘reciprocity’, ‘commitment and consistency’, ‘social proof’, ‘liking’, ‘authority’, ‘scarcity’, and ‘unity’. The results indicate that strategies such as ‘liking’, ‘unity’, and ‘authority’ were used more frequently than other persuasive strategies. On the other hand, ‘scarcity’ was the least used strategy by the participants. Significant gender differences were also observed in the data. These findings have important pedagogical implications and suggest the need to incorporate persuasive strategies into instructional materials and teaching practices to enhance the persuasive writing skills of university students. Furthermore, gender differences highlight the importance of considering individual differences when teaching persuasive writing. Finally, the study discusses the pedagogical implications of these findings in the context of learning and teaching.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39138811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; College students ; Educational materials ; English (Second Language) ; English Instruction ; Female ; Gender differences ; Higher education ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Instructional Materials ; Iran ; Male ; Pedagogy ; Persuasion ; Persuasive Communication ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Second language instruction ; Second language writing ; Students - psychology ; Teaching methods ; TESOL ; Universities ; University students ; Writing ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Skills ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2024-10, Vol.53 (5), p.62, Article 62</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-ee7ab4aae687d3a4aa9861897419e44dbce523d65479a54a2ca83f7229eb90583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7939-7105</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39138811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monazzah, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</creatorcontrib><title>The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>This study investigates persuasive strategies used in the writings of Iranian university students in the field of teaching English as foreign language (TEFL). The study utilized the 7 principles of persuasive strategies presented by Cialdini (The psychology of persuasion, Quill William Morrow, New York 1984; Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade, Simon & Schuster, New York 2016), which include ‘reciprocity’, ‘commitment and consistency’, ‘social proof’, ‘liking’, ‘authority’, ‘scarcity’, and ‘unity’. The results indicate that strategies such as ‘liking’, ‘unity’, and ‘authority’ were used more frequently than other persuasive strategies. On the other hand, ‘scarcity’ was the least used strategy by the participants. Significant gender differences were also observed in the data. These findings have important pedagogical implications and suggest the need to incorporate persuasive strategies into instructional materials and teaching practices to enhance the persuasive writing skills of university students. Furthermore, gender differences highlight the importance of considering individual differences when teaching persuasive writing. Finally, the study discusses the pedagogical implications of these findings in the context of learning and teaching.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Persuasive Communication</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Second language instruction</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>TESOL</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEUhYMotj7-gAsJuHEzmkweM3FXxBcICra4DOnMnZoyzdQkI_rvTVsf4MJVTuA75yb3IHREyRklpDgPlCgmM5LzjBJKZMa30JCKgmVSCLGNhoQokklFxADthTAn6V6WdBcNmKIsKTpEzfgF8MhH3DX4zjVtD66ybnaBr96XbeeTxI_gQ2-CfQP8FL2JMLMQsHU4JuuztzFBYe33xlnj8MQl1gcbP5Khr8HFcIB2GtMGOPw699Hk-mp8eZvdP9zcXY7usyoXMmYAhZlyY0CWRc1MUqqUtFQFpwo4r6cViJzVUvBCGcFNXpmSNUWeK5imb5ZsH51ucpe-e-0hRL2woYK2NQ66PmhGVF4WlBOa0JM_6LzrvUuvW1NpDpOrwHxDVb4LwUOjl94ujP_QlOhVC3rTgk4t6HULmifT8Vd0P11A_WP5XnsC2AYIy9WKwf_O_if2E3cAkks</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Monazzah, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa</creator><creator>Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-7105</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students</title><author>Monazzah, Fatemeh ; Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa ; Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-ee7ab4aae687d3a4aa9861897419e44dbce523d65479a54a2ca83f7229eb90583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Persuasive Communication</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Second language instruction</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>TESOL</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monazzah, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monazzah, Fatemeh</au><au>Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa</au><au>Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>62</spage><pages>62-</pages><artnum>62</artnum><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>This study investigates persuasive strategies used in the writings of Iranian university students in the field of teaching English as foreign language (TEFL). The study utilized the 7 principles of persuasive strategies presented by Cialdini (The psychology of persuasion, Quill William Morrow, New York 1984; Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade, Simon & Schuster, New York 2016), which include ‘reciprocity’, ‘commitment and consistency’, ‘social proof’, ‘liking’, ‘authority’, ‘scarcity’, and ‘unity’. The results indicate that strategies such as ‘liking’, ‘unity’, and ‘authority’ were used more frequently than other persuasive strategies. On the other hand, ‘scarcity’ was the least used strategy by the participants. Significant gender differences were also observed in the data. These findings have important pedagogical implications and suggest the need to incorporate persuasive strategies into instructional materials and teaching practices to enhance the persuasive writing skills of university students. Furthermore, gender differences highlight the importance of considering individual differences when teaching persuasive writing. Finally, the study discusses the pedagogical implications of these findings in the context of learning and teaching.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>39138811</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7939-7105</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-6905 |
ispartof | Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2024-10, Vol.53 (5), p.62, Article 62 |
issn | 0090-6905 1573-6555 1573-6555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3092871401 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Adult Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology College students Educational materials English (Second Language) English Instruction Female Gender differences Higher education Humans Individual differences Instructional Materials Iran Male Pedagogy Persuasion Persuasive Communication Psycholinguistics Psychology Resistance (Psychology) Second language instruction Second language writing Students - psychology Teaching methods TESOL Universities University students Writing Writing Instruction Writing Skills Young Adult |
title | The Art of Influencing: Exploring Persuasive Strategies in the Writings of Iranian University Students |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Art%20of%20Influencing:%20Exploring%20Persuasive%20Strategies%20in%20the%20Writings%20of%20Iranian%20University%20Students&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Monazzah,%20Fatemeh&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=62&rft.pages=62-&rft.artnum=62&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-024-10106-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3092871401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092523368&rft_id=info:pmid/39138811&rfr_iscdi=true |