No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty

Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hip international 2024-11, Vol.34 (6), p.733-740
Hauptverfasser: Douven, Dirk P M, van Kampen, Paulien M, Werner, Paul H, Schrier, Joost C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 740
container_issue 6
container_start_page 733
container_title Hip international
container_volume 34
creator Douven, Dirk P M
van Kampen, Paulien M
Werner, Paul H
Schrier, Joost C
description Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and length of stay were assessed as secondary outcomes. Methods: Patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled by shared decision making for the DAA (32 patients) or PA (26 patients). Baseline data were collected preoperatively and outcomes postoperatively at 2-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up. Results: There is no significant difference (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/11207000241269285
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3092011260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_11207000241269285</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3092011260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-a87db26dcd284f651f74ce4ff9d693398168fd18d7f834e0332c7914f9decc503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoflR_gBfJ0cvWJLvdbI5S_IKiFz0vaTJpI9tkTbKU_g1_sSmtHhQ8zTDzvC_DOwhdUjKmlPMbShnhhBBWUVYL1kwO0CnlrCpqUvPD3Od9sQVO0FmM7xlkYlIdo5NSUCYYZ6fo89ljbY2BAE4Btg6DDN0Gm8GpZL2THfZDUn4FeA5pDeBwWkKWBFAJS5cgWB-w7PvgpVrmica9j7_H2beXyYJLERvfdX5t3QInn7L_0vZYhrQMvu9kTJtzdGRkF-FiX0fo7f7udfpYzF4enqa3s0IxxlIhG67nrNZKs6Yy9YQaXimojBG6FmUpGlo3RtNGc9OUFZCyZIoLWuU9KDUh5Qhd73zzjR8DxNSubFTQddKBH2JbEsFIjrDeonSHquBjDGDaPtiVDJuWknb7ivbPK7Lmam8_zFegfxTf2WdgvAOiXED77oeQ047_OH4BSUSUXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092011260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Douven, Dirk P M ; van Kampen, Paulien M ; Werner, Paul H ; Schrier, Joost C</creator><creatorcontrib>Douven, Dirk P M ; van Kampen, Paulien M ; Werner, Paul H ; Schrier, Joost C</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and length of stay were assessed as secondary outcomes. Methods: Patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled by shared decision making for the DAA (32 patients) or PA (26 patients). Baseline data were collected preoperatively and outcomes postoperatively at 2-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up. Results: There is no significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the DAA and PA on primary outcome (OHS). There was a main effect of time which indicated an increase of OHS over time independent of group (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: In the current study, no significant differences in postoperative functional outcome were found between DAA and PA in all follow-up moments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-7000</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1724-6067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/11207000241269285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39129272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Hip international, 2024-11, Vol.34 (6), p.733-740</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-a87db26dcd284f651f74ce4ff9d693398168fd18d7f834e0332c7914f9decc503</cites><orcidid>0009-0002-2166-6795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/11207000241269285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11207000241269285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39129272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douven, Dirk P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kampen, Paulien M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Paul H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrier, Joost C</creatorcontrib><title>No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Hip international</title><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><description>Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and length of stay were assessed as secondary outcomes. Methods: Patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled by shared decision making for the DAA (32 patients) or PA (26 patients). Baseline data were collected preoperatively and outcomes postoperatively at 2-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up. Results: There is no significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the DAA and PA on primary outcome (OHS). There was a main effect of time which indicated an increase of OHS over time independent of group (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: In the current study, no significant differences in postoperative functional outcome were found between DAA and PA in all follow-up moments.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1120-7000</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoflR_gBfJ0cvWJLvdbI5S_IKiFz0vaTJpI9tkTbKU_g1_sSmtHhQ8zTDzvC_DOwhdUjKmlPMbShnhhBBWUVYL1kwO0CnlrCpqUvPD3Od9sQVO0FmM7xlkYlIdo5NSUCYYZ6fo89ljbY2BAE4Btg6DDN0Gm8GpZL2THfZDUn4FeA5pDeBwWkKWBFAJS5cgWB-w7PvgpVrmica9j7_H2beXyYJLERvfdX5t3QInn7L_0vZYhrQMvu9kTJtzdGRkF-FiX0fo7f7udfpYzF4enqa3s0IxxlIhG67nrNZKs6Yy9YQaXimojBG6FmUpGlo3RtNGc9OUFZCyZIoLWuU9KDUh5Qhd73zzjR8DxNSubFTQddKBH2JbEsFIjrDeonSHquBjDGDaPtiVDJuWknb7ivbPK7Lmam8_zFegfxTf2WdgvAOiXED77oeQ047_OH4BSUSUXQ</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Douven, Dirk P M</creator><creator>van Kampen, Paulien M</creator><creator>Werner, Paul H</creator><creator>Schrier, Joost C</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2166-6795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Douven, Dirk P M ; van Kampen, Paulien M ; Werner, Paul H ; Schrier, Joost C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-a87db26dcd284f651f74ce4ff9d693398168fd18d7f834e0332c7914f9decc503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douven, Dirk P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kampen, Paulien M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Paul H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrier, Joost C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douven, Dirk P M</au><au>van Kampen, Paulien M</au><au>Werner, Paul H</au><au>Schrier, Joost C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>733</spage><epage>740</epage><pages>733-740</pages><issn>1120-7000</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><eissn>1724-6067</eissn><abstract>Background: Objective and subjective outcomes in the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were assessed in this study, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. Pain, 3 objective performance-based tests, surgical time, blood loss and length of stay were assessed as secondary outcomes. Methods: Patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively enrolled by shared decision making for the DAA (32 patients) or PA (26 patients). Baseline data were collected preoperatively and outcomes postoperatively at 2-, 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up. Results: There is no significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the DAA and PA on primary outcome (OHS). There was a main effect of time which indicated an increase of OHS over time independent of group (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: In the current study, no significant differences in postoperative functional outcome were found between DAA and PA in all follow-up moments.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39129272</pmid><doi>10.1177/11207000241269285</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2166-6795</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1120-7000
ispartof Hip international, 2024-11, Vol.34 (6), p.733-740
issn 1120-7000
1724-6067
1724-6067
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3092011260
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Pain Measurement
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title No difference in early functional outcome between the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in patients following total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A07%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20difference%20in%20early%20functional%20outcome%20between%20the%20direct%20anterior%20approach%20and%20posterior%20approach%20in%20patients%20following%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Hip%20international&rft.au=Douven,%20Dirk%20P%20M&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=733&rft.epage=740&rft.pages=733-740&rft.issn=1120-7000&rft.eissn=1724-6067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/11207000241269285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3092011260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092011260&rft_id=info:pmid/39129272&rft_sage_id=10.1177_11207000241269285&rfr_iscdi=true