Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness

Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we inves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2024-08
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Scott, Kuhlmey, Megan E, Despotidis, Meghan A, Alter, Isaac L, Hwa, Tiffany P, Chern, Alexander, Lalwani, Anil K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume
creator Kelly, Scott
Kuhlmey, Megan E
Despotidis, Meghan A
Alter, Isaac L
Hwa, Tiffany P
Chern, Alexander
Lalwani, Anil K
description Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary care center. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ohn.941
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3090947690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090947690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-ab6333fe9a1da2a4811aa99762a537cc1cc85fcb9d97d8712c8b622f20c8513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMobk7xH0ju9KYzb9M1zaVsfgwGKnWIVyVN39pI-mHSXuzfW9n06sDh4XB4CLkENgfGwtu2auYygiMyBSZFECcgjsmUgYyChZTJhJx5_8UYi2MhTsmES4AkktGUfKQdoq7o66Cs6Xf0BZ3GrjdtQ01Dt42xqkenLF22urKoHF3XnVVNT7cenafvpq9oappPi0FqCizoClXZoPfn5KRU1uPFIWckfbh_Wz4Fm-fH9fJuE2gQvA9UHnPOS5QKChWqKAFQSkoRh2rBhdagdbIodS4LKYpEQKiTPA7DMmRjD3xGbvarnWu_B_R9Vhuv0Y4XsR18xplkMhKxZCN6vUe1a713WGadM7VyuwxY9msxGy1mo8WRvDqMDnmNxT_3p43_ACV7bTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090947690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kelly, Scott ; Kuhlmey, Megan E ; Despotidis, Meghan A ; Alter, Isaac L ; Hwa, Tiffany P ; Chern, Alexander ; Lalwani, Anil K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Scott ; Kuhlmey, Megan E ; Despotidis, Meghan A ; Alter, Isaac L ; Hwa, Tiffany P ; Chern, Alexander ; Lalwani, Anil K</creatorcontrib><description>Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary care center. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ohn.941</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39118494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2024-08</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-ab6333fe9a1da2a4811aa99762a537cc1cc85fcb9d97d8712c8b622f20c8513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0253-2161 ; 0009-0007-4763-9206</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39118494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmey, Megan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Despotidis, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alter, Isaac L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwa, Tiffany P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalwani, Anil K</creatorcontrib><title>Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary care center. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.</description><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMobk7xH0ju9KYzb9M1zaVsfgwGKnWIVyVN39pI-mHSXuzfW9n06sDh4XB4CLkENgfGwtu2auYygiMyBSZFECcgjsmUgYyChZTJhJx5_8UYi2MhTsmES4AkktGUfKQdoq7o66Cs6Xf0BZ3GrjdtQ01Dt42xqkenLF22urKoHF3XnVVNT7cenafvpq9oappPi0FqCizoClXZoPfn5KRU1uPFIWckfbh_Wz4Fm-fH9fJuE2gQvA9UHnPOS5QKChWqKAFQSkoRh2rBhdagdbIodS4LKYpEQKiTPA7DMmRjD3xGbvarnWu_B_R9Vhuv0Y4XsR18xplkMhKxZCN6vUe1a713WGadM7VyuwxY9msxGy1mo8WRvDqMDnmNxT_3p43_ACV7bTc</recordid><startdate>20240809</startdate><enddate>20240809</enddate><creator>Kelly, Scott</creator><creator>Kuhlmey, Megan E</creator><creator>Despotidis, Meghan A</creator><creator>Alter, Isaac L</creator><creator>Hwa, Tiffany P</creator><creator>Chern, Alexander</creator><creator>Lalwani, Anil K</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-2161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4763-9206</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240809</creationdate><title>Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness</title><author>Kelly, Scott ; Kuhlmey, Megan E ; Despotidis, Meghan A ; Alter, Isaac L ; Hwa, Tiffany P ; Chern, Alexander ; Lalwani, Anil K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-ab6333fe9a1da2a4811aa99762a537cc1cc85fcb9d97d8712c8b622f20c8513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmey, Megan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Despotidis, Meghan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alter, Isaac L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwa, Tiffany P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalwani, Anil K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Scott</au><au>Kuhlmey, Megan E</au><au>Despotidis, Meghan A</au><au>Alter, Isaac L</au><au>Hwa, Tiffany P</au><au>Chern, Alexander</au><au>Lalwani, Anil K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2024-08-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Cochlear implant (CI) users frequently complain about speech quality perception (SQP). In patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, there is concern that poor SQP from the implanted ear will negatively impact binaural (CI + normal hearing [NH]) SQP. In this study, we investigate if binaural SQP is measurably different than unimplanted NH alone. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary care center. Fifteen unilateral CI users with NH in the contralateral ear completed the validated Columbia Speech Quality Instrument. This instrument consists of 9 audio clips rated across 14 specific speech qualities using a 10-point visual analog scale. SQP was assessed in 3 conditions: CI only, NH only, and CI + NH. Median speech quality scores were worse in the CI only condition compared to the NH only (50.0 vs 72.6, P = .0003) and binaural (50.0 vs 71.0, P = .007) conditions. Median speech quality scores were not significantly different between the NH only and binaural conditions (72.6 vs 71, P = .8). Compared to NH, CI speech quality sounded less clear, less natural, and more mechanical. Compared to NH, SQP is poorer with a CI alone. However, in contrast to expectation, there is no significant difference between NH and binaural SQP. This suggests poorer CI speech perception does not negatively impact binaural SQP in patients undergoing cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39118494</pmid><doi>10.1002/ohn.941</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-2161</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4763-9206</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2024-08
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3090947690
source Wiley Journals
title Speech Quality Perception in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A27%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Speech%20Quality%20Perception%20in%20Unilateral%20Cochlear%20Implant%20Users%20With%20Single-Sided%20Deafness&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Kelly,%20Scott&rft.date=2024-08-09&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ohn.941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3090947690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090947690&rft_id=info:pmid/39118494&rfr_iscdi=true