Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study
•In this study, 38 patients with splenic injuries underwent emergency transarterial embolization (TAE).•Seventeen patients were hemodynamically unstable (HDU), and the other 21 patients were hemodynamically stable (HDS).•The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU patients and all HDS...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2024-08, p.111768, Article 111768 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 111768 |
| container_title | Injury |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Okada, Naohiro Mitani, Hidenori Mori, Takuya Ueda, Masatomo Chosa, Keigo Fukumoto, Wataru Urata, Kazuki Hata, Ryoichiro Okazaki, Hajime Hieda, Masashi Awai, Kazuo |
| description | •In this study, 38 patients with splenic injuries underwent emergency transarterial embolization (TAE).•Seventeen patients were hemodynamically unstable (HDU), and the other 21 patients were hemodynamically stable (HDS).•The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU patients and all HDS patients were discharged.•Rebleeding occurred in 23.5 % (4/17) of HDU patients compared to 4.8 % (1/21) of HDS patients; only one HDU patient required splenectomy.•The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy.
We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.
This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.
Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.
The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111768 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3090945409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138324004741</els_id><sourcerecordid>3090945409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1561-68df04ef01b1aa88bf919cd83de2c828497a72fb9d6576232fec6e024da4e0e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqAy0b1BVXrLJ1D-ZxGaBhBB_EhIburYc-0Z45MSp7UyVvkZfuIZQll3dhb_jc-85CH2lZEsJbb7vt27cz3HZMsLqLaW0bcQHtKGilRVhTfsRbQhhpKJc8GN0ktKeENoSzj-hYy4LvmN0g_48RT0mHTNEpz2GoQve_dbZhRHngHMEnfEzDMEuox6c0d4veB5T1p2H8qznQeOp8DDmhH-5_IzT5GF0Br-u5yCd40scIceQJjDZHQAPs8_OFAVEHLoE8fBqWPxTnu3yGR312if48jZP0Y-b66eru-rh8fb-6vKhMnTX0KoRtic19IR2VGshul5SaazgFpgRTNSy1S3rO2mbXdswznowDZSwrK6BAOWn6Gz9d4rh5wwpq8ElA97rEcKcFCeSyHpXE1nQekVNOSNF6NUU3aDjoihRL3WovVrrUC91qLWOIvv25jB3A9h30b_8C3CxAlDuPDiIKpkSpQHrYglL2eD-7_AXBtSjFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090945409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Okada, Naohiro ; Mitani, Hidenori ; Mori, Takuya ; Ueda, Masatomo ; Chosa, Keigo ; Fukumoto, Wataru ; Urata, Kazuki ; Hata, Ryoichiro ; Okazaki, Hajime ; Hieda, Masashi ; Awai, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Okada, Naohiro ; Mitani, Hidenori ; Mori, Takuya ; Ueda, Masatomo ; Chosa, Keigo ; Fukumoto, Wataru ; Urata, Kazuki ; Hata, Ryoichiro ; Okazaki, Hajime ; Hieda, Masashi ; Awai, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>•In this study, 38 patients with splenic injuries underwent emergency transarterial embolization (TAE).•Seventeen patients were hemodynamically unstable (HDU), and the other 21 patients were hemodynamically stable (HDS).•The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU patients and all HDS patients were discharged.•Rebleeding occurred in 23.5 % (4/17) of HDU patients compared to 4.8 % (1/21) of HDS patients; only one HDU patient required splenectomy.•The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy.
We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.
This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.
Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.
The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39117521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Angiography ; Blunt trauma ; Hemodynamically unstable trauma patients ; Splenic injury ; Transarterial embolization</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2024-08, p.111768, Article 111768</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1561-68df04ef01b1aa88bf919cd83de2c828497a72fb9d6576232fec6e024da4e0e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5942-5666</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39117521$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okada, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitani, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Masatomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chosa, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukumoto, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urata, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hata, Ryoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okazaki, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieda, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awai, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•In this study, 38 patients with splenic injuries underwent emergency transarterial embolization (TAE).•Seventeen patients were hemodynamically unstable (HDU), and the other 21 patients were hemodynamically stable (HDS).•The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU patients and all HDS patients were discharged.•Rebleeding occurred in 23.5 % (4/17) of HDU patients compared to 4.8 % (1/21) of HDS patients; only one HDU patient required splenectomy.•The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy.
We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.
This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.
Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.
The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE.</description><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Blunt trauma</subject><subject>Hemodynamically unstable trauma patients</subject><subject>Splenic injury</subject><subject>Transarterial embolization</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3DAUha2qqAy0b1BVXrLJ1D-ZxGaBhBB_EhIburYc-0Z45MSp7UyVvkZfuIZQll3dhb_jc-85CH2lZEsJbb7vt27cz3HZMsLqLaW0bcQHtKGilRVhTfsRbQhhpKJc8GN0ktKeENoSzj-hYy4LvmN0g_48RT0mHTNEpz2GoQve_dbZhRHngHMEnfEzDMEuox6c0d4veB5T1p2H8qznQeOp8DDmhH-5_IzT5GF0Br-u5yCd40scIceQJjDZHQAPs8_OFAVEHLoE8fBqWPxTnu3yGR312if48jZP0Y-b66eru-rh8fb-6vKhMnTX0KoRtic19IR2VGshul5SaazgFpgRTNSy1S3rO2mbXdswznowDZSwrK6BAOWn6Gz9d4rh5wwpq8ElA97rEcKcFCeSyHpXE1nQekVNOSNF6NUU3aDjoihRL3WovVrrUC91qLWOIvv25jB3A9h30b_8C3CxAlDuPDiIKpkSpQHrYglL2eD-7_AXBtSjFQ</recordid><startdate>20240803</startdate><enddate>20240803</enddate><creator>Okada, Naohiro</creator><creator>Mitani, Hidenori</creator><creator>Mori, Takuya</creator><creator>Ueda, Masatomo</creator><creator>Chosa, Keigo</creator><creator>Fukumoto, Wataru</creator><creator>Urata, Kazuki</creator><creator>Hata, Ryoichiro</creator><creator>Okazaki, Hajime</creator><creator>Hieda, Masashi</creator><creator>Awai, Kazuo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-5666</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240803</creationdate><title>Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study</title><author>Okada, Naohiro ; Mitani, Hidenori ; Mori, Takuya ; Ueda, Masatomo ; Chosa, Keigo ; Fukumoto, Wataru ; Urata, Kazuki ; Hata, Ryoichiro ; Okazaki, Hajime ; Hieda, Masashi ; Awai, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1561-68df04ef01b1aa88bf919cd83de2c828497a72fb9d6576232fec6e024da4e0e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Blunt trauma</topic><topic>Hemodynamically unstable trauma patients</topic><topic>Splenic injury</topic><topic>Transarterial embolization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okada, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitani, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Masatomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chosa, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukumoto, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urata, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hata, Ryoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okazaki, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieda, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awai, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okada, Naohiro</au><au>Mitani, Hidenori</au><au>Mori, Takuya</au><au>Ueda, Masatomo</au><au>Chosa, Keigo</au><au>Fukumoto, Wataru</au><au>Urata, Kazuki</au><au>Hata, Ryoichiro</au><au>Okazaki, Hajime</au><au>Hieda, Masashi</au><au>Awai, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2024-08-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>111768</spage><pages>111768-</pages><artnum>111768</artnum><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•In this study, 38 patients with splenic injuries underwent emergency transarterial embolization (TAE).•Seventeen patients were hemodynamically unstable (HDU), and the other 21 patients were hemodynamically stable (HDS).•The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU patients and all HDS patients were discharged.•Rebleeding occurred in 23.5 % (4/17) of HDU patients compared to 4.8 % (1/21) of HDS patients; only one HDU patient required splenectomy.•The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy.
We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.
This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.
Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.
The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39117521</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2024.111768</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-5666</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-1383 |
| ispartof | Injury, 2024-08, p.111768, Article 111768 |
| issn | 0020-1383 1879-0267 1879-0267 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3090945409 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Angiography Blunt trauma Hemodynamically unstable trauma patients Splenic injury Transarterial embolization |
| title | Transarterial embolization to treat hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with splenic injuries: A retrospective multicenter observational study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transarterial%20embolization%20to%20treat%20hemodynamically%20unstable%20trauma%20patients%20with%20splenic%20injuries:%20A%20retrospective%20multicenter%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Okada,%20Naohiro&rft.date=2024-08-03&rft.spage=111768&rft.pages=111768-&rft.artnum=111768&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3090945409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090945409&rft_id=info:pmid/39117521&rft_els_id=S0020138324004741&rfr_iscdi=true |