Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses
Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedure...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2024-09, Vol.90 (9), p.2265-2272 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2272 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2265 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Spradling, Jess Garfinkel, Sophia Edgecomb, Taylor Chapman, Alistair J. Pounders, Steffen Burns, Kelly Fisk, Chelsea S. Stowe, Alicia Hill, Emily Krech, Laura |
description | Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedures. This exploratory study aims to quantify the risk of a VTE event in trauma patients associated with missed doses of prophylactic enoxaparin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2021. A 1:1 propensity match with ten variables was performed to compare patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin that had a VTE and those that did not. The primary outcome was a VTE event. Results: 493 patients met inclusion criteria; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed resulting in a cohort of 184 patients. The percentage of patients that missed a prophylactic enoxaparin dose in the VTE group was higher than the no VTE group (34.8% vs 21.7%, P = 0.049). This is consistent when examining total missed doses (P = 0.038) and consecutively missed doses (P = 0.035). The odds of having a VTE for patients that missed at least one dose or more of enoxaparin are nearly two times greater (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.997, 3.7). Conclusion: Missing enoxaparin doses significantly increases the risk of VTE in matched populations. Most prophylactic enoxaparin doses were held for procedures, and not for bleeding events. Trauma teams should carefully weigh the risk of bleeding complications associated with continuing enoxaparin prophylaxis against the significant thromboembolic risk of withholding it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00031348241269401 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3088563817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00031348241269401</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3088563817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-90e8ce6a2fec457ebfa04e8cea1a0139ce3903b78818e0e8ade9446de0886553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlrhwSfHEH7GPqJRSqYgKVnCMZr2TrqvECXYisf--Xm0BCcTBGnnmmXe-GHsJ4gygad4KISRIZWsFtXFKwCO2Aq115WwtH7PVIV4dgBP2LOe78lVGw1N2Ih0IcApWbPpGcVwyX-_SOGxGKq8PeeBfcKbMQ-TrhMuA_AbnQHHO_Gu4jaELHuPc7_lV9IkwE_8e5h3_FHKmLb9J47Tb9-jn4PlFHH_ihKlIvR8z5efsSYd9phcP9pStP1yszz9W158vr87fXVe-1mKunCDryWDdkVe6oU2HQh1cCChAOk_SCblprAVLhcUtOaXMloS1Rmt5yt4cZac0_lgoz-0Qsqe-x0hl3lYWThtpoSno67_Qu3FJsTTXSqgBnDXGFAqOlE9jzom6dkphwLRvQbSHa7T_XKPkvHpQXjYDbX9n_Fp_Ac6OQMZb-lP2_4r3aUqSnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121198666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Spradling, Jess ; Garfinkel, Sophia ; Edgecomb, Taylor ; Chapman, Alistair J. ; Pounders, Steffen ; Burns, Kelly ; Fisk, Chelsea S. ; Stowe, Alicia ; Hill, Emily ; Krech, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Spradling, Jess ; Garfinkel, Sophia ; Edgecomb, Taylor ; Chapman, Alistair J. ; Pounders, Steffen ; Burns, Kelly ; Fisk, Chelsea S. ; Stowe, Alicia ; Hill, Emily ; Krech, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedures. This exploratory study aims to quantify the risk of a VTE event in trauma patients associated with missed doses of prophylactic enoxaparin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2021. A 1:1 propensity match with ten variables was performed to compare patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin that had a VTE and those that did not. The primary outcome was a VTE event. Results: 493 patients met inclusion criteria; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed resulting in a cohort of 184 patients. The percentage of patients that missed a prophylactic enoxaparin dose in the VTE group was higher than the no VTE group (34.8% vs 21.7%, P = 0.049). This is consistent when examining total missed doses (P = 0.038) and consecutively missed doses (P = 0.035). The odds of having a VTE for patients that missed at least one dose or more of enoxaparin are nearly two times greater (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.997, 3.7). Conclusion: Missing enoxaparin doses significantly increases the risk of VTE in matched populations. Most prophylactic enoxaparin doses were held for procedures, and not for bleeding events. Trauma teams should carefully weigh the risk of bleeding complications associated with continuing enoxaparin prophylaxis against the significant thromboembolic risk of withholding it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00031348241269401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39101941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bleeding ; Demographics ; Diabetes ; Disease prevention ; Drug dosages ; Group dynamics ; Injuries ; Intervention ; Patients ; Prophylaxis ; Risk ; Software ; Thromboembolism ; Trauma ; Trauma centers ; Variables ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2024-09, Vol.90 (9), p.2265-2272</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-90e8ce6a2fec457ebfa04e8cea1a0139ce3903b78818e0e8ade9446de0886553</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-3947-8180</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00031348241269401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031348241269401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39101941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spradling, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garfinkel, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgecomb, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pounders, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Chelsea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krech, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedures. This exploratory study aims to quantify the risk of a VTE event in trauma patients associated with missed doses of prophylactic enoxaparin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2021. A 1:1 propensity match with ten variables was performed to compare patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin that had a VTE and those that did not. The primary outcome was a VTE event. Results: 493 patients met inclusion criteria; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed resulting in a cohort of 184 patients. The percentage of patients that missed a prophylactic enoxaparin dose in the VTE group was higher than the no VTE group (34.8% vs 21.7%, P = 0.049). This is consistent when examining total missed doses (P = 0.038) and consecutively missed doses (P = 0.035). The odds of having a VTE for patients that missed at least one dose or more of enoxaparin are nearly two times greater (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.997, 3.7). Conclusion: Missing enoxaparin doses significantly increases the risk of VTE in matched populations. Most prophylactic enoxaparin doses were held for procedures, and not for bleeding events. Trauma teams should carefully weigh the risk of bleeding complications associated with continuing enoxaparin prophylaxis against the significant thromboembolic risk of withholding it.</description><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Trauma centers</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlrhwSfHEH7GPqJRSqYgKVnCMZr2TrqvECXYisf--Xm0BCcTBGnnmmXe-GHsJ4gygad4KISRIZWsFtXFKwCO2Aq115WwtH7PVIV4dgBP2LOe78lVGw1N2Ih0IcApWbPpGcVwyX-_SOGxGKq8PeeBfcKbMQ-TrhMuA_AbnQHHO_Gu4jaELHuPc7_lV9IkwE_8e5h3_FHKmLb9J47Tb9-jn4PlFHH_ihKlIvR8z5efsSYd9phcP9pStP1yszz9W158vr87fXVe-1mKunCDryWDdkVe6oU2HQh1cCChAOk_SCblprAVLhcUtOaXMloS1Rmt5yt4cZac0_lgoz-0Qsqe-x0hl3lYWThtpoSno67_Qu3FJsTTXSqgBnDXGFAqOlE9jzom6dkphwLRvQbSHa7T_XKPkvHpQXjYDbX9n_Fp_Ac6OQMZb-lP2_4r3aUqSnQ</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Spradling, Jess</creator><creator>Garfinkel, Sophia</creator><creator>Edgecomb, Taylor</creator><creator>Chapman, Alistair J.</creator><creator>Pounders, Steffen</creator><creator>Burns, Kelly</creator><creator>Fisk, Chelsea S.</creator><creator>Stowe, Alicia</creator><creator>Hill, Emily</creator><creator>Krech, Laura</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3947-8180</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses</title><author>Spradling, Jess ; Garfinkel, Sophia ; Edgecomb, Taylor ; Chapman, Alistair J. ; Pounders, Steffen ; Burns, Kelly ; Fisk, Chelsea S. ; Stowe, Alicia ; Hill, Emily ; Krech, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-90e8ce6a2fec457ebfa04e8cea1a0139ce3903b78818e0e8ade9446de0886553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Trauma centers</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spradling, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garfinkel, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgecomb, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Alistair J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pounders, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Chelsea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krech, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spradling, Jess</au><au>Garfinkel, Sophia</au><au>Edgecomb, Taylor</au><au>Chapman, Alistair J.</au><au>Pounders, Steffen</au><au>Burns, Kelly</au><au>Fisk, Chelsea S.</au><au>Stowe, Alicia</au><au>Hill, Emily</au><au>Krech, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2265</spage><epage>2272</epage><pages>2265-2272</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedures. This exploratory study aims to quantify the risk of a VTE event in trauma patients associated with missed doses of prophylactic enoxaparin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2021. A 1:1 propensity match with ten variables was performed to compare patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin that had a VTE and those that did not. The primary outcome was a VTE event. Results: 493 patients met inclusion criteria; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed resulting in a cohort of 184 patients. The percentage of patients that missed a prophylactic enoxaparin dose in the VTE group was higher than the no VTE group (34.8% vs 21.7%, P = 0.049). This is consistent when examining total missed doses (P = 0.038) and consecutively missed doses (P = 0.035). The odds of having a VTE for patients that missed at least one dose or more of enoxaparin are nearly two times greater (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.997, 3.7). Conclusion: Missing enoxaparin doses significantly increases the risk of VTE in matched populations. Most prophylactic enoxaparin doses were held for procedures, and not for bleeding events. Trauma teams should carefully weigh the risk of bleeding complications associated with continuing enoxaparin prophylaxis against the significant thromboembolic risk of withholding it.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39101941</pmid><doi>10.1177/00031348241269401</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3947-8180</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2024-09, Vol.90 (9), p.2265-2272 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3088563817 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Bleeding Demographics Diabetes Disease prevention Drug dosages Group dynamics Injuries Intervention Patients Prophylaxis Risk Software Thromboembolism Trauma Trauma centers Variables Ventilators |
title | Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A11%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Venous%20Thromboembolism%20Rates%20in%20Trauma%20Patients%20Significantly%20Increase%20With%20Missed%20Prophylactic%20Enoxaparin%20Doses&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Spradling,%20Jess&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2265&rft.epage=2272&rft.pages=2265-2272&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00031348241269401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3088563817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121198666&rft_id=info:pmid/39101941&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00031348241269401&rfr_iscdi=true |