Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections
The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intrav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand medical journal 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1600 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | New Zealand medical journal |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed Winsloe, Sarah |
description | The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections.
The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient.
Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26635/6965.6557 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087352219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087352219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-ce79dbdff4b6b8e9d20e5be941824e1aec780d1dae2dbca25cb6ca3700cd51773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQlggpxXbqR5ao4iVVYgNsgx8T1VUSB9up1L-nLxCrmbk6cxcHoWuCp5Tzgt3zkrMpZ0ycoDEhguVSEH76bx-hixhXGFPGSnyORkWJpZQEj9HXp2oGyGofstZ3sMl8nQUYotINZGsIcYiZdbH3h8T3y7RUTetM5rqYwtBCl-L-3XUpqLVLAVSzPVZgkvNdvERntWoiXB3nBH08Pb7PX_LF2_Pr_GGRGyJ4yg2I0mpb1zPNtYTSUgxMQzkjks6AKDBCYkusAmq1UZQZzY0qBMbGMiJEMUG3h94--O8BYqpaFw00jerAD7EqsBQFo5SUW_TugJrgYwxQV31wrQqbiuBqb7TaGa12RrfwzbF30C3YP_RXYfEDfcBzsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087352219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections.
The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient.
Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1175-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1175-8716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26635/6965.6557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39088810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Disposable Equipment - economics ; Equipment Reuse - economics ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections - economics ; Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation ; New Zealand</subject><ispartof>New Zealand medical journal, 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65</ispartof><rights>PMA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39088810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><title>New Zealand medical journal</title><addtitle>N Z Med J</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections.
The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient.
Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Disposable Equipment - economics</subject><subject>Equipment Reuse - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections - economics</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><issn>1175-8716</issn><issn>1175-8716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQlggpxXbqR5ao4iVVYgNsgx8T1VUSB9up1L-nLxCrmbk6cxcHoWuCp5Tzgt3zkrMpZ0ycoDEhguVSEH76bx-hixhXGFPGSnyORkWJpZQEj9HXp2oGyGofstZ3sMl8nQUYotINZGsIcYiZdbH3h8T3y7RUTetM5rqYwtBCl-L-3XUpqLVLAVSzPVZgkvNdvERntWoiXB3nBH08Pb7PX_LF2_Pr_GGRGyJ4yg2I0mpb1zPNtYTSUgxMQzkjks6AKDBCYkusAmq1UZQZzY0qBMbGMiJEMUG3h94--O8BYqpaFw00jerAD7EqsBQFo5SUW_TugJrgYwxQV31wrQqbiuBqb7TaGa12RrfwzbF30C3YP_RXYfEDfcBzsQ</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creator><creator>Winsloe, Sarah</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><author>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-ce79dbdff4b6b8e9d20e5be941824e1aec780d1dae2dbca25cb6ca3700cd51773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Disposable Equipment - economics</topic><topic>Equipment Reuse - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections - economics</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>New Zealand medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</au><au>Winsloe, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>N Z Med J</addtitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1600</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>62-65</pages><issn>1175-8716</issn><eissn>1175-8716</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections.
The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient.
Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pmid>39088810</pmid><doi>10.26635/6965.6557</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1175-8716 |
ispartof | New Zealand medical journal, 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65 |
issn | 1175-8716 1175-8716 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087352219 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB Free E-Journals |
subjects | Cost-Benefit Analysis Disposable Equipment - economics Equipment Reuse - economics Humans Intravitreal Injections - economics Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation New Zealand |
title | Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T00%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20for%20money%20of%20reusable%20versus%20disposable%20ophthalmic%20instruments%20for%20intravitreal%20injections&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Sadiq,%20Saghir%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1600&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=62-65&rft.issn=1175-8716&rft.eissn=1175-8716&rft_id=info:doi/10.26635/6965.6557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087352219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087352219&rft_id=info:pmid/39088810&rfr_iscdi=true |