Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections

The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intrav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New Zealand medical journal 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65
Hauptverfasser: Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed, Winsloe, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1600
container_start_page 62
container_title New Zealand medical journal
container_volume 137
creator Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed
Winsloe, Sarah
description The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.26635/6965.6557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087352219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087352219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-ce79dbdff4b6b8e9d20e5be941824e1aec780d1dae2dbca25cb6ca3700cd51773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQlggpxXbqR5ao4iVVYgNsgx8T1VUSB9up1L-nLxCrmbk6cxcHoWuCp5Tzgt3zkrMpZ0ycoDEhguVSEH76bx-hixhXGFPGSnyORkWJpZQEj9HXp2oGyGofstZ3sMl8nQUYotINZGsIcYiZdbH3h8T3y7RUTetM5rqYwtBCl-L-3XUpqLVLAVSzPVZgkvNdvERntWoiXB3nBH08Pb7PX_LF2_Pr_GGRGyJ4yg2I0mpb1zPNtYTSUgxMQzkjks6AKDBCYkusAmq1UZQZzY0qBMbGMiJEMUG3h94--O8BYqpaFw00jerAD7EqsBQFo5SUW_TugJrgYwxQV31wrQqbiuBqb7TaGa12RrfwzbF30C3YP_RXYfEDfcBzsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087352219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1175-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1175-8716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26635/6965.6557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39088810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Disposable Equipment - economics ; Equipment Reuse - economics ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections - economics ; Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation ; New Zealand</subject><ispartof>New Zealand medical journal, 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65</ispartof><rights>PMA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39088810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><title>New Zealand medical journal</title><addtitle>N Z Med J</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Disposable Equipment - economics</subject><subject>Equipment Reuse - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections - economics</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><issn>1175-8716</issn><issn>1175-8716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQlggpxXbqR5ao4iVVYgNsgx8T1VUSB9up1L-nLxCrmbk6cxcHoWuCp5Tzgt3zkrMpZ0ycoDEhguVSEH76bx-hixhXGFPGSnyORkWJpZQEj9HXp2oGyGofstZ3sMl8nQUYotINZGsIcYiZdbH3h8T3y7RUTetM5rqYwtBCl-L-3XUpqLVLAVSzPVZgkvNdvERntWoiXB3nBH08Pb7PX_LF2_Pr_GGRGyJ4yg2I0mpb1zPNtYTSUgxMQzkjks6AKDBCYkusAmq1UZQZzY0qBMbGMiJEMUG3h94--O8BYqpaFw00jerAD7EqsBQFo5SUW_TugJrgYwxQV31wrQqbiuBqb7TaGa12RrfwzbF30C3YP_RXYfEDfcBzsQ</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creator><creator>Winsloe, Sarah</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</title><author>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed ; Winsloe, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-ce79dbdff4b6b8e9d20e5be941824e1aec780d1dae2dbca25cb6ca3700cd51773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Disposable Equipment - economics</topic><topic>Equipment Reuse - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections - economics</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsloe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>New Zealand medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed</au><au>Winsloe, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>N Z Med J</addtitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1600</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>62-65</pages><issn>1175-8716</issn><eissn>1175-8716</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. results: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pmid>39088810</pmid><doi>10.26635/6965.6557</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1175-8716
ispartof New Zealand medical journal, 2024-08, Vol.137 (1600), p.62-65
issn 1175-8716
1175-8716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3087352219
source MEDLINE; EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disposable Equipment - economics
Equipment Reuse - economics
Humans
Intravitreal Injections - economics
Intravitreal Injections - instrumentation
New Zealand
title Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T00%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20for%20money%20of%20reusable%20versus%20disposable%20ophthalmic%20instruments%20for%20intravitreal%20injections&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Sadiq,%20Saghir%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1600&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=62-65&rft.issn=1175-8716&rft.eissn=1175-8716&rft_id=info:doi/10.26635/6965.6557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087352219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087352219&rft_id=info:pmid/39088810&rfr_iscdi=true