Heterogeneous spatial tuning in the auditory pathway of the Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus)

Sound‐source localization is based on spatial cues arising due to interactions of sound waves with the torso, head and ears. Here, we evaluated neural responses to free‐field sound sources in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (CIC), the medial geniculate body (MGB) and the primary auditory cortex (A1) of Mongolian gerbils. Using silicon probes we recorded from anaesthetized gerbils positioned in the centre of a sound‐attenuating, anechoic chamber. We measured rate‐azimuth functions (RAFs) with broad‐band noise of varying levels presented from loudspeakers spanning 210° in azimuth and characterized RAFs by calculating spatial centroids, Equivalent Rectangular Receptive Fields (ERRFs), steepest slope locations and spatial‐separation thresholds. To compare neuronal responses with behavioural discrimination thresholds from the literature we performed a neurometric analysis based on signal‐detection theory. All structures demonstrated heterogeneous spatial tuning with a clear dominance of contralateral tuning. However, the relative amount of contralateral tuning decreased from the CIC to A1. In all three structures spatial tuning broadened with increasing sound‐level. This effect was strongest in CIC and weakest in A1. Neurometric spatial‐separation thresholds compared well with behavioural discrimination thresholds for locations directly in front of the animal. Our findings contrast with those reported for another rodent, the rat, which exhibits homogenous and sharply delimited contralateral spatial tuning. Spatial tuning in gerbils resembles more closely the tuning reported in A1 of cats, ferrets and non‐human primates. Interestingly, gerbils, in contrast to rats, share good low‐frequency hearing with carnivores and non‐human primates, which may account for the observed spatial tuning properties. Neurons in the core of the inferior colliculus (CIC), medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex (A1) exhibited four distinct spatial‐tuning types; contralateral tuning dominated. Spatial tuning broadened with increasing sound‐level, the effect being strongest in CIC and weakest in A1. Spatial tuning in gerbils resembles tuning reported in A1 of carnivores and non‐human primates but contrasts with the homogeneous contralateral spatial tuning reported for another rodent, the rat.