The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to nonmotor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2024-11, Vol.9 (11), p.1083-1120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1083 |
container_title | Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Speranza, Bridgette E. Hill, Aron T. Do, Michael Cerins, Andris Donaldson, Peter H. Desarkar, Pushpal Oberman, Lindsay M. Das, Sushmit Enticott, Peter G. Kirkovski, Melissa |
description | Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to nonmotor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be understood and characterized. We synthesized the electrophysiological effects of a single session of TBS, as indexed by electroencephalography (EEG) and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG, in nonclinical participants. We reviewed 79 studies that administered either continuous TBS or intermittent TBS protocols. Broadly, continuous TBS suppressed and intermittent TBS facilitated evoked response component amplitudes. Response to TBS as measured by spectral power and connectivity was much more variable. Variability increased in the presence of task stimuli. There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the research methodology across studies. Additionally, the effect of individual differences on TBS response has been insufficiently investigated. Future research investigating the effects of TBS as measured by EEG must consider methodological and individual factors that may affect TBS outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3086953707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2451902224002064</els_id><sourcerecordid>3086953707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-fde61aab9a9cd6ac742eedbdf70f11c80c0ceed8d219ed867fa9bafc06fd00153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoKtoXcCFZuul4kmnnIm601At4Aa3rkElObMpMMyYzSt_GZ_HJTKm6dHVC-P4f_o-QIwYJA5adLpKqDSrhwEcJ5AmwYovs89GYDUtIYfvvzfkeGYSwAIgpgLRku2QvLaEYjXm2T_rZHOkD9t6181WwrnavVsmaTo1B1QXqDI1EJ-ll70P39fnc2aavZWfdkspA71GG3qOm1YpO65jwDpcK27mMRV7GzjN6QZ9XocMmhhR9wneLH4dkx8g64ODnHpCXq-lscjO8e7y-nVzcDRUvWDc0GjMmZVXKUulMqnzEEXWlTQ6GMVWAAhU_Cs1ZGU-WG1lW0ijIjI5zx-kBOdn0tt699Rg60digsK7lEl0fRApFVo7THPKI8g2qvAvBoxGtt430K8FArI2LhVgbF2vjAnIRjcfQ8U9_XzWo_yK_fiNwvgEwrozLvQjKrg1p66MtoZ39r_8bdn2WLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086953707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Speranza, Bridgette E. ; Hill, Aron T. ; Do, Michael ; Cerins, Andris ; Donaldson, Peter H. ; Desarkar, Pushpal ; Oberman, Lindsay M. ; Das, Sushmit ; Enticott, Peter G. ; Kirkovski, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Speranza, Bridgette E. ; Hill, Aron T. ; Do, Michael ; Cerins, Andris ; Donaldson, Peter H. ; Desarkar, Pushpal ; Oberman, Lindsay M. ; Das, Sushmit ; Enticott, Peter G. ; Kirkovski, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to nonmotor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be understood and characterized. We synthesized the electrophysiological effects of a single session of TBS, as indexed by electroencephalography (EEG) and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG, in nonclinical participants. We reviewed 79 studies that administered either continuous TBS or intermittent TBS protocols. Broadly, continuous TBS suppressed and intermittent TBS facilitated evoked response component amplitudes. Response to TBS as measured by spectral power and connectivity was much more variable. Variability increased in the presence of task stimuli. There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the research methodology across studies. Additionally, the effect of individual differences on TBS response has been insufficiently investigated. Future research investigating the effects of TBS as measured by EEG must consider methodological and individual factors that may affect TBS outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2451-9022</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2451-9030</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2451-9030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39084526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brain - physiology ; Connectivity ; Electroencephalography ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Event-related potentials ; Humans ; Spectral power ; TBS ; Theta burst stimulation ; Theta Rhythm - physiology ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2024-11, Vol.9 (11), p.1083-1120</ispartof><rights>2024 Society of Biological Psychiatry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-fde61aab9a9cd6ac742eedbdf70f11c80c0ceed8d219ed867fa9bafc06fd00153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7507-2557</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39084526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speranza, Bridgette E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Aron T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerins, Andris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desarkar, Pushpal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberman, Lindsay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Sushmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enticott, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkovski, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review</title><title>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</title><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging</addtitle><description>Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to nonmotor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be understood and characterized. We synthesized the electrophysiological effects of a single session of TBS, as indexed by electroencephalography (EEG) and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG, in nonclinical participants. We reviewed 79 studies that administered either continuous TBS or intermittent TBS protocols. Broadly, continuous TBS suppressed and intermittent TBS facilitated evoked response component amplitudes. Response to TBS as measured by spectral power and connectivity was much more variable. Variability increased in the presence of task stimuli. There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the research methodology across studies. Additionally, the effect of individual differences on TBS response has been insufficiently investigated. Future research investigating the effects of TBS as measured by EEG must consider methodological and individual factors that may affect TBS outcomes.</description><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Spectral power</subject><subject>TBS</subject><subject>Theta burst stimulation</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm - physiology</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><issn>2451-9022</issn><issn>2451-9030</issn><issn>2451-9030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoKtoXcCFZuul4kmnnIm601At4Aa3rkElObMpMMyYzSt_GZ_HJTKm6dHVC-P4f_o-QIwYJA5adLpKqDSrhwEcJ5AmwYovs89GYDUtIYfvvzfkeGYSwAIgpgLRku2QvLaEYjXm2T_rZHOkD9t6181WwrnavVsmaTo1B1QXqDI1EJ-ll70P39fnc2aavZWfdkspA71GG3qOm1YpO65jwDpcK27mMRV7GzjN6QZ9XocMmhhR9wneLH4dkx8g64ODnHpCXq-lscjO8e7y-nVzcDRUvWDc0GjMmZVXKUulMqnzEEXWlTQ6GMVWAAhU_Cs1ZGU-WG1lW0ijIjI5zx-kBOdn0tt699Rg60digsK7lEl0fRApFVo7THPKI8g2qvAvBoxGtt430K8FArI2LhVgbF2vjAnIRjcfQ8U9_XzWo_yK_fiNwvgEwrozLvQjKrg1p66MtoZ39r_8bdn2WLg</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Speranza, Bridgette E.</creator><creator>Hill, Aron T.</creator><creator>Do, Michael</creator><creator>Cerins, Andris</creator><creator>Donaldson, Peter H.</creator><creator>Desarkar, Pushpal</creator><creator>Oberman, Lindsay M.</creator><creator>Das, Sushmit</creator><creator>Enticott, Peter G.</creator><creator>Kirkovski, Melissa</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-2557</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review</title><author>Speranza, Bridgette E. ; Hill, Aron T. ; Do, Michael ; Cerins, Andris ; Donaldson, Peter H. ; Desarkar, Pushpal ; Oberman, Lindsay M. ; Das, Sushmit ; Enticott, Peter G. ; Kirkovski, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-fde61aab9a9cd6ac742eedbdf70f11c80c0ceed8d219ed867fa9bafc06fd00153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Spectral power</topic><topic>TBS</topic><topic>Theta burst stimulation</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm - physiology</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speranza, Bridgette E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Aron T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerins, Andris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desarkar, Pushpal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberman, Lindsay M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Sushmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enticott, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkovski, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speranza, Bridgette E.</au><au>Hill, Aron T.</au><au>Do, Michael</au><au>Cerins, Andris</au><au>Donaldson, Peter H.</au><au>Desarkar, Pushpal</au><au>Oberman, Lindsay M.</au><au>Das, Sushmit</au><au>Enticott, Peter G.</au><au>Kirkovski, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1083-1120</pages><issn>2451-9022</issn><issn>2451-9030</issn><eissn>2451-9030</eissn><abstract>Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate neural activity. The effect of TBS on regions beyond the motor cortex remains unclear. With increased interest in applying TBS to nonmotor regions for research and clinical purposes, these effects must be understood and characterized. We synthesized the electrophysiological effects of a single session of TBS, as indexed by electroencephalography (EEG) and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG, in nonclinical participants. We reviewed 79 studies that administered either continuous TBS or intermittent TBS protocols. Broadly, continuous TBS suppressed and intermittent TBS facilitated evoked response component amplitudes. Response to TBS as measured by spectral power and connectivity was much more variable. Variability increased in the presence of task stimuli. There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the research methodology across studies. Additionally, the effect of individual differences on TBS response has been insufficiently investigated. Future research investigating the effects of TBS as measured by EEG must consider methodological and individual factors that may affect TBS outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39084526</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.018</doi><tpages>38</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-2557</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2451-9022 |
ispartof | Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2024-11, Vol.9 (11), p.1083-1120 |
issn | 2451-9022 2451-9030 2451-9030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3086953707 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Brain - physiology Connectivity Electroencephalography Electroencephalography - methods Event-related potentials Humans Spectral power TBS Theta burst stimulation Theta Rhythm - physiology Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods |
title | The Neurophysiological Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Measured by Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A58%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Neurophysiological%20Effects%20of%20Theta%20Burst%C2%A0Stimulation%20as%20Measured%20by%20Electroencephalography:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20:%20cognitive%20neuroscience%20and%20neuroimaging&rft.au=Speranza,%20Bridgette%20E.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1083-1120&rft.issn=2451-9022&rft.eissn=2451-9030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086953707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086953707&rft_id=info:pmid/39084526&rft_els_id=S2451902224002064&rfr_iscdi=true |