Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws
Gun violence is a leading public health concern in the US; subsequently, firearm-related violence prevention is a top priority for policymakers. Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a state-level attempt to reduce gun-related injuries and deaths. These court-issued orders prohibit people fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Policy, politics & nursing practice politics & nursing practice, 2024-08, Vol.25 (3), p.182-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 182 |
container_title | Policy, politics & nursing practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Lindley, Lisa C. Policastro, Christina N. Svynarenko, Radion Davis, Heather A. Beebe, Lora Humphrey |
description | Gun violence is a leading public health concern in the US; subsequently, firearm-related violence prevention is a top priority for policymakers. Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a state-level attempt to reduce gun-related injuries and deaths. These court-issued orders prohibit people found to be dangerous to themselves or others from temporarily purchasing or possessing a firearm. Six states (Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, New York) and the District of Columbia have passed or amended their laws to include nurses as ERPO petitioners. The study's purpose was to conduct a review of state ERPO laws that included nurses as petitioners. Using a legal mapping approach, information on nurse ERPO petitioning was extracted from the seven jurisdictions. ERPO laws with nurse petitioners were passed between 1999 and 2023. Nurse petitioners included advanced practice registered nurse (n = 3), clinical nurse specialists (n = 3), nurse practitioner (n = 3), professional nurse (n = 2), and register nurse (n = 1). Psychiatric/mental health (n = 2) and school nurses (n = 2) were specified. Statutes differed in the handling of disclosed health information as part of the ERPO petition, as well as how health information would be handled by the court (e.g. sealed by the court, confidential by the court, returned to provider/disposed of post-hearing/order.) Three statutes exempted petitioners from civil and/or criminal liability, if petitions were submitted in good faith. Two of these states extended protection from liability to all petitioners, while one only referenced petitioners who were healthcare providers. The study findings have important policy, clinical, and research implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15271544241262744 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084776606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15271544241262744</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3099865934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-8f48000648dffc79ba1ce2197b675c777b950503d4ad02fb88367c698278aef33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQJS5cUmzH9jrcqqr8SIVWBc6Rk2yqlLYpdiLg7UnUAhKIvewevpkdDSGnnPU5B7jkSgBXUgrJhRYg5R7pcqVEAFKb_fYWELRAhxx5v2DNGOCHpBNGTLWCLpk91M6jp9bTKVZFVZRrdP6KDugY53ZJ7-1mU6zntMzpY2UrpKP3yuEK6azwL3TqygrTVkQnLkNHx_bNH5OD3C49nux2jzxfj56Gt8F4cnM3HIyDVChWBSaXpgmkpcnyPIUosTxFwSNINKgUAJJIMcXCTNqMiTwxJtSQ6sgIMBbzMOyRi63vxpWvNfoqXhU-xeXSrrGsfRwyIwG0ZrpBz3-hi7J26yZdQ0WR0SoKZUPxLZW60nuHebxxxcq6j5izuC08_lN4oznbOdfJCrNvxVfDDdDfAt7O8eft_46fHyuFeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099865934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lindley, Lisa C. ; Policastro, Christina N. ; Svynarenko, Radion ; Davis, Heather A. ; Beebe, Lora Humphrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Lisa C. ; Policastro, Christina N. ; Svynarenko, Radion ; Davis, Heather A. ; Beebe, Lora Humphrey</creatorcontrib><description>Gun violence is a leading public health concern in the US; subsequently, firearm-related violence prevention is a top priority for policymakers. Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a state-level attempt to reduce gun-related injuries and deaths. These court-issued orders prohibit people found to be dangerous to themselves or others from temporarily purchasing or possessing a firearm. Six states (Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, New York) and the District of Columbia have passed or amended their laws to include nurses as ERPO petitioners. The study's purpose was to conduct a review of state ERPO laws that included nurses as petitioners. Using a legal mapping approach, information on nurse ERPO petitioning was extracted from the seven jurisdictions. ERPO laws with nurse petitioners were passed between 1999 and 2023. Nurse petitioners included advanced practice registered nurse (n = 3), clinical nurse specialists (n = 3), nurse practitioner (n = 3), professional nurse (n = 2), and register nurse (n = 1). Psychiatric/mental health (n = 2) and school nurses (n = 2) were specified. Statutes differed in the handling of disclosed health information as part of the ERPO petition, as well as how health information would be handled by the court (e.g. sealed by the court, confidential by the court, returned to provider/disposed of post-hearing/order.) Three statutes exempted petitioners from civil and/or criminal liability, if petitions were submitted in good faith. Two of these states extended protection from liability to all petitioners, while one only referenced petitioners who were healthcare providers. The study findings have important policy, clinical, and research implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-1544</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-7468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15271544241262744</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39056274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advanced practice nurses ; Clinical research ; Courts ; Criminal liability ; Firearms ; Gun violence ; Health care industry ; Health information ; Information ; Mapping ; Mental health ; Nurse specialists ; Nurses ; Petition ; Policy making ; Public health ; Risk reduction ; School nurses ; Specialists ; Statutes</subject><ispartof>Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2024-08, Vol.25 (3), p.182-188</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-8f48000648dffc79ba1ce2197b675c777b950503d4ad02fb88367c698278aef33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2960-7896</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15271544241262744$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15271544241262744$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27843,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39056274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Lisa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Policastro, Christina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svynarenko, Radion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Heather A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Lora Humphrey</creatorcontrib><title>Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws</title><title>Policy, politics & nursing practice</title><addtitle>Policy Polit Nurs Pract</addtitle><description>Gun violence is a leading public health concern in the US; subsequently, firearm-related violence prevention is a top priority for policymakers. Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a state-level attempt to reduce gun-related injuries and deaths. These court-issued orders prohibit people found to be dangerous to themselves or others from temporarily purchasing or possessing a firearm. Six states (Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, New York) and the District of Columbia have passed or amended their laws to include nurses as ERPO petitioners. The study's purpose was to conduct a review of state ERPO laws that included nurses as petitioners. Using a legal mapping approach, information on nurse ERPO petitioning was extracted from the seven jurisdictions. ERPO laws with nurse petitioners were passed between 1999 and 2023. Nurse petitioners included advanced practice registered nurse (n = 3), clinical nurse specialists (n = 3), nurse practitioner (n = 3), professional nurse (n = 2), and register nurse (n = 1). Psychiatric/mental health (n = 2) and school nurses (n = 2) were specified. Statutes differed in the handling of disclosed health information as part of the ERPO petition, as well as how health information would be handled by the court (e.g. sealed by the court, confidential by the court, returned to provider/disposed of post-hearing/order.) Three statutes exempted petitioners from civil and/or criminal liability, if petitions were submitted in good faith. Two of these states extended protection from liability to all petitioners, while one only referenced petitioners who were healthcare providers. The study findings have important policy, clinical, and research implications.</description><subject>Advanced practice nurses</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal liability</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Gun violence</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health information</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Nurse specialists</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Petition</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>School nurses</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><issn>1527-1544</issn><issn>1552-7468</issn><issn>1552-7468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQJS5cUmzH9jrcqqr8SIVWBc6Rk2yqlLYpdiLg7UnUAhKIvewevpkdDSGnnPU5B7jkSgBXUgrJhRYg5R7pcqVEAFKb_fYWELRAhxx5v2DNGOCHpBNGTLWCLpk91M6jp9bTKVZFVZRrdP6KDugY53ZJ7-1mU6zntMzpY2UrpKP3yuEK6azwL3TqygrTVkQnLkNHx_bNH5OD3C49nux2jzxfj56Gt8F4cnM3HIyDVChWBSaXpgmkpcnyPIUosTxFwSNINKgUAJJIMcXCTNqMiTwxJtSQ6sgIMBbzMOyRi63vxpWvNfoqXhU-xeXSrrGsfRwyIwG0ZrpBz3-hi7J26yZdQ0WR0SoKZUPxLZW60nuHebxxxcq6j5izuC08_lN4oznbOdfJCrNvxVfDDdDfAt7O8eft_46fHyuFeA</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Lindley, Lisa C.</creator><creator>Policastro, Christina N.</creator><creator>Svynarenko, Radion</creator><creator>Davis, Heather A.</creator><creator>Beebe, Lora Humphrey</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-7896</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws</title><author>Lindley, Lisa C. ; Policastro, Christina N. ; Svynarenko, Radion ; Davis, Heather A. ; Beebe, Lora Humphrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-8f48000648dffc79ba1ce2197b675c777b950503d4ad02fb88367c698278aef33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advanced practice nurses</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal liability</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Gun violence</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health information</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Nurse specialists</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Petition</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>School nurses</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Lisa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Policastro, Christina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svynarenko, Radion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Heather A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beebe, Lora Humphrey</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Policy, politics & nursing practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindley, Lisa C.</au><au>Policastro, Christina N.</au><au>Svynarenko, Radion</au><au>Davis, Heather A.</au><au>Beebe, Lora Humphrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws</atitle><jtitle>Policy, politics & nursing practice</jtitle><addtitle>Policy Polit Nurs Pract</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>182-188</pages><issn>1527-1544</issn><issn>1552-7468</issn><eissn>1552-7468</eissn><abstract>Gun violence is a leading public health concern in the US; subsequently, firearm-related violence prevention is a top priority for policymakers. Extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws are a state-level attempt to reduce gun-related injuries and deaths. These court-issued orders prohibit people found to be dangerous to themselves or others from temporarily purchasing or possessing a firearm. Six states (Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, New York) and the District of Columbia have passed or amended their laws to include nurses as ERPO petitioners. The study's purpose was to conduct a review of state ERPO laws that included nurses as petitioners. Using a legal mapping approach, information on nurse ERPO petitioning was extracted from the seven jurisdictions. ERPO laws with nurse petitioners were passed between 1999 and 2023. Nurse petitioners included advanced practice registered nurse (n = 3), clinical nurse specialists (n = 3), nurse practitioner (n = 3), professional nurse (n = 2), and register nurse (n = 1). Psychiatric/mental health (n = 2) and school nurses (n = 2) were specified. Statutes differed in the handling of disclosed health information as part of the ERPO petition, as well as how health information would be handled by the court (e.g. sealed by the court, confidential by the court, returned to provider/disposed of post-hearing/order.) Three statutes exempted petitioners from civil and/or criminal liability, if petitions were submitted in good faith. Two of these states extended protection from liability to all petitioners, while one only referenced petitioners who were healthcare providers. The study findings have important policy, clinical, and research implications.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39056274</pmid><doi>10.1177/15271544241262744</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-7896</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-1544 |
ispartof | Policy, politics & nursing practice, 2024-08, Vol.25 (3), p.182-188 |
issn | 1527-1544 1552-7468 1552-7468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084776606 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; PAIS Index |
subjects | Advanced practice nurses Clinical research Courts Criminal liability Firearms Gun violence Health care industry Health information Information Mapping Mental health Nurse specialists Nurses Petition Policy making Public health Risk reduction School nurses Specialists Statutes |
title | Nurses as Petitioners: A Legal Mapping of State Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nurses%20as%20Petitioners:%20A%20Legal%20Mapping%20of%20State%20Extreme%20Risk%20Protection%20Order%20Laws&rft.jtitle=Policy,%20politics%20&%20nursing%20practice&rft.au=Lindley,%20Lisa%20C.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=182-188&rft.issn=1527-1544&rft.eissn=1552-7468&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15271544241262744&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099865934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099865934&rft_id=info:pmid/39056274&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15271544241262744&rfr_iscdi=true |