Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study
Support interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit. To compare two models to determine whether self-care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied nursing research 2024-08, Vol.78, p.151810, Article 151810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 151810 |
container_title | Applied nursing research |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Riegel, Barbara Barbaranelli, Claudio Stawnychy, Michael A. Matus, Austin Hirschman, Karen B. |
description | Support interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit.
To compare two models to determine whether self-care improves coping or coping improves self-care.
We used cross-sectional data from 248 caregivers obtained at enrollment into a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a support intervention. Factor scores for scales measuring caregiver demand, self-care, coping, stress appraisal, and mental health were derived from exploratory factor analysis. Structural equation models were analyzed using the factor scores as estimates of each construct. To control possible spurious effects caregiver age, gender, relationship with the patient, and income adequacy were included.
Both models were compatible with the data, but the self-care model was stronger than the coping model. That model had a non-significant chi square and an excellent fit to the data, χ2(4, N = 248) = 2.64, p = .62. The percentage of variance explained by the self-care model was 54 % for mental health, 42 % for stress appraisal, 10 % for avoidance coping, and 6 % for active coping. In the coping model the explained variance of stress appraisal dropped to 33 %, avoidance coping dropped to 0 %, and active coping dropped to 3 %.
The self-care model was strongest, illustrating that self-care decreases stress, promotes coping, and improves mental health. These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in improving mental health than interventions aimed at improving coping.
•The clinical skills needed to promote self-care and coping are different.•When we compared two models, the self-care model was stronger than the coping model.•The stronger model illustrates that self-care can decrease stress, promote coping, and improve mental health.•These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in support interventions than trying to change coping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151810 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084775017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089718972400048X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3084775017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a86379db7e453906570b0a321dc318f95a89e16d6b2590f5c87130d0aa7145703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoSTZp_0APQcdcvJmxLEuGQAj5hkAv7VlopXHRYlsbyQ7k38dmNzn2IiH0vC8zD2O_ENYIWF9u13Y3pHUJZbVGiRrhiK1QirLQJeA3tgLdqALn44Sd5rwFQKxqOGYnogEpGq1WzN9FyjxT1xbOJuKh36X4RtzFXRj-8Zi4X4DD8_P3i7_mNzyPaXLjlGzH6XWyY4gD76OnbknkcfLvP9j31naZfh7uM_b34f7P7VPx8vvx-fbmpXBC4lhYXQvV-I2iap4OaqlgA1aU6J1A3TbS6oaw9vWmlA200mmFAjxYq7CaYXHGLva985SvE-XR9CE76jo7UJyyEaArpSSgmtFyj7oUc07Uml0KvU3vBsEsds3WLHbNYtfs7c6h80P_tOnJf0U-dc7A1R6gecu3QMlkF2hw5EMiNxofw__6PwALW4rl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084775017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Riegel, Barbara ; Barbaranelli, Claudio ; Stawnychy, Michael A. ; Matus, Austin ; Hirschman, Karen B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara ; Barbaranelli, Claudio ; Stawnychy, Michael A. ; Matus, Austin ; Hirschman, Karen B.</creatorcontrib><description>Support interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit.
To compare two models to determine whether self-care improves coping or coping improves self-care.
We used cross-sectional data from 248 caregivers obtained at enrollment into a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a support intervention. Factor scores for scales measuring caregiver demand, self-care, coping, stress appraisal, and mental health were derived from exploratory factor analysis. Structural equation models were analyzed using the factor scores as estimates of each construct. To control possible spurious effects caregiver age, gender, relationship with the patient, and income adequacy were included.
Both models were compatible with the data, but the self-care model was stronger than the coping model. That model had a non-significant chi square and an excellent fit to the data, χ2(4, N = 248) = 2.64, p = .62. The percentage of variance explained by the self-care model was 54 % for mental health, 42 % for stress appraisal, 10 % for avoidance coping, and 6 % for active coping. In the coping model the explained variance of stress appraisal dropped to 33 %, avoidance coping dropped to 0 %, and active coping dropped to 3 %.
The self-care model was strongest, illustrating that self-care decreases stress, promotes coping, and improves mental health. These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in improving mental health than interventions aimed at improving coping.
•The clinical skills needed to promote self-care and coping are different.•When we compared two models, the self-care model was stronger than the coping model.•The stronger model illustrates that self-care can decrease stress, promote coping, and improve mental health.•These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in support interventions than trying to change coping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-1897</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-8201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39053987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Caregivers - psychology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Latent Class Analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychological adaptation ; Psychosocial support systems ; Self Care - methods ; Self Care - psychology ; Self-care</subject><ispartof>Applied nursing research, 2024-08, Vol.78, p.151810, Article 151810</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a86379db7e453906570b0a321dc318f95a89e16d6b2590f5c87130d0aa7145703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089718972400048X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39053987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaranelli, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawnychy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matus, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschman, Karen B.</creatorcontrib><title>Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study</title><title>Applied nursing research</title><addtitle>Appl Nurs Res</addtitle><description>Support interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit.
To compare two models to determine whether self-care improves coping or coping improves self-care.
We used cross-sectional data from 248 caregivers obtained at enrollment into a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a support intervention. Factor scores for scales measuring caregiver demand, self-care, coping, stress appraisal, and mental health were derived from exploratory factor analysis. Structural equation models were analyzed using the factor scores as estimates of each construct. To control possible spurious effects caregiver age, gender, relationship with the patient, and income adequacy were included.
Both models were compatible with the data, but the self-care model was stronger than the coping model. That model had a non-significant chi square and an excellent fit to the data, χ2(4, N = 248) = 2.64, p = .62. The percentage of variance explained by the self-care model was 54 % for mental health, 42 % for stress appraisal, 10 % for avoidance coping, and 6 % for active coping. In the coping model the explained variance of stress appraisal dropped to 33 %, avoidance coping dropped to 0 %, and active coping dropped to 3 %.
The self-care model was strongest, illustrating that self-care decreases stress, promotes coping, and improves mental health. These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in improving mental health than interventions aimed at improving coping.
•The clinical skills needed to promote self-care and coping are different.•When we compared two models, the self-care model was stronger than the coping model.•The stronger model illustrates that self-care can decrease stress, promote coping, and improve mental health.•These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in support interventions than trying to change coping.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latent Class Analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychological adaptation</subject><subject>Psychosocial support systems</subject><subject>Self Care - methods</subject><subject>Self Care - psychology</subject><subject>Self-care</subject><issn>0897-1897</issn><issn>1532-8201</issn><issn>1532-8201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoSTZp_0APQcdcvJmxLEuGQAj5hkAv7VlopXHRYlsbyQ7k38dmNzn2IiH0vC8zD2O_ENYIWF9u13Y3pHUJZbVGiRrhiK1QirLQJeA3tgLdqALn44Sd5rwFQKxqOGYnogEpGq1WzN9FyjxT1xbOJuKh36X4RtzFXRj-8Zi4X4DD8_P3i7_mNzyPaXLjlGzH6XWyY4gD76OnbknkcfLvP9j31naZfh7uM_b34f7P7VPx8vvx-fbmpXBC4lhYXQvV-I2iap4OaqlgA1aU6J1A3TbS6oaw9vWmlA200mmFAjxYq7CaYXHGLva985SvE-XR9CE76jo7UJyyEaArpSSgmtFyj7oUc07Uml0KvU3vBsEsds3WLHbNYtfs7c6h80P_tOnJf0U-dc7A1R6gecu3QMlkF2hw5EMiNxofw__6PwALW4rl</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Riegel, Barbara</creator><creator>Barbaranelli, Claudio</creator><creator>Stawnychy, Michael A.</creator><creator>Matus, Austin</creator><creator>Hirschman, Karen B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study</title><author>Riegel, Barbara ; Barbaranelli, Claudio ; Stawnychy, Michael A. ; Matus, Austin ; Hirschman, Karen B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a86379db7e453906570b0a321dc318f95a89e16d6b2590f5c87130d0aa7145703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latent Class Analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychological adaptation</topic><topic>Psychosocial support systems</topic><topic>Self Care - methods</topic><topic>Self Care - psychology</topic><topic>Self-care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riegel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaranelli, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawnychy, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matus, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschman, Karen B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied nursing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riegel, Barbara</au><au>Barbaranelli, Claudio</au><au>Stawnychy, Michael A.</au><au>Matus, Austin</au><au>Hirschman, Karen B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study</atitle><jtitle>Applied nursing research</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Nurs Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>78</volume><spage>151810</spage><pages>151810-</pages><artnum>151810</artnum><issn>0897-1897</issn><issn>1532-8201</issn><eissn>1532-8201</eissn><abstract>Support interventions often address both self-care and coping. Different approaches are used to promote self-care and coping so clarifying the intervention effect can guide clinicians and researchers to provide interventions that achieve benefit.
To compare two models to determine whether self-care improves coping or coping improves self-care.
We used cross-sectional data from 248 caregivers obtained at enrollment into a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a support intervention. Factor scores for scales measuring caregiver demand, self-care, coping, stress appraisal, and mental health were derived from exploratory factor analysis. Structural equation models were analyzed using the factor scores as estimates of each construct. To control possible spurious effects caregiver age, gender, relationship with the patient, and income adequacy were included.
Both models were compatible with the data, but the self-care model was stronger than the coping model. That model had a non-significant chi square and an excellent fit to the data, χ2(4, N = 248) = 2.64, p = .62. The percentage of variance explained by the self-care model was 54 % for mental health, 42 % for stress appraisal, 10 % for avoidance coping, and 6 % for active coping. In the coping model the explained variance of stress appraisal dropped to 33 %, avoidance coping dropped to 0 %, and active coping dropped to 3 %.
The self-care model was strongest, illustrating that self-care decreases stress, promotes coping, and improves mental health. These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in improving mental health than interventions aimed at improving coping.
•The clinical skills needed to promote self-care and coping are different.•When we compared two models, the self-care model was stronger than the coping model.•The stronger model illustrates that self-care can decrease stress, promote coping, and improve mental health.•These results suggest that promoting self-care may be more effective in support interventions than trying to change coping.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39053987</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151810</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-1897 |
ispartof | Applied nursing research, 2024-08, Vol.78, p.151810, Article 151810 |
issn | 0897-1897 1532-8201 1532-8201 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084775017 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Caregivers - psychology Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Latent Class Analysis Male Middle Aged Psychological adaptation Psychosocial support systems Self Care - methods Self Care - psychology Self-care |
title | Does self-care improve coping or does coping improve self-care? A structural equation modeling study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20self-care%20improve%20coping%20or%20does%20coping%20improve%20self-care?%20A%20structural%20equation%20modeling%20study&rft.jtitle=Applied%20nursing%20research&rft.au=Riegel,%20Barbara&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=151810&rft.pages=151810-&rft.artnum=151810&rft.issn=0897-1897&rft.eissn=1532-8201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3084775017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084775017&rft_id=info:pmid/39053987&rft_els_id=S089718972400048X&rfr_iscdi=true |