On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought

Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time – freely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cortex 2024-09, Vol.178, p.249-268
Hauptverfasser: Rasmussen, Tara, Filmer, Hannah L., Dux, Paul E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title Cortex
container_volume 178
creator Rasmussen, Tara
Filmer, Hannah L.
Dux, Paul E.
description Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time – freely moving, deliberately constrained, and automatically constrained (thoughts). There is currently very little evidence on how different types of dynamic thought are represented in the brain. Previous research has applied non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to causally implicate the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule in mind wandering. However, a more recently developed and nuanced technique, high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS), delivers more focal stimulation able to target specific brain regions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of anodal HD-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortices (with the occipital cortex included as an active control) on mind wandering, and specifically, the causal neural substrates of the three internal dynamic thought types. This was a single session study using a novel task which allows investigation into how dynamic thoughts are associated with behavioural variability and the recruitment of executive control operations across the three brain regions. There was no evidence to support our hypothesised effect of stimulation reducing task unrelated thought. Furthermore, the hypothesis driven analyses found no evidence of stimulation affecting the dynamic thought types, nor any evidence for our hypothesised effects of stimulation reducing behavioural variability and increasing randomness. There was only evidence for a relationship between these two measures of performance when participants thoughts were freely moving. However, there was evidence from our exploratory analyses that anodal stimulation to the prefrontal cortex decreased freely moving thought and anodal stimulation to the parietal lobule decreased deliberately constrained thought, relative to the sham conditions. The exploratory analyses also suggested stimulation may increase freely moving thought in the occipital cortex. Overall, these findings suggest stimulation does not affect the dynamic thought types, however there is preliminary evidence to support the heterogenous nature of mind wandering, whereby different brain regions may be causally implicated in distinct dynamic thought types.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084771982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945224001904</els_id><sourcerecordid>3084771982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-543cb109e6aff92779d58ce1ec750ecb5870f8df76504116a640dcdb1b61fbe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOxDAMhiMEguFxA4S6ZNNit03TbpAQ4iUhsQG2UZq4kFHbDEkHmNtwFk5GywBLVpblz_7lj7FDhAQBi5N5op0f6D1JIc0TKBJAscFmWIksLhHSTTYDQIirnKc7bDeEOUAKJefbbCergGdZXs3Y410fDc8UeddS5Jpo4anxrh9UG6neRAvlLU3NlGU1hcj2nx-dHUdv45y87Z--QbPqVWf1eMstn56HfbbVqDbQwU_dYw-XF_fn1_Ht3dXN-dltrDPEIeZ5pmuEigrVNFUqRGV4qQlJCw6ka14KaErTiIJDjlioIgejTY11gU1NabbHjtd3F969LCkMsrNBU9uqntwyyAzKXAisygnN16j2LoTxTbnwtlN-JRHkZFTO5dqonIxKKORodFw7-klY1h2Zv6VfhSNwugZo_PPVkpdBW-o1GetJD9I4-3_CFzsYisM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084771982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rasmussen, Tara ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Tara ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><description>Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time – freely moving, deliberately constrained, and automatically constrained (thoughts). There is currently very little evidence on how different types of dynamic thought are represented in the brain. Previous research has applied non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to causally implicate the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule in mind wandering. However, a more recently developed and nuanced technique, high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS), delivers more focal stimulation able to target specific brain regions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of anodal HD-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortices (with the occipital cortex included as an active control) on mind wandering, and specifically, the causal neural substrates of the three internal dynamic thought types. This was a single session study using a novel task which allows investigation into how dynamic thoughts are associated with behavioural variability and the recruitment of executive control operations across the three brain regions. There was no evidence to support our hypothesised effect of stimulation reducing task unrelated thought. Furthermore, the hypothesis driven analyses found no evidence of stimulation affecting the dynamic thought types, nor any evidence for our hypothesised effects of stimulation reducing behavioural variability and increasing randomness. There was only evidence for a relationship between these two measures of performance when participants thoughts were freely moving. However, there was evidence from our exploratory analyses that anodal stimulation to the prefrontal cortex decreased freely moving thought and anodal stimulation to the parietal lobule decreased deliberately constrained thought, relative to the sham conditions. The exploratory analyses also suggested stimulation may increase freely moving thought in the occipital cortex. Overall, these findings suggest stimulation does not affect the dynamic thought types, however there is preliminary evidence to support the heterogenous nature of mind wandering, whereby different brain regions may be causally implicated in distinct dynamic thought types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39053349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Dynamic thought ; Mind wandering ; Parietal cortex ; Prefrontal cortex ; Task unrelated thought ; tDCS</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2024-09, Vol.178, p.249-268</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-543cb109e6aff92779d58ce1ec750ecb5870f8df76504116a640dcdb1b61fbe23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7721-4918 ; 0000-0001-9005-8975</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224001904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39053349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filmer, Hannah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><title>On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time – freely moving, deliberately constrained, and automatically constrained (thoughts). There is currently very little evidence on how different types of dynamic thought are represented in the brain. Previous research has applied non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to causally implicate the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule in mind wandering. However, a more recently developed and nuanced technique, high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS), delivers more focal stimulation able to target specific brain regions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of anodal HD-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortices (with the occipital cortex included as an active control) on mind wandering, and specifically, the causal neural substrates of the three internal dynamic thought types. This was a single session study using a novel task which allows investigation into how dynamic thoughts are associated with behavioural variability and the recruitment of executive control operations across the three brain regions. There was no evidence to support our hypothesised effect of stimulation reducing task unrelated thought. Furthermore, the hypothesis driven analyses found no evidence of stimulation affecting the dynamic thought types, nor any evidence for our hypothesised effects of stimulation reducing behavioural variability and increasing randomness. There was only evidence for a relationship between these two measures of performance when participants thoughts were freely moving. However, there was evidence from our exploratory analyses that anodal stimulation to the prefrontal cortex decreased freely moving thought and anodal stimulation to the parietal lobule decreased deliberately constrained thought, relative to the sham conditions. The exploratory analyses also suggested stimulation may increase freely moving thought in the occipital cortex. Overall, these findings suggest stimulation does not affect the dynamic thought types, however there is preliminary evidence to support the heterogenous nature of mind wandering, whereby different brain regions may be causally implicated in distinct dynamic thought types.</description><subject>Dynamic thought</subject><subject>Mind wandering</subject><subject>Parietal cortex</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Task unrelated thought</subject><subject>tDCS</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOxDAMhiMEguFxA4S6ZNNit03TbpAQ4iUhsQG2UZq4kFHbDEkHmNtwFk5GywBLVpblz_7lj7FDhAQBi5N5op0f6D1JIc0TKBJAscFmWIksLhHSTTYDQIirnKc7bDeEOUAKJefbbCergGdZXs3Y410fDc8UeddS5Jpo4anxrh9UG6neRAvlLU3NlGU1hcj2nx-dHUdv45y87Z--QbPqVWf1eMstn56HfbbVqDbQwU_dYw-XF_fn1_Ht3dXN-dltrDPEIeZ5pmuEigrVNFUqRGV4qQlJCw6ka14KaErTiIJDjlioIgejTY11gU1NabbHjtd3F969LCkMsrNBU9uqntwyyAzKXAisygnN16j2LoTxTbnwtlN-JRHkZFTO5dqonIxKKORodFw7-klY1h2Zv6VfhSNwugZo_PPVkpdBW-o1GetJD9I4-3_CFzsYisM</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Rasmussen, Tara</creator><creator>Filmer, Hannah L.</creator><creator>Dux, Paul E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7721-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8975</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought</title><author>Rasmussen, Tara ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-543cb109e6aff92779d58ce1ec750ecb5870f8df76504116a640dcdb1b61fbe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Dynamic thought</topic><topic>Mind wandering</topic><topic>Parietal cortex</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Task unrelated thought</topic><topic>tDCS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filmer, Hannah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rasmussen, Tara</au><au>Filmer, Hannah L.</au><au>Dux, Paul E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>249</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>249-268</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>Mind wandering is a common phenomenon in our daily lives and can have both an adaptive and detrimental impact. Recently, a dynamic framework has been proposed to characterise the heterogeneity of internal thoughts, suggesting there are three distinct thought types which can change over time – freely moving, deliberately constrained, and automatically constrained (thoughts). There is currently very little evidence on how different types of dynamic thought are represented in the brain. Previous research has applied non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to causally implicate the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobule in mind wandering. However, a more recently developed and nuanced technique, high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS), delivers more focal stimulation able to target specific brain regions. Therefore, the current study investigated the effect of anodal HD-tDCS applied to the left prefrontal and right inferior parietal cortices (with the occipital cortex included as an active control) on mind wandering, and specifically, the causal neural substrates of the three internal dynamic thought types. This was a single session study using a novel task which allows investigation into how dynamic thoughts are associated with behavioural variability and the recruitment of executive control operations across the three brain regions. There was no evidence to support our hypothesised effect of stimulation reducing task unrelated thought. Furthermore, the hypothesis driven analyses found no evidence of stimulation affecting the dynamic thought types, nor any evidence for our hypothesised effects of stimulation reducing behavioural variability and increasing randomness. There was only evidence for a relationship between these two measures of performance when participants thoughts were freely moving. However, there was evidence from our exploratory analyses that anodal stimulation to the prefrontal cortex decreased freely moving thought and anodal stimulation to the parietal lobule decreased deliberately constrained thought, relative to the sham conditions. The exploratory analyses also suggested stimulation may increase freely moving thought in the occipital cortex. Overall, these findings suggest stimulation does not affect the dynamic thought types, however there is preliminary evidence to support the heterogenous nature of mind wandering, whereby different brain regions may be causally implicated in distinct dynamic thought types.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39053349</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.017</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7721-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8975</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9452
ispartof Cortex, 2024-09, Vol.178, p.249-268
issn 0010-9452
1973-8102
1973-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3084771982
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Dynamic thought
Mind wandering
Parietal cortex
Prefrontal cortex
Task unrelated thought
tDCS
title On the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in mind wandering and dynamic thought
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20role%20of%20prefrontal%20and%20parietal%20cortices%20in%C2%A0mind%20wandering%20and%20dynamic%20thought&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Rasmussen,%20Tara&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=249-268&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3084771982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084771982&rft_id=info:pmid/39053349&rft_els_id=S0010945224001904&rfr_iscdi=true