Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review
Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight‐threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of hematology 2024-11, Vol.99 (11), p.2152-2163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2152 |
container_title | American journal of hematology |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Cummings, Olivia W. Rahman, Sara Fletcher, Lauren Scott, Adrienne W. |
description | Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight‐threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory‐based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO‐registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty‐four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR‐ of 0.3). Ultra‐widefield‐fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR‐ 0.1‐0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower‐grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image‐based approaches, such as computer‐based image analysis and ultra‐wide‐field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence‐based SCR screening recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajh.27439 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3083682530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115270419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-ddbe3e66c63649f04d7da2c5c14fea6ded35975a09d7bb96ba8e73537580a5513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0h_6BIOilgdgerVbaVW4mNB_FkEt6FlppHMtZax1pN8H_PnLt5hDIaWbg4eGdl5AfDCYMoJia1XJSVCVXn8iIgZLjWoriMxkBlyzvoI7IcUorAMbKGr6SI66gZAzqEbEz92yCxUR9oMnbxxapxbalEXsfuo3pl1uabEQMPjzQHu0y-KcB03neU5-HCY5uorG9z5YLOqNpm3pcm3xnybPHl2_ky8K0Cb8f5gn5e_X7_vJmPL-7vr2czce2yNnHzjXIUUoruSzVAkpXOVNYYVm5QCMdOi5UJQwoVzWNko2pseKCV6IGIwTjJ-TX3ruJ3S5ir9c-7Z4xAbshaQ41l3UhOGT05zt01Q0x5HSaMyaKKvejMnW2p2zsUoq40Jvo1yZuNQO9a17n5vW_5jN7ejAOzRrdG_m_6gxM98CLb3H7sUnP_tzsla8QHYz3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115270419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Cummings, Olivia W. ; Rahman, Sara ; Fletcher, Lauren ; Scott, Adrienne W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Olivia W. ; Rahman, Sara ; Fletcher, Lauren ; Scott, Adrienne W.</creatorcontrib><description>Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight‐threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory‐based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO‐registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty‐four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR‐ of 0.3). Ultra‐widefield‐fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR‐ 0.1‐0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower‐grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image‐based approaches, such as computer‐based image analysis and ultra‐wide‐field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence‐based SCR screening recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8609</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39041108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Angiography ; Eye diseases ; Hemorrhage ; Image processing ; Photography ; Retinopathy ; Sickle cell disease ; Systematic review ; Vascularization</subject><ispartof>American journal of hematology, 2024-11, Vol.99 (11), p.2152-2163</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-ddbe3e66c63649f04d7da2c5c14fea6ded35975a09d7bb96ba8e73537580a5513</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2607-1184 ; 0000-0002-3499-087X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajh.27439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajh.27439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39041108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Olivia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Adrienne W.</creatorcontrib><title>Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review</title><title>American journal of hematology</title><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><description>Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight‐threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory‐based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO‐registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty‐four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR‐ of 0.3). Ultra‐widefield‐fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR‐ 0.1‐0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower‐grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image‐based approaches, such as computer‐based image analysis and ultra‐wide‐field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence‐based SCR screening recommendations.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Eye diseases</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Retinopathy</subject><subject>Sickle cell disease</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vascularization</subject><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1rGzEQhkVpaZy0h_6BIOilgdgerVbaVW4mNB_FkEt6FlppHMtZax1pN8H_PnLt5hDIaWbg4eGdl5AfDCYMoJia1XJSVCVXn8iIgZLjWoriMxkBlyzvoI7IcUorAMbKGr6SI66gZAzqEbEz92yCxUR9oMnbxxapxbalEXsfuo3pl1uabEQMPjzQHu0y-KcB03neU5-HCY5uorG9z5YLOqNpm3pcm3xnybPHl2_ky8K0Cb8f5gn5e_X7_vJmPL-7vr2czce2yNnHzjXIUUoruSzVAkpXOVNYYVm5QCMdOi5UJQwoVzWNko2pseKCV6IGIwTjJ-TX3ruJ3S5ir9c-7Z4xAbshaQ41l3UhOGT05zt01Q0x5HSaMyaKKvejMnW2p2zsUoq40Jvo1yZuNQO9a17n5vW_5jN7ejAOzRrdG_m_6gxM98CLb3H7sUnP_tzsla8QHYz3</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Cummings, Olivia W.</creator><creator>Rahman, Sara</creator><creator>Fletcher, Lauren</creator><creator>Scott, Adrienne W.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-1184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-087X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review</title><author>Cummings, Olivia W. ; Rahman, Sara ; Fletcher, Lauren ; Scott, Adrienne W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-ddbe3e66c63649f04d7da2c5c14fea6ded35975a09d7bb96ba8e73537580a5513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Eye diseases</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Retinopathy</topic><topic>Sickle cell disease</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vascularization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Olivia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Adrienne W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cummings, Olivia W.</au><au>Rahman, Sara</au><au>Fletcher, Lauren</au><au>Scott, Adrienne W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2152</spage><epage>2163</epage><pages>2152-2163</pages><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><eissn>1096-8652</eissn><abstract>Sickle cell retinopathy (SCR) is a progressive, sight‐threatening ophthalmic complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Current SCR screening focuses on the detection of pathologic sea fan neovascularization, the first sign of proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSR). If untreated, PSR can lead to severe visual impairment and blindness through progression to vitreous hemorrhage and/or retinal detachment. SCR screening with dilated fundus examination (DFE) is recommended every 1–2 years starting at age 10, but data underlying this recommendation are of poor quality and based upon expert consensus. We performed a systematic review to characterize imaging techniques, laboratory‐based tests, and clinical practices for SCR screening. This PROSPERO‐registered systematic review included relevant texts identified through predetermined searches in online databases. Collected test accuracy data facilitated the calculation of likelihood ratios. Forty‐four studies evaluating 4928 patients were included. DFE demonstrated moderate test accuracy (LR+ of 8.0, LR‐ of 0.3). Ultra‐widefield‐fundus photography demonstrated superior accuracy (LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03). Optical coherence tomography angiography applications were highly accurate for PSR identification (machine learning LR+ 32.5, LR‐ 0.03; human grader LR+ 2.8–213.1, LR‐ 0.1‐0.2). Most techniques and tests were more accurate at detecting PSR than staging SCR or detecting lower‐grade SCR. Our findings support the integration of advanced image‐based approaches, such as computer‐based image analysis and ultra‐wide‐field fundus imaging, for SCR screening in SCD patients given the superior accuracy in PSR detection compared with the current standard of care. Rigorous SCR screening implementation studies are needed to support evidence‐based SCR screening recommendations.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39041108</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajh.27439</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-1184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-087X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-8609 |
ispartof | American journal of hematology, 2024-11, Vol.99 (11), p.2152-2163 |
issn | 0361-8609 1096-8652 1096-8652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3083682530 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Accuracy Angiography Eye diseases Hemorrhage Image processing Photography Retinopathy Sickle cell disease Systematic review Vascularization |
title | Advances in sickle cell retinopathy screening techniques, tests, and practices: A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T23%3A17%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances%20in%20sickle%20cell%20retinopathy%20screening%20techniques,%20tests,%20and%20practices:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Cummings,%20Olivia%20W.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2152&rft.epage=2163&rft.pages=2152-2163&rft.issn=0361-8609&rft.eissn=1096-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajh.27439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115270419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115270419&rft_id=info:pmid/39041108&rfr_iscdi=true |