Expression of PDL-1 between primary and recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A bi-institutional retrospective concordance analysis (CONCORDL-1 study)

•A significant change in PD-L1 CPS expression between primary tumor and paired relapse is a rare occurrence.•Conducting a confirmatory biopsy upon relapse would be optimal to accurately assess PD-L1 CPS expression.•Due to the rarity of significant changes in PD-L1 CPS expression, it is acceptable to evaluate PD-L1 CPS expression on archival samples. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Keynote 048 highlighted the relevance of PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) as a predictive biomarker for ICIs treatment, but challenges persist regarding ideal assessment and concordance between primary and relapsing tumor has not been determined. This is a retrospective multicentric study that included HNSCC patients with locoregional and/or metastatic relapses after curative treatment. Histological samples of primary tumors and corresponding relapses were collected. The primary objective was to evaluate PD-L1 CPS concordance between primary and recurrent tumors, with secondary objective of exploring the impact of clinical-pathological variables. Out of 86 evaluated patients, 30 cases were excluded due to insufficient histological material, with a final enrollment of 56 patients. Concordance analysis revealed a 66.1% agreement in PD-L1 CPS between primary and recurrent tumors. Only 3.6% of cases exhibited a change from negative to positive PD-L1 CPS status, and 7.2% showed the reverse. Factors analyzed, including primary tumor site, treatment modality, and recurrence type, did not significantly influence PD-L1 CPS concordance level. While significant changes in PD-L1 CPS expression are rare, the study underscores the importance of confirmatory biopsies on relapse. However, reliance on archival tumor tissue for initial PDL1 assessment may be considered in cases where obtaining additional biopsies poses risks to patients or urgent therapeutic decisions are required.