Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry

Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2024-07
Hauptverfasser: Bangma, Chris, Doan, Paul, Zhu, Lin, Remmers, Sebastiaan, Nieboer, Daan, Helleman, Jozien, Roobol, Monique J., Sugimoto, Mikio, Chung, Byung Ha, Lee, Lui Shiong, Frydenberg, Mark, Klotz, Laurence, Peacock, Michael, Perry, Antoinette, Bjartell, Anders, Rannikko, Antti, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke, Dasgupta, Prokar, Moore, Caroline, Trock, Bruce J., Pavlovich, Christian, Steyerberg, Ewout, Carroll, Peter, Koo, Kyo Chul, Hayen, Andrew, Thompson, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title European urology oncology
container_volume
creator Bangma, Chris
Doan, Paul
Zhu, Lin
Remmers, Sebastiaan
Nieboer, Daan
Helleman, Jozien
Roobol, Monique J.
Sugimoto, Mikio
Chung, Byung Ha
Lee, Lui Shiong
Frydenberg, Mark
Klotz, Laurence
Peacock, Michael
Perry, Antoinette
Bjartell, Anders
Rannikko, Antti
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Dasgupta, Prokar
Moore, Caroline
Trock, Bruce J.
Pavlovich, Christian
Steyerberg, Ewout
Carroll, Peter
Koo, Kyo Chul
Hayen, Andrew
Thompson, James
description Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr. Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards. Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment. Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and inter
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082628027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2588931124001767</els_id><sourcerecordid>3082628027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoKrU_wIvk6KXrJNlmEzyIFr-goPhxDml2VlJ2G012C_57U6riydMMw_O-MA8hxwwKBkyeLQscQsGBlwVUBYDYIYd8qtREC8Z2_-wHZJzSEgAyCwz4PjkQGvhUquqQ-Dub6KXr_Rrp8xDX6NvWrhzSJkT6GEPqbY90tjlFeoUudJmzDcYLOseUwirlaeMKa9rE0FFLb9uwsC2dtX7lXV6e8M2nPn4ekb3GtgnH33NEXm-uX2Z3k_nD7f3scj5xTAsx0aySCrWWZcmVtNo2TlZa1nIhqlrXiJCvrnbOKVEiL5lsLGegXMl4TnAxIqfb3vcYPgZMvel8crh5C8OQjADFJVfAq4yyLeryoyliY96j72z8NAzMRrJZmizZbCQbqEyWnDMn3_XDosP6N_GjNAPnWwDzk2uP0STnMfurfUTXmzr4f-q_ACQZi40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082628027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James ; The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium ; Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of &gt;20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr. Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards. Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (&gt;99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment. Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39025687</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Active surveillance ; Global registry ; Long-term outcome ; Prostate cancer</subject><ispartof>European urology oncology, 2024-07</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39025687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieboer, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helleman, Jozien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roobol, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Mikio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Byung Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lui Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydenberg, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjartell, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trock, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyerberg, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><title>European urology oncology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of &gt;20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr. Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards. Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (&gt;99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment. Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</description><subject>Active surveillance</subject><subject>Global registry</subject><subject>Long-term outcome</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><issn>2588-9311</issn><issn>2588-9311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoKrU_wIvk6KXrJNlmEzyIFr-goPhxDml2VlJ2G012C_57U6riydMMw_O-MA8hxwwKBkyeLQscQsGBlwVUBYDYIYd8qtREC8Z2_-wHZJzSEgAyCwz4PjkQGvhUquqQ-Dub6KXr_Rrp8xDX6NvWrhzSJkT6GEPqbY90tjlFeoUudJmzDcYLOseUwirlaeMKa9rE0FFLb9uwsC2dtX7lXV6e8M2nPn4ekb3GtgnH33NEXm-uX2Z3k_nD7f3scj5xTAsx0aySCrWWZcmVtNo2TlZa1nIhqlrXiJCvrnbOKVEiL5lsLGegXMl4TnAxIqfb3vcYPgZMvel8crh5C8OQjADFJVfAq4yyLeryoyliY96j72z8NAzMRrJZmizZbCQbqEyWnDMn3_XDosP6N_GjNAPnWwDzk2uP0STnMfurfUTXmzr4f-q_ACQZi40</recordid><startdate>20240717</startdate><enddate>20240717</enddate><creator>Bangma, Chris</creator><creator>Doan, Paul</creator><creator>Zhu, Lin</creator><creator>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creator><creator>Nieboer, Daan</creator><creator>Helleman, Jozien</creator><creator>Roobol, Monique J.</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Mikio</creator><creator>Chung, Byung Ha</creator><creator>Lee, Lui Shiong</creator><creator>Frydenberg, Mark</creator><creator>Klotz, Laurence</creator><creator>Peacock, Michael</creator><creator>Perry, Antoinette</creator><creator>Bjartell, Anders</creator><creator>Rannikko, Antti</creator><creator>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><creator>Moore, Caroline</creator><creator>Trock, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Pavlovich, Christian</creator><creator>Steyerberg, Ewout</creator><creator>Carroll, Peter</creator><creator>Koo, Kyo Chul</creator><creator>Hayen, Andrew</creator><creator>Thompson, James</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240717</creationdate><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><author>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active surveillance</topic><topic>Global registry</topic><topic>Long-term outcome</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieboer, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helleman, Jozien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roobol, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Mikio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Byung Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lui Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydenberg, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjartell, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trock, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyerberg, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bangma, Chris</au><au>Doan, Paul</au><au>Zhu, Lin</au><au>Remmers, Sebastiaan</au><au>Nieboer, Daan</au><au>Helleman, Jozien</au><au>Roobol, Monique J.</au><au>Sugimoto, Mikio</au><au>Chung, Byung Ha</au><au>Lee, Lui Shiong</au><au>Frydenberg, Mark</au><au>Klotz, Laurence</au><au>Peacock, Michael</au><au>Perry, Antoinette</au><au>Bjartell, Anders</au><au>Rannikko, Antti</au><au>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</au><au>Dasgupta, Prokar</au><au>Moore, Caroline</au><au>Trock, Bruce J.</au><au>Pavlovich, Christian</au><au>Steyerberg, Ewout</au><au>Carroll, Peter</au><au>Koo, Kyo Chul</au><au>Hayen, Andrew</au><au>Thompson, James</au><aucorp>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</atitle><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-07-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2588-9311</issn><eissn>2588-9311</eissn><abstract>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of &gt;20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr. Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards. Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (&gt;99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment. Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours. Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39025687</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2588-9311
ispartof European urology oncology, 2024-07
issn 2588-9311
2588-9311
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082628027
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Active surveillance
Global registry
Long-term outcome
Prostate cancer
title Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20Active%20Surveillance%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Become%20Safer?%20Lessons%20Learned%20from%20a%20Global%20Clinical%20Registry&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20oncology&rft.au=Bangma,%20Chris&rft.aucorp=The%20Movember%20Foundation%E2%80%99s%20Global%20Action%20Plan%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Active%20Surveillance%20(GAP3)%20Consortium&rft.date=2024-07-17&rft.issn=2588-9311&rft.eissn=2588-9311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082628027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082628027&rft_id=info:pmid/39025687&rft_els_id=S2588931124001767&rfr_iscdi=true