Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry
Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology oncology 2024-07 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European urology oncology |
container_volume | |
creator | Bangma, Chris Doan, Paul Zhu, Lin Remmers, Sebastiaan Nieboer, Daan Helleman, Jozien Roobol, Monique J. Sugimoto, Mikio Chung, Byung Ha Lee, Lui Shiong Frydenberg, Mark Klotz, Laurence Peacock, Michael Perry, Antoinette Bjartell, Anders Rannikko, Antti Van Hemelrijck, Mieke Dasgupta, Prokar Moore, Caroline Trock, Bruce J. Pavlovich, Christian Steyerberg, Ewout Carroll, Peter Koo, Kyo Chul Hayen, Andrew Thompson, James |
description | Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr.
Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards.
Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment.
Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and inter |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082628027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2588931124001767</els_id><sourcerecordid>3082628027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoKrU_wIvk6KXrJNlmEzyIFr-goPhxDml2VlJ2G012C_57U6riydMMw_O-MA8hxwwKBkyeLQscQsGBlwVUBYDYIYd8qtREC8Z2_-wHZJzSEgAyCwz4PjkQGvhUquqQ-Dub6KXr_Rrp8xDX6NvWrhzSJkT6GEPqbY90tjlFeoUudJmzDcYLOseUwirlaeMKa9rE0FFLb9uwsC2dtX7lXV6e8M2nPn4ekb3GtgnH33NEXm-uX2Z3k_nD7f3scj5xTAsx0aySCrWWZcmVtNo2TlZa1nIhqlrXiJCvrnbOKVEiL5lsLGegXMl4TnAxIqfb3vcYPgZMvel8crh5C8OQjADFJVfAq4yyLeryoyliY96j72z8NAzMRrJZmizZbCQbqEyWnDMn3_XDosP6N_GjNAPnWwDzk2uP0STnMfurfUTXmzr4f-q_ACQZi40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082628027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James ; The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium ; Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><description>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr.
Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards.
Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment.
Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39025687</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Active surveillance ; Global registry ; Long-term outcome ; Prostate cancer</subject><ispartof>European urology oncology, 2024-07</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39025687$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieboer, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helleman, Jozien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roobol, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Mikio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Byung Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lui Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydenberg, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjartell, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trock, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyerberg, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><title>European urology oncology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr.
Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards.
Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment.
Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</description><subject>Active surveillance</subject><subject>Global registry</subject><subject>Long-term outcome</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><issn>2588-9311</issn><issn>2588-9311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoKrU_wIvk6KXrJNlmEzyIFr-goPhxDml2VlJ2G012C_57U6riydMMw_O-MA8hxwwKBkyeLQscQsGBlwVUBYDYIYd8qtREC8Z2_-wHZJzSEgAyCwz4PjkQGvhUquqQ-Dub6KXr_Rrp8xDX6NvWrhzSJkT6GEPqbY90tjlFeoUudJmzDcYLOseUwirlaeMKa9rE0FFLb9uwsC2dtX7lXV6e8M2nPn4ekb3GtgnH33NEXm-uX2Z3k_nD7f3scj5xTAsx0aySCrWWZcmVtNo2TlZa1nIhqlrXiJCvrnbOKVEiL5lsLGegXMl4TnAxIqfb3vcYPgZMvel8crh5C8OQjADFJVfAq4yyLeryoyliY96j72z8NAzMRrJZmizZbCQbqEyWnDMn3_XDosP6N_GjNAPnWwDzk2uP0STnMfurfUTXmzr4f-q_ACQZi40</recordid><startdate>20240717</startdate><enddate>20240717</enddate><creator>Bangma, Chris</creator><creator>Doan, Paul</creator><creator>Zhu, Lin</creator><creator>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creator><creator>Nieboer, Daan</creator><creator>Helleman, Jozien</creator><creator>Roobol, Monique J.</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Mikio</creator><creator>Chung, Byung Ha</creator><creator>Lee, Lui Shiong</creator><creator>Frydenberg, Mark</creator><creator>Klotz, Laurence</creator><creator>Peacock, Michael</creator><creator>Perry, Antoinette</creator><creator>Bjartell, Anders</creator><creator>Rannikko, Antti</creator><creator>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Prokar</creator><creator>Moore, Caroline</creator><creator>Trock, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Pavlovich, Christian</creator><creator>Steyerberg, Ewout</creator><creator>Carroll, Peter</creator><creator>Koo, Kyo Chul</creator><creator>Hayen, Andrew</creator><creator>Thompson, James</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240717</creationdate><title>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</title><author>Bangma, Chris ; Doan, Paul ; Zhu, Lin ; Remmers, Sebastiaan ; Nieboer, Daan ; Helleman, Jozien ; Roobol, Monique J. ; Sugimoto, Mikio ; Chung, Byung Ha ; Lee, Lui Shiong ; Frydenberg, Mark ; Klotz, Laurence ; Peacock, Michael ; Perry, Antoinette ; Bjartell, Anders ; Rannikko, Antti ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Moore, Caroline ; Trock, Bruce J. ; Pavlovich, Christian ; Steyerberg, Ewout ; Carroll, Peter ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Hayen, Andrew ; Thompson, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1933-91768e99644286a9afc6796d6b37d9dee086acdccc834e2416fa2108c41242823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active surveillance</topic><topic>Global registry</topic><topic>Long-term outcome</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bangma, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmers, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieboer, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helleman, Jozien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roobol, Monique J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Mikio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Byung Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lui Shiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydenberg, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klotz, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjartell, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Prokar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trock, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovich, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steyerberg, Ewout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayen, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bangma, Chris</au><au>Doan, Paul</au><au>Zhu, Lin</au><au>Remmers, Sebastiaan</au><au>Nieboer, Daan</au><au>Helleman, Jozien</au><au>Roobol, Monique J.</au><au>Sugimoto, Mikio</au><au>Chung, Byung Ha</au><au>Lee, Lui Shiong</au><au>Frydenberg, Mark</au><au>Klotz, Laurence</au><au>Peacock, Michael</au><au>Perry, Antoinette</au><au>Bjartell, Anders</au><au>Rannikko, Antti</au><au>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</au><au>Dasgupta, Prokar</au><au>Moore, Caroline</au><au>Trock, Bruce J.</au><au>Pavlovich, Christian</au><au>Steyerberg, Ewout</au><au>Carroll, Peter</au><au>Koo, Kyo Chul</au><au>Hayen, Andrew</au><au>Thompson, James</au><aucorp>The Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</aucorp><aucorp>Movember Foundation’s Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry</atitle><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-07-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2588-9311</issn><eissn>2588-9311</eissn><abstract>Active surveillance is a safe management option for the management of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer over the full duration of >20 yr in this large multicentre cohort of over 26 000 men. Overall survival and metastases-free survival are 84.1% and 99.4%, respectively, at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in those with intermediate-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men around the world with low-risk prostate cancer (or in selected cases intermediate-risk disease). Here, we report on the safety and acceptability of AS, and treatment outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk tumours over time in 14 623 men with follow-up of over 6 yr.
Clinical data from 26 999 men on AS from 25 cohorts in 15 countries have been collected in an international database from 2000 onwards.
Across our predefined four time periods of 4 yr each (covering the period 2000–2016), there was no significant change in overall survival (OS). However, metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates have improved since the second period and were excellent (>99%). Treatment-free survival rates for earlier periods showed a slightly more rapid shift to radical treatment. Over time, there was a constant proportion of 5% of men for whom anxiety was registered as the reason for treatment alteration. There was, however, also a subset of 10–15% in whom treatment was changed, for which no apparent reason was available. In a subset of men (10–15%), tumour progression was the trigger for treatment. In men who opted for radical treatment, surgery was the most common treatment modality. In those men who underwent radical treatment, 90% were free from biochemical recurrence at 5 yr after treatment.
Our study confirms that AS was a safe management option over the full duration in this large multicentre cohort with long-term follow-up, given the 84.1% OS and 99.4% MFS at 10 yr. The probability of treatment at 10 yr was 20% in men with initial low-risk tumours and 31% in men with intermediate-risk tumours. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.
Active surveillance (AS) has evolved into a widely applied treatment strategy for many men with prostate cancer around the world. In this report, we show the long-term safety of following AS for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Our study confirms AS as a safe management option for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. New diagnostic modalities may improve the acceptability of follow-up using individual risk assessments, while safely broadening the use of AS in higher-risk tumours.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39025687</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2588-9311 |
ispartof | European urology oncology, 2024-07 |
issn | 2588-9311 2588-9311 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082628027 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Active surveillance Global registry Long-term outcome Prostate cancer |
title | Has Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer Become Safer? Lessons Learned from a Global Clinical Registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20Active%20Surveillance%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Become%20Safer?%20Lessons%20Learned%20from%20a%20Global%20Clinical%20Registry&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20oncology&rft.au=Bangma,%20Chris&rft.aucorp=The%20Movember%20Foundation%E2%80%99s%20Global%20Action%20Plan%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Active%20Surveillance%20(GAP3)%20Consortium&rft.date=2024-07-17&rft.issn=2588-9311&rft.eissn=2588-9311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082628027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082628027&rft_id=info:pmid/39025687&rft_els_id=S2588931124001767&rfr_iscdi=true |