Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes

Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2024-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2258-2268
Hauptverfasser: Tam, Patrick C.K., Alexander, Barbara D., Lee, Mark J., Hardie, Rochelle G., Reynolds, John M., Haney, John C., Waites, Ken B., Perfect, John R., Baker, Arthur W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2268
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2258
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 24
creator Tam, Patrick C.K.
Alexander, Barbara D.
Lee, Mark J.
Hardie, Rochelle G.
Reynolds, John M.
Haney, John C.
Waites, Ken B.
Perfect, John R.
Baker, Arthur W.
description Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082627829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1600613524004362</els_id><sourcerecordid>3082627829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-8692a93c4b386ed3a1e8c6355b060970ce4585271dfd3dc2d1778e20c4c899f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAGyQl2wSru3EcWBVlb9KRd20a8tj3yCPJnGwnZHmqXhFHGYYiU1XPpa_e6xzDyFvGdQMmPywrc021xx4U0NXAxPPyCWTAJVkjXh-1qK9IK9S2gKwjiv-klyIHngrgF-S35_DFGLlMPo9OvrjYMO8M2k01EyOPkY0p6ufBrTZhykVSXfL9JPmaKZUnqdMI1o_e5xy-kiv6RxDmld6jzTlxR1oGKhbP_rreoaLSrOPJod4WN1spslGxMkX9__JsGQbRkyvyYvB7BK-OZ1X5PHrl4eb79Xd_bfbm-u7ynLR5krJnpte2GYjlEQnDENlpWjbDUjoO7DYtKrlHXODE85yx7pOIQfbWNX3gxRX5P3Rt2T5tWDKevTJ4q6kxbAkLUBxyTvF-4KyI2pL7BRx0HP0o4kHzUCvPemtLj3ptScNnS49lZl3J_tlM6I7T_wrpgCfjgCWkHuPUSdbFmHR-bKUrF3wT9j_ARwVp80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082627829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tam, Patrick C.K. ; Alexander, Barbara D. ; Lee, Mark J. ; Hardie, Rochelle G. ; Reynolds, John M. ; Haney, John C. ; Waites, Ken B. ; Perfect, John R. ; Baker, Arthur W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tam, Patrick C.K. ; Alexander, Barbara D. ; Lee, Mark J. ; Hardie, Rochelle G. ; Reynolds, John M. ; Haney, John C. ; Waites, Ken B. ; Perfect, John R. ; Baker, Arthur W.</creatorcontrib><description>Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39025302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology ; Donor Selection ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; lung transplantation ; Lung Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mollicute infection ; Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis ; Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology ; mycoplasma species ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - microbiology ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis ; Respiratory Tract Infections - etiology ; Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology ; Risk Factors ; screening ; Tissue Donors ; Transplant Recipients ; Ureaplasma - isolation &amp; purification ; Ureaplasma Infections - diagnosis ; Ureaplasma Infections - microbiology ; ureaplasma species</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2024-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2258-2268</ispartof><rights>2024 American Society of Transplantation &amp; American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation &amp; American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-8692a93c4b386ed3a1e8c6355b060970ce4585271dfd3dc2d1778e20c4c899f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4602-1889 ; 0000-0001-5868-0529 ; 0000-0003-4766-8852 ; 0000-0003-0019-8638 ; 0000-0002-0914-0291</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39025302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tam, Patrick C.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardie, Rochelle G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waites, Ken B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfect, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Arthur W.</creatorcontrib><title>Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology</subject><subject>Donor Selection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lung transplantation</subject><subject>Lung Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mollicute infection</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>mycoplasma species</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - microbiology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><subject>Ureaplasma - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Ureaplasma Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ureaplasma Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>ureaplasma species</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAGyQl2wSru3EcWBVlb9KRd20a8tj3yCPJnGwnZHmqXhFHGYYiU1XPpa_e6xzDyFvGdQMmPywrc021xx4U0NXAxPPyCWTAJVkjXh-1qK9IK9S2gKwjiv-klyIHngrgF-S35_DFGLlMPo9OvrjYMO8M2k01EyOPkY0p6ufBrTZhykVSXfL9JPmaKZUnqdMI1o_e5xy-kiv6RxDmld6jzTlxR1oGKhbP_rreoaLSrOPJod4WN1spslGxMkX9__JsGQbRkyvyYvB7BK-OZ1X5PHrl4eb79Xd_bfbm-u7ynLR5krJnpte2GYjlEQnDENlpWjbDUjoO7DYtKrlHXODE85yx7pOIQfbWNX3gxRX5P3Rt2T5tWDKevTJ4q6kxbAkLUBxyTvF-4KyI2pL7BRx0HP0o4kHzUCvPemtLj3ptScNnS49lZl3J_tlM6I7T_wrpgCfjgCWkHuPUSdbFmHR-bKUrF3wT9j_ARwVp80</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Tam, Patrick C.K.</creator><creator>Alexander, Barbara D.</creator><creator>Lee, Mark J.</creator><creator>Hardie, Rochelle G.</creator><creator>Reynolds, John M.</creator><creator>Haney, John C.</creator><creator>Waites, Ken B.</creator><creator>Perfect, John R.</creator><creator>Baker, Arthur W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-1889</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-0529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-8852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-0291</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes</title><author>Tam, Patrick C.K. ; Alexander, Barbara D. ; Lee, Mark J. ; Hardie, Rochelle G. ; Reynolds, John M. ; Haney, John C. ; Waites, Ken B. ; Perfect, John R. ; Baker, Arthur W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-8692a93c4b386ed3a1e8c6355b060970ce4585271dfd3dc2d1778e20c4c899f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology</topic><topic>Donor Selection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lung transplantation</topic><topic>Lung Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mollicute infection</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>mycoplasma species</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - microbiology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><topic>Ureaplasma - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Ureaplasma Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ureaplasma Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>ureaplasma species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tam, Patrick C.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardie, Rochelle G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haney, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waites, Ken B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perfect, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Arthur W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tam, Patrick C.K.</au><au>Alexander, Barbara D.</au><au>Lee, Mark J.</au><au>Hardie, Rochelle G.</au><au>Reynolds, John M.</au><au>Haney, John C.</au><au>Waites, Ken B.</au><au>Perfect, John R.</au><au>Baker, Arthur W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2258</spage><epage>2268</epage><pages>2258-2268</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39025302</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-1889</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5868-0529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-8852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-8638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-0291</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2024-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2258-2268
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082627829
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology
Donor Selection
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
lung transplantation
Lung Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
mollicute infection
Mycoplasma Infections - diagnosis
Mycoplasma Infections - microbiology
mycoplasma species
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - microbiology
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis
Respiratory Tract Infections - etiology
Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology
Risk Factors
screening
Tissue Donors
Transplant Recipients
Ureaplasma - isolation & purification
Ureaplasma Infections - diagnosis
Ureaplasma Infections - microbiology
ureaplasma species
title Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donor-derived%20Mycoplasma%20and%20Ureaplasma%20infections%20in%20lung%20transplant%20recipients:%20A%20prospective%20study%20of%20donor%20and%20recipient%20respiratory%20tract%20screening%20and%20recipient%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Tam,%20Patrick%20C.K.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2258&rft.epage=2268&rft.pages=2258-2268&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082627829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082627829&rft_id=info:pmid/39025302&rft_els_id=S1600613524004362&rfr_iscdi=true