The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods

Powdered activated carbon (PAC) has better adsorption performance than granular activated carbon (GAC) and is widely used in water purification. In most cases, PAC is dosed into water directly, then precipitated as sludge, and landfilled. In this study, PAC was mixed with a polymer and dissolved in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research 2024-07, Vol.96 (7), p.e11081-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hou, Yizhi, Mayer, Brooke K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e11081
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 96
creator Hou, Yizhi
Mayer, Brooke K.
description Powdered activated carbon (PAC) has better adsorption performance than granular activated carbon (GAC) and is widely used in water purification. In most cases, PAC is dosed into water directly, then precipitated as sludge, and landfilled. In this study, PAC was mixed with a polymer and dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent to form a PAC‐loaded membrane, which was then tested for chloroform removal. The chloroform adsorption capacity of the PAC membrane increased with increasing membrane thickness because of higher carbon loading. However, regardless of membrane thickness, the flux of the PAC membranes was similar since flux resistance predominantly occurred at the top dense polymer surface. This dense surface can be removed by sandpaper polishing, where the adsorption capacity of the polished PAC membranes was 20% higher than the unpolished membranes because of more even distribution of feed water on the polished surface. Removal of the dense surface via polishing increased the flux by 97% to 130%, exceeding the flux of typical household carbon block filters. Using DMF to regenerate the membrane recovered 48% to 66% of the initial adsorption capacity. Thermal regeneration of the exhausted PAC membrane at 250°C was more effective than DMF regeneration (both in terms of cost and performance), with 83% to 94% PAC membrane regeneration efficiency over four regeneration recycles. After four thermal regeneration cycles, flux increased by 300% and the membrane became brittle because of thermal aging of the polymer, indicating that a total of 6 h of regeneration time (equivalent to three cycles in this study) was the limit for effective PAC membrane performance. Practitioner Points Powdered activated carbon was immobilized on a membrane to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes increased adsorption capacity but did not impact flux. Flux and capacity increased using polishing to remove the dense polymer surface and more evenly distribute flow across the membrane. Thermal regeneration of the membrane at 250°C was effective for up to three cycles and outperformed solvent‐based regeneration. PAC‐loaded filters are relevant for applications such as household carbon block filtration. A PAC‐loaded membrane was used to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes improved adsorption and polishing the membrane surface further improved adsorption capacity. The PAC membrane was successfully regenerated for up to three cycles using 250°C thermal regeneratio
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wer.11081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082311720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3084664331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2431-6f4702623243039c2ef4deb85b99e20281d590bb297971ea44e4ab372b12a9323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c1q3DAQwHFRWpqP9tAXKIJe2oOTmZFsr49hST8g0FBSejSyPa6dStZW8ibsLW-QPGOfpNpsmkMhJwn048-IEeINwhEC0PE1hyNEWOAzsY95rrMyV_g83aHATCtQe-IgxksAJAL9UuypCkiBLvfF7cXAcnQr087S9_L8ZPnn5s5603EnV95uHAfp2DXBTCznYWx_TRyj9JNsB-uD731wMrDzV8ZKM3Wy9SkWxphE6kVvr3ia71_mgYNL6jEX-CdPHMw8Jux4HnwXX4kXvbGRXz-ch-L7x9OL5efs7OunL8uTs6wlrTArel0CFaRo-72qJe51x80ib6qKCWiBXV5B01BVViWy0Zq1aVRJDZKpFKlD8X7XXQX_e81xrt0YW7Y2DebXsVawIIVYEiT67j966ddhStNtlS4KrRQm9WGn2uBjDNzXqzA6EzY1Qr3dUp22VN9vKdm3D8V147h7lP_WksDxDlyPljdPl-ofp992yb-V6Z1x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084664331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hou, Yizhi ; Mayer, Brooke K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hou, Yizhi ; Mayer, Brooke K.</creatorcontrib><description>Powdered activated carbon (PAC) has better adsorption performance than granular activated carbon (GAC) and is widely used in water purification. In most cases, PAC is dosed into water directly, then precipitated as sludge, and landfilled. In this study, PAC was mixed with a polymer and dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent to form a PAC‐loaded membrane, which was then tested for chloroform removal. The chloroform adsorption capacity of the PAC membrane increased with increasing membrane thickness because of higher carbon loading. However, regardless of membrane thickness, the flux of the PAC membranes was similar since flux resistance predominantly occurred at the top dense polymer surface. This dense surface can be removed by sandpaper polishing, where the adsorption capacity of the polished PAC membranes was 20% higher than the unpolished membranes because of more even distribution of feed water on the polished surface. Removal of the dense surface via polishing increased the flux by 97% to 130%, exceeding the flux of typical household carbon block filters. Using DMF to regenerate the membrane recovered 48% to 66% of the initial adsorption capacity. Thermal regeneration of the exhausted PAC membrane at 250°C was more effective than DMF regeneration (both in terms of cost and performance), with 83% to 94% PAC membrane regeneration efficiency over four regeneration recycles. After four thermal regeneration cycles, flux increased by 300% and the membrane became brittle because of thermal aging of the polymer, indicating that a total of 6 h of regeneration time (equivalent to three cycles in this study) was the limit for effective PAC membrane performance. Practitioner Points Powdered activated carbon was immobilized on a membrane to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes increased adsorption capacity but did not impact flux. Flux and capacity increased using polishing to remove the dense polymer surface and more evenly distribute flow across the membrane. Thermal regeneration of the membrane at 250°C was effective for up to three cycles and outperformed solvent‐based regeneration. PAC‐loaded filters are relevant for applications such as household carbon block filtration. A PAC‐loaded membrane was used to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes improved adsorption and polishing the membrane surface further improved adsorption capacity. The PAC membrane was successfully regenerated for up to three cycles using 250°C thermal regeneration, which outperformed solvent‐based regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.11081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39023047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Activated sludge ; Adsorption ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Charcoal - chemistry ; Chlorine compounds ; Chloroform ; Chloroform - chemistry ; Dimethylformamide ; disinfection byproduct (DBP) ; Embrittlement ; Filters ; filtration ; Fluctuations ; household carbon block filter ; Households ; Landfills ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Polishing ; Polymers ; Polymers - chemistry ; powdered activated carbon (PAC) ; Regeneration (biological) ; reuse ; Sludge ; Solvents ; Solvents - chemistry ; Thermal regeneration ; Thickness ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water purification ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2024-07, Vol.96 (7), p.e11081-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Water Environment Federation.</rights><rights>2024 Water Environment Federation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2431-6f4702623243039c2ef4deb85b99e20281d590bb297971ea44e4ab372b12a9323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4858-2834</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwer.11081$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwer.11081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39023047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hou, Yizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Brooke K.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>Powdered activated carbon (PAC) has better adsorption performance than granular activated carbon (GAC) and is widely used in water purification. In most cases, PAC is dosed into water directly, then precipitated as sludge, and landfilled. In this study, PAC was mixed with a polymer and dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent to form a PAC‐loaded membrane, which was then tested for chloroform removal. The chloroform adsorption capacity of the PAC membrane increased with increasing membrane thickness because of higher carbon loading. However, regardless of membrane thickness, the flux of the PAC membranes was similar since flux resistance predominantly occurred at the top dense polymer surface. This dense surface can be removed by sandpaper polishing, where the adsorption capacity of the polished PAC membranes was 20% higher than the unpolished membranes because of more even distribution of feed water on the polished surface. Removal of the dense surface via polishing increased the flux by 97% to 130%, exceeding the flux of typical household carbon block filters. Using DMF to regenerate the membrane recovered 48% to 66% of the initial adsorption capacity. Thermal regeneration of the exhausted PAC membrane at 250°C was more effective than DMF regeneration (both in terms of cost and performance), with 83% to 94% PAC membrane regeneration efficiency over four regeneration recycles. After four thermal regeneration cycles, flux increased by 300% and the membrane became brittle because of thermal aging of the polymer, indicating that a total of 6 h of regeneration time (equivalent to three cycles in this study) was the limit for effective PAC membrane performance. Practitioner Points Powdered activated carbon was immobilized on a membrane to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes increased adsorption capacity but did not impact flux. Flux and capacity increased using polishing to remove the dense polymer surface and more evenly distribute flow across the membrane. Thermal regeneration of the membrane at 250°C was effective for up to three cycles and outperformed solvent‐based regeneration. PAC‐loaded filters are relevant for applications such as household carbon block filtration. A PAC‐loaded membrane was used to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes improved adsorption and polishing the membrane surface further improved adsorption capacity. The PAC membrane was successfully regenerated for up to three cycles using 250°C thermal regeneration, which outperformed solvent‐based regeneration.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Charcoal - chemistry</subject><subject>Chlorine compounds</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Chloroform - chemistry</subject><subject>Dimethylformamide</subject><subject>disinfection byproduct (DBP)</subject><subject>Embrittlement</subject><subject>Filters</subject><subject>filtration</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>household carbon block filter</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Polishing</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polymers - chemistry</subject><subject>powdered activated carbon (PAC)</subject><subject>Regeneration (biological)</subject><subject>reuse</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Solvents - chemistry</subject><subject>Thermal regeneration</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10c1q3DAQwHFRWpqP9tAXKIJe2oOTmZFsr49hST8g0FBSejSyPa6dStZW8ibsLW-QPGOfpNpsmkMhJwn048-IEeINwhEC0PE1hyNEWOAzsY95rrMyV_g83aHATCtQe-IgxksAJAL9UuypCkiBLvfF7cXAcnQr087S9_L8ZPnn5s5603EnV95uHAfp2DXBTCznYWx_TRyj9JNsB-uD731wMrDzV8ZKM3Wy9SkWxphE6kVvr3ia71_mgYNL6jEX-CdPHMw8Jux4HnwXX4kXvbGRXz-ch-L7x9OL5efs7OunL8uTs6wlrTArel0CFaRo-72qJe51x80ib6qKCWiBXV5B01BVViWy0Zq1aVRJDZKpFKlD8X7XXQX_e81xrt0YW7Y2DebXsVawIIVYEiT67j966ddhStNtlS4KrRQm9WGn2uBjDNzXqzA6EzY1Qr3dUp22VN9vKdm3D8V147h7lP_WksDxDlyPljdPl-ofp992yb-V6Z1x</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Hou, Yizhi</creator><creator>Mayer, Brooke K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-2834</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods</title><author>Hou, Yizhi ; Mayer, Brooke K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2431-6f4702623243039c2ef4deb85b99e20281d590bb297971ea44e4ab372b12a9323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Charcoal - chemistry</topic><topic>Chlorine compounds</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Chloroform - chemistry</topic><topic>Dimethylformamide</topic><topic>disinfection byproduct (DBP)</topic><topic>Embrittlement</topic><topic>Filters</topic><topic>filtration</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>household carbon block filter</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Polishing</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polymers - chemistry</topic><topic>powdered activated carbon (PAC)</topic><topic>Regeneration (biological)</topic><topic>reuse</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Solvents - chemistry</topic><topic>Thermal regeneration</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hou, Yizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Brooke K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hou, Yizhi</au><au>Mayer, Brooke K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e11081</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e11081-n/a</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>Powdered activated carbon (PAC) has better adsorption performance than granular activated carbon (GAC) and is widely used in water purification. In most cases, PAC is dosed into water directly, then precipitated as sludge, and landfilled. In this study, PAC was mixed with a polymer and dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent to form a PAC‐loaded membrane, which was then tested for chloroform removal. The chloroform adsorption capacity of the PAC membrane increased with increasing membrane thickness because of higher carbon loading. However, regardless of membrane thickness, the flux of the PAC membranes was similar since flux resistance predominantly occurred at the top dense polymer surface. This dense surface can be removed by sandpaper polishing, where the adsorption capacity of the polished PAC membranes was 20% higher than the unpolished membranes because of more even distribution of feed water on the polished surface. Removal of the dense surface via polishing increased the flux by 97% to 130%, exceeding the flux of typical household carbon block filters. Using DMF to regenerate the membrane recovered 48% to 66% of the initial adsorption capacity. Thermal regeneration of the exhausted PAC membrane at 250°C was more effective than DMF regeneration (both in terms of cost and performance), with 83% to 94% PAC membrane regeneration efficiency over four regeneration recycles. After four thermal regeneration cycles, flux increased by 300% and the membrane became brittle because of thermal aging of the polymer, indicating that a total of 6 h of regeneration time (equivalent to three cycles in this study) was the limit for effective PAC membrane performance. Practitioner Points Powdered activated carbon was immobilized on a membrane to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes increased adsorption capacity but did not impact flux. Flux and capacity increased using polishing to remove the dense polymer surface and more evenly distribute flow across the membrane. Thermal regeneration of the membrane at 250°C was effective for up to three cycles and outperformed solvent‐based regeneration. PAC‐loaded filters are relevant for applications such as household carbon block filtration. A PAC‐loaded membrane was used to remove chloroform from water. Thicker membranes improved adsorption and polishing the membrane surface further improved adsorption capacity. The PAC membrane was successfully regenerated for up to three cycles using 250°C thermal regeneration, which outperformed solvent‐based regeneration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>39023047</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.11081</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-2834</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 2024-07, Vol.96 (7), p.e11081-n/a
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3082311720
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Activated carbon
Activated sludge
Adsorption
Carbon
Carbon cycle
Charcoal - chemistry
Chlorine compounds
Chloroform
Chloroform - chemistry
Dimethylformamide
disinfection byproduct (DBP)
Embrittlement
Filters
filtration
Fluctuations
household carbon block filter
Households
Landfills
Membranes
Membranes, Artificial
Polishing
Polymers
Polymers - chemistry
powdered activated carbon (PAC)
Regeneration (biological)
reuse
Sludge
Solvents
Solvents - chemistry
Thermal regeneration
Thickness
Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry
Water purification
Water Purification - methods
title The impact of PAC‐loaded polymer membrane thickness on chloroform removal and comparison of solvent and thermal membrane regeneration methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20PAC%E2%80%90loaded%20polymer%20membrane%20thickness%20on%20chloroform%20removal%20and%20comparison%20of%20solvent%20and%20thermal%20membrane%20regeneration%20methods&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Hou,%20Yizhi&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e11081&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e11081-n/a&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.11081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3084664331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084664331&rft_id=info:pmid/39023047&rfr_iscdi=true