Mobility Assessment Instruments

Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in oncology nursing 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660
Hauptverfasser: Fessele, Kristen L., Syrkin, Grigory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 151660
container_title Seminars in oncology nursing
container_volume 40
creator Fessele, Kristen L.
Syrkin, Grigory
description Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments. Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings. Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool. Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081771027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749208124001098</els_id><sourcerecordid>3081771027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CgRy4pXtux4wOHquJRqYgLnK3E2Uiu8ijZBKn_npQUjlx29zCzo_kYuwa-AA76frugpvb1QnChFhCD1vyETSExSSSVsqdsyo2ykeAJTNgF0ZZzYTW352wiLQdpJEzZ7WuThTJ0-_mSCIkqrLv5uqau7Q8nXbKzIi0Jr457xj6eHt9XL9Hm7Xm9Wm4iL6TthqklF0WBOsUcbG69KYrY6xQEJEqJNI1tZoxXmc91YTKRGA-AJo-VlVnC5YzdjX93bfPZI3WuCuSxLNMam56cHFoYA1yYQSpHqW8bohYLt2tDlbZ7B9wdyLit-yHjDmTcSGZw3RwD-qzC_M_zi2IQPIwCHGp-BWwd-YC1xzy06DuXN-HfgG9JfXRp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3081771027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</creator><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><description>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments. Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings. Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool. Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-2081</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39013731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Cancer ; Functional decline ; Humans ; Mobility ; Mobility Limitation ; Neoplasms - nursing ; Nursing ; Oncology Nursing - standards ; Outcome assessment ; Physical activity ; Reproducibility of Results ; Wearable activity monitors</subject><ispartof>Seminars in oncology nursing, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39013731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><title>Seminars in oncology nursing</title><addtitle>Semin Oncol Nurs</addtitle><description>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments. Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings. Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool. Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Functional decline</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Mobility Limitation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - nursing</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oncology Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Outcome assessment</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Wearable activity monitors</subject><issn>0749-2081</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CgRy4pXtux4wOHquJRqYgLnK3E2Uiu8ijZBKn_npQUjlx29zCzo_kYuwa-AA76frugpvb1QnChFhCD1vyETSExSSSVsqdsyo2ykeAJTNgF0ZZzYTW352wiLQdpJEzZ7WuThTJ0-_mSCIkqrLv5uqau7Q8nXbKzIi0Jr457xj6eHt9XL9Hm7Xm9Wm4iL6TthqklF0WBOsUcbG69KYrY6xQEJEqJNI1tZoxXmc91YTKRGA-AJo-VlVnC5YzdjX93bfPZI3WuCuSxLNMam56cHFoYA1yYQSpHqW8bohYLt2tDlbZ7B9wdyLit-yHjDmTcSGZw3RwD-qzC_M_zi2IQPIwCHGp-BWwd-YC1xzy06DuXN-HfgG9JfXRp</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Fessele, Kristen L.</creator><creator>Syrkin, Grigory</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><author>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Functional decline</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Mobility Limitation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - nursing</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oncology Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Outcome assessment</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Wearable activity monitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in oncology nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fessele, Kristen L.</au><au>Syrkin, Grigory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mobility Assessment Instruments</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in oncology nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Oncol Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>151660</spage><pages>151660-</pages><artnum>151660</artnum><issn>0749-2081</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><eissn>1878-3449</eissn><abstract>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments. Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings. Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool. Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39013731</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-2081
ispartof Seminars in oncology nursing, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660
issn 0749-2081
1878-3449
1878-3449
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081771027
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Cancer
Functional decline
Humans
Mobility
Mobility Limitation
Neoplasms - nursing
Nursing
Oncology Nursing - standards
Outcome assessment
Physical activity
Reproducibility of Results
Wearable activity monitors
title Mobility Assessment Instruments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobility%20Assessment%20Instruments&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20oncology%20nursing&rft.au=Fessele,%20Kristen%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=151660&rft.pages=151660-&rft.artnum=151660&rft.issn=0749-2081&rft.eissn=1878-3449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3081771027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3081771027&rft_id=info:pmid/39013731&rft_els_id=S0749208124001098&rfr_iscdi=true