Mobility Assessment Instruments
Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice. Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in oncology nursing 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 151660 |
container_title | Seminars in oncology nursing |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Fessele, Kristen L. Syrkin, Grigory |
description | Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice.
Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments.
Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings.
Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool.
Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081771027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749208124001098</els_id><sourcerecordid>3081771027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CgRy4pXtux4wOHquJRqYgLnK3E2Uiu8ijZBKn_npQUjlx29zCzo_kYuwa-AA76frugpvb1QnChFhCD1vyETSExSSSVsqdsyo2ykeAJTNgF0ZZzYTW352wiLQdpJEzZ7WuThTJ0-_mSCIkqrLv5uqau7Q8nXbKzIi0Jr457xj6eHt9XL9Hm7Xm9Wm4iL6TthqklF0WBOsUcbG69KYrY6xQEJEqJNI1tZoxXmc91YTKRGA-AJo-VlVnC5YzdjX93bfPZI3WuCuSxLNMam56cHFoYA1yYQSpHqW8bohYLt2tDlbZ7B9wdyLit-yHjDmTcSGZw3RwD-qzC_M_zi2IQPIwCHGp-BWwd-YC1xzy06DuXN-HfgG9JfXRp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3081771027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</creator><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><description>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice.
Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments.
Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings.
Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool.
Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-2081</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39013731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Cancer ; Functional decline ; Humans ; Mobility ; Mobility Limitation ; Neoplasms - nursing ; Nursing ; Oncology Nursing - standards ; Outcome assessment ; Physical activity ; Reproducibility of Results ; Wearable activity monitors</subject><ispartof>Seminars in oncology nursing, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39013731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><title>Seminars in oncology nursing</title><addtitle>Semin Oncol Nurs</addtitle><description>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice.
Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments.
Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings.
Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool.
Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Functional decline</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Mobility Limitation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - nursing</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oncology Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Outcome assessment</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Wearable activity monitors</subject><issn>0749-2081</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwC5CgRy4pXtux4wOHquJRqYgLnK3E2Uiu8ijZBKn_npQUjlx29zCzo_kYuwa-AA76frugpvb1QnChFhCD1vyETSExSSSVsqdsyo2ykeAJTNgF0ZZzYTW352wiLQdpJEzZ7WuThTJ0-_mSCIkqrLv5uqau7Q8nXbKzIi0Jr457xj6eHt9XL9Hm7Xm9Wm4iL6TthqklF0WBOsUcbG69KYrY6xQEJEqJNI1tZoxXmc91YTKRGA-AJo-VlVnC5YzdjX93bfPZI3WuCuSxLNMam56cHFoYA1yYQSpHqW8bohYLt2tDlbZ7B9wdyLit-yHjDmTcSGZw3RwD-qzC_M_zi2IQPIwCHGp-BWwd-YC1xzy06DuXN-HfgG9JfXRp</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Fessele, Kristen L.</creator><creator>Syrkin, Grigory</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Mobility Assessment Instruments</title><author>Fessele, Kristen L. ; Syrkin, Grigory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-c26302ffe6aed19d9c7ff5c6a1218442aa59b77c4bcd6f7b287c11e7d5493b803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Functional decline</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Mobility Limitation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - nursing</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oncology Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Outcome assessment</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Wearable activity monitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fessele, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syrkin, Grigory</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in oncology nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fessele, Kristen L.</au><au>Syrkin, Grigory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mobility Assessment Instruments</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in oncology nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Oncol Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>151660</spage><pages>151660-</pages><artnum>151660</artnum><issn>0749-2081</issn><issn>1878-3449</issn><eissn>1878-3449</eissn><abstract>Review commonly used mobility assessment instruments and discuss their use in multidisciplinary research and clinical practice.
Data sources include peer-reviewed articles sourced in electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL), government websites, national, and international best practice guidelines to describe frequently used mobility assessment instruments.
Numerous clinician-, observer-, patient-reported, and performance outcome instruments and evidence-based implementation program resources exist, though these vary in their intended purpose and setting. Wearable and ambient sensors provide new opportunities to collect passive, objective physical activity data and observe changes in mobility across settings.
Selection among multiple assessment tools requires consideration of the available evidence for use in the desired population, the outcomes of interest, whether use is feasible for the setting, and the strength of validity and reliability data for the tool.
Nurses, especially in the inpatient setting, are typically in most frequent contact with patients and are well-positioned to assess mobility and ensure that safe, progressive mobility care plans are in place. Development of an organization-wide mobility culture requires a systematic, multidisciplinary approach and long-term commitment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39013731</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-6841</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-2081 |
ispartof | Seminars in oncology nursing, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.151660, Article 151660 |
issn | 0749-2081 1878-3449 1878-3449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3081771027 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living Cancer Functional decline Humans Mobility Mobility Limitation Neoplasms - nursing Nursing Oncology Nursing - standards Outcome assessment Physical activity Reproducibility of Results Wearable activity monitors |
title | Mobility Assessment Instruments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A15%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobility%20Assessment%20Instruments&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20oncology%20nursing&rft.au=Fessele,%20Kristen%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=151660&rft.pages=151660-&rft.artnum=151660&rft.issn=0749-2081&rft.eissn=1878-3449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3081771027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3081771027&rft_id=info:pmid/39013731&rft_els_id=S0749208124001098&rfr_iscdi=true |