A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups

Aims Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex). Methods A cross‐sectional...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 2024-10, Vol.41 (10), p.e15404-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Woolley, Angharad, Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle, Bodicoat, Danielle H., Khunti, Kamlesh, Davies, Melanie J., Seidu, Samuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page e15404
container_title Diabetic medicine
container_volume 41
creator Woolley, Angharad
Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle
Bodicoat, Danielle H.
Khunti, Kamlesh
Davies, Melanie J.
Seidu, Samuel
description Aims Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex). Methods A cross‐sectional questionnaire was deployed across five counties in the East Midlands, UK between 2017 and 2022 to adults with CMD (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease). Respondent demographic data were collected alongside health education preferences. Statistical analyses ascertained whether demographic characteristics influenced preferences. The distribution of preferences over time was charted to identify trends. Results A total of 4301 eligible responses were collected. Face‐to‐face one‐to‐one education was preferred (first choice for 75.1% of participants) but popularity waned over the five‐year period. Trends were similar amongst demographic groups. Online education showed a U‐shaped trend: In 2017, 44% of respondents ranked it as acceptable, peaking at 53% in 2019, but declining again, to below base line, 43%, by 2022. This modality was more popular with participants aged younger than 65 years, but popularity in people older than 65 years increased over the study period. The popularity of printed information also declined over time across all demographic groups except those of South Asian ethnicity, for whom it remained static. Conclusions The overwhelming preference for face‐to‐face one‐to‐one health education from a doctor or nurse highlights the importance of preserving access to this modality, even in the face of current NHS pressures and trends towards digitalisation. Trends are changing, and should continue to be monitored, including between different sociodemographic groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dme.15404
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079174758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3117612101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2784-963718c8d031f424523739e00a9b75bce9599b3dafab81ff91e22eaa567329f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqAy0i74AstRNWQR8bSeOl2jKTyUQG7qOHOeaMUrGwU6E2PUR-ow8ST0ztAskvPHmO590zyHkK7ATyO-0G_AESsnkB7IAWcmilBo-kgVTkheCKdgnByk9MAZcC_2J7Itaa6l5tSDzGbUxpPTy-09CO_mwNj2d_IA0YfSYaHDUmtj5MOBk2tB7S1do-mlFsZut2SSoC3EwEx0jOoy4tjlmtlaagvWhwyHcRzOucvY-hnlMn8meM33CL6__Ifl1cX63vCquby9_Ls-uC8tVLQtdCQW1rTsmwEkuSy6U0MiY0a0qW4u61LoVnXGmrcE5Dcg5GlNWSnDtQByS7zvvGMPjjGlqBp8s9r1ZY5hTk7vRoKQq64x-e4M-hDnmNjIFoCrgwDbC4x21PS_f24zRDyY-N8CazRZN3qLZbpHZo1fj3A7Y_Sf_lZ-B0x3w5Ht8ft_U_Lg53yn_AnMblTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117612101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Woolley, Angharad ; Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle ; Bodicoat, Danielle H. ; Khunti, Kamlesh ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Seidu, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Angharad ; Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle ; Bodicoat, Danielle H. ; Khunti, Kamlesh ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Seidu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex). Methods A cross‐sectional questionnaire was deployed across five counties in the East Midlands, UK between 2017 and 2022 to adults with CMD (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease). Respondent demographic data were collected alongside health education preferences. Statistical analyses ascertained whether demographic characteristics influenced preferences. The distribution of preferences over time was charted to identify trends. Results A total of 4301 eligible responses were collected. Face‐to‐face one‐to‐one education was preferred (first choice for 75.1% of participants) but popularity waned over the five‐year period. Trends were similar amongst demographic groups. Online education showed a U‐shaped trend: In 2017, 44% of respondents ranked it as acceptable, peaking at 53% in 2019, but declining again, to below base line, 43%, by 2022. This modality was more popular with participants aged younger than 65 years, but popularity in people older than 65 years increased over the study period. The popularity of printed information also declined over time across all demographic groups except those of South Asian ethnicity, for whom it remained static. Conclusions The overwhelming preference for face‐to‐face one‐to‐one health education from a doctor or nurse highlights the importance of preserving access to this modality, even in the face of current NHS pressures and trends towards digitalisation. Trends are changing, and should continue to be monitored, including between different sociodemographic groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dme.15404</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38994926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular diseases ; Cerebrovascular diseases ; Demography ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Ethnicity ; Health education ; lifestyle ; metabolic diseases ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; patient education as topic ; self‐management ; Sociodemographics ; socioeconomic factors ; Statistical analysis ; Trends ; type 2 diabetes mellitus</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 2024-10, Vol.41 (10), p.e15404-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2784-963718c8d031f424523739e00a9b75bce9599b3dafab81ff91e22eaa567329f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9987-9371 ; 0000-0003-2343-7099 ; 0000-0003-3122-8713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdme.15404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdme.15404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38994926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Angharad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodicoat, Danielle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khunti, Kamlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><description>Aims Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex). Methods A cross‐sectional questionnaire was deployed across five counties in the East Midlands, UK between 2017 and 2022 to adults with CMD (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease). Respondent demographic data were collected alongside health education preferences. Statistical analyses ascertained whether demographic characteristics influenced preferences. The distribution of preferences over time was charted to identify trends. Results A total of 4301 eligible responses were collected. Face‐to‐face one‐to‐one education was preferred (first choice for 75.1% of participants) but popularity waned over the five‐year period. Trends were similar amongst demographic groups. Online education showed a U‐shaped trend: In 2017, 44% of respondents ranked it as acceptable, peaking at 53% in 2019, but declining again, to below base line, 43%, by 2022. This modality was more popular with participants aged younger than 65 years, but popularity in people older than 65 years increased over the study period. The popularity of printed information also declined over time across all demographic groups except those of South Asian ethnicity, for whom it remained static. Conclusions The overwhelming preference for face‐to‐face one‐to‐one health education from a doctor or nurse highlights the importance of preserving access to this modality, even in the face of current NHS pressures and trends towards digitalisation. Trends are changing, and should continue to be monitored, including between different sociodemographic groups.</description><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular diseases</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>lifestyle</subject><subject>metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>patient education as topic</subject><subject>self‐management</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>type 2 diabetes mellitus</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqAy0i74AstRNWQR8bSeOl2jKTyUQG7qOHOeaMUrGwU6E2PUR-ow8ST0ztAskvPHmO590zyHkK7ATyO-0G_AESsnkB7IAWcmilBo-kgVTkheCKdgnByk9MAZcC_2J7Itaa6l5tSDzGbUxpPTy-09CO_mwNj2d_IA0YfSYaHDUmtj5MOBk2tB7S1do-mlFsZut2SSoC3EwEx0jOoy4tjlmtlaagvWhwyHcRzOucvY-hnlMn8meM33CL6__Ifl1cX63vCquby9_Ls-uC8tVLQtdCQW1rTsmwEkuSy6U0MiY0a0qW4u61LoVnXGmrcE5Dcg5GlNWSnDtQByS7zvvGMPjjGlqBp8s9r1ZY5hTk7vRoKQq64x-e4M-hDnmNjIFoCrgwDbC4x21PS_f24zRDyY-N8CazRZN3qLZbpHZo1fj3A7Y_Sf_lZ-B0x3w5Ht8ft_U_Lg53yn_AnMblTI</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Woolley, Angharad</creator><creator>Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle</creator><creator>Bodicoat, Danielle H.</creator><creator>Khunti, Kamlesh</creator><creator>Davies, Melanie J.</creator><creator>Seidu, Samuel</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-9371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-7099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-8713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups</title><author>Woolley, Angharad ; Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle ; Bodicoat, Danielle H. ; Khunti, Kamlesh ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Seidu, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2784-963718c8d031f424523739e00a9b75bce9599b3dafab81ff91e22eaa567329f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular diseases</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>lifestyle</topic><topic>metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>patient education as topic</topic><topic>self‐management</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>type 2 diabetes mellitus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Angharad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodicoat, Danielle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khunti, Kamlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woolley, Angharad</au><au>Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle</au><au>Bodicoat, Danielle H.</au><au>Khunti, Kamlesh</au><au>Davies, Melanie J.</au><au>Seidu, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e15404</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e15404-n/a</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><abstract>Aims Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex). Methods A cross‐sectional questionnaire was deployed across five counties in the East Midlands, UK between 2017 and 2022 to adults with CMD (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease). Respondent demographic data were collected alongside health education preferences. Statistical analyses ascertained whether demographic characteristics influenced preferences. The distribution of preferences over time was charted to identify trends. Results A total of 4301 eligible responses were collected. Face‐to‐face one‐to‐one education was preferred (first choice for 75.1% of participants) but popularity waned over the five‐year period. Trends were similar amongst demographic groups. Online education showed a U‐shaped trend: In 2017, 44% of respondents ranked it as acceptable, peaking at 53% in 2019, but declining again, to below base line, 43%, by 2022. This modality was more popular with participants aged younger than 65 years, but popularity in people older than 65 years increased over the study period. The popularity of printed information also declined over time across all demographic groups except those of South Asian ethnicity, for whom it remained static. Conclusions The overwhelming preference for face‐to‐face one‐to‐one health education from a doctor or nurse highlights the importance of preserving access to this modality, even in the face of current NHS pressures and trends towards digitalisation. Trends are changing, and should continue to be monitored, including between different sociodemographic groups.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38994926</pmid><doi>10.1111/dme.15404</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-9371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-7099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-8713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3071
ispartof Diabetic medicine, 2024-10, Vol.41 (10), p.e15404-n/a
issn 0742-3071
1464-5491
1464-5491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079174758
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cardiovascular diseases
Cerebrovascular diseases
Demography
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Ethnicity
Health education
lifestyle
metabolic diseases
Minority & ethnic groups
patient education as topic
self‐management
Sociodemographics
socioeconomic factors
Statistical analysis
Trends
type 2 diabetes mellitus
title A cross‐sectional time series of cardiometabolic health education format preferences across sociodemographic groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A07%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20time%20series%20of%20cardiometabolic%20health%20education%20format%20preferences%20across%20sociodemographic%20groups&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Woolley,%20Angharad&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e15404&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e15404-n/a&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dme.15404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3117612101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117612101&rft_id=info:pmid/38994926&rfr_iscdi=true