Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 2024-10, Vol.37 (11), p.868-875
Hauptverfasser: Hansell, Laurel D, Hsu, Clarissa W, Munson, Sean A, Margolis, Karen L, Thompson, Matthew J, Ehrlich, Kelly J, Hall, Yoshio N, Anderson, Melissa L, Evers, Sarah C, Marcus-Smith, Miriam S, McClure, Jennifer B, Green, Beverly B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 875
container_issue 11
container_start_page 868
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 37
creator Hansell, Laurel D
Hsu, Clarissa W
Munson, Sean A
Margolis, Karen L
Thompson, Matthew J
Ehrlich, Kelly J
Hall, Yoshio N
Anderson, Melissa L
Evers, Sarah C
Marcus-Smith, Miriam S
McClure, Jennifer B
Green, Beverly B
description Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods. Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study. Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension. Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care. Trial number NCT03130257.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajh/hpae088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079174532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079174532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-2021b9882a0370a58132e6a3d9fa07742de06c340b99df0174cb48d38d4c1b843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFP2zAYxa1p0-hgp92Rj5NQxuc4iW1uUFo6DbQimHaMnPgLMUriYjsTvfOHk4qy03uH33uHHyHfGPxgoPipfmxP241GkPIDmTGVsUSkaf6RzECqPBFQsAPyJYRHAMiKgn0mB1wqlU_kjLysdbQ4RLp43qCfWo2B_rWxpRedc4auPYYweqQ3qHfZ79gbjK0zgTbO09V22kUcgnUDvbT6YXDBhjN6O-rOxun8H9KlHYwdHgJdetfT2CK9WCfz1WL-i97F0WyPyKdGdwG_7vOQ_Fku7uer5Pr31c_5-XVSMyFikkLKKiVlqoEL0LlkPMVCc6MaDUJkqUEoap5BpZRpgImsrjJpuDRZzSqZ8UPy_e13493TiCGWvQ01dp0e0I2h5CDUtMp5OqEnb2jtXQgem3Ljba_9tmRQ7rSXk_Zyr32ij_fHY9Wj-c--e-avxBl_xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079174532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Hansell, Laurel D ; Hsu, Clarissa W ; Munson, Sean A ; Margolis, Karen L ; Thompson, Matthew J ; Ehrlich, Kelly J ; Hall, Yoshio N ; Anderson, Melissa L ; Evers, Sarah C ; Marcus-Smith, Miriam S ; McClure, Jennifer B ; Green, Beverly B</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansell, Laurel D ; Hsu, Clarissa W ; Munson, Sean A ; Margolis, Karen L ; Thompson, Matthew J ; Ehrlich, Kelly J ; Hall, Yoshio N ; Anderson, Melissa L ; Evers, Sarah C ; Marcus-Smith, Miriam S ; McClure, Jennifer B ; Green, Beverly B</creatorcontrib><description>Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods. Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study. Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension. Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care. Trial number NCT03130257.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpae088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38995194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Blood Pressure ; Blood Pressure Determination - methods ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Hypertension - diagnosis ; Hypertension - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Qualitative Research ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2024-10, Vol.37 (11), p.868-875</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-2021b9882a0370a58132e6a3d9fa07742de06c340b99df0174cb48d38d4c1b843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4847-5596 ; 0000-0002-0472-6138 ; 0000-0001-7096-3791 ; 0000-0002-2094-9147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38995194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansell, Laurel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Clarissa W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Kelly J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Yoshio N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Melissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus-Smith, Miriam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Beverly B</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>Am J Hypertens</addtitle><description>Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods. Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study. Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension. Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care. Trial number NCT03130257.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFP2zAYxa1p0-hgp92Rj5NQxuc4iW1uUFo6DbQimHaMnPgLMUriYjsTvfOHk4qy03uH33uHHyHfGPxgoPipfmxP241GkPIDmTGVsUSkaf6RzECqPBFQsAPyJYRHAMiKgn0mB1wqlU_kjLysdbQ4RLp43qCfWo2B_rWxpRedc4auPYYweqQ3qHfZ79gbjK0zgTbO09V22kUcgnUDvbT6YXDBhjN6O-rOxun8H9KlHYwdHgJdetfT2CK9WCfz1WL-i97F0WyPyKdGdwG_7vOQ_Fku7uer5Pr31c_5-XVSMyFikkLKKiVlqoEL0LlkPMVCc6MaDUJkqUEoap5BpZRpgImsrjJpuDRZzSqZ8UPy_e13493TiCGWvQ01dp0e0I2h5CDUtMp5OqEnb2jtXQgem3Ljba_9tmRQ7rSXk_Zyr32ij_fHY9Wj-c--e-avxBl_xw</recordid><startdate>20241014</startdate><enddate>20241014</enddate><creator>Hansell, Laurel D</creator><creator>Hsu, Clarissa W</creator><creator>Munson, Sean A</creator><creator>Margolis, Karen L</creator><creator>Thompson, Matthew J</creator><creator>Ehrlich, Kelly J</creator><creator>Hall, Yoshio N</creator><creator>Anderson, Melissa L</creator><creator>Evers, Sarah C</creator><creator>Marcus-Smith, Miriam S</creator><creator>McClure, Jennifer B</creator><creator>Green, Beverly B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-5596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-6138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-3791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-9147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241014</creationdate><title>Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study</title><author>Hansell, Laurel D ; Hsu, Clarissa W ; Munson, Sean A ; Margolis, Karen L ; Thompson, Matthew J ; Ehrlich, Kelly J ; Hall, Yoshio N ; Anderson, Melissa L ; Evers, Sarah C ; Marcus-Smith, Miriam S ; McClure, Jennifer B ; Green, Beverly B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-2021b9882a0370a58132e6a3d9fa07742de06c340b99df0174cb48d38d4c1b843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansell, Laurel D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Clarissa W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Kelly J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Yoshio N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Melissa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evers, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus-Smith, Miriam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Beverly B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansell, Laurel D</au><au>Hsu, Clarissa W</au><au>Munson, Sean A</au><au>Margolis, Karen L</au><au>Thompson, Matthew J</au><au>Ehrlich, Kelly J</au><au>Hall, Yoshio N</au><au>Anderson, Melissa L</au><au>Evers, Sarah C</au><au>Marcus-Smith, Miriam S</au><au>McClure, Jennifer B</au><au>Green, Beverly B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hypertens</addtitle><date>2024-10-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>868</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>868-875</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><abstract>Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is recommended when making a new hypertension diagnosis. In practice, however, hypertension is primarily diagnosed using clinic BP. The study objective was to understand patient attitudes about accuracy and patient-centeredness regarding hypertension diagnostic methods. Qualitative study within a randomized controlled diagnostic study conducted between May 2017 and March 2019 comparing the accuracy and acceptability of BP measurement methods among patients in an integrated healthcare delivery system. All participants completed 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), plus either clinic BP, home BP monitoring (HBPM), or kiosk BP diagnostic testing. Qualitative interviewees (aged 31-76 years, n = 35) were recruited from the main study. Participants who completed HBPM found it to be comfortable and low burden, and believed it produced accurate results. Participants in the clinic arm described clinic measurements as inconvenient. Participants in the kiosk arm overall did not favor kiosks due to concerns about accuracy and privacy. Participants described ABPM as the most accurate method due to repeated measurements over the 24-hour period in real-world contexts, but many found it uncomfortable and disruptive. Participants also noted methods that involved repeated measures such as HBPM and ABPM particularly influenced their understanding of whether or not they had hypertension. Hypertension diagnostic methods that include more BP measurements help patients gain a deeper understanding of BP variability and the lower reliability of infrequent measurements in the clinic. These findings warrant implementing strategies to enhance out-of-office BP diagnostic testing in primary care. Trial number NCT03130257.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38995194</pmid><doi>10.1093/ajh/hpae088</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-5596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0472-6138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-3791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-9147</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 2024-10, Vol.37 (11), p.868-875
issn 0895-7061
1941-7225
1941-7225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079174532
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Determination - methods
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis
Hypertension - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Qualitative Research
Reproducibility of Results
title Patient Experiences With Blood Pressure Measurement Methods for Hypertension Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings From the BP-CHECK Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A02%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Experiences%20With%20Blood%20Pressure%20Measurement%20Methods%20for%20Hypertension%20Diagnosis:%20Qualitative%20Findings%20From%20the%20BP-CHECK%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Hansell,%20Laurel%20D&rft.date=2024-10-14&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=868&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=868-875&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1941-7225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajh/hpae088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079174532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079174532&rft_id=info:pmid/38995194&rfr_iscdi=true