Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral
Despite their frequency and potential impact on prognosis, cancers diagnosed via self-referral to the emergency department are poorly documented. We conducted a detailed analysis of cancer patients diagnosed following emergency self-referral and compared them with those diagnosed following emergency...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer epidemiology 2024-10, Vol.92, p.102609, Article 102609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102609 |
container_title | Cancer epidemiology |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Bosch, Xavier Montori-Palacin, Elisabet Gomes, Tiago Mota Naval-Álvarez, José Moreno, Pedro López-Soto, Alfonso |
description | Despite their frequency and potential impact on prognosis, cancers diagnosed via self-referral to the emergency department are poorly documented. We conducted a detailed analysis of cancer patients diagnosed following emergency self-referral and compared them with those diagnosed following emergency referral from primary care. Given the challenges associated with measuring intervals in the emergency self-referral pathway, we also aimed to provide a definition of the diagnostic interval for these cancers.
A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with 13 cancers, either following emergency self-referral or emergency referral from primary care. We analysed demographics, tumour stage, clinical data (including 28 presenting symptoms categorised by body systems), and diagnostic intervals by cancer site, then testing for differences between pathways.
Out of 3624 patients, 37 % were diagnosed following emergency self-referral and 63 % via emergency referral from primary care. Emergency self-referrals were associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers manifesting with localising symptoms (e.g., breast and endometrial cancer), whereas the likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers featuring nonspecific symptoms and abdominal pain (e.g., pancreatic and ovarian cancer) was higher among patients referred from primary care. Diagnostic intervals in self-referred patients were half as long as those in patients referred from primary care, with most significant differences for pancreatic cancer (28 [95 % CI −34 to −23] days shorter, respectively).
These findings enrich the best available evidence on cancer diagnosis through emergency self-referral and showed that, compared with the emergency referral pathway from primary care, these patients had a significantly increased likelihood of presenting with symptoms that are strongly predictive of cancer. Since the starting point for the diagnostic interval in these patients is their emergency presentation, comparing it with that of those referred from primary care as an emergency is likely to result in biased data.
•Cancers diagnosed through self-referral to the emergency room are relatively unknown•We assessed diagnoses via emergency self-referral vs. emergency referral from PC•Emergency self-referrals represented 37 % of emergency-diagnosed cancers•Self-referred were more likely than PC referred patients to report alarm symptoms•Oesophageal, breast, endometrial, and kidney |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102609 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079172137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877782124000882</els_id><sourcerecordid>3079172137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-e7ab9e0629202652ef21b83e75c7de49abca26b31223ca1b7d03ba521d97958c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqu_QJCAFy9b89HdbA4epPgFBS8KXiRks7NtSrqpydbSf29qaw8ePGUIz7wz8yB0QcmAElrczAZGt7AYMMKG6YcVRB6gE1oKkYmSvx_ua0Z76DTGGSFFQWl-jHq8lJLysjxBHyNnW2u0w2aqgzYdBBt1Z32LfYMXqYK2i7i2etL6CDVe2W6K02ADATfeOb-y7QTDHMIEWrPGEVyTBWggBO3O0FGjXYTz3dtHbw_3r6OnbPzy-Dy6G2eGFaLLQOhKAimYTLcUOYOG0arkIHIjahhKXRnNiopTxrjRtBI14ZXOGa2lkHlpeB9db3MXwX8uIXZqbqMB55Igv4yKEyGpYJSLhF79QWd-Gdq0neKUDIcpNdnrI76lTPAxpnPUIti5DmtFidrYVzP1Y19t7Kut_dR1ucteVnOo9z2_uhNwuwUgyfiyEFQ0SbCB2gYwnaq9_XfAN3z4lzU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104452178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bosch, Xavier ; Montori-Palacin, Elisabet ; Gomes, Tiago Mota ; Naval-Álvarez, José ; Moreno, Pedro ; López-Soto, Alfonso</creator><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Xavier ; Montori-Palacin, Elisabet ; Gomes, Tiago Mota ; Naval-Álvarez, José ; Moreno, Pedro ; López-Soto, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><description>Despite their frequency and potential impact on prognosis, cancers diagnosed via self-referral to the emergency department are poorly documented. We conducted a detailed analysis of cancer patients diagnosed following emergency self-referral and compared them with those diagnosed following emergency referral from primary care. Given the challenges associated with measuring intervals in the emergency self-referral pathway, we also aimed to provide a definition of the diagnostic interval for these cancers.
A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with 13 cancers, either following emergency self-referral or emergency referral from primary care. We analysed demographics, tumour stage, clinical data (including 28 presenting symptoms categorised by body systems), and diagnostic intervals by cancer site, then testing for differences between pathways.
Out of 3624 patients, 37 % were diagnosed following emergency self-referral and 63 % via emergency referral from primary care. Emergency self-referrals were associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers manifesting with localising symptoms (e.g., breast and endometrial cancer), whereas the likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers featuring nonspecific symptoms and abdominal pain (e.g., pancreatic and ovarian cancer) was higher among patients referred from primary care. Diagnostic intervals in self-referred patients were half as long as those in patients referred from primary care, with most significant differences for pancreatic cancer (28 [95 % CI −34 to −23] days shorter, respectively).
These findings enrich the best available evidence on cancer diagnosis through emergency self-referral and showed that, compared with the emergency referral pathway from primary care, these patients had a significantly increased likelihood of presenting with symptoms that are strongly predictive of cancer. Since the starting point for the diagnostic interval in these patients is their emergency presentation, comparing it with that of those referred from primary care as an emergency is likely to result in biased data.
•Cancers diagnosed through self-referral to the emergency room are relatively unknown•We assessed diagnoses via emergency self-referral vs. emergency referral from PC•Emergency self-referrals represented 37 % of emergency-diagnosed cancers•Self-referred were more likely than PC referred patients to report alarm symptoms•Oesophageal, breast, endometrial, and kidney/bladder cancer were more likely among self-referred patients</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-7821</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1877-783X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-783X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102609</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38991388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer diagnosis ; Diagnostic interval ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency referral from primary care ; Emergency self-referral ; Endometrial cancer ; Help seeking behavior ; Hospitals ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical prognosis ; Medical referrals ; Ovarian cancer ; Pancreatic cancer ; Patients ; Physicians ; Presenting symptoms ; Primary care ; Prostate ; Skin cancer ; Uterine cancer ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, 2024-10, Vol.92, p.102609, Article 102609</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-e7ab9e0629202652ef21b83e75c7de49abca26b31223ca1b7d03ba521d97958c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6398-0673 ; 0000-0001-7822-8556</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782124000882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38991388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montori-Palacin, Elisabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Tiago Mota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naval-Álvarez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Soto, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral</title><title>Cancer epidemiology</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Despite their frequency and potential impact on prognosis, cancers diagnosed via self-referral to the emergency department are poorly documented. We conducted a detailed analysis of cancer patients diagnosed following emergency self-referral and compared them with those diagnosed following emergency referral from primary care. Given the challenges associated with measuring intervals in the emergency self-referral pathway, we also aimed to provide a definition of the diagnostic interval for these cancers.
A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with 13 cancers, either following emergency self-referral or emergency referral from primary care. We analysed demographics, tumour stage, clinical data (including 28 presenting symptoms categorised by body systems), and diagnostic intervals by cancer site, then testing for differences between pathways.
Out of 3624 patients, 37 % were diagnosed following emergency self-referral and 63 % via emergency referral from primary care. Emergency self-referrals were associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers manifesting with localising symptoms (e.g., breast and endometrial cancer), whereas the likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers featuring nonspecific symptoms and abdominal pain (e.g., pancreatic and ovarian cancer) was higher among patients referred from primary care. Diagnostic intervals in self-referred patients were half as long as those in patients referred from primary care, with most significant differences for pancreatic cancer (28 [95 % CI −34 to −23] days shorter, respectively).
These findings enrich the best available evidence on cancer diagnosis through emergency self-referral and showed that, compared with the emergency referral pathway from primary care, these patients had a significantly increased likelihood of presenting with symptoms that are strongly predictive of cancer. Since the starting point for the diagnostic interval in these patients is their emergency presentation, comparing it with that of those referred from primary care as an emergency is likely to result in biased data.
•Cancers diagnosed through self-referral to the emergency room are relatively unknown•We assessed diagnoses via emergency self-referral vs. emergency referral from PC•Emergency self-referrals represented 37 % of emergency-diagnosed cancers•Self-referred were more likely than PC referred patients to report alarm symptoms•Oesophageal, breast, endometrial, and kidney/bladder cancer were more likely among self-referred patients</description><subject>Cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic interval</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency referral from primary care</subject><subject>Emergency self-referral</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Presenting symptoms</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Uterine cancer</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1877-7821</issn><issn>1877-783X</issn><issn>1877-783X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqu_QJCAFy9b89HdbA4epPgFBS8KXiRks7NtSrqpydbSf29qaw8ePGUIz7wz8yB0QcmAElrczAZGt7AYMMKG6YcVRB6gE1oKkYmSvx_ua0Z76DTGGSFFQWl-jHq8lJLysjxBHyNnW2u0w2aqgzYdBBt1Z32LfYMXqYK2i7i2etL6CDVe2W6K02ADATfeOb-y7QTDHMIEWrPGEVyTBWggBO3O0FGjXYTz3dtHbw_3r6OnbPzy-Dy6G2eGFaLLQOhKAimYTLcUOYOG0arkIHIjahhKXRnNiopTxrjRtBI14ZXOGa2lkHlpeB9db3MXwX8uIXZqbqMB55Igv4yKEyGpYJSLhF79QWd-Gdq0neKUDIcpNdnrI76lTPAxpnPUIti5DmtFidrYVzP1Y19t7Kut_dR1ucteVnOo9z2_uhNwuwUgyfiyEFQ0SbCB2gYwnaq9_XfAN3z4lzU</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Bosch, Xavier</creator><creator>Montori-Palacin, Elisabet</creator><creator>Gomes, Tiago Mota</creator><creator>Naval-Álvarez, José</creator><creator>Moreno, Pedro</creator><creator>López-Soto, Alfonso</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-0673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-8556</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral</title><author>Bosch, Xavier ; Montori-Palacin, Elisabet ; Gomes, Tiago Mota ; Naval-Álvarez, José ; Moreno, Pedro ; López-Soto, Alfonso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-e7ab9e0629202652ef21b83e75c7de49abca26b31223ca1b7d03ba521d97958c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic interval</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency referral from primary care</topic><topic>Emergency self-referral</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Presenting symptoms</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Uterine cancer</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montori-Palacin, Elisabet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Tiago Mota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naval-Álvarez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Soto, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bosch, Xavier</au><au>Montori-Palacin, Elisabet</au><au>Gomes, Tiago Mota</au><au>Naval-Álvarez, José</au><au>Moreno, Pedro</au><au>López-Soto, Alfonso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>102609</spage><pages>102609-</pages><artnum>102609</artnum><issn>1877-7821</issn><issn>1877-783X</issn><eissn>1877-783X</eissn><abstract>Despite their frequency and potential impact on prognosis, cancers diagnosed via self-referral to the emergency department are poorly documented. We conducted a detailed analysis of cancer patients diagnosed following emergency self-referral and compared them with those diagnosed following emergency referral from primary care. Given the challenges associated with measuring intervals in the emergency self-referral pathway, we also aimed to provide a definition of the diagnostic interval for these cancers.
A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with 13 cancers, either following emergency self-referral or emergency referral from primary care. We analysed demographics, tumour stage, clinical data (including 28 presenting symptoms categorised by body systems), and diagnostic intervals by cancer site, then testing for differences between pathways.
Out of 3624 patients, 37 % were diagnosed following emergency self-referral and 63 % via emergency referral from primary care. Emergency self-referrals were associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers manifesting with localising symptoms (e.g., breast and endometrial cancer), whereas the likelihood of being diagnosed with cancers featuring nonspecific symptoms and abdominal pain (e.g., pancreatic and ovarian cancer) was higher among patients referred from primary care. Diagnostic intervals in self-referred patients were half as long as those in patients referred from primary care, with most significant differences for pancreatic cancer (28 [95 % CI −34 to −23] days shorter, respectively).
These findings enrich the best available evidence on cancer diagnosis through emergency self-referral and showed that, compared with the emergency referral pathway from primary care, these patients had a significantly increased likelihood of presenting with symptoms that are strongly predictive of cancer. Since the starting point for the diagnostic interval in these patients is their emergency presentation, comparing it with that of those referred from primary care as an emergency is likely to result in biased data.
•Cancers diagnosed through self-referral to the emergency room are relatively unknown•We assessed diagnoses via emergency self-referral vs. emergency referral from PC•Emergency self-referrals represented 37 % of emergency-diagnosed cancers•Self-referred were more likely than PC referred patients to report alarm symptoms•Oesophageal, breast, endometrial, and kidney/bladder cancer were more likely among self-referred patients</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38991388</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canep.2024.102609</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-0673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-8556</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-7821 |
ispartof | Cancer epidemiology, 2024-10, Vol.92, p.102609, Article 102609 |
issn | 1877-7821 1877-783X 1877-783X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3079172137 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Cancer diagnosis Diagnostic interval Emergency medical care Emergency referral from primary care Emergency self-referral Endometrial cancer Help seeking behavior Hospitals Medical diagnosis Medical prognosis Medical referrals Ovarian cancer Pancreatic cancer Patients Physicians Presenting symptoms Primary care Prostate Skin cancer Uterine cancer Variables |
title | Clinical characterisation of patients diagnosed with cancer following emergency self-referral |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20characterisation%20of%20patients%20diagnosed%20with%20cancer%20following%20emergency%20self-referral&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology&rft.au=Bosch,%20Xavier&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=102609&rft.pages=102609-&rft.artnum=102609&rft.issn=1877-7821&rft.eissn=1877-783X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canep.2024.102609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079172137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104452178&rft_id=info:pmid/38991388&rft_els_id=S1877782124000882&rfr_iscdi=true |