Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study

Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nagata, Hiroki, Komatsu, Hiroaki, Yamamoto, Koji, Okawa, Masayo, Hikino, Kohei, Iida, Yuki, Wada, Ikumi, Ikebuchi, Ai, Sawada, Mayumi, Azuma, Yukihiro, Sato, Shinya, Harada, Tasuku, Taniguchi, Fuminori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page e13358
container_title Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
container_volume 17
creator Nagata, Hiroki
Komatsu, Hiroaki
Yamamoto, Koji
Okawa, Masayo
Hikino, Kohei
Iida, Yuki
Wada, Ikumi
Ikebuchi, Ai
Sawada, Mayumi
Azuma, Yukihiro
Sato, Shinya
Harada, Tasuku
Taniguchi, Fuminori
description Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines. Results Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314). Conclusion Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ases.13358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3078714790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCPC6EnTtIm7YfAGggsvuLKkaTpkaJsxp0Vm5yP4jD6JHccLuPBsziH5-DjnJ2SPwTHr60SjxWPGuZBrZMhSIUdCMVj_mSEakC3EGUCSsphvkgGXSiYigiF5mvh6roND31BfUuzC1BldUd-1xtcWl4-Fpg-uMe73FxfY2hrpI9VNQR_dKR1TdM20su-vb8Y2rQ0U265Y7JCNUldod7_6Nrk_P7ubXI6uby6uJuPrkYlkJEecxwlEZWnjVHCbA1NpIRNmcq2iXACXWuo8ZQoSneSFiCMBiUhUoYEZVXDFt8nhyjsP_rmz2Ga1Q2OrSjfWd5hxSGV_e6qgRw_-oDPfhabfrqckyDSWsBQerSgTPGKwZTYPrtZhkTHIlqlny9Szz9R7eP9L2eW1LX7Q75h7gK2AF1fZxT-qbHx7druSfgCjfowU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080874809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><description>Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines. Results Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314). Conclusion Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.13358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38986520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; cost‐effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Laparoscopy ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Retrospective Studies ; robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-9052-1502 ; 0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fases.13358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fases.13358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38986520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Masayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikino, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebuchi, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuma, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines. Results Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314). Conclusion Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>cost‐effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCPC6EnTtIm7YfAGggsvuLKkaTpkaJsxp0Vm5yP4jD6JHccLuPBsziH5-DjnJ2SPwTHr60SjxWPGuZBrZMhSIUdCMVj_mSEakC3EGUCSsphvkgGXSiYigiF5mvh6roND31BfUuzC1BldUd-1xtcWl4-Fpg-uMe73FxfY2hrpI9VNQR_dKR1TdM20su-vb8Y2rQ0U265Y7JCNUldod7_6Nrk_P7ubXI6uby6uJuPrkYlkJEecxwlEZWnjVHCbA1NpIRNmcq2iXACXWuo8ZQoSneSFiCMBiUhUoYEZVXDFt8nhyjsP_rmz2Ga1Q2OrSjfWd5hxSGV_e6qgRw_-oDPfhabfrqckyDSWsBQerSgTPGKwZTYPrtZhkTHIlqlny9Szz9R7eP9L2eW1LX7Q75h7gK2AF1fZxT-qbHx7druSfgCjfowU</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Nagata, Hiroki</creator><creator>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Koji</creator><creator>Okawa, Masayo</creator><creator>Hikino, Kohei</creator><creator>Iida, Yuki</creator><creator>Wada, Ikumi</creator><creator>Ikebuchi, Ai</creator><creator>Sawada, Mayumi</creator><creator>Azuma, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Sato, Shinya</creator><creator>Harada, Tasuku</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9052-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><author>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>cost‐effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Masayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikino, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebuchi, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuma, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagata, Hiroki</au><au>Komatsu, Hiroaki</au><au>Yamamoto, Koji</au><au>Okawa, Masayo</au><au>Hikino, Kohei</au><au>Iida, Yuki</au><au>Wada, Ikumi</au><au>Ikebuchi, Ai</au><au>Sawada, Mayumi</au><au>Azuma, Yukihiro</au><au>Sato, Shinya</au><au>Harada, Tasuku</au><au>Taniguchi, Fuminori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13358</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13358-n/a</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines. Results Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314). Conclusion Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38986520</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.13358</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9052-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5902
ispartof Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a
issn 1758-5902
1758-5910
1758-5910
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714790
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
cost‐effectiveness
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - methods
Laparoscopy
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Retrospective Studies
robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20surgical%20outcomes%20of%20da%20Vinci%20surgical%20systems%20X%20and%20Xi:%20A%20single%E2%80%90center%20study&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Nagata,%20Hiroki&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13358&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13358-n/a&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.13358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3078714790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080874809&rft_id=info:pmid/38986520&rfr_iscdi=true