Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study
Background The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems. Methods Data from 172 patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e13358 |
container_title | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Nagata, Hiroki Komatsu, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Koji Okawa, Masayo Hikino, Kohei Iida, Yuki Wada, Ikumi Ikebuchi, Ai Sawada, Mayumi Azuma, Yukihiro Sato, Shinya Harada, Tasuku Taniguchi, Fuminori |
description | Background
The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems.
Methods
Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
Results
Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314).
Conclusion
Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ases.13358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3078714790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCPC6EnTtIm7YfAGggsvuLKkaTpkaJsxp0Vm5yP4jD6JHccLuPBsziH5-DjnJ2SPwTHr60SjxWPGuZBrZMhSIUdCMVj_mSEakC3EGUCSsphvkgGXSiYigiF5mvh6roND31BfUuzC1BldUd-1xtcWl4-Fpg-uMe73FxfY2hrpI9VNQR_dKR1TdM20su-vb8Y2rQ0U265Y7JCNUldod7_6Nrk_P7ubXI6uby6uJuPrkYlkJEecxwlEZWnjVHCbA1NpIRNmcq2iXACXWuo8ZQoSneSFiCMBiUhUoYEZVXDFt8nhyjsP_rmz2Ga1Q2OrSjfWd5hxSGV_e6qgRw_-oDPfhabfrqckyDSWsBQerSgTPGKwZTYPrtZhkTHIlqlny9Szz9R7eP9L2eW1LX7Q75h7gK2AF1fZxT-qbHx7druSfgCjfowU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080874809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems.
Methods
Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
Results
Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314).
Conclusion
Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.13358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38986520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; cost‐effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Laparoscopy ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Retrospective Studies ; robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-9052-1502 ; 0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fases.13358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fases.13358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38986520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Masayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikino, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebuchi, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuma, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Background
The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems.
Methods
Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
Results
Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314).
Conclusion
Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>cost‐effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCPC6EnTtIm7YfAGggsvuLKkaTpkaJsxp0Vm5yP4jD6JHccLuPBsziH5-DjnJ2SPwTHr60SjxWPGuZBrZMhSIUdCMVj_mSEakC3EGUCSsphvkgGXSiYigiF5mvh6roND31BfUuzC1BldUd-1xtcWl4-Fpg-uMe73FxfY2hrpI9VNQR_dKR1TdM20su-vb8Y2rQ0U265Y7JCNUldod7_6Nrk_P7ubXI6uby6uJuPrkYlkJEecxwlEZWnjVHCbA1NpIRNmcq2iXACXWuo8ZQoSneSFiCMBiUhUoYEZVXDFt8nhyjsP_rmz2Ga1Q2OrSjfWd5hxSGV_e6qgRw_-oDPfhabfrqckyDSWsBQerSgTPGKwZTYPrtZhkTHIlqlny9Szz9R7eP9L2eW1LX7Q75h7gK2AF1fZxT-qbHx7druSfgCjfowU</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Nagata, Hiroki</creator><creator>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Koji</creator><creator>Okawa, Masayo</creator><creator>Hikino, Kohei</creator><creator>Iida, Yuki</creator><creator>Wada, Ikumi</creator><creator>Ikebuchi, Ai</creator><creator>Sawada, Mayumi</creator><creator>Azuma, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Sato, Shinya</creator><creator>Harada, Tasuku</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9052-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</title><author>Nagata, Hiroki ; Komatsu, Hiroaki ; Yamamoto, Koji ; Okawa, Masayo ; Hikino, Kohei ; Iida, Yuki ; Wada, Ikumi ; Ikebuchi, Ai ; Sawada, Mayumi ; Azuma, Yukihiro ; Sato, Shinya ; Harada, Tasuku ; Taniguchi, Fuminori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2828-334602ffe4753eb0197d861cba92b5038a8ab71906a6bd542506569da01c9d393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>cost‐effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Masayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hikino, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikebuchi, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawada, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuma, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagata, Hiroki</au><au>Komatsu, Hiroaki</au><au>Yamamoto, Koji</au><au>Okawa, Masayo</au><au>Hikino, Kohei</au><au>Iida, Yuki</au><au>Wada, Ikumi</au><au>Ikebuchi, Ai</au><au>Sawada, Mayumi</au><au>Azuma, Yukihiro</au><au>Sato, Shinya</au><au>Harada, Tasuku</au><au>Taniguchi, Fuminori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e13358</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13358-n/a</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Background
The da Vinci surgical systems (X and Xi) are fourth‐generation systems marketed by Intuitive Inc. The X system is less expensive than the Xi system. This study compared the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy using the X and Xi systems.
Methods
Data from 172 patients who underwent robot‐assisted total hysterectomies by four surgeons between April 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in a single‐center study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical system used. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Tottori University Hospital (22A134). All patients provided opt‐out consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines.
Results
Operative time (126.6 ± 29.5 for X, 138.2 ± 38.5 for Xi, p = .227) and console time (92.9 ± 27.0 for X, 105.5 ± 34.7 for Xi, p = .089) were insignificantly shorter in group X than in group Xi after propensity score matching for age, body mass index, nulliparity, previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach. No significant differences between X and Xi were observed in a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent robot‐assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (operative time: 199.0 ± 26.5 for X, 221.5 ± 45.1 for Xi, p = .227; console time: 162.1 ± 25.0 for X, 178.3 ± 0.314 for Xi, p = .314).
Conclusion
Perioperative outcomes for the X and Xi da Vinci surgical systems were equivalent. The cost‐effective X system may allow the widespread use of robotic surgeries.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38986520</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.13358</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9052-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-5902 |
ispartof | Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.17 (3), p.e13358-n/a |
issn | 1758-5902 1758-5910 1758-5910 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714790 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged cost‐effectiveness Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy - methods Laparoscopy Middle Aged Operative Time Retrospective Studies robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgical outcomes Treatment Outcome |
title | Comparison of surgical outcomes of da Vinci surgical systems X and Xi: A single‐center study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20surgical%20outcomes%20of%20da%20Vinci%20surgical%20systems%20X%20and%20Xi:%20A%20single%E2%80%90center%20study&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Nagata,%20Hiroki&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e13358&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13358-n/a&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.13358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3078714790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080874809&rft_id=info:pmid/38986520&rfr_iscdi=true |