The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement

Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2024-11, Vol.110 (7), p.103931, Article 103931
Hauptverfasser: Wiklund, Marianne, Gras, Arthur, Hanouz, Jean-Luc, Dunet, Julien, Rochcongar, Goulven, Hulet, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 103931
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 110
creator Wiklund, Marianne
Gras, Arthur
Hanouz, Jean-Luc
Dunet, Julien
Rochcongar, Goulven
Hulet, Christophe
description Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However, the threshold of satisfaction (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) has not yet been defined in a French population after this type of arthroplasty. This led us to carry out a retrospective study on a population of patients who received a femoral reconstruction megaprosthesis in order to 1) define the PASS for the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), 2) study the complications. The PASS threshold for proximal femur and distal femur reconstruction prothesis for the HHS and the KSS, respectively, will be lower than the threshold for these same scores for primary arthroplasty. Forty-four patients who were operated on between 2009 and 2020 were included: 23 received a proximal femur prosthesis and 21 received a distal femur prosthesis. The PASS threshold was defined using an anchoring strategy by analyzing ROC curves for the HSS for the proximal femur, KSS for the distal femur and the MSTS for all the prostheses. Complications were classified according to Henderson. The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.6 (1–12.5) years. The PASS threshold was 47.5 (area under curve (AUC) 0.71 (0.45–0.97)) for the HHS, 69.5 (AUC 0.97 (0.92–1.0)) for the KSS knee and 62.5 (AUC 0.81 (0.61–0.99)) for the KSS function. Thirteen patients (29%) had complications, nine of whom required another surgery (20%). The most frequent were Henderson type 1 (soft tissue lesions, n = 5/44 [11%]) and type 2 (loosening, n = 5/44 [11%]) There was no relationship between satisfaction and postoperative complications (p = 0.071). Most of the patients who undergo femoral resection and reconstruction (59%) are satisfied with their function, albeit reduced, despite a high complication rate (29%). Our hypothesis is confirmed for the PASS threshold for the HHS (47.5 versus 93) and the KSS knee and function (69.5 and 62.5 versus 85.5 and 72.5). IV; retrospective observational single-center study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103931
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056824001865</els_id><sourcerecordid>3078714637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-423e980fe09b0269ab10f74f0e3a1bc4476587653692724be81bc93c03ce0db83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfJsR625mObZMFLKX6BYGHrwVPIZmdxy253TVKx_96UVvHkYZjh5Z2XmQehS0omlFBxs5p0wbsJIyyNAs84PUJDqqRMyFSo4z_zAJ15vyJECMrZKRpwlSlJOB-it-U74IUJNawDnlkLfTBFAzjftn3oWpwHEwCPF7M8v8amCuBw77qvujUNNusSl7UPcayg7VzsDvrGWGhj2jk6qUzj4eLQR-j1_m45f0yeXx6e5rPnxDIuQ5IyDpkiFZCsIExkpqCkkmlFgBta2DSVYqpicZExydICVFQzbgm3QMpC8REa73PjXR8b8EG3tbfQNGYN3cZrTqSSNBVcRivbW63rvHdQ6d7FT9xWU6J3SPVK75DqHVK9RxqXrg75m6KF8nflh2E03O4NEL_8rMFpbyNOC2XtwAZddvV_-d-iNYbC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3078714637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wiklund, Marianne ; Gras, Arthur ; Hanouz, Jean-Luc ; Dunet, Julien ; Rochcongar, Goulven ; Hulet, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Marianne ; Gras, Arthur ; Hanouz, Jean-Luc ; Dunet, Julien ; Rochcongar, Goulven ; Hulet, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However, the threshold of satisfaction (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) has not yet been defined in a French population after this type of arthroplasty. This led us to carry out a retrospective study on a population of patients who received a femoral reconstruction megaprosthesis in order to 1) define the PASS for the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), 2) study the complications. The PASS threshold for proximal femur and distal femur reconstruction prothesis for the HHS and the KSS, respectively, will be lower than the threshold for these same scores for primary arthroplasty. Forty-four patients who were operated on between 2009 and 2020 were included: 23 received a proximal femur prosthesis and 21 received a distal femur prosthesis. The PASS threshold was defined using an anchoring strategy by analyzing ROC curves for the HSS for the proximal femur, KSS for the distal femur and the MSTS for all the prostheses. Complications were classified according to Henderson. The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.6 (1–12.5) years. The PASS threshold was 47.5 (area under curve (AUC) 0.71 (0.45–0.97)) for the HHS, 69.5 (AUC 0.97 (0.92–1.0)) for the KSS knee and 62.5 (AUC 0.81 (0.61–0.99)) for the KSS function. Thirteen patients (29%) had complications, nine of whom required another surgery (20%). The most frequent were Henderson type 1 (soft tissue lesions, n = 5/44 [11%]) and type 2 (loosening, n = 5/44 [11%]) There was no relationship between satisfaction and postoperative complications (p = 0.071). Most of the patients who undergo femoral resection and reconstruction (59%) are satisfied with their function, albeit reduced, despite a high complication rate (29%). Our hypothesis is confirmed for the PASS threshold for the HHS (47.5 versus 93) and the KSS knee and function (69.5 and 62.5 versus 85.5 and 72.5). IV; retrospective observational single-center study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103931</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38987033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Distal femur ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PASS ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications ; Proximal femur ; Reconstruction prothesis ; Retrospective Studies ; Satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2024-11, Vol.110 (7), p.103931, Article 103931</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-423e980fe09b0269ab10f74f0e3a1bc4476587653692724be81bc93c03ce0db83</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-1123-9382 ; 0000-0003-1845-8610 ; 0000-0002-9019-0033 ; 0000-0002-1011-6141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103931$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38987033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gras, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanouz, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochcongar, Goulven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulet, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However, the threshold of satisfaction (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) has not yet been defined in a French population after this type of arthroplasty. This led us to carry out a retrospective study on a population of patients who received a femoral reconstruction megaprosthesis in order to 1) define the PASS for the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), 2) study the complications. The PASS threshold for proximal femur and distal femur reconstruction prothesis for the HHS and the KSS, respectively, will be lower than the threshold for these same scores for primary arthroplasty. Forty-four patients who were operated on between 2009 and 2020 were included: 23 received a proximal femur prosthesis and 21 received a distal femur prosthesis. The PASS threshold was defined using an anchoring strategy by analyzing ROC curves for the HSS for the proximal femur, KSS for the distal femur and the MSTS for all the prostheses. Complications were classified according to Henderson. The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.6 (1–12.5) years. The PASS threshold was 47.5 (area under curve (AUC) 0.71 (0.45–0.97)) for the HHS, 69.5 (AUC 0.97 (0.92–1.0)) for the KSS knee and 62.5 (AUC 0.81 (0.61–0.99)) for the KSS function. Thirteen patients (29%) had complications, nine of whom required another surgery (20%). The most frequent were Henderson type 1 (soft tissue lesions, n = 5/44 [11%]) and type 2 (loosening, n = 5/44 [11%]) There was no relationship between satisfaction and postoperative complications (p = 0.071). Most of the patients who undergo femoral resection and reconstruction (59%) are satisfied with their function, albeit reduced, despite a high complication rate (29%). Our hypothesis is confirmed for the PASS threshold for the HHS (47.5 versus 93) and the KSS knee and function (69.5 and 62.5 versus 85.5 and 72.5). IV; retrospective observational single-center study.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Distal femur</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PASS</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Proximal femur</subject><subject>Reconstruction prothesis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfJsR625mObZMFLKX6BYGHrwVPIZmdxy253TVKx_96UVvHkYZjh5Z2XmQehS0omlFBxs5p0wbsJIyyNAs84PUJDqqRMyFSo4z_zAJ15vyJECMrZKRpwlSlJOB-it-U74IUJNawDnlkLfTBFAzjftn3oWpwHEwCPF7M8v8amCuBw77qvujUNNusSl7UPcayg7VzsDvrGWGhj2jk6qUzj4eLQR-j1_m45f0yeXx6e5rPnxDIuQ5IyDpkiFZCsIExkpqCkkmlFgBta2DSVYqpicZExydICVFQzbgm3QMpC8REa73PjXR8b8EG3tbfQNGYN3cZrTqSSNBVcRivbW63rvHdQ6d7FT9xWU6J3SPVK75DqHVK9RxqXrg75m6KF8nflh2E03O4NEL_8rMFpbyNOC2XtwAZddvV_-d-iNYbC</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Wiklund, Marianne</creator><creator>Gras, Arthur</creator><creator>Hanouz, Jean-Luc</creator><creator>Dunet, Julien</creator><creator>Rochcongar, Goulven</creator><creator>Hulet, Christophe</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1123-9382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-8610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-0033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-6141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement</title><author>Wiklund, Marianne ; Gras, Arthur ; Hanouz, Jean-Luc ; Dunet, Julien ; Rochcongar, Goulven ; Hulet, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-423e980fe09b0269ab10f74f0e3a1bc4476587653692724be81bc93c03ce0db83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Distal femur</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PASS</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Proximal femur</topic><topic>Reconstruction prothesis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiklund, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gras, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanouz, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochcongar, Goulven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulet, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiklund, Marianne</au><au>Gras, Arthur</au><au>Hanouz, Jean-Luc</au><au>Dunet, Julien</au><au>Rochcongar, Goulven</au><au>Hulet, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>103931</spage><pages>103931-</pages><artnum>103931</artnum><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However, the threshold of satisfaction (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) has not yet been defined in a French population after this type of arthroplasty. This led us to carry out a retrospective study on a population of patients who received a femoral reconstruction megaprosthesis in order to 1) define the PASS for the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS), 2) study the complications. The PASS threshold for proximal femur and distal femur reconstruction prothesis for the HHS and the KSS, respectively, will be lower than the threshold for these same scores for primary arthroplasty. Forty-four patients who were operated on between 2009 and 2020 were included: 23 received a proximal femur prosthesis and 21 received a distal femur prosthesis. The PASS threshold was defined using an anchoring strategy by analyzing ROC curves for the HSS for the proximal femur, KSS for the distal femur and the MSTS for all the prostheses. Complications were classified according to Henderson. The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.6 (1–12.5) years. The PASS threshold was 47.5 (area under curve (AUC) 0.71 (0.45–0.97)) for the HHS, 69.5 (AUC 0.97 (0.92–1.0)) for the KSS knee and 62.5 (AUC 0.81 (0.61–0.99)) for the KSS function. Thirteen patients (29%) had complications, nine of whom required another surgery (20%). The most frequent were Henderson type 1 (soft tissue lesions, n = 5/44 [11%]) and type 2 (loosening, n = 5/44 [11%]) There was no relationship between satisfaction and postoperative complications (p = 0.071). Most of the patients who undergo femoral resection and reconstruction (59%) are satisfied with their function, albeit reduced, despite a high complication rate (29%). Our hypothesis is confirmed for the PASS threshold for the HHS (47.5 versus 93) and the KSS knee and function (69.5 and 62.5 versus 85.5 and 72.5). IV; retrospective observational single-center study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>38987033</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103931</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1123-9382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-8610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-0033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-6141</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-11, Vol.110 (7), p.103931, Article 103931
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3078714637
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Distal femur
Female
Femur - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
PASS
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Complications
Proximal femur
Reconstruction prothesis
Retrospective Studies
Satisfaction
title The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A20%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Patient%20Acceptable%20Symptom%20State%20(PASS)%20after%20proximal%20and%20distal%20femoral%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Wiklund,%20Marianne&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=103931&rft.pages=103931-&rft.artnum=103931&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3078714637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3078714637&rft_id=info:pmid/38987033&rft_els_id=S1877056824001865&rfr_iscdi=true