Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans

Background The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer‐specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement‐to‐calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube‐shaped DCS‐trimmed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2024-09, Vol.51 (9), p.5901-5910
Hauptverfasser: Bennett, Laura C., Hyer, Daniel E., Vu, Justin, Patwardhan, Kaustubh, Erhart, Kevin, Gutierrez, Alonso N., Pons, Eduardo, Jensen, Eric, Ubau, Manual, Zapata, Julio, Wroe, Andrew, Wake, Karsten, Nelson, Nicholas P., Culberson, Wesley S., Smith, Blake R., Hill, Patrick M., Flynn, Ryan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5910
container_issue 9
container_start_page 5901
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 51
creator Bennett, Laura C.
Hyer, Daniel E.
Vu, Justin
Patwardhan, Kaustubh
Erhart, Kevin
Gutierrez, Alonso N.
Pons, Eduardo
Jensen, Eric
Ubau, Manual
Zapata, Julio
Wroe, Andrew
Wake, Karsten
Nelson, Nicholas P.
Culberson, Wesley S.
Smith, Blake R.
Hill, Patrick M.
Flynn, Ryan T.
description Background The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer‐specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement‐to‐calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube‐shaped DCS‐trimmed dose distributions, no comparison of measurement and dose calculation has been made for patient‐specific treatment plans. Purpose To validate a patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for DCS‐trimmed PBS treatment plans and evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. Methods Three intracranial patient cases were considered. Standard uncollimated PBS and DCS‐collimated treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Astroid treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and delivered at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) using an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) dedicated nozzle system and prototype DCS. Planar dose measurements were acquired at two depths within low‐gradient regions of the target volume using an IBA MatriXX ion chamber array. Results Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared using 2D gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm criteria and low dose threshold of 10% of the maximum dose. Median gamma pass rates across all plans and measurement depths were 99.0% (PBS) and 98.3% (DCS), with a minimum gamma pass rate of 88.5% (PBS) and 91.2% (DCS). Conclusions The PSQA process has been validated and experimentally verified for DCS‐collimated PBS. Dosimetric agreement between the measured and calculated doses was demonstrated to be similar for DCS‐collimated PBS to that achievable with noncollimated PBS.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.17295
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3077176317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3077176317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2125-1b779b4ec2de21ae1b8d017479165c7cf5e16a51e5b1f28be940bd80703a44bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EoqUg8QQoI0vKtWPXyYgq_qQiOsBs2c6NCHJ-GjtC2XgEnpEnIdACE9Ndjo6-ewg5pTCnAOyiaudUskzskSnjMok5g2yfTAEyHjMOYkKOvH8BgEUi4JBMkjSTkqViStRahxLr8PH27lu0ZVHaaNNrV4Yh0t73na4tRk0R5UOtq9Jq54aRtY1zZaUD5lHbNaGpo_CMnW6HKHSoQzUao9bp2h-Tg0I7jye7OyNP11ePy9t49XBzt7xcxZZRJmJqpMwMR8tyZFQjNWkOVHKZ0YWw0hYC6UILisLQgqUGMw4mT0FCojk3JpmR8613nLPp0QdVld6iGzdg03uVgJRULhIq_1DbNd53WKi2G3_pBkVBfeVUVau-c47o2c7amwrzX_Cn3wjEW-C1dDj8K1L3663wE0_Ngao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3077176317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bennett, Laura C. ; Hyer, Daniel E. ; Vu, Justin ; Patwardhan, Kaustubh ; Erhart, Kevin ; Gutierrez, Alonso N. ; Pons, Eduardo ; Jensen, Eric ; Ubau, Manual ; Zapata, Julio ; Wroe, Andrew ; Wake, Karsten ; Nelson, Nicholas P. ; Culberson, Wesley S. ; Smith, Blake R. ; Hill, Patrick M. ; Flynn, Ryan T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Laura C. ; Hyer, Daniel E. ; Vu, Justin ; Patwardhan, Kaustubh ; Erhart, Kevin ; Gutierrez, Alonso N. ; Pons, Eduardo ; Jensen, Eric ; Ubau, Manual ; Zapata, Julio ; Wroe, Andrew ; Wake, Karsten ; Nelson, Nicholas P. ; Culberson, Wesley S. ; Smith, Blake R. ; Hill, Patrick M. ; Flynn, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer‐specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement‐to‐calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube‐shaped DCS‐trimmed dose distributions, no comparison of measurement and dose calculation has been made for patient‐specific treatment plans. Purpose To validate a patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for DCS‐trimmed PBS treatment plans and evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. Methods Three intracranial patient cases were considered. Standard uncollimated PBS and DCS‐collimated treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Astroid treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and delivered at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) using an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) dedicated nozzle system and prototype DCS. Planar dose measurements were acquired at two depths within low‐gradient regions of the target volume using an IBA MatriXX ion chamber array. Results Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared using 2D gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm criteria and low dose threshold of 10% of the maximum dose. Median gamma pass rates across all plans and measurement depths were 99.0% (PBS) and 98.3% (DCS), with a minimum gamma pass rate of 88.5% (PBS) and 91.2% (DCS). Conclusions The PSQA process has been validated and experimentally verified for DCS‐collimated PBS. Dosimetric agreement between the measured and calculated doses was demonstrated to be similar for DCS‐collimated PBS to that achievable with noncollimated PBS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.17295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38977285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; collimation ; dose calculation ; dynamic collimation ; dynamic collimation system (DCS) ; Humans ; pencil beam scanning (PBS) ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Precision Medicine ; proton therapy ; Proton Therapy - instrumentation ; Proton Therapy - methods ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; spot scanning</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2024-09, Vol.51 (9), p.5901-5910</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2125-1b779b4ec2de21ae1b8d017479165c7cf5e16a51e5b1f28be940bd80703a44bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.17295$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.17295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38977285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyer, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patwardhan, Kaustubh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhart, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Alonso N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ubau, Manual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapata, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culberson, Wesley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Blake R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><title>Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Background The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer‐specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement‐to‐calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube‐shaped DCS‐trimmed dose distributions, no comparison of measurement and dose calculation has been made for patient‐specific treatment plans. Purpose To validate a patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for DCS‐trimmed PBS treatment plans and evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. Methods Three intracranial patient cases were considered. Standard uncollimated PBS and DCS‐collimated treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Astroid treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and delivered at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) using an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) dedicated nozzle system and prototype DCS. Planar dose measurements were acquired at two depths within low‐gradient regions of the target volume using an IBA MatriXX ion chamber array. Results Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared using 2D gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm criteria and low dose threshold of 10% of the maximum dose. Median gamma pass rates across all plans and measurement depths were 99.0% (PBS) and 98.3% (DCS), with a minimum gamma pass rate of 88.5% (PBS) and 91.2% (DCS). Conclusions The PSQA process has been validated and experimentally verified for DCS‐collimated PBS. Dosimetric agreement between the measured and calculated doses was demonstrated to be similar for DCS‐collimated PBS to that achievable with noncollimated PBS.</description><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>collimation</subject><subject>dose calculation</subject><subject>dynamic collimation</subject><subject>dynamic collimation system (DCS)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pencil beam scanning (PBS)</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Precision Medicine</subject><subject>proton therapy</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>spot scanning</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EoqUg8QQoI0vKtWPXyYgq_qQiOsBs2c6NCHJ-GjtC2XgEnpEnIdACE9Ndjo6-ewg5pTCnAOyiaudUskzskSnjMok5g2yfTAEyHjMOYkKOvH8BgEUi4JBMkjSTkqViStRahxLr8PH27lu0ZVHaaNNrV4Yh0t73na4tRk0R5UOtq9Jq54aRtY1zZaUD5lHbNaGpo_CMnW6HKHSoQzUao9bp2h-Tg0I7jye7OyNP11ePy9t49XBzt7xcxZZRJmJqpMwMR8tyZFQjNWkOVHKZ0YWw0hYC6UILisLQgqUGMw4mT0FCojk3JpmR8613nLPp0QdVld6iGzdg03uVgJRULhIq_1DbNd53WKi2G3_pBkVBfeVUVau-c47o2c7amwrzX_Cn3wjEW-C1dDj8K1L3663wE0_Ngao</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Bennett, Laura C.</creator><creator>Hyer, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Vu, Justin</creator><creator>Patwardhan, Kaustubh</creator><creator>Erhart, Kevin</creator><creator>Gutierrez, Alonso N.</creator><creator>Pons, Eduardo</creator><creator>Jensen, Eric</creator><creator>Ubau, Manual</creator><creator>Zapata, Julio</creator><creator>Wroe, Andrew</creator><creator>Wake, Karsten</creator><creator>Nelson, Nicholas P.</creator><creator>Culberson, Wesley S.</creator><creator>Smith, Blake R.</creator><creator>Hill, Patrick M.</creator><creator>Flynn, Ryan T.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans</title><author>Bennett, Laura C. ; Hyer, Daniel E. ; Vu, Justin ; Patwardhan, Kaustubh ; Erhart, Kevin ; Gutierrez, Alonso N. ; Pons, Eduardo ; Jensen, Eric ; Ubau, Manual ; Zapata, Julio ; Wroe, Andrew ; Wake, Karsten ; Nelson, Nicholas P. ; Culberson, Wesley S. ; Smith, Blake R. ; Hill, Patrick M. ; Flynn, Ryan T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2125-1b779b4ec2de21ae1b8d017479165c7cf5e16a51e5b1f28be940bd80703a44bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>collimation</topic><topic>dose calculation</topic><topic>dynamic collimation</topic><topic>dynamic collimation system (DCS)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pencil beam scanning (PBS)</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Precision Medicine</topic><topic>proton therapy</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>spot scanning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyer, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patwardhan, Kaustubh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhart, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Alonso N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pons, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ubau, Manual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapata, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wroe, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wake, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culberson, Wesley S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Blake R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennett, Laura C.</au><au>Hyer, Daniel E.</au><au>Vu, Justin</au><au>Patwardhan, Kaustubh</au><au>Erhart, Kevin</au><au>Gutierrez, Alonso N.</au><au>Pons, Eduardo</au><au>Jensen, Eric</au><au>Ubau, Manual</au><au>Zapata, Julio</au><au>Wroe, Andrew</au><au>Wake, Karsten</au><au>Nelson, Nicholas P.</au><au>Culberson, Wesley S.</au><au>Smith, Blake R.</au><au>Hill, Patrick M.</au><au>Flynn, Ryan T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5901</spage><epage>5910</epage><pages>5901-5910</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Background The dynamic collimation system (DCS) provides energy layer‐specific collimation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using two pairs of orthogonal nickel trimmer blades. While excellent measurement‐to‐calculation agreement has been demonstrated for simple cube‐shaped DCS‐trimmed dose distributions, no comparison of measurement and dose calculation has been made for patient‐specific treatment plans. Purpose To validate a patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) process for DCS‐trimmed PBS treatment plans and evaluate the agreement between measured and calculated dose distributions. Methods Three intracranial patient cases were considered. Standard uncollimated PBS and DCS‐collimated treatment plans were generated for each patient using the Astroid treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were recalculated in a water phantom and delivered at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) using an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) dedicated nozzle system and prototype DCS. Planar dose measurements were acquired at two depths within low‐gradient regions of the target volume using an IBA MatriXX ion chamber array. Results Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared using 2D gamma analysis with 3%/3 mm criteria and low dose threshold of 10% of the maximum dose. Median gamma pass rates across all plans and measurement depths were 99.0% (PBS) and 98.3% (DCS), with a minimum gamma pass rate of 88.5% (PBS) and 91.2% (DCS). Conclusions The PSQA process has been validated and experimentally verified for DCS‐collimated PBS. Dosimetric agreement between the measured and calculated doses was demonstrated to be similar for DCS‐collimated PBS to that achievable with noncollimated PBS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38977285</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.17295</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2024-09, Vol.51 (9), p.5901-5910
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3077176317
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
collimation
dose calculation
dynamic collimation
dynamic collimation system (DCS)
Humans
pencil beam scanning (PBS)
Phantoms, Imaging
Precision Medicine
proton therapy
Proton Therapy - instrumentation
Proton Therapy - methods
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
spot scanning
title Patient‐specific quality assurance of dynamically‐collimated proton therapy treatment plans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T07%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%E2%80%90specific%20quality%20assurance%20of%20dynamically%E2%80%90collimated%20proton%20therapy%20treatment%20plans&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Bennett,%20Laura%20C.&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5901&rft.epage=5910&rft.pages=5901-5910&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.17295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3077176317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3077176317&rft_id=info:pmid/38977285&rfr_iscdi=true