Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making
Summary Background Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high‐end equipment can be prohibitive. Aim To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre‐existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment without incurring addi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2024-09, Vol.60 (5), p.633-647 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 647 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 633 |
container_title | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Pal, Partha Mateen, Mohammad Abdul Pooja, Kanapuram Marri, Uday Kumar Gupta, Rajesh Tandan, Manu Reddy, D. Nageshwar |
description | Summary
Background
Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high‐end equipment can be prohibitive.
Aim
To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre‐existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment without incurring additional cost.
Methods
Consecutive IBD patients underwent POCUS with or without faecal calprotectin (FCP) using a mid‐end ultrasound machine. If POCUS with or without FCP could not guide management, we performed additional ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We evaluated the impact of POCUS on IBD management and its correlation with ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We analysed pregnant, paediatric and post‐operative patients separately.
Results
Among 508 patients with IBD, we analysed 419 (60.4% Crohn's disease [CD]; 61.3% male, age [years]: 36 [18–78]) undergoing 556 POCUS sessions. POCUS with or without FCP independently influenced clinical management in 42.8% of patients with CD and 49.7% with ulcerative colitis (UC). POCUS helped avoid colonoscopy in 51.4% of patients with CD and 51.8% with UC, and cross‐sectional imaging in 38.1% of suspected active small bowel CD. In patients with additional diagnostics, POCUS‐based decisions remained unchanged in 81.2% with CD and 85% with UC. Sensitivity and specificity of POCUS compared to ileocolonoscopy were 80% and 94.4% for CD and 80.8% and 92.8% for UC, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity compared to cross‐sectional imaging were 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
POCUS using existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment in low‐resource settings influenced IBD clinical decision‐making with excellent accuracy, often avoiding colonoscopy and cross‐sectional imaging.
Utilising an existing mid‐end ultrasound, POCUS independently impacted IBD management in 45%, negating the need for colonoscopy and/or cross‐sectional imaging in 40%–50%. POCUS‐informed management decisions remained unaltered in 80% of cases post additional testing, exhibiting excellent agreement (≥85%). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apt.18155 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076767091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076767091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2435-3a8286d109ffdc181d76f06369c1132349babfc5a7676f3fb57636e8a4ea87563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhwAsgS1xAIq3_rJ2EW1VRQFqJHso58jrj4uLYwU669MYj8DZ9H56ECVsQQsIHe-z5fZ81M4Q85eyI4zo243TEG67UPbLiUqtKMKnvkxUTuq1Ew-UBeVTKFWNM10w8JAeyaWuFghW53cA1ZHPp4yWFr75MSzD4_se37xB7Oocpm5JmDAdjP_kI1KVMx-TjhEhyuFmTgeIdFrEJf2t8pCHtkMmAD9kCLTAtX5TX9DynMoKd_DW8ohlMQGyXckDVMBo70RSpDT56i549WF98isgM5jMaPCYPnAkFntydh-Tj2ZuL03fV5sPb96cnm8qKtVSVNI1odM9Z61xvsUd9rR3TUreWcynkut2arbPK1BoT0m1VjUlozBpMUystD8mLve-Y05cZS-wGXyyEYCKkuXSSLcqatRzR5_-gV1gzdmShWiG54K1C6uWeslh_yeC6MfvB5JuOs26ZZofT7H5NE9lnd47zdoD-D_l7fAgc74GdD3Dzf6fu5Pxib_kT1kezPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092312195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pal, Partha ; Mateen, Mohammad Abdul ; Pooja, Kanapuram ; Marri, Uday Kumar ; Gupta, Rajesh ; Tandan, Manu ; Reddy, D. Nageshwar</creator><creatorcontrib>Pal, Partha ; Mateen, Mohammad Abdul ; Pooja, Kanapuram ; Marri, Uday Kumar ; Gupta, Rajesh ; Tandan, Manu ; Reddy, D. Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high‐end equipment can be prohibitive.
Aim
To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre‐existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment without incurring additional cost.
Methods
Consecutive IBD patients underwent POCUS with or without faecal calprotectin (FCP) using a mid‐end ultrasound machine. If POCUS with or without FCP could not guide management, we performed additional ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We evaluated the impact of POCUS on IBD management and its correlation with ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We analysed pregnant, paediatric and post‐operative patients separately.
Results
Among 508 patients with IBD, we analysed 419 (60.4% Crohn's disease [CD]; 61.3% male, age [years]: 36 [18–78]) undergoing 556 POCUS sessions. POCUS with or without FCP independently influenced clinical management in 42.8% of patients with CD and 49.7% with ulcerative colitis (UC). POCUS helped avoid colonoscopy in 51.4% of patients with CD and 51.8% with UC, and cross‐sectional imaging in 38.1% of suspected active small bowel CD. In patients with additional diagnostics, POCUS‐based decisions remained unchanged in 81.2% with CD and 85% with UC. Sensitivity and specificity of POCUS compared to ileocolonoscopy were 80% and 94.4% for CD and 80.8% and 92.8% for UC, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity compared to cross‐sectional imaging were 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
POCUS using existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment in low‐resource settings influenced IBD clinical decision‐making with excellent accuracy, often avoiding colonoscopy and cross‐sectional imaging.
Utilising an existing mid‐end ultrasound, POCUS independently impacted IBD management in 45%, negating the need for colonoscopy and/or cross‐sectional imaging in 40%–50%. POCUS‐informed management decisions remained unaltered in 80% of cases post additional testing, exhibiting excellent agreement (≥85%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2813</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apt.18155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38975815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - instrumentation ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Crohn Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Crohn's disease ; Decision making ; Feasibility Studies ; Feces ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Inflammatory bowel diseases ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Intestine ; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Small intestine ; Ulcerative colitis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024-09, Vol.60 (5), p.633-647</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2435-3a8286d109ffdc181d76f06369c1132349babfc5a7676f3fb57636e8a4ea87563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7090-9004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapt.18155$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapt.18155$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38975815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pal, Partha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateen, Mohammad Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pooja, Kanapuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marri, Uday Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandan, Manu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, D. Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><title>Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making</title><title>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</title><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high‐end equipment can be prohibitive.
Aim
To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre‐existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment without incurring additional cost.
Methods
Consecutive IBD patients underwent POCUS with or without faecal calprotectin (FCP) using a mid‐end ultrasound machine. If POCUS with or without FCP could not guide management, we performed additional ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We evaluated the impact of POCUS on IBD management and its correlation with ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We analysed pregnant, paediatric and post‐operative patients separately.
Results
Among 508 patients with IBD, we analysed 419 (60.4% Crohn's disease [CD]; 61.3% male, age [years]: 36 [18–78]) undergoing 556 POCUS sessions. POCUS with or without FCP independently influenced clinical management in 42.8% of patients with CD and 49.7% with ulcerative colitis (UC). POCUS helped avoid colonoscopy in 51.4% of patients with CD and 51.8% with UC, and cross‐sectional imaging in 38.1% of suspected active small bowel CD. In patients with additional diagnostics, POCUS‐based decisions remained unchanged in 81.2% with CD and 85% with UC. Sensitivity and specificity of POCUS compared to ileocolonoscopy were 80% and 94.4% for CD and 80.8% and 92.8% for UC, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity compared to cross‐sectional imaging were 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
POCUS using existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment in low‐resource settings influenced IBD clinical decision‐making with excellent accuracy, often avoiding colonoscopy and cross‐sectional imaging.
Utilising an existing mid‐end ultrasound, POCUS independently impacted IBD management in 45%, negating the need for colonoscopy and/or cross‐sectional imaging in 40%–50%. POCUS‐informed management decisions remained unaltered in 80% of cases post additional testing, exhibiting excellent agreement (≥85%).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Crohn's disease</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel diseases</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>Ulcerative colitis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0269-2813</issn><issn>1365-2036</issn><issn>1365-2036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhwAsgS1xAIq3_rJ2EW1VRQFqJHso58jrj4uLYwU669MYj8DZ9H56ECVsQQsIHe-z5fZ81M4Q85eyI4zo243TEG67UPbLiUqtKMKnvkxUTuq1Ew-UBeVTKFWNM10w8JAeyaWuFghW53cA1ZHPp4yWFr75MSzD4_se37xB7Oocpm5JmDAdjP_kI1KVMx-TjhEhyuFmTgeIdFrEJf2t8pCHtkMmAD9kCLTAtX5TX9DynMoKd_DW8ohlMQGyXckDVMBo70RSpDT56i549WF98isgM5jMaPCYPnAkFntydh-Tj2ZuL03fV5sPb96cnm8qKtVSVNI1odM9Z61xvsUd9rR3TUreWcynkut2arbPK1BoT0m1VjUlozBpMUystD8mLve-Y05cZS-wGXyyEYCKkuXSSLcqatRzR5_-gV1gzdmShWiG54K1C6uWeslh_yeC6MfvB5JuOs26ZZofT7H5NE9lnd47zdoD-D_l7fAgc74GdD3Dzf6fu5Pxib_kT1kezPg</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Pal, Partha</creator><creator>Mateen, Mohammad Abdul</creator><creator>Pooja, Kanapuram</creator><creator>Marri, Uday Kumar</creator><creator>Gupta, Rajesh</creator><creator>Tandan, Manu</creator><creator>Reddy, D. Nageshwar</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7090-9004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making</title><author>Pal, Partha ; Mateen, Mohammad Abdul ; Pooja, Kanapuram ; Marri, Uday Kumar ; Gupta, Rajesh ; Tandan, Manu ; Reddy, D. Nageshwar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2435-3a8286d109ffdc181d76f06369c1132349babfc5a7676f3fb57636e8a4ea87563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Crohn's disease</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel diseases</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>Ulcerative colitis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pal, Partha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateen, Mohammad Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pooja, Kanapuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marri, Uday Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandan, Manu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, D. Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pal, Partha</au><au>Mateen, Mohammad Abdul</au><au>Pooja, Kanapuram</au><au>Marri, Uday Kumar</au><au>Gupta, Rajesh</au><au>Tandan, Manu</au><au>Reddy, D. Nageshwar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making</atitle><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>633-647</pages><issn>0269-2813</issn><issn>1365-2036</issn><eissn>1365-2036</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high‐end equipment can be prohibitive.
Aim
To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre‐existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment without incurring additional cost.
Methods
Consecutive IBD patients underwent POCUS with or without faecal calprotectin (FCP) using a mid‐end ultrasound machine. If POCUS with or without FCP could not guide management, we performed additional ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We evaluated the impact of POCUS on IBD management and its correlation with ileocolonoscopy or cross‐sectional imaging. We analysed pregnant, paediatric and post‐operative patients separately.
Results
Among 508 patients with IBD, we analysed 419 (60.4% Crohn's disease [CD]; 61.3% male, age [years]: 36 [18–78]) undergoing 556 POCUS sessions. POCUS with or without FCP independently influenced clinical management in 42.8% of patients with CD and 49.7% with ulcerative colitis (UC). POCUS helped avoid colonoscopy in 51.4% of patients with CD and 51.8% with UC, and cross‐sectional imaging in 38.1% of suspected active small bowel CD. In patients with additional diagnostics, POCUS‐based decisions remained unchanged in 81.2% with CD and 85% with UC. Sensitivity and specificity of POCUS compared to ileocolonoscopy were 80% and 94.4% for CD and 80.8% and 92.8% for UC, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity compared to cross‐sectional imaging were 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
POCUS using existing mid‐end ultrasound equipment in low‐resource settings influenced IBD clinical decision‐making with excellent accuracy, often avoiding colonoscopy and cross‐sectional imaging.
Utilising an existing mid‐end ultrasound, POCUS independently impacted IBD management in 45%, negating the need for colonoscopy and/or cross‐sectional imaging in 40%–50%. POCUS‐informed management decisions remained unaltered in 80% of cases post additional testing, exhibiting excellent agreement (≥85%).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38975815</pmid><doi>10.1111/apt.18155</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7090-9004</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-2813 |
ispartof | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024-09, Vol.60 (5), p.633-647 |
issn | 0269-2813 1365-2036 1365-2036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076767091 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Clinical Decision-Making Colon Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - instrumentation Colonoscopy - methods Crohn Disease - diagnostic imaging Crohn's disease Decision making Feasibility Studies Feces Female Humans Inflammatory bowel disease Inflammatory bowel diseases Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - diagnostic imaging Intestine Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex - analysis Male Middle Aged Patients Pediatrics Point-of-Care Systems Pregnancy Prospective Studies Small intestine Ulcerative colitis Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography - methods Ultrasound Young Adult |
title | Leveraging existing mid‐end ultrasound machine for point‐of‐care intestinal ultrasound in low‐resource settings: Prospective, real‐world impact on clinical decision‐making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveraging%20existing%20mid%E2%80%90end%20ultrasound%20machine%20for%20point%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90care%20intestinal%20ultrasound%20in%20low%E2%80%90resource%20settings:%20Prospective,%20real%E2%80%90world%20impact%20on%20clinical%20decision%E2%80%90making&rft.jtitle=Alimentary%20pharmacology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=Pal,%20Partha&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=633-647&rft.issn=0269-2813&rft.eissn=1365-2036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apt.18155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076767091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092312195&rft_id=info:pmid/38975815&rfr_iscdi=true |