Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study

This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, to report that patients are willing to accept additional cytoreductive treatments to the prostate and metastases for progression-free and survival benefits. We report willingness to accept 10 percentage-point increases in urinary incontinence and f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2024-07
Hauptverfasser: Connor, Martin J., Genie, Mesfin, Dudderidge, Tim, Wu, Hangjian, Sukumar, Johanna, Beresford, Mark, Bianchini, Diletta, Goh, Chee, Horan, Gail, Innominato, Pasquale, Khoo, Vincent, Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia, Madaan, Sanjeev, Mangar, Stephen, McCracken, Stuart, Ostler, Peter, Paisey, Sangeeta, Robinson, Angus, Rai, Bhavan, Sarwar, Naveed, Srihari, Narayanan, Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu, Varughese, Mohini, Winkler, Mathias, Ahmed, Hashim U., Watson, Verity
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title European urology oncology
container_volume
creator Connor, Martin J.
Genie, Mesfin
Dudderidge, Tim
Wu, Hangjian
Sukumar, Johanna
Beresford, Mark
Bianchini, Diletta
Goh, Chee
Horan, Gail
Innominato, Pasquale
Khoo, Vincent
Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia
Madaan, Sanjeev
Mangar, Stephen
McCracken, Stuart
Ostler, Peter
Paisey, Sangeeta
Robinson, Angus
Rai, Bhavan
Sarwar, Naveed
Srihari, Narayanan
Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu
Varughese, Mohini
Winkler, Mathias
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Watson, Verity
description This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, to report that patients are willing to accept additional cytoreductive treatments to the prostate and metastases for progression-free and survival benefits. We report willingness to accept 10 percentage-point increases in urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 and 2.7 mo of post-treatment survival time, respectively. These results can be used to support policy on the commissioning and delivery of current, and emerging, cytoreductive treatments for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Cytoreductive treatments for patients diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) confer incremental survival benefits over systemic therapy, but these may lead to added toxicity and morbidity. Our objective was to determine patients’ preferences for, and trade-offs between, additional cytoreductive prostate and metastasis-directed interventions. A prospective multicentre discrete choice experiment trial was conducted at 30 hospitals in the UK between December 3, 2020 and January 25, 2023 (NCT04590976). The individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with de novo synchronous mHSPC within 4 mo of commencing androgen deprivation therapy and had performance status 0–2. A discrete choice experiment instrument was developed to elicit patients’ preferences for cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy, prostatectomy, prostate ablation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to metastasis. Patients chose their preferred treatment based on seven attributes. An error-component conditional logit model was used to estimate the preferences for and trade-offs between treatment attributes. A total of 352 patients were enrolled, of whom 303 completed the study. The median age was 70 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 64–76) and prostate-specific antigen was 94 ng/ml (IQR 28–370). Metastatic stages were M1a 10.9% (33/303), M1b 79.9% (242/303), and M1c 7.6% (23/303). Patients preferred treatments with longer survival and progression-free periods. Patients were less likely to favour cytoreductive prostatectomy with systemic therapy (Coef. –0.448; [95% confidence interval {CI} –0.60 to –0.29]; p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076763580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2588931124001585</els_id><sourcerecordid>3076763580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1930-2f94f8d97a942a8a95c0cc2a0be8c9ab143ebd25b23212163af21de056f9ad3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQQK0KBAj4AC6Vj70kjO1NNm5PaKGABHTVpmfLsSfg1W4CtkPZG7_B7_ElOFpa9cRp5vDmSfMIOWKQM2Dl8SLHoc858EkOZQ4MPpE9XlRVJgVjW__tu-QwhAUAJDZhfIfsikpOeSXYHnma6-iwi-H1-YXOPbbosTMYaNt7OlvH3qMdTHSPSGuPOq5GlrqO3uCf5ZqeOn3b9QEtvcaoQ0wykzT9uCGd6aTyX2l9h_RyXmTXJ3V99pP-ioNdH5DtVi8DHr7PffL7-1k9u8iufpxfzk6uMsOkgIy3ctJWVk61nHBdaVkYMIZraLAyUjdsIrCxvGi44IyzUuiWM4tQlK3UVqDYJ1823nvfPwwYolq5YHC51B32Q1ACpuW0FEUFCWUb1KQHQmqh7r1bab9WDNTYXC1Uaq7G5gpKlWKmm8_v-qFZof138bdwAr5tAExPPjr0Khg3JrbOo4nK9u4D_RuXJpMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076763580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Connor, Martin J. ; Genie, Mesfin ; Dudderidge, Tim ; Wu, Hangjian ; Sukumar, Johanna ; Beresford, Mark ; Bianchini, Diletta ; Goh, Chee ; Horan, Gail ; Innominato, Pasquale ; Khoo, Vincent ; Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia ; Madaan, Sanjeev ; Mangar, Stephen ; McCracken, Stuart ; Ostler, Peter ; Paisey, Sangeeta ; Robinson, Angus ; Rai, Bhavan ; Sarwar, Naveed ; Srihari, Narayanan ; Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu ; Varughese, Mohini ; Winkler, Mathias ; Ahmed, Hashim U. ; Watson, Verity</creator><creatorcontrib>Connor, Martin J. ; Genie, Mesfin ; Dudderidge, Tim ; Wu, Hangjian ; Sukumar, Johanna ; Beresford, Mark ; Bianchini, Diletta ; Goh, Chee ; Horan, Gail ; Innominato, Pasquale ; Khoo, Vincent ; Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia ; Madaan, Sanjeev ; Mangar, Stephen ; McCracken, Stuart ; Ostler, Peter ; Paisey, Sangeeta ; Robinson, Angus ; Rai, Bhavan ; Sarwar, Naveed ; Srihari, Narayanan ; Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu ; Varughese, Mohini ; Winkler, Mathias ; Ahmed, Hashim U. ; Watson, Verity ; IP5-MATTER Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, to report that patients are willing to accept additional cytoreductive treatments to the prostate and metastases for progression-free and survival benefits. We report willingness to accept 10 percentage-point increases in urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 and 2.7 mo of post-treatment survival time, respectively. These results can be used to support policy on the commissioning and delivery of current, and emerging, cytoreductive treatments for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Cytoreductive treatments for patients diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) confer incremental survival benefits over systemic therapy, but these may lead to added toxicity and morbidity. Our objective was to determine patients’ preferences for, and trade-offs between, additional cytoreductive prostate and metastasis-directed interventions. A prospective multicentre discrete choice experiment trial was conducted at 30 hospitals in the UK between December 3, 2020 and January 25, 2023 (NCT04590976). The individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with de novo synchronous mHSPC within 4 mo of commencing androgen deprivation therapy and had performance status 0–2. A discrete choice experiment instrument was developed to elicit patients’ preferences for cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy, prostatectomy, prostate ablation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to metastasis. Patients chose their preferred treatment based on seven attributes. An error-component conditional logit model was used to estimate the preferences for and trade-offs between treatment attributes. A total of 352 patients were enrolled, of whom 303 completed the study. The median age was 70 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 64–76) and prostate-specific antigen was 94 ng/ml (IQR 28–370). Metastatic stages were M1a 10.9% (33/303), M1b 79.9% (242/303), and M1c 7.6% (23/303). Patients preferred treatments with longer survival and progression-free periods. Patients were less likely to favour cytoreductive prostatectomy with systemic therapy (Coef. –0.448; [95% confidence interval {CI} –0.60 to –0.29]; p &lt; 0.001), unless combined with metastasis-directed therapy. Cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy or ablation with systemic therapy, number of hospital visits, use of a “day-case” procedure, or addition of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy did not impact treatment choice. Patients were willing to accept an additional cytoreductive treatment with 10 percentage point increases in the risk of urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 mo (95% CI 2.8–4.3) and 2.7 mo (95% CI 2.3–3.1) of overall survival, respectively. Patients are accepting of additional cytoreductive treatments for survival benefit in mHSPC, prioritising preservation of urinary function and avoidance of fatigue. We performed a large study to ascertain how patients diagnosed with advanced (metastatic) prostate cancer at their first diagnosis made decisions regarding additional available treatments for their prostate and cancer deposits (metastases). Treatments would not provide cure but may reduce cancer burden (cytoreduction), prolong life, and extend time without cancer progression. We reported that most patients were willing to accept additional treatments for survival benefits, in particular treatments that preserved urinary function and reduced fatigue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38972831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cryotherapy ; Cytoreductive ; Discrete choice experiment ; Metastasis-directed therapy ; Metastatic prostate cancer ; Oligometastatic disease ; Patient preference ; Radical prostatectomy ; Radiotherapy ; Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>European urology oncology, 2024-07</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1930-2f94f8d97a942a8a95c0cc2a0be8c9ab143ebd25b23212163af21de056f9ad3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4033-7508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38972831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connor, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genie, Mesfin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudderidge, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukumar, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresford, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Diletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Chee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horan, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innominato, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madaan, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangar, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostler, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paisey, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Bhavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwar, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srihari, Narayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varughese, Mohini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Hashim U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Verity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IP5-MATTER Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study</title><title>European urology oncology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, to report that patients are willing to accept additional cytoreductive treatments to the prostate and metastases for progression-free and survival benefits. We report willingness to accept 10 percentage-point increases in urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 and 2.7 mo of post-treatment survival time, respectively. These results can be used to support policy on the commissioning and delivery of current, and emerging, cytoreductive treatments for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Cytoreductive treatments for patients diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) confer incremental survival benefits over systemic therapy, but these may lead to added toxicity and morbidity. Our objective was to determine patients’ preferences for, and trade-offs between, additional cytoreductive prostate and metastasis-directed interventions. A prospective multicentre discrete choice experiment trial was conducted at 30 hospitals in the UK between December 3, 2020 and January 25, 2023 (NCT04590976). The individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with de novo synchronous mHSPC within 4 mo of commencing androgen deprivation therapy and had performance status 0–2. A discrete choice experiment instrument was developed to elicit patients’ preferences for cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy, prostatectomy, prostate ablation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to metastasis. Patients chose their preferred treatment based on seven attributes. An error-component conditional logit model was used to estimate the preferences for and trade-offs between treatment attributes. A total of 352 patients were enrolled, of whom 303 completed the study. The median age was 70 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 64–76) and prostate-specific antigen was 94 ng/ml (IQR 28–370). Metastatic stages were M1a 10.9% (33/303), M1b 79.9% (242/303), and M1c 7.6% (23/303). Patients preferred treatments with longer survival and progression-free periods. Patients were less likely to favour cytoreductive prostatectomy with systemic therapy (Coef. –0.448; [95% confidence interval {CI} –0.60 to –0.29]; p &lt; 0.001), unless combined with metastasis-directed therapy. Cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy or ablation with systemic therapy, number of hospital visits, use of a “day-case” procedure, or addition of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy did not impact treatment choice. Patients were willing to accept an additional cytoreductive treatment with 10 percentage point increases in the risk of urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 mo (95% CI 2.8–4.3) and 2.7 mo (95% CI 2.3–3.1) of overall survival, respectively. Patients are accepting of additional cytoreductive treatments for survival benefit in mHSPC, prioritising preservation of urinary function and avoidance of fatigue. We performed a large study to ascertain how patients diagnosed with advanced (metastatic) prostate cancer at their first diagnosis made decisions regarding additional available treatments for their prostate and cancer deposits (metastases). Treatments would not provide cure but may reduce cancer burden (cytoreduction), prolong life, and extend time without cancer progression. We reported that most patients were willing to accept additional treatments for survival benefits, in particular treatments that preserved urinary function and reduced fatigue.</description><subject>Cryotherapy</subject><subject>Cytoreductive</subject><subject>Discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>Metastasis-directed therapy</subject><subject>Metastatic prostate cancer</subject><subject>Oligometastatic disease</subject><subject>Patient preference</subject><subject>Radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy</subject><issn>2588-9311</issn><issn>2588-9311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQQK0KBAj4AC6Vj70kjO1NNm5PaKGABHTVpmfLsSfg1W4CtkPZG7_B7_ElOFpa9cRp5vDmSfMIOWKQM2Dl8SLHoc858EkOZQ4MPpE9XlRVJgVjW__tu-QwhAUAJDZhfIfsikpOeSXYHnma6-iwi-H1-YXOPbbosTMYaNt7OlvH3qMdTHSPSGuPOq5GlrqO3uCf5ZqeOn3b9QEtvcaoQ0wykzT9uCGd6aTyX2l9h_RyXmTXJ3V99pP-ioNdH5DtVi8DHr7PffL7-1k9u8iufpxfzk6uMsOkgIy3ctJWVk61nHBdaVkYMIZraLAyUjdsIrCxvGi44IyzUuiWM4tQlK3UVqDYJ1823nvfPwwYolq5YHC51B32Q1ACpuW0FEUFCWUb1KQHQmqh7r1bab9WDNTYXC1Uaq7G5gpKlWKmm8_v-qFZof138bdwAr5tAExPPjr0Khg3JrbOo4nK9u4D_RuXJpMQ</recordid><startdate>20240706</startdate><enddate>20240706</enddate><creator>Connor, Martin J.</creator><creator>Genie, Mesfin</creator><creator>Dudderidge, Tim</creator><creator>Wu, Hangjian</creator><creator>Sukumar, Johanna</creator><creator>Beresford, Mark</creator><creator>Bianchini, Diletta</creator><creator>Goh, Chee</creator><creator>Horan, Gail</creator><creator>Innominato, Pasquale</creator><creator>Khoo, Vincent</creator><creator>Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia</creator><creator>Madaan, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Mangar, Stephen</creator><creator>McCracken, Stuart</creator><creator>Ostler, Peter</creator><creator>Paisey, Sangeeta</creator><creator>Robinson, Angus</creator><creator>Rai, Bhavan</creator><creator>Sarwar, Naveed</creator><creator>Srihari, Narayanan</creator><creator>Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu</creator><creator>Varughese, Mohini</creator><creator>Winkler, Mathias</creator><creator>Ahmed, Hashim U.</creator><creator>Watson, Verity</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-7508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240706</creationdate><title>Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study</title><author>Connor, Martin J. ; Genie, Mesfin ; Dudderidge, Tim ; Wu, Hangjian ; Sukumar, Johanna ; Beresford, Mark ; Bianchini, Diletta ; Goh, Chee ; Horan, Gail ; Innominato, Pasquale ; Khoo, Vincent ; Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia ; Madaan, Sanjeev ; Mangar, Stephen ; McCracken, Stuart ; Ostler, Peter ; Paisey, Sangeeta ; Robinson, Angus ; Rai, Bhavan ; Sarwar, Naveed ; Srihari, Narayanan ; Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu ; Varughese, Mohini ; Winkler, Mathias ; Ahmed, Hashim U. ; Watson, Verity</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1930-2f94f8d97a942a8a95c0cc2a0be8c9ab143ebd25b23212163af21de056f9ad3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cryotherapy</topic><topic>Cytoreductive</topic><topic>Discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>Metastasis-directed therapy</topic><topic>Metastatic prostate cancer</topic><topic>Oligometastatic disease</topic><topic>Patient preference</topic><topic>Radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connor, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genie, Mesfin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudderidge, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukumar, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresford, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Diletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Chee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horan, Gail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innominato, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madaan, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangar, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostler, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paisey, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rai, Bhavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwar, Naveed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srihari, Narayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varughese, Mohini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkler, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Hashim U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Verity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IP5-MATTER Trial Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connor, Martin J.</au><au>Genie, Mesfin</au><au>Dudderidge, Tim</au><au>Wu, Hangjian</au><au>Sukumar, Johanna</au><au>Beresford, Mark</au><au>Bianchini, Diletta</au><au>Goh, Chee</au><au>Horan, Gail</au><au>Innominato, Pasquale</au><au>Khoo, Vincent</au><au>Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia</au><au>Madaan, Sanjeev</au><au>Mangar, Stephen</au><au>McCracken, Stuart</au><au>Ostler, Peter</au><au>Paisey, Sangeeta</au><au>Robinson, Angus</au><au>Rai, Bhavan</au><au>Sarwar, Naveed</au><au>Srihari, Narayanan</au><au>Jayaprakash, Kamal Thippu</au><au>Varughese, Mohini</au><au>Winkler, Mathias</au><au>Ahmed, Hashim U.</au><au>Watson, Verity</au><aucorp>IP5-MATTER Trial Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study</atitle><jtitle>European urology oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-07-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2588-9311</issn><eissn>2588-9311</eissn><abstract>This is the first study, to the authors’ knowledge, to report that patients are willing to accept additional cytoreductive treatments to the prostate and metastases for progression-free and survival benefits. We report willingness to accept 10 percentage-point increases in urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 and 2.7 mo of post-treatment survival time, respectively. These results can be used to support policy on the commissioning and delivery of current, and emerging, cytoreductive treatments for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Cytoreductive treatments for patients diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) confer incremental survival benefits over systemic therapy, but these may lead to added toxicity and morbidity. Our objective was to determine patients’ preferences for, and trade-offs between, additional cytoreductive prostate and metastasis-directed interventions. A prospective multicentre discrete choice experiment trial was conducted at 30 hospitals in the UK between December 3, 2020 and January 25, 2023 (NCT04590976). The individuals were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with de novo synchronous mHSPC within 4 mo of commencing androgen deprivation therapy and had performance status 0–2. A discrete choice experiment instrument was developed to elicit patients’ preferences for cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy, prostatectomy, prostate ablation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to metastasis. Patients chose their preferred treatment based on seven attributes. An error-component conditional logit model was used to estimate the preferences for and trade-offs between treatment attributes. A total of 352 patients were enrolled, of whom 303 completed the study. The median age was 70 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 64–76) and prostate-specific antigen was 94 ng/ml (IQR 28–370). Metastatic stages were M1a 10.9% (33/303), M1b 79.9% (242/303), and M1c 7.6% (23/303). Patients preferred treatments with longer survival and progression-free periods. Patients were less likely to favour cytoreductive prostatectomy with systemic therapy (Coef. –0.448; [95% confidence interval {CI} –0.60 to –0.29]; p &lt; 0.001), unless combined with metastasis-directed therapy. Cytoreductive prostate radiotherapy or ablation with systemic therapy, number of hospital visits, use of a “day-case” procedure, or addition of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy did not impact treatment choice. Patients were willing to accept an additional cytoreductive treatment with 10 percentage point increases in the risk of urinary incontinence and fatigue to gain 3.4 mo (95% CI 2.8–4.3) and 2.7 mo (95% CI 2.3–3.1) of overall survival, respectively. Patients are accepting of additional cytoreductive treatments for survival benefit in mHSPC, prioritising preservation of urinary function and avoidance of fatigue. We performed a large study to ascertain how patients diagnosed with advanced (metastatic) prostate cancer at their first diagnosis made decisions regarding additional available treatments for their prostate and cancer deposits (metastases). Treatments would not provide cure but may reduce cancer burden (cytoreduction), prolong life, and extend time without cancer progression. We reported that most patients were willing to accept additional treatments for survival benefits, in particular treatments that preserved urinary function and reduced fatigue.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38972831</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.010</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-7508</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2588-9311
ispartof European urology oncology, 2024-07
issn 2588-9311
2588-9311
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3076763580
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cryotherapy
Cytoreductive
Discrete choice experiment
Metastasis-directed therapy
Metastatic prostate cancer
Oligometastatic disease
Patient preference
Radical prostatectomy
Radiotherapy
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy
title Patients’ Preferences for Cytoreductive Treatments in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The IP5-MATTER Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A50%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%E2%80%99%20Preferences%20for%20Cytoreductive%20Treatments%20in%20Newly%20Diagnosed%20Metastatic%20Prostate%20Cancer:%20The%20IP5-MATTER%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20oncology&rft.au=Connor,%20Martin%20J.&rft.aucorp=IP5-MATTER%20Trial%20Investigators&rft.date=2024-07-06&rft.issn=2588-9311&rft.eissn=2588-9311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076763580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076763580&rft_id=info:pmid/38972831&rft_els_id=S2588931124001585&rfr_iscdi=true