Oncological risks associated with the planned watch-and-wait strategy using total neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: A narrative review

•Watch-and-wait (w&w) after TNT results in high organ preservation rate.•Yet, the ultimate local failure rate appears to be higher than expected.•High local failure rate creates challenges for shared decision-making.•Action should be taken to reduce this oncological risk.•A two-tier selection pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer treatment reviews 2024-09, Vol.129, p.102796, Article 102796
Hauptverfasser: Socha, Joanna, Glynne-Jones, Robert, Bujko, Krzysztof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Watch-and-wait (w&w) after TNT results in high organ preservation rate.•Yet, the ultimate local failure rate appears to be higher than expected.•High local failure rate creates challenges for shared decision-making.•Action should be taken to reduce this oncological risk.•A two-tier selection process should exclude patients better managed by surgery. Overall survival benefit of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) remains unconfirmed. Thus, in our opinion, the main rationale for using TNT is a planned watch-and-wait (w&w) strategy to improve patients’ long-term quality of life through organ preservation. The OPRA randomized trial, which examined a planned w&w strategy using TNT, showed a higher organ preservation rate but also a higher regrowth rate compared to studies on the opportunistic w&w strategy. Higher rates of complete clinical response with TNT did not improve disease-free survival compared to historical controls. Therefore, the gain in organ-sparing capability might not be balanced by the increased oncological risk. The ultimate local failure rate in the intention-to-treat analysis of the OPRA trial was 13% for induction chemotherapy and 16% for consolidation chemotherapy, which seems higher than expected compared to 8% in a meta-analysis of w&w studies or 12% after TNT and surgery in the PRODIGE-23 and RAPIDO trials, which enrolled patients with more advanced cancers than the OPRA trial. Other studies also suggest worse local control when surgery is delayed for radio–chemoresistant cancers. Our review questions the safety of the planned w&w strategy using TNT in unselected patients. To reduce the oncological risk while maintaining high organ preservation rates, we suggest that the planned w&w strategy using TNT requires a two-tier patient selection process: before treatment and after tumor response assessment at the midpoint of consolidation chemotherapy. These robust selections should identify patients who are unlikely to achieve organ preservation with TNT and would be better managed by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (without consolidation chemotherapy) and surgery, or by discontinuing consolidation chemotherapy and proceeding directly to surgery.
ISSN:0305-7372
1532-1967
1532-1967
DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102796