Mechanical and biological behavior of double network hydrogels reinforced with alginate versus gellan gum

Alginate and gellan gum have both been used by researchers as reinforcing networks to create tough and biocompatible polyethylene glycol (PEG) based double network (DN) hydrogels; however, the relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach are not understood. This study directly compares the mechanical and biological properties of polyethylene glycol di-methacrylate (PEGDMA) hybrid DN hydrogels reinforced with either gellan gum or sodium alginate using PEGDMA concentrations from 10 to 20 wt% and reinforcing network concentrations of 1 and 2 wt%. The findings demonstrate that gellan gum reinforcement is more effective at increasing the strength, stiffness, and toughness of PEGDMA DN hydrogels. In contrast, alginate reinforcement yields DN hydrogels with greater stretchability compared to gellan gum reinforced PEGDMA. Furthermore, separate measurements of toughness via unnotched work of rupture testing and notched fracture toughness testing showed a strong correlation of these two properties for a single reinforcing network type, but not across the two types of reinforcing networks. This suggests that additional notched fracture toughness experiments are important for understanding the full mechanical response when comparing different tough DN hydrogel systems. Regarding the biological response, after conjugation of matrix protein to the surface of both materials robust cell attachment and spreading was supported with higher yes associated protein (YAP) nuclear expression observed in populations adhering to the stiffer gellan gum-PEGDMA material. This study provides valuable insights regarding how to design double network hydrogels for specific property requirements, e.g., for use in biomedical devices, as scaffolding for tissue engineering, or in soft robotic applications.