Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery
We inquire into the role of Turing’s biological thought in the development of his concept of intelligent machinery. We trace the possible relations between his proto-connectionist notion of ‘organising’ machines in Turing (1948) on the one hand and his mathematical theory of morphogenesis in develop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A 2024-08, Vol.106, p.126-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 126 |
container_title | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Greif, Hajo Kubiak, Adam P. Stacewicz, Paweł |
description | We inquire into the role of Turing’s biological thought in the development of his concept of intelligent machinery. We trace the possible relations between his proto-connectionist notion of ‘organising’ machines in Turing (1948) on the one hand and his mathematical theory of morphogenesis in developmental biology (1952) on the other. These works were concerned with distinct fields of inquiry and followed distinct paradigms of biological theory, respectively postulating analogues of Darwinian selection in learning and mathematical laws of form in organic pattern formation. Still, these strands of Turing’s work are related, first, in terms of being amenable in principle to his (1936) computational method of modelling. Second, they are connected by Turing’s scattered speculations about the possible bearing of learning processes on the anatomy of the brain. We argue that these two theories form an unequal couple that, from different angles and in partial fashion, point towards cognition as a biological and embodied phenomenon while, for reasons inherent to Turing’s computational approach to modelling, not being capable of directly addressing it as such. We explore ways in which these two distinct-but-related theories could be more explicitly and systematically connected, using von Neumann’s contemporaneous and related work on Cellular Automata and more recent biomimetic approaches as a foil. We conclude that the nature of ‘initiative’ and the mode of material realisation are the key issues that decide on the possibility of intelligent machinery in Turing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075700419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039368124000657</els_id><sourcerecordid>3075700419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-bd8d8ea0ee214dc14a68ffad6c6834b8768637bd4e94de68cdb006151e1611693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQh62qVVlon6BS5WMPJMzEieMcOFSIQiUkDqWHnizHnux6lcSLnWXFra_R1-NJmmVpj5xGGn2_-fMx9gkhR0B5ts7TapNMXkBR5lDlgPUbtkBVN1lRIbxlCwDRZEIqPGLHKa1hJlCp9-xIqKZqKlUs2K8f1JOdfBhP-TKG3bTiZnS8C3HI-d02-nH59PtP4tMu8NaHPiy9NT3fmGk1N8PORJe4Hyfqe7-kceKDsSs_Unz8wN51pk_08aWesJ_fLu8urrOb26vvF19vMluIZspap5wiA0QFls5iaaTqOuOklUqUraqlkqJuXUlN6Ugq61oAiRUSSkTZiBP25TB3E8P9ltKkB5_sfI8ZKWyTFlBXNUCJe1QcUBtDSpE6vYl-MPFRI-i9U73Wz0713qmGSs_G5tTnlwXbdiD3P_NP4gycHwCa33zwFHWynkZLzsfZrXbBv7rgLy5Vixk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3075700419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Greif, Hajo ; Kubiak, Adam P. ; Stacewicz, Paweł</creator><creatorcontrib>Greif, Hajo ; Kubiak, Adam P. ; Stacewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><description>We inquire into the role of Turing’s biological thought in the development of his concept of intelligent machinery. We trace the possible relations between his proto-connectionist notion of ‘organising’ machines in Turing (1948) on the one hand and his mathematical theory of morphogenesis in developmental biology (1952) on the other. These works were concerned with distinct fields of inquiry and followed distinct paradigms of biological theory, respectively postulating analogues of Darwinian selection in learning and mathematical laws of form in organic pattern formation. Still, these strands of Turing’s work are related, first, in terms of being amenable in principle to his (1936) computational method of modelling. Second, they are connected by Turing’s scattered speculations about the possible bearing of learning processes on the anatomy of the brain. We argue that these two theories form an unequal couple that, from different angles and in partial fashion, point towards cognition as a biological and embodied phenomenon while, for reasons inherent to Turing’s computational approach to modelling, not being capable of directly addressing it as such. We explore ways in which these two distinct-but-related theories could be more explicitly and systematically connected, using von Neumann’s contemporaneous and related work on Cellular Automata and more recent biomimetic approaches as a foil. We conclude that the nature of ‘initiative’ and the mode of material realisation are the key issues that decide on the possibility of intelligent machinery in Turing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-3681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38959582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological Evolution ; Brain - embryology ; Brain - growth & development ; Brain - physiology ; Cellular automata ; Connectionism ; Darwinian evolution ; Developmental Biology - history ; D’Arcy Thompson ; History, 20th Century ; Intelligence ; Learning ; Mechanism ; Models, Biological ; Morphogenesis ; Selection, Genetic ; Universal computing machines</subject><ispartof>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, 2024-08, Vol.106, p.126-135</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-bd8d8ea0ee214dc14a68ffad6c6834b8768637bd4e94de68cdb006151e1611693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2500-4086 ; 0000-0002-1003-7494 ; 0000-0001-7178-3784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368124000657$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38959582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greif, Hajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubiak, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><title>Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery</title><title>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</title><addtitle>Stud Hist Philos Sci</addtitle><description>We inquire into the role of Turing’s biological thought in the development of his concept of intelligent machinery. We trace the possible relations between his proto-connectionist notion of ‘organising’ machines in Turing (1948) on the one hand and his mathematical theory of morphogenesis in developmental biology (1952) on the other. These works were concerned with distinct fields of inquiry and followed distinct paradigms of biological theory, respectively postulating analogues of Darwinian selection in learning and mathematical laws of form in organic pattern formation. Still, these strands of Turing’s work are related, first, in terms of being amenable in principle to his (1936) computational method of modelling. Second, they are connected by Turing’s scattered speculations about the possible bearing of learning processes on the anatomy of the brain. We argue that these two theories form an unequal couple that, from different angles and in partial fashion, point towards cognition as a biological and embodied phenomenon while, for reasons inherent to Turing’s computational approach to modelling, not being capable of directly addressing it as such. We explore ways in which these two distinct-but-related theories could be more explicitly and systematically connected, using von Neumann’s contemporaneous and related work on Cellular Automata and more recent biomimetic approaches as a foil. We conclude that the nature of ‘initiative’ and the mode of material realisation are the key issues that decide on the possibility of intelligent machinery in Turing.</description><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Brain - embryology</subject><subject>Brain - growth & development</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cellular automata</subject><subject>Connectionism</subject><subject>Darwinian evolution</subject><subject>Developmental Biology - history</subject><subject>D’Arcy Thompson</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mechanism</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Morphogenesis</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Universal computing machines</subject><issn>0039-3681</issn><issn>1879-2510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQh62qVVlon6BS5WMPJMzEieMcOFSIQiUkDqWHnizHnux6lcSLnWXFra_R1-NJmmVpj5xGGn2_-fMx9gkhR0B5ts7TapNMXkBR5lDlgPUbtkBVN1lRIbxlCwDRZEIqPGLHKa1hJlCp9-xIqKZqKlUs2K8f1JOdfBhP-TKG3bTiZnS8C3HI-d02-nH59PtP4tMu8NaHPiy9NT3fmGk1N8PORJe4Hyfqe7-kceKDsSs_Unz8wN51pk_08aWesJ_fLu8urrOb26vvF19vMluIZspap5wiA0QFls5iaaTqOuOklUqUraqlkqJuXUlN6Ugq61oAiRUSSkTZiBP25TB3E8P9ltKkB5_sfI8ZKWyTFlBXNUCJe1QcUBtDSpE6vYl-MPFRI-i9U73Wz0713qmGSs_G5tTnlwXbdiD3P_NP4gycHwCa33zwFHWynkZLzsfZrXbBv7rgLy5Vixk</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Greif, Hajo</creator><creator>Kubiak, Adam P.</creator><creator>Stacewicz, Paweł</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-4086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7178-3784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery</title><author>Greif, Hajo ; Kubiak, Adam P. ; Stacewicz, Paweł</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-bd8d8ea0ee214dc14a68ffad6c6834b8768637bd4e94de68cdb006151e1611693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Brain - embryology</topic><topic>Brain - growth & development</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cellular automata</topic><topic>Connectionism</topic><topic>Darwinian evolution</topic><topic>Developmental Biology - history</topic><topic>D’Arcy Thompson</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mechanism</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Morphogenesis</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Universal computing machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greif, Hajo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubiak, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greif, Hajo</au><au>Kubiak, Adam P.</au><au>Stacewicz, Paweł</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery</atitle><jtitle>Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>Stud Hist Philos Sci</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>126</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>126-135</pages><issn>0039-3681</issn><eissn>1879-2510</eissn><abstract>We inquire into the role of Turing’s biological thought in the development of his concept of intelligent machinery. We trace the possible relations between his proto-connectionist notion of ‘organising’ machines in Turing (1948) on the one hand and his mathematical theory of morphogenesis in developmental biology (1952) on the other. These works were concerned with distinct fields of inquiry and followed distinct paradigms of biological theory, respectively postulating analogues of Darwinian selection in learning and mathematical laws of form in organic pattern formation. Still, these strands of Turing’s work are related, first, in terms of being amenable in principle to his (1936) computational method of modelling. Second, they are connected by Turing’s scattered speculations about the possible bearing of learning processes on the anatomy of the brain. We argue that these two theories form an unequal couple that, from different angles and in partial fashion, point towards cognition as a biological and embodied phenomenon while, for reasons inherent to Turing’s computational approach to modelling, not being capable of directly addressing it as such. We explore ways in which these two distinct-but-related theories could be more explicitly and systematically connected, using von Neumann’s contemporaneous and related work on Cellular Automata and more recent biomimetic approaches as a foil. We conclude that the nature of ‘initiative’ and the mode of material realisation are the key issues that decide on the possibility of intelligent machinery in Turing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38959582</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.017</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-4086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7178-3784</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-3681 |
ispartof | Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A, 2024-08, Vol.106, p.126-135 |
issn | 0039-3681 1879-2510 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075700419 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological Evolution Brain - embryology Brain - growth & development Brain - physiology Cellular automata Connectionism Darwinian evolution Developmental Biology - history D’Arcy Thompson History, 20th Century Intelligence Learning Mechanism Models, Biological Morphogenesis Selection, Genetic Universal computing machines |
title | Selection, growth and form. Turing’s two biological paths towards intelligent machinery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A04%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection,%20growth%20and%20form.%20Turing%E2%80%99s%20two%20biological%20paths%20towards%20intelligent%20machinery&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20history%20and%20philosophy%20of%20science.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Greif,%20Hajo&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=126-135&rft.issn=0039-3681&rft.eissn=1879-2510&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.05.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3075700419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3075700419&rft_id=info:pmid/38959582&rft_els_id=S0039368124000657&rfr_iscdi=true |