Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review
Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is neces...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child : care, health & development health & development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e13298 |
container_title | Child : care, health & development |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Duncan, Andrea F. Gerner, Gwyn J. Neel, Mary Lauren Burton, Vera J. Byrne, Rachel Warschausky, Seth |
description | Background
Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results
Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy.
Conclusions
The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cch.13298 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075378113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3083007671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFNZcmbdzJwRsIbnRd0mSqkTbVpD163sZn8cmMVl0IzmYG5uNj5kdol5IjmurYmIcjypkqV9CMcikyxmi-imaEE5HRUrINtBnjI0klc7KONnipRMmYmiG48gOEBfjB9T7ioceuewr9AjC8ghkHl6Zm9GZaO4_Ng2ttAI_1PVjM39-WoEPE2ls8egvhBJ_iuIwDdHpwBgdYOHjZRmuNbiPsfPctdHd-dju_zK5vLq7mp9eZYTkvMyuZ4ZY1HKSwQtTKClvXrFYsB90Utea2SJ_JvDYWhNJKKMkV1SUnVtSl5FvoYPKmF55HiEPVuWigbbWHfowVJ4XgRUkpT-j-H_SxH4NP1yUqCUkhC5qow4kyoY8xQFM9BdfpsKwoqT6zr1L21Vf2id37No51B_aX_Ak7AccT8OJaWP5vqubzy0n5AZmWjo0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3083007671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results
Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy.
Conclusions
The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1862</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cch.13298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38958229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Academic readiness ; assessment ; Attentional processes ; Bias ; Child Development - physiology ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood ; Children & youth ; Cognitive flexibility ; Criteria ; Dosage ; Early intervention ; Early Intervention, Educational ; Efficacy ; Evidence ; Executive function ; Executive Function - physiology ; executive functions ; High risk ; Humans ; Infancy ; Infant ; Intervention ; preschool ; School Readiness ; Self Control ; Short term memory ; Skills ; Systematic review ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; toddler ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child : care, health & development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5973-2690 ; 0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcch.13298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcch.13298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,30998,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38958229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, Mary Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Vera J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><title>Child : care, health & development</title><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><description>Background
Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results
Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy.
Conclusions
The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Academic readiness</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Attentional processes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognitive flexibility</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Early Intervention, Educational</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>executive functions</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infancy</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>preschool</subject><subject>School Readiness</subject><subject>Self Control</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>toddler</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0305-1862</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFNZcmbdzJwRsIbnRd0mSqkTbVpD163sZn8cmMVl0IzmYG5uNj5kdol5IjmurYmIcjypkqV9CMcikyxmi-imaEE5HRUrINtBnjI0klc7KONnipRMmYmiG48gOEBfjB9T7ioceuewr9AjC8ghkHl6Zm9GZaO4_Ng2ttAI_1PVjM39-WoEPE2ls8egvhBJ_iuIwDdHpwBgdYOHjZRmuNbiPsfPctdHd-dju_zK5vLq7mp9eZYTkvMyuZ4ZY1HKSwQtTKClvXrFYsB90Utea2SJ_JvDYWhNJKKMkV1SUnVtSl5FvoYPKmF55HiEPVuWigbbWHfowVJ4XgRUkpT-j-H_SxH4NP1yUqCUkhC5qow4kyoY8xQFM9BdfpsKwoqT6zr1L21Vf2id37No51B_aX_Ak7AccT8OJaWP5vqubzy0n5AZmWjo0</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Duncan, Andrea F.</creator><creator>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creator><creator>Neel, Mary Lauren</creator><creator>Burton, Vera J.</creator><creator>Byrne, Rachel</creator><creator>Warschausky, Seth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-2690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><author>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Academic readiness</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Attentional processes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognitive flexibility</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Early Intervention, Educational</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>executive functions</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infancy</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>preschool</topic><topic>School Readiness</topic><topic>Self Control</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>toddler</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, Mary Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Vera J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child : care, health & development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, Andrea F.</au><au>Gerner, Gwyn J.</au><au>Neel, Mary Lauren</au><au>Burton, Vera J.</au><au>Byrne, Rachel</au><au>Warschausky, Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Child : care, health & development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e13298</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13298-n/a</pages><issn>0305-1862</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><eissn>1365-2214</eissn><abstract>Background
Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results
Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy.
Conclusions
The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38958229</pmid><doi>10.1111/cch.13298</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-2690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-1862 |
ispartof | Child : care, health & development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a |
issn | 0305-1862 1365-2214 1365-2214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075378113 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Academic achievement Academic readiness assessment Attentional processes Bias Child Development - physiology Child, Preschool Childhood Children & youth Cognitive flexibility Criteria Dosage Early intervention Early Intervention, Educational Efficacy Evidence Executive function Executive Function - physiology executive functions High risk Humans Infancy Infant Intervention preschool School Readiness Self Control Short term memory Skills Systematic review Teachers Teaching Methods toddler Young Children |
title | Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20to%20improve%20executive%20functions%20in%20children%20aged%203%C2%A0years%20and%20under:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Child%20:%20care,%20health%20&%20development&rft.au=Duncan,%20Andrea%20F.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e13298&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13298-n/a&rft.issn=0305-1862&rft.eissn=1365-2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cch.13298&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3083007671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3083007671&rft_id=info:pmid/38958229&rfr_iscdi=true |