Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review

Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is neces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child : care, health & development health & development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Duncan, Andrea F., Gerner, Gwyn J., Neel, Mary Lauren, Burton, Vera J., Byrne, Rachel, Warschausky, Seth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e13298
container_title Child : care, health & development
container_volume 50
creator Duncan, Andrea F.
Gerner, Gwyn J.
Neel, Mary Lauren
Burton, Vera J.
Byrne, Rachel
Warschausky, Seth
description Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy. Conclusions The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cch.13298
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075378113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3083007671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFNZcmbdzJwRsIbnRd0mSqkTbVpD163sZn8cmMVl0IzmYG5uNj5kdol5IjmurYmIcjypkqV9CMcikyxmi-imaEE5HRUrINtBnjI0klc7KONnipRMmYmiG48gOEBfjB9T7ioceuewr9AjC8ghkHl6Zm9GZaO4_Ng2ttAI_1PVjM39-WoEPE2ls8egvhBJ_iuIwDdHpwBgdYOHjZRmuNbiPsfPctdHd-dju_zK5vLq7mp9eZYTkvMyuZ4ZY1HKSwQtTKClvXrFYsB90Utea2SJ_JvDYWhNJKKMkV1SUnVtSl5FvoYPKmF55HiEPVuWigbbWHfowVJ4XgRUkpT-j-H_SxH4NP1yUqCUkhC5qow4kyoY8xQFM9BdfpsKwoqT6zr1L21Vf2id37No51B_aX_Ak7AccT8OJaWP5vqubzy0n5AZmWjo0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3083007671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><description>Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy. Conclusions The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1862</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cch.13298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38958229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Academic readiness ; assessment ; Attentional processes ; Bias ; Child Development - physiology ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognitive flexibility ; Criteria ; Dosage ; Early intervention ; Early Intervention, Educational ; Efficacy ; Evidence ; Executive function ; Executive Function - physiology ; executive functions ; High risk ; Humans ; Infancy ; Infant ; Intervention ; preschool ; School Readiness ; Self Control ; Short term memory ; Skills ; Systematic review ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; toddler ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child : care, health &amp; development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Child: Care, Health and Development published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5973-2690 ; 0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcch.13298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcch.13298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,30998,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38958229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, Mary Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Vera J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><title>Child : care, health &amp; development</title><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><description>Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy. Conclusions The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Academic readiness</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Attentional processes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognitive flexibility</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Early Intervention, Educational</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>executive functions</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infancy</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>preschool</subject><subject>School Readiness</subject><subject>Self Control</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>toddler</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0305-1862</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFNZcmbdzJwRsIbnRd0mSqkTbVpD163sZn8cmMVl0IzmYG5uNj5kdol5IjmurYmIcjypkqV9CMcikyxmi-imaEE5HRUrINtBnjI0klc7KONnipRMmYmiG48gOEBfjB9T7ioceuewr9AjC8ghkHl6Zm9GZaO4_Ng2ttAI_1PVjM39-WoEPE2ls8egvhBJ_iuIwDdHpwBgdYOHjZRmuNbiPsfPctdHd-dju_zK5vLq7mp9eZYTkvMyuZ4ZY1HKSwQtTKClvXrFYsB90Utea2SJ_JvDYWhNJKKMkV1SUnVtSl5FvoYPKmF55HiEPVuWigbbWHfowVJ4XgRUkpT-j-H_SxH4NP1yUqCUkhC5qow4kyoY8xQFM9BdfpsKwoqT6zr1L21Vf2id37No51B_aX_Ak7AccT8OJaWP5vqubzy0n5AZmWjo0</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Duncan, Andrea F.</creator><creator>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creator><creator>Neel, Mary Lauren</creator><creator>Burton, Vera J.</creator><creator>Byrne, Rachel</creator><creator>Warschausky, Seth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-2690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</title><author>Duncan, Andrea F. ; Gerner, Gwyn J. ; Neel, Mary Lauren ; Burton, Vera J. ; Byrne, Rachel ; Warschausky, Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-d62c3d2f3e65d55b9d5dbb2b924eaf7ba3d721464bcde59a9596391a830d5b863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Academic readiness</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Attentional processes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognitive flexibility</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Early Intervention, Educational</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>executive functions</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infancy</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>preschool</topic><topic>School Readiness</topic><topic>Self Control</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>toddler</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Andrea F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerner, Gwyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, Mary Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Vera J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warschausky, Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child : care, health &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan, Andrea F.</au><au>Gerner, Gwyn J.</au><au>Neel, Mary Lauren</au><au>Burton, Vera J.</au><au>Byrne, Rachel</au><au>Warschausky, Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Child : care, health &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Care Health Dev</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e13298</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13298-n/a</pages><issn>0305-1862</issn><issn>1365-2214</issn><eissn>1365-2214</eissn><abstract>Background Early executive functioning (EF) skills are foundational capabilities that predict school readiness, academic development and psychiatric risk. Early interventions enhancing these capabilities could have critical import in improving outcomes. However, to develop interventions, it is necessary to identify specific EF skills that will vary with child age. Thus, we aimed to examine the characteristics and efficacy of interventions targeting EF in infancy and early childhood up to age 3. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases was performed for studies published before December 2022. Randomized and non‐randomized studies of interventions designed to improve at least one EF skill in children ≤3 years were included. EF skills included attentional control, inhibition/self‐regulation, activity initiation, working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning ability, problem‐solving and performance monitoring. We independently extracted data, used the revised Cochrane Risk‐of‐Bias tool to assess the quality of the evidence and conducted Synthesis Without Meta‐analysis (SWiM). The overall quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations was determined using elements of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results Thirty‐five studies met inclusion criteria (original n = 7467). Studies were highly variable in the EF skill targeted, target subject (i.e., child, parent and teacher), nature and dosage of the intervention, and timing of outcome assessment. Most interventions focused on improving impulse control and self‐regulation. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate with a high risk of bias, though six studies had low risk of bias but yielded mixed findings of efficacy. Conclusions The relatively small number of early EF intervention studies uses such variable methods that there is currently no converging evidence of efficacy to recommend a specific intervention. Thus, findings support the need for a more systematic, targeted approach to the design and implementation of early EF interventions for target populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38958229</pmid><doi>10.1111/cch.13298</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-2690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-2144</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-1862
ispartof Child : care, health & development, 2024-07, Vol.50 (4), p.e13298-n/a
issn 0305-1862
1365-2214
1365-2214
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3075378113
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Academic achievement
Academic readiness
assessment
Attentional processes
Bias
Child Development - physiology
Child, Preschool
Childhood
Children & youth
Cognitive flexibility
Criteria
Dosage
Early intervention
Early Intervention, Educational
Efficacy
Evidence
Executive function
Executive Function - physiology
executive functions
High risk
Humans
Infancy
Infant
Intervention
preschool
School Readiness
Self Control
Short term memory
Skills
Systematic review
Teachers
Teaching Methods
toddler
Young Children
title Interventions to improve executive functions in children aged 3 years and under: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20to%20improve%20executive%20functions%20in%20children%20aged%203%C2%A0years%20and%20under:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Child%20:%20care,%20health%20&%20development&rft.au=Duncan,%20Andrea%20F.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e13298&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13298-n/a&rft.issn=0305-1862&rft.eissn=1365-2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cch.13298&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3083007671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3083007671&rft_id=info:pmid/38958229&rfr_iscdi=true