Duplications and Retrogenes Are Numerous and Widespread in Modern Canine Genomic Assemblies
Abstract Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of canine genome assemblies available. Duplications are an important source of evolutionary novelty and are also prone to misassembly. We explored the duplication content of nine canine genome assemblies using both genome self-alignme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genome biology and evolution 2024-07, Vol.16 (7) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the number of canine genome assemblies available. Duplications are an important source of evolutionary novelty and are also prone to misassembly. We explored the duplication content of nine canine genome assemblies using both genome self-alignment and read-depth approaches. We find that 8.58% of the genome is duplicated in the canFam4 assembly, derived from the German Shepherd Dog Mischka, including 90.15% of unplaced contigs. Highlighting the continued difficulty in properly assembling duplications, less than half of read-depth and assembly alignment duplications overlap, but the mCanLor1.2 Greenland wolf assembly shows greater concordance. Further study shows the presence of multiple segments that have alignments to four or more duplicate copies. These high-recurrence duplications correspond to gene retrocopies. We identified 3,892 candidate retrocopies from 1,316 parental genes in the canFam4 assembly and find that ∼8.82% of duplicated base pairs involve a retrocopy, confirming this mechanism as a major driver of gene duplication in canines. Similar patterns are found across eight other recent canine genome assemblies, with metrics supporting a greater quality of the PacBio HiFi mCanLor1.2 assembly. Comparison between the wolf and other canine assemblies found that 92% of retrocopy insertions are shared between assemblies. By calculating the number of generations since genome divergence, we estimate that new retrocopy insertions appear, on average, in 1 out of 3,514 births. Our analyses illustrate the impact of retrogene formation on canine genomes and highlight the variable representation of duplicated sequences among recently completed canine assemblies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1759-6653 1759-6653 |
DOI: | 10.1093/gbe/evae142 |