Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir
Geological carbon sequestration is a promising technique to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The Washita-Fredericksburg formation in the southeastern United States is being considered as a prospective storage formation. This requires understanding the geochemical impact of CO2 injection...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of contaminant hydrology 2024-07, Vol.265, p.104393, Article 104393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104393 |
container_title | Journal of contaminant hydrology |
container_volume | 265 |
creator | Lopez Rivera, Nora V. Beckingham, Lauren E. |
description | Geological carbon sequestration is a promising technique to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The Washita-Fredericksburg formation in the southeastern United States is being considered as a prospective storage formation. This requires understanding the geochemical impact of CO2 injection on the formation, which is the focus of this work. Here, sandstone samples from the Washita-Fredericksburg formation are analyzed to understand their overall mineralogical composition and the potential geochemical processes that might occur following CO2 injection. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging, and image analysis were used to identify mineral phases. SEM images were processed to create a segmented mineral map, which was then used to calculate mineral volume fractions and porosity. Results show that the sample has a porosity of 20% and is mainly composed of quartz, K-feldspar, muscovite, and clays. Accessory minerals such as titanite were also found. Reactive transport models were constructed to assess potential CO2-brine-mineral interactions following CO2 injection. Simulation results suggest that the overall extent of mineral dissolution and precipitation reactions over 10,000 days is limited, with muscovite dissolution increasing porosity to 22%. Limited mineral reactions suggest more injected CO2 will exist in free and dissolved forms, which may require more extensive long-term monitoring.
•The Washita-Fredericksburg formation could act as an adequate CO2 reservoir.•Primary mineralogy consists of quartz, K-feldspar, albite, muscovite, and clays.•Simulated porosity increases from 20% to 22% after CO2 injection.•Results suggest limited secondary mineral precipitation of anatase and rutile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074133465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169772224000974</els_id><sourcerecordid>3074133465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-a64ca09af75cda9ac9fb6a2ae119f19527fd6b1205b5757b875519a7088d349b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKAeuXQkTdM0J4QmNpCQuIDgFrmpu2W0y0jaSXt7OnVw5WTL-n5b_gi5ZnTKKMvu1tO1cZvVvpwmNEn7WcoVPyFjlkseZ5SqUzLuORVLmSQjchHCmlIqc5qfkxHPVSqoFGPyuUBnVthYA3WEO6g7aK3bRK6KPiCsbAvx3GOJ3pqvUHR-GVXONwMDIYLIgC_6PrTOwxIjjwH9zll_Sc4qqANeHeuEvM8f32ZP8cvr4nn28BKbJOVtDFlqgCqopDAlKDCqKjJIABlTFVMikVWZFSyhohBSyCKXQjAFkuZ5yVNV8Am5HfZuvfvuMLS6scFgXcMGXRc0pzJlnKeZ6FExoMa7EDxWeuttA36vGdUHqXqtj1L1QaoepPa5m-OJrmiw_Ev9WuyB-wHA_tGdRa-DsbgxWFqPptWls_-c-AEhHIvn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074133465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lopez Rivera, Nora V. ; Beckingham, Lauren E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopez Rivera, Nora V. ; Beckingham, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><description>Geological carbon sequestration is a promising technique to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The Washita-Fredericksburg formation in the southeastern United States is being considered as a prospective storage formation. This requires understanding the geochemical impact of CO2 injection on the formation, which is the focus of this work. Here, sandstone samples from the Washita-Fredericksburg formation are analyzed to understand their overall mineralogical composition and the potential geochemical processes that might occur following CO2 injection. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging, and image analysis were used to identify mineral phases. SEM images were processed to create a segmented mineral map, which was then used to calculate mineral volume fractions and porosity. Results show that the sample has a porosity of 20% and is mainly composed of quartz, K-feldspar, muscovite, and clays. Accessory minerals such as titanite were also found. Reactive transport models were constructed to assess potential CO2-brine-mineral interactions following CO2 injection. Simulation results suggest that the overall extent of mineral dissolution and precipitation reactions over 10,000 days is limited, with muscovite dissolution increasing porosity to 22%. Limited mineral reactions suggest more injected CO2 will exist in free and dissolved forms, which may require more extensive long-term monitoring.
•The Washita-Fredericksburg formation could act as an adequate CO2 reservoir.•Primary mineralogy consists of quartz, K-feldspar, albite, muscovite, and clays.•Simulated porosity increases from 20% to 22% after CO2 injection.•Results suggest limited secondary mineral precipitation of anatase and rutile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-7722</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-6009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38945075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon Dioxide - chemistry ; Carbon Sequestration ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Mineral reactions ; Mineral trapping ; Minerals - analysis ; Minerals - chemistry ; Porosity ; Porosity evolution ; Reactive transport modeling ; Salts - chemistry ; Washita-Fredericksburg formation ; X-Ray Diffraction</subject><ispartof>Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2024-07, Vol.265, p.104393, Article 104393</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-a64ca09af75cda9ac9fb6a2ae119f19527fd6b1205b5757b875519a7088d349b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38945075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopez Rivera, Nora V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckingham, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><title>Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir</title><title>Journal of contaminant hydrology</title><addtitle>J Contam Hydrol</addtitle><description>Geological carbon sequestration is a promising technique to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The Washita-Fredericksburg formation in the southeastern United States is being considered as a prospective storage formation. This requires understanding the geochemical impact of CO2 injection on the formation, which is the focus of this work. Here, sandstone samples from the Washita-Fredericksburg formation are analyzed to understand their overall mineralogical composition and the potential geochemical processes that might occur following CO2 injection. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging, and image analysis were used to identify mineral phases. SEM images were processed to create a segmented mineral map, which was then used to calculate mineral volume fractions and porosity. Results show that the sample has a porosity of 20% and is mainly composed of quartz, K-feldspar, muscovite, and clays. Accessory minerals such as titanite were also found. Reactive transport models were constructed to assess potential CO2-brine-mineral interactions following CO2 injection. Simulation results suggest that the overall extent of mineral dissolution and precipitation reactions over 10,000 days is limited, with muscovite dissolution increasing porosity to 22%. Limited mineral reactions suggest more injected CO2 will exist in free and dissolved forms, which may require more extensive long-term monitoring.
•The Washita-Fredericksburg formation could act as an adequate CO2 reservoir.•Primary mineralogy consists of quartz, K-feldspar, albite, muscovite, and clays.•Simulated porosity increases from 20% to 22% after CO2 injection.•Results suggest limited secondary mineral precipitation of anatase and rutile.</description><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Mineral reactions</subject><subject>Mineral trapping</subject><subject>Minerals - analysis</subject><subject>Minerals - chemistry</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Porosity evolution</subject><subject>Reactive transport modeling</subject><subject>Salts - chemistry</subject><subject>Washita-Fredericksburg formation</subject><subject>X-Ray Diffraction</subject><issn>0169-7722</issn><issn>1873-6009</issn><issn>1873-6009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKAeuXQkTdM0J4QmNpCQuIDgFrmpu2W0y0jaSXt7OnVw5WTL-n5b_gi5ZnTKKMvu1tO1cZvVvpwmNEn7WcoVPyFjlkseZ5SqUzLuORVLmSQjchHCmlIqc5qfkxHPVSqoFGPyuUBnVthYA3WEO6g7aK3bRK6KPiCsbAvx3GOJ3pqvUHR-GVXONwMDIYLIgC_6PrTOwxIjjwH9zll_Sc4qqANeHeuEvM8f32ZP8cvr4nn28BKbJOVtDFlqgCqopDAlKDCqKjJIABlTFVMikVWZFSyhohBSyCKXQjAFkuZ5yVNV8Am5HfZuvfvuMLS6scFgXcMGXRc0pzJlnKeZ6FExoMa7EDxWeuttA36vGdUHqXqtj1L1QaoepPa5m-OJrmiw_Ev9WuyB-wHA_tGdRa-DsbgxWFqPptWls_-c-AEhHIvn</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Lopez Rivera, Nora V.</creator><creator>Beckingham, Lauren E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir</title><author>Lopez Rivera, Nora V. ; Beckingham, Lauren E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-a64ca09af75cda9ac9fb6a2ae119f19527fd6b1205b5757b875519a7088d349b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Mineral reactions</topic><topic>Mineral trapping</topic><topic>Minerals - analysis</topic><topic>Minerals - chemistry</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Porosity evolution</topic><topic>Reactive transport modeling</topic><topic>Salts - chemistry</topic><topic>Washita-Fredericksburg formation</topic><topic>X-Ray Diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopez Rivera, Nora V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckingham, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of contaminant hydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopez Rivera, Nora V.</au><au>Beckingham, Lauren E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir</atitle><jtitle>Journal of contaminant hydrology</jtitle><addtitle>J Contam Hydrol</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>265</volume><spage>104393</spage><pages>104393-</pages><artnum>104393</artnum><issn>0169-7722</issn><issn>1873-6009</issn><eissn>1873-6009</eissn><abstract>Geological carbon sequestration is a promising technique to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. The Washita-Fredericksburg formation in the southeastern United States is being considered as a prospective storage formation. This requires understanding the geochemical impact of CO2 injection on the formation, which is the focus of this work. Here, sandstone samples from the Washita-Fredericksburg formation are analyzed to understand their overall mineralogical composition and the potential geochemical processes that might occur following CO2 injection. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging, and image analysis were used to identify mineral phases. SEM images were processed to create a segmented mineral map, which was then used to calculate mineral volume fractions and porosity. Results show that the sample has a porosity of 20% and is mainly composed of quartz, K-feldspar, muscovite, and clays. Accessory minerals such as titanite were also found. Reactive transport models were constructed to assess potential CO2-brine-mineral interactions following CO2 injection. Simulation results suggest that the overall extent of mineral dissolution and precipitation reactions over 10,000 days is limited, with muscovite dissolution increasing porosity to 22%. Limited mineral reactions suggest more injected CO2 will exist in free and dissolved forms, which may require more extensive long-term monitoring.
•The Washita-Fredericksburg formation could act as an adequate CO2 reservoir.•Primary mineralogy consists of quartz, K-feldspar, albite, muscovite, and clays.•Simulated porosity increases from 20% to 22% after CO2 injection.•Results suggest limited secondary mineral precipitation of anatase and rutile.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38945075</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-7722 |
ispartof | Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2024-07, Vol.265, p.104393, Article 104393 |
issn | 0169-7722 1873-6009 1873-6009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3074133465 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Carbon Dioxide - analysis Carbon Dioxide - chemistry Carbon Sequestration Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Mineral reactions Mineral trapping Minerals - analysis Minerals - chemistry Porosity Porosity evolution Reactive transport modeling Salts - chemistry Washita-Fredericksburg formation X-Ray Diffraction |
title | Geochemical evaluation of Washita-Fredericksburg formation as a carbon storage reservoir |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A36%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geochemical%20evaluation%20of%20Washita-Fredericksburg%20formation%20as%20a%20carbon%20storage%20reservoir&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20contaminant%20hydrology&rft.au=Lopez%20Rivera,%20Nora%20V.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=265&rft.spage=104393&rft.pages=104393-&rft.artnum=104393&rft.issn=0169-7722&rft.eissn=1873-6009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074133465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074133465&rft_id=info:pmid/38945075&rft_els_id=S0169772224000974&rfr_iscdi=true |