Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Emb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2024-06
Hauptverfasser: Kakpovbia, Efe E, Young, Trevor, Milam, Emily C, Qian, Yingzhi, Yassin, Sallie, Nicholson, Joey, Hu, Jiyuan, Troxel, Andrea B, Nagler, Arielle R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume
creator Kakpovbia, Efe E
Young, Trevor
Milam, Emily C
Qian, Yingzhi
Yassin, Sallie
Nicholson, Joey
Hu, Jiyuan
Troxel, Andrea B
Nagler, Arielle R
description Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.20154
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3073712721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073712721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-4753d4738d80b696709a64eeaa3b92ad5d61b10adf008fafd998e59e00571ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKBDEQRYMoOj4W_oBkqYvWSqdfcSfiCwQ3um5qkgpEOp0xySgjfrw9OlqbWxSHW3AYOxZwLqa5eDXv5yWIutpiM1E1XSGhk9tsBqpsCqVqtcf2U3oFACHqbpftyU5VspJixr5urHUa9YoHy3NYTPvAcyTMnsacuA2RezeYIofCB0MRM3HUI13yK55WKZPH7DSP9O7og-NouKeMBY44rJJL69o4XYN3n2S4DmOOYf3B4ZAO2Y6dgo42ecBebm-er--Lx6e7h-urx0KXVZ2Lqq2lqVrZmQ7mjWpaUNhURIhyrko0tWnEXAAaC9BZtEapjmpFAHUrNIE8YKe_vYsY3paUcu9d0jQMOFJYpl5CK1tRtqWY0LNfVMeQUiTbL6LzGFe9gH4tu59k9z-yJ_ZkU7ucezL_5J9d-Q1d4nwH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3073712721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kakpovbia, Efe E ; Young, Trevor ; Milam, Emily C ; Qian, Yingzhi ; Yassin, Sallie ; Nicholson, Joey ; Hu, Jiyuan ; Troxel, Andrea B ; Nagler, Arielle R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kakpovbia, Efe E ; Young, Trevor ; Milam, Emily C ; Qian, Yingzhi ; Yassin, Sallie ; Nicholson, Joey ; Hu, Jiyuan ; Troxel, Andrea B ; Nagler, Arielle R</creatorcontrib><description>Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20154</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38943431</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-4753d4738d80b696709a64eeaa3b92ad5d61b10adf008fafd998e59e00571ce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6959-1385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38943431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kakpovbia, Efe E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milam, Emily C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Yingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Sallie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Joey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxel, Andrea B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagler, Arielle R</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.</description><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtKBDEQRYMoOj4W_oBkqYvWSqdfcSfiCwQ3um5qkgpEOp0xySgjfrw9OlqbWxSHW3AYOxZwLqa5eDXv5yWIutpiM1E1XSGhk9tsBqpsCqVqtcf2U3oFACHqbpftyU5VspJixr5urHUa9YoHy3NYTPvAcyTMnsacuA2RezeYIofCB0MRM3HUI13yK55WKZPH7DSP9O7og-NouKeMBY44rJJL69o4XYN3n2S4DmOOYf3B4ZAO2Y6dgo42ecBebm-er--Lx6e7h-urx0KXVZ2Lqq2lqVrZmQ7mjWpaUNhURIhyrko0tWnEXAAaC9BZtEapjmpFAHUrNIE8YKe_vYsY3paUcu9d0jQMOFJYpl5CK1tRtqWY0LNfVMeQUiTbL6LzGFe9gH4tu59k9z-yJ_ZkU7ucezL_5J9d-Q1d4nwH</recordid><startdate>20240629</startdate><enddate>20240629</enddate><creator>Kakpovbia, Efe E</creator><creator>Young, Trevor</creator><creator>Milam, Emily C</creator><creator>Qian, Yingzhi</creator><creator>Yassin, Sallie</creator><creator>Nicholson, Joey</creator><creator>Hu, Jiyuan</creator><creator>Troxel, Andrea B</creator><creator>Nagler, Arielle R</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-1385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240629</creationdate><title>Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><author>Kakpovbia, Efe E ; Young, Trevor ; Milam, Emily C ; Qian, Yingzhi ; Yassin, Sallie ; Nicholson, Joey ; Hu, Jiyuan ; Troxel, Andrea B ; Nagler, Arielle R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c245t-4753d4738d80b696709a64eeaa3b92ad5d61b10adf008fafd998e59e00571ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kakpovbia, Efe E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milam, Emily C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Yingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Sallie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Joey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxel, Andrea B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagler, Arielle R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kakpovbia, Efe E</au><au>Young, Trevor</au><au>Milam, Emily C</au><au>Qian, Yingzhi</au><au>Yassin, Sallie</au><au>Nicholson, Joey</au><au>Hu, Jiyuan</au><au>Troxel, Andrea B</au><au>Nagler, Arielle R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2024-06-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>Acne is a common skin condition, but little data exist on the comparative efficacy of topical acne therapies. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapies for mild-to-moderate acne. Searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL via Ovid, Embase via Ovid and Web of Science were conducted on 29 November 2021. Randomized controlled trials examining ≥12 weeks of topical treatments for acne vulgaris in subjects aged 12 and older were included. Main outcomes were absolute or percent change in acne lesion count and treatment success on the Investigator's Global Assessment scale. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials with 33,472 participants comparing nine different topical agents were included. Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin-BPO and clindamycin-tretinoin demonstrated the greatest reduction in non-inflammatory (ratio of means [RoM] 1.76; 95% CI [1.46; 2.12], RoM 1.70; 95% CI [1.44; 2.02] and RoM 1.87; 95% CI [1.53; 2.30], respectively), inflammatory (RoM 1.56; 95% CI [1.44; 1.70], RoM 1.49; 95% CI [1.39; 1.60] and RoM 1.48; 95% CI [1.36; 1.61], respectively) and total lesion count (ROM 1.67; 95% CI [1.47; 1.90], RoM 1.59; 95% CI [1.42; 1.79] and RoM 1.64; 95% CI [1.42; 1.89], respectively) compared to placebo. All single agents outperformed placebo except tazarotene, which did not significantly outperform placebo for inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count reduction. Most combination agents significantly outperformed their individual components in lesion count reduction and global assessment scores, except for clindamycin-tretinoin and clindamycin-BPO, which did not significantly outperform tretinoin (RoM 1.13; 95% CI [0.94; 1.36]) and BPO (RoM = 1.15, 95% CI [0.98; 1.36]), respectively, for non-inflammatory lesion reduction. There was no significant difference amongst most single agents when evaluating lesion count reduction. Combination agents are generally most effective for mild-to-moderate acne; however for non-inflammatory acne, the addition of clindamycin in topical regimens is unnecessary and should be avoided.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38943431</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.20154</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6959-1385</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2024-06
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3073712721
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Efficacy of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate acne: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A10%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20topical%20treatments%20for%20mild-to-moderate%20acne:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20control%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Kakpovbia,%20Efe%20E&rft.date=2024-06-29&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.20154&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073712721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3073712721&rft_id=info:pmid/38943431&rfr_iscdi=true