Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study
Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers. Methods Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Deskt...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2024-10, Vol.26 (5), p.922-929 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 929 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 922 |
| container_title | Clinical implant dentistry and related research |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Pitman, Jeremy Cosyn, Jan Christiaens, Véronique Younes, Faris Bruyckere, Thomas Vervaeke, Stijn Glibert, Maarten |
| description | Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.
Methods
Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.
Results
Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.
Conclusions
The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cid.13354 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3072812463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072812463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2434-2dd12fd3cca275d13ac1cb8e255a4f99f50c80175fca5f17ecdf5ec0adb8ff7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctqHDEQRUWIiR_JIj8QBNnYi7b1aE2rsxvGjwwYvHHWjaZUGmT6MZFaTnrnT_A35ksseyZeGFybKorDhXsvIV85O-V5zsDbUy6lKj-QA14xXWjB9Md8KyELput6nxzGeMeY4HzGP5F9qWsp1IwfkL9zgBQMTHRw1HcdWm9GbCe6aQ2gza989GOkKfp-TWMKaw-mpevkLUbqwtBR653DgP1I5b-HR-s77KMf-kxtgu9HDPEHnffU9_Tej2GgcUx2-kz2nGkjftntI_Lr8uJ28bO4vrlaLubXBYhSloWwlgtnJYARlbJcGuCw0iiUMqWra6cYaMYr5cAoxysE6xQCM3alnauMPCLHW91NGH4njGPT-QjYZlc4pNhIVgnNRTmTGf3-Br0bUsg-MsVzlhUrK5apky0FYYgxoGuyy86EqeGsea6jyXU0L3Vk9ttOMa1ytK_k__wzcLYF_vgWp_eVmsXyfCv5BLJ7lxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115270470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pitman, Jeremy ; Cosyn, Jan ; Christiaens, Véronique ; Younes, Faris ; Bruyckere, Thomas ; Vervaeke, Stijn ; Glibert, Maarten</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy ; Cosyn, Jan ; Christiaens, Véronique ; Younes, Faris ; Bruyckere, Thomas ; Vervaeke, Stijn ; Glibert, Maarten</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.
Methods
Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.
Results
Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.
Conclusions
The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cid.13354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38932561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>3‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide ; Accuracy ; dental implant ; Deviation ; immediate ; single tooth ; Surgical implants ; Surgical instruments ; Vertical orientation</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2024-10, Vol.26 (5), p.922-929</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2434-2dd12fd3cca275d13ac1cb8e255a4f99f50c80175fca5f17ecdf5ec0adb8ff7a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5042-2875 ; 0000-0002-1416-6787 ; 0000-0001-9051-2541 ; 0000-0002-8585-1036 ; 0000-0003-0647-6985 ; 0000-0002-0938-8887 ; 0000-0003-3716-5119</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcid.13354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcid.13354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38932561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosyn, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiaens, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Younes, Faris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyckere, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vervaeke, Stijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glibert, Maarten</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.
Methods
Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.
Results
Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.
Conclusions
The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.</description><subject>3‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>immediate</subject><subject>single tooth</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Surgical instruments</subject><subject>Vertical orientation</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctqHDEQRUWIiR_JIj8QBNnYi7b1aE2rsxvGjwwYvHHWjaZUGmT6MZFaTnrnT_A35ksseyZeGFybKorDhXsvIV85O-V5zsDbUy6lKj-QA14xXWjB9Md8KyELput6nxzGeMeY4HzGP5F9qWsp1IwfkL9zgBQMTHRw1HcdWm9GbCe6aQ2gza989GOkKfp-TWMKaw-mpevkLUbqwtBR653DgP1I5b-HR-s77KMf-kxtgu9HDPEHnffU9_Tej2GgcUx2-kz2nGkjftntI_Lr8uJ28bO4vrlaLubXBYhSloWwlgtnJYARlbJcGuCw0iiUMqWra6cYaMYr5cAoxysE6xQCM3alnauMPCLHW91NGH4njGPT-QjYZlc4pNhIVgnNRTmTGf3-Br0bUsg-MsVzlhUrK5apky0FYYgxoGuyy86EqeGsea6jyXU0L3Vk9ttOMa1ytK_k__wzcLYF_vgWp_eVmsXyfCv5BLJ7lxc</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Pitman, Jeremy</creator><creator>Cosyn, Jan</creator><creator>Christiaens, Véronique</creator><creator>Younes, Faris</creator><creator>Bruyckere, Thomas</creator><creator>Vervaeke, Stijn</creator><creator>Glibert, Maarten</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5042-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-6787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-2541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-1036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-6985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-8887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3716-5119</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study</title><author>Pitman, Jeremy ; Cosyn, Jan ; Christiaens, Véronique ; Younes, Faris ; Bruyckere, Thomas ; Vervaeke, Stijn ; Glibert, Maarten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2434-2dd12fd3cca275d13ac1cb8e255a4f99f50c80175fca5f17ecdf5ec0adb8ff7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>3‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>immediate</topic><topic>single tooth</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Surgical instruments</topic><topic>Vertical orientation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitman, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosyn, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiaens, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Younes, Faris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyckere, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vervaeke, Stijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glibert, Maarten</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitman, Jeremy</au><au>Cosyn, Jan</au><au>Christiaens, Véronique</au><au>Younes, Faris</au><au>Bruyckere, Thomas</au><au>Vervaeke, Stijn</au><au>Glibert, Maarten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>922</spage><epage>929</epage><pages>922-929</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3‐dimensional (3D)‐printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.
Methods
Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.
Results
Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.
Conclusions
The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38932561</pmid><doi>10.1111/cid.13354</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5042-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-6787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-2541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-1036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-6985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-8887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3716-5119</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1523-0899 |
| ispartof | Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2024-10, Vol.26 (5), p.922-929 |
| issn | 1523-0899 1708-8208 1708-8208 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3072812463 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | 3‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide Accuracy dental implant Deviation immediate single tooth Surgical implants Surgical instruments Vertical orientation |
| title | Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3‐dimensional printers: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20immediately%20placed%20implants%20using%20surgical%20guides%20from%20different%203%E2%80%90dimensional%20printers:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Pitman,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=922&rft.epage=929&rft.pages=922-929&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cid.13354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3072812463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115270470&rft_id=info:pmid/38932561&rfr_iscdi=true |