Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?

Traditional mandibular reconstruction has relied on the use of vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. The use of allografts and tissue engineering modalities has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of a cellular bone matrix (CBM) allograft composed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1163-1175
Hauptverfasser: Marschall, Jeffrey S., Davis, Stephen S., Jones, Lewis, Kushner, George M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1175
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1163
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 82
creator Marschall, Jeffrey S.
Davis, Stephen S.
Jones, Lewis
Kushner, George M.
description Traditional mandibular reconstruction has relied on the use of vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. The use of allografts and tissue engineering modalities has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of a cellular bone matrix (CBM) allograft composed of lineage committed bone forming cells for mandibular tissue engineering and reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study was implemented using data from subjects treated with a CBM at the University of Louisville from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. The predictor variables were composed of heterogenous variables grouped into the following categories: demographics (age, sex), medical history (history of penicillin [PCN] allergy, history of diabetes mellitus [DM] and tobacco use), etiology (benign tumor, ballistic trauma, nonballistic trauma, odontogenic cyst, osteomyelitis/ medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw), mandibular resection length (cm) and type (marginal, segmental), delayed versus immediate reconstruction, and whether an autograft (proximal tibia) with platelet-rich fibrin was used in combination with the CBM. The primary outcome variable was graft success (yes or no). Success was defined as bony union and defect fill (demonstrated on panoramic radiograph) and mandibular stability (based on postoperative clinical examination at 3 months). Not applicable. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric data were used. A P value of
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3071515380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239124003653</els_id><sourcerecordid>3071515380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-e40bba34644824ef08f0cda1e2143a02195eb37d3c4612ed83df451e4ab81c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhWbqp8t48qqpBkLYZHzAyII3bkErdatJUJ21SNei_N22PLl3dxf3OgfMx9gqhRsDm7aE-xGOuBQhVg65BwRO2Qi2x0qDlU7YC0XaVkGu8Ytc5HwAQdds8Z1eyW8O6Ee2K-U0ivqVpWiab-IcYiH-1c_I_-Waa4j7Zcc7c8u_e9hPx-9PsY-BjTIUKg-__pHY-54X4bdj7QJR82PPy5N_IxZDntLhz6P0L9my0U6aXj_eG7T7e7rafq7v7T1-2m7vKoRZtRQr63krVKNUJRSN0I7jBIglU0oLAtaZetoN0qkFBQyeHUWkkZfsOnZY37M2l9pTij4XybI4-uzLQBopLNhJa1EVSBwUVF9SlmHOi0ZySP9r0yyCYs2FzMGfD5mzYgDbFcAm9fuxf-iMN_yJ_lRbg3QWgMvLBUzLZeQqOBp_IzWaI_n_9vwGCZY0D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3071515380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Marschall, Jeffrey S. ; Davis, Stephen S. ; Jones, Lewis ; Kushner, George M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marschall, Jeffrey S. ; Davis, Stephen S. ; Jones, Lewis ; Kushner, George M.</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional mandibular reconstruction has relied on the use of vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. The use of allografts and tissue engineering modalities has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of a cellular bone matrix (CBM) allograft composed of lineage committed bone forming cells for mandibular tissue engineering and reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study was implemented using data from subjects treated with a CBM at the University of Louisville from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. The predictor variables were composed of heterogenous variables grouped into the following categories: demographics (age, sex), medical history (history of penicillin [PCN] allergy, history of diabetes mellitus [DM] and tobacco use), etiology (benign tumor, ballistic trauma, nonballistic trauma, odontogenic cyst, osteomyelitis/ medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw), mandibular resection length (cm) and type (marginal, segmental), delayed versus immediate reconstruction, and whether an autograft (proximal tibia) with platelet-rich fibrin was used in combination with the CBM. The primary outcome variable was graft success (yes or no). Success was defined as bony union and defect fill (demonstrated on panoramic radiograph) and mandibular stability (based on postoperative clinical examination at 3 months). Not applicable. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric data were used. A P value of &lt;.05 was considered significant. The sample included 38 subjects. The median age of all subjects was 46 (interquartile range 32.6) years. Overall, 28 (73.7%) cases were successful. Subjects with a reported PCN allergy or a history of DM had significantly lower success (2, 7.1% with PCN allergy or DM) compared to those who did not (P = .008, PCN allergy; P = .03, DM). This is the largest case series of CBM based mandibular reconstruction relative to the available maxillofacial surgery literature. The clinician should consider confirmation of PCN allergy so PCN-type antibiotics can be used. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38909627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1163-1175</ispartof><rights>2024 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-e40bba34644824ef08f0cda1e2143a02195eb37d3c4612ed83df451e4ab81c53</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-9339-8077</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38909627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marschall, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lewis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushner, George M.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Traditional mandibular reconstruction has relied on the use of vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. The use of allografts and tissue engineering modalities has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of a cellular bone matrix (CBM) allograft composed of lineage committed bone forming cells for mandibular tissue engineering and reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study was implemented using data from subjects treated with a CBM at the University of Louisville from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. The predictor variables were composed of heterogenous variables grouped into the following categories: demographics (age, sex), medical history (history of penicillin [PCN] allergy, history of diabetes mellitus [DM] and tobacco use), etiology (benign tumor, ballistic trauma, nonballistic trauma, odontogenic cyst, osteomyelitis/ medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw), mandibular resection length (cm) and type (marginal, segmental), delayed versus immediate reconstruction, and whether an autograft (proximal tibia) with platelet-rich fibrin was used in combination with the CBM. The primary outcome variable was graft success (yes or no). Success was defined as bony union and defect fill (demonstrated on panoramic radiograph) and mandibular stability (based on postoperative clinical examination at 3 months). Not applicable. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric data were used. A P value of &lt;.05 was considered significant. The sample included 38 subjects. The median age of all subjects was 46 (interquartile range 32.6) years. Overall, 28 (73.7%) cases were successful. Subjects with a reported PCN allergy or a history of DM had significantly lower success (2, 7.1% with PCN allergy or DM) compared to those who did not (P = .008, PCN allergy; P = .03, DM). This is the largest case series of CBM based mandibular reconstruction relative to the available maxillofacial surgery literature. The clinician should consider confirmation of PCN allergy so PCN-type antibiotics can be used. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.</description><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoTs_oH3AhWbqp8t48qqpBkLYZHzAyII3bkErdatJUJ21SNei_N22PLl3dxf3OgfMx9gqhRsDm7aE-xGOuBQhVg65BwRO2Qi2x0qDlU7YC0XaVkGu8Ytc5HwAQdds8Z1eyW8O6Ee2K-U0ivqVpWiab-IcYiH-1c_I_-Waa4j7Zcc7c8u_e9hPx-9PsY-BjTIUKg-__pHY-54X4bdj7QJR82PPy5N_IxZDntLhz6P0L9my0U6aXj_eG7T7e7rafq7v7T1-2m7vKoRZtRQr63krVKNUJRSN0I7jBIglU0oLAtaZetoN0qkFBQyeHUWkkZfsOnZY37M2l9pTij4XybI4-uzLQBopLNhJa1EVSBwUVF9SlmHOi0ZySP9r0yyCYs2FzMGfD5mzYgDbFcAm9fuxf-iMN_yJ_lRbg3QWgMvLBUzLZeQqOBp_IzWaI_n_9vwGCZY0D</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Marschall, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Davis, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Jones, Lewis</creator><creator>Kushner, George M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9339-8077</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?</title><author>Marschall, Jeffrey S. ; Davis, Stephen S. ; Jones, Lewis ; Kushner, George M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-e40bba34644824ef08f0cda1e2143a02195eb37d3c4612ed83df451e4ab81c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marschall, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lewis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushner, George M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marschall, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Davis, Stephen S.</au><au>Jones, Lewis</au><au>Kushner, George M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1163</spage><epage>1175</epage><pages>1163-1175</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><abstract>Traditional mandibular reconstruction has relied on the use of vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. The use of allografts and tissue engineering modalities has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of a cellular bone matrix (CBM) allograft composed of lineage committed bone forming cells for mandibular tissue engineering and reconstruction. A retrospective cohort study was implemented using data from subjects treated with a CBM at the University of Louisville from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. The predictor variables were composed of heterogenous variables grouped into the following categories: demographics (age, sex), medical history (history of penicillin [PCN] allergy, history of diabetes mellitus [DM] and tobacco use), etiology (benign tumor, ballistic trauma, nonballistic trauma, odontogenic cyst, osteomyelitis/ medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw), mandibular resection length (cm) and type (marginal, segmental), delayed versus immediate reconstruction, and whether an autograft (proximal tibia) with platelet-rich fibrin was used in combination with the CBM. The primary outcome variable was graft success (yes or no). Success was defined as bony union and defect fill (demonstrated on panoramic radiograph) and mandibular stability (based on postoperative clinical examination at 3 months). Not applicable. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric data were used. A P value of &lt;.05 was considered significant. The sample included 38 subjects. The median age of all subjects was 46 (interquartile range 32.6) years. Overall, 28 (73.7%) cases were successful. Subjects with a reported PCN allergy or a history of DM had significantly lower success (2, 7.1% with PCN allergy or DM) compared to those who did not (P = .008, PCN allergy; P = .03, DM). This is the largest case series of CBM based mandibular reconstruction relative to the available maxillofacial surgery literature. The clinician should consider confirmation of PCN allergy so PCN-type antibiotics can be used. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38909627</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.040</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9339-8077</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-09, Vol.82 (9), p.1163-1175
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3071515380
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Are Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts a Viable Option for Mandibular Tissue Engineering and Reconstruction?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A13%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Cellular%20Bone%20Matrix%20Allografts%20a%20Viable%20Option%20for%20Mandibular%20Tissue%20Engineering%20and%20Reconstruction?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Marschall,%20Jeffrey%20S.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1163&rft.epage=1175&rft.pages=1163-1175&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2024.05.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3071515380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3071515380&rft_id=info:pmid/38909627&rft_els_id=S0278239124003653&rfr_iscdi=true