Clinical performance of the Roche Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & influenza A/B assay: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•Roche Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B was approved and widely used.•We analyzed the pooled performance of this rapid multiplex molecular assay.•After screening 317 articles, 9 studies with 5333 samples were included.•The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 100.0 % and 99.7 %, respecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical virology 2024-10, Vol.174, p.105706, Article 105706
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Eunjin, Jeon, Kibum, Lee, Nuri, Park, Min-Jeong, Song, Wonkeun, Kim, Hyun Soo, Kim, Han-Sung, Kim, Jae-Seok, Kim, Jimin, Jeong, Seri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Roche Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B was approved and widely used.•We analyzed the pooled performance of this rapid multiplex molecular assay.•After screening 317 articles, 9 studies with 5333 samples were included.•The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 100.0 % and 99.7 %, respectively.•This assay can be used reliably for the management of respiratory infections. Respiratory tract infections caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza viruses are persistent and critical. The Cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & influenza A/B assay (Multiplex Liat), the FDA-authorized point-of-care reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, has a turnaround time of 20 min and high accuracy. This study evaluates the pooled performance of this assay to provide practical information. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023467579). A systematic literature search was conducted within PubMed, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles evaluating the accuracy of the Multiplex Liat assay through September 2023. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic values with real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) as a reference test. A total of 4,705 samples from eight studies were included in the primary meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of Multiplex Liat were 100.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 96.7 %–100.0 %) and 99.7 % (95 % CI = 98.7 %–99.9 %), respectively. The presence of variants of concern or in-house rRT-PCR assays as reference standards did not significantly affect the pooled diagnostic performance of the Multiplex Liat. When 5,333 samples from nine studies were assessed for sensitivity, the pooled sensitivity was 100.0 % (95 % CI = 85.8 %–100.0 %) without a significant difference. This meta-analysis demonstrates the usefulness of Multiplex Liat for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 based on pooled diagnostic values. These practical findings may facilitate appropriate settings for the diagnosis and management of patients with respiratory tract infections.
ISSN:1386-6532
1873-5967
1873-5967
DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105706