Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to describe the variability in estimates of the association of daily steps and all-cause mortality in systematic reviews with meta-analyses, to identify the factors potentially responsible for it, and to provide an updated estimate. Five databases were systematically searched up to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 2024-08, Vol.185, p.108047, Article 108047
Hauptverfasser: Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva, Torres-Costoso, Ana, del Pozo Cruz, Borja, de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez, Pascual-Morena, Carlos, Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno, Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108047
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 185
creator Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva
Torres-Costoso, Ana
del Pozo Cruz, Borja
de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez
Pascual-Morena, Carlos
Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno
Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente
description This study aimed to describe the variability in estimates of the association of daily steps and all-cause mortality in systematic reviews with meta-analyses, to identify the factors potentially responsible for it, and to provide an updated estimate. Five databases were systematically searched up to May 2024 to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies. A qualitative synthesis of previous reviews and an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies were performed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eleven systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 14 cohort studies were included, revealing considerable variability in result presentation. Our updated meta-analysis showed a nonlinear association, indicating a lower risk of all-cause mortality with increased daily steps, with a protective threshold at 3143 steps/day, and a pooled HR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) per 1000 steps/day increment. Physical activity categories consistently indicated progressively reduced mortality risk, with the highly active category (>12,500 steps/day) exhibiting the lowest risk (0.35 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.42)). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed considerable variability in effect estimates due to different methods of quantifying exposure. Despite it, our study underscores the importance of increased daily steps in reducing all-cause mortality, with a minimum protective dose of 3000 steps/day, although the optimal dose differed according to age and sex. It is recommended that future studies categorise daily steps by physical activity category, perform dose-response analyses, and use increments of 1000 steps/day. [Display omitted] •This umbrella review is the largest synthesis of daily steps and all-cause mortality in the general population.•Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published to date showed substantial variability in the effect estimates provided.•All-cause mortality risk decreases with more steps: minimum protection at 3143 steps/day, with the lowest risk for >12,500 steps/day.•Future research should categorise daily steps by activity level, analise dose-response, and use 1000 step/day increments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108047
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3070837257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743524002020</els_id><sourcerecordid>3070837257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-1dbbf1064169a3768c99bf0186922d59e1238593f197511413b53d747e48c5553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouj5-gSA9euk60yRNI3gQ3yB40XNI0ylk6WNNWqX_3q7rXj0NzHzz-hg7R1giYH61Wk7rlqplBpmYMwUItccWCDpPIcthny0ANKZKcHnEjmNcASDmIA7ZES80oBLZgr3cW99MSRxoHRPbVYltmtTZMVLS9mGwjR-m6-S2S8a2DNQ0Ngn05en7l21psKntbDNFH0_ZQW2bSGd_8YR9PD683z2nr29PL3e3r6njUgwpVmVZI-QCc225ygundVkDFrnOskpqwowXUvMatZKIAnkpeaWEIlE4KSU_YZfbuevQf44UB9P66DanddSP0XBQUHCVSTWjfIu60McYqDbr4FsbJoNgNg7Nyvw6NBuHZutw7rr4WzCWm9quZydtBm62AM1vzjKCic5T56jygdxgqt7_u-AHPqeBLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3070837257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva ; Torres-Costoso, Ana ; del Pozo Cruz, Borja ; de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez ; Pascual-Morena, Carlos ; Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno ; Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva ; Torres-Costoso, Ana ; del Pozo Cruz, Borja ; de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez ; Pascual-Morena, Carlos ; Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno ; Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to describe the variability in estimates of the association of daily steps and all-cause mortality in systematic reviews with meta-analyses, to identify the factors potentially responsible for it, and to provide an updated estimate. Five databases were systematically searched up to May 2024 to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies. A qualitative synthesis of previous reviews and an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies were performed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eleven systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 14 cohort studies were included, revealing considerable variability in result presentation. Our updated meta-analysis showed a nonlinear association, indicating a lower risk of all-cause mortality with increased daily steps, with a protective threshold at 3143 steps/day, and a pooled HR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) per 1000 steps/day increment. Physical activity categories consistently indicated progressively reduced mortality risk, with the highly active category (&gt;12,500 steps/day) exhibiting the lowest risk (0.35 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.42)). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed considerable variability in effect estimates due to different methods of quantifying exposure. Despite it, our study underscores the importance of increased daily steps in reducing all-cause mortality, with a minimum protective dose of 3000 steps/day, although the optimal dose differed according to age and sex. It is recommended that future studies categorise daily steps by physical activity category, perform dose-response analyses, and use increments of 1000 steps/day. [Display omitted] •This umbrella review is the largest synthesis of daily steps and all-cause mortality in the general population.•Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published to date showed substantial variability in the effect estimates provided.•All-cause mortality risk decreases with more steps: minimum protection at 3143 steps/day, with the lowest risk for &gt;12,500 steps/day.•Future research should categorise daily steps by activity level, analise dose-response, and use 1000 step/day increments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108047</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38901742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cause of Death ; Daily steps ; Death ; Dose response ; Exercise ; Humans ; Mortality - trends ; Physical activity ; Step count ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Walking ; Wearable</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2024-08, Vol.185, p.108047, Article 108047</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-1dbbf1064169a3768c99bf0186922d59e1238593f197511413b53d747e48c5553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38901742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Costoso, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Pozo Cruz, Borja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual-Morena, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</creatorcontrib><title>Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>This study aimed to describe the variability in estimates of the association of daily steps and all-cause mortality in systematic reviews with meta-analyses, to identify the factors potentially responsible for it, and to provide an updated estimate. Five databases were systematically searched up to May 2024 to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies. A qualitative synthesis of previous reviews and an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies were performed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eleven systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 14 cohort studies were included, revealing considerable variability in result presentation. Our updated meta-analysis showed a nonlinear association, indicating a lower risk of all-cause mortality with increased daily steps, with a protective threshold at 3143 steps/day, and a pooled HR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) per 1000 steps/day increment. Physical activity categories consistently indicated progressively reduced mortality risk, with the highly active category (&gt;12,500 steps/day) exhibiting the lowest risk (0.35 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.42)). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed considerable variability in effect estimates due to different methods of quantifying exposure. Despite it, our study underscores the importance of increased daily steps in reducing all-cause mortality, with a minimum protective dose of 3000 steps/day, although the optimal dose differed according to age and sex. It is recommended that future studies categorise daily steps by physical activity category, perform dose-response analyses, and use increments of 1000 steps/day. [Display omitted] •This umbrella review is the largest synthesis of daily steps and all-cause mortality in the general population.•Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published to date showed substantial variability in the effect estimates provided.•All-cause mortality risk decreases with more steps: minimum protection at 3143 steps/day, with the lowest risk for &gt;12,500 steps/day.•Future research should categorise daily steps by activity level, analise dose-response, and use 1000 step/day increments.</description><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Daily steps</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Dose response</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Step count</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Wearable</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouj5-gSA9euk60yRNI3gQ3yB40XNI0ylk6WNNWqX_3q7rXj0NzHzz-hg7R1giYH61Wk7rlqplBpmYMwUItccWCDpPIcthny0ANKZKcHnEjmNcASDmIA7ZES80oBLZgr3cW99MSRxoHRPbVYltmtTZMVLS9mGwjR-m6-S2S8a2DNQ0Ngn05en7l21psKntbDNFH0_ZQW2bSGd_8YR9PD683z2nr29PL3e3r6njUgwpVmVZI-QCc225ygundVkDFrnOskpqwowXUvMatZKIAnkpeaWEIlE4KSU_YZfbuevQf44UB9P66DanddSP0XBQUHCVSTWjfIu60McYqDbr4FsbJoNgNg7Nyvw6NBuHZutw7rr4WzCWm9quZydtBm62AM1vzjKCic5T56jygdxgqt7_u-AHPqeBLA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva</creator><creator>Torres-Costoso, Ana</creator><creator>del Pozo Cruz, Borja</creator><creator>de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez</creator><creator>Pascual-Morena, Carlos</creator><creator>Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno</creator><creator>Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis</title><author>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva ; Torres-Costoso, Ana ; del Pozo Cruz, Borja ; de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez ; Pascual-Morena, Carlos ; Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno ; Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-1dbbf1064169a3768c99bf0186922d59e1238593f197511413b53d747e48c5553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Daily steps</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Dose response</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Step count</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Wearable</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Costoso, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Pozo Cruz, Borja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual-Morena, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Eva</au><au>Torres-Costoso, Ana</au><au>del Pozo Cruz, Borja</au><au>de Arenas-Arroyo, Sergio Núñez</au><au>Pascual-Morena, Carlos</au><au>Bizzozero-Peroni, Bruno</au><au>Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>185</volume><spage>108047</spage><pages>108047-</pages><artnum>108047</artnum><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to describe the variability in estimates of the association of daily steps and all-cause mortality in systematic reviews with meta-analyses, to identify the factors potentially responsible for it, and to provide an updated estimate. Five databases were systematically searched up to May 2024 to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies. A qualitative synthesis of previous reviews and an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies were performed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eleven systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 14 cohort studies were included, revealing considerable variability in result presentation. Our updated meta-analysis showed a nonlinear association, indicating a lower risk of all-cause mortality with increased daily steps, with a protective threshold at 3143 steps/day, and a pooled HR of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95) per 1000 steps/day increment. Physical activity categories consistently indicated progressively reduced mortality risk, with the highly active category (&gt;12,500 steps/day) exhibiting the lowest risk (0.35 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.42)). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed considerable variability in effect estimates due to different methods of quantifying exposure. Despite it, our study underscores the importance of increased daily steps in reducing all-cause mortality, with a minimum protective dose of 3000 steps/day, although the optimal dose differed according to age and sex. It is recommended that future studies categorise daily steps by physical activity category, perform dose-response analyses, and use increments of 1000 steps/day. [Display omitted] •This umbrella review is the largest synthesis of daily steps and all-cause mortality in the general population.•Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published to date showed substantial variability in the effect estimates provided.•All-cause mortality risk decreases with more steps: minimum protection at 3143 steps/day, with the lowest risk for &gt;12,500 steps/day.•Future research should categorise daily steps by activity level, analise dose-response, and use 1000 step/day increments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38901742</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108047</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2024-08, Vol.185, p.108047, Article 108047
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3070837257
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cause of Death
Daily steps
Death
Dose response
Exercise
Humans
Mortality - trends
Physical activity
Step count
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Walking
Wearable
title Daily steps and all-cause mortality: An umbrella review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A18%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Daily%20steps%20and%20all-cause%20mortality:%20An%20umbrella%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez-Guti%C3%A9rrez,%20Eva&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=185&rft.spage=108047&rft.pages=108047-&rft.artnum=108047&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3070837257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3070837257&rft_id=info:pmid/38901742&rft_els_id=S0091743524002020&rfr_iscdi=true