Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study

Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient’s appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to diseng...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2024-10, Vol.127, p.108346, Article 108346
Hauptverfasser: Strauss, Alexandra T., Brundage, Janetta, Sidoti, Carolyn N., Jain, Vedant, Gurakar, Ahmet, Mohr, Katlyn, Levan, Macey, Segev, Dorry L., Hamilton, James P., Sung, Hannah C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108346
container_title Patient education and counseling
container_volume 127
creator Strauss, Alexandra T.
Brundage, Janetta
Sidoti, Carolyn N.
Jain, Vedant
Gurakar, Ahmet
Mohr, Katlyn
Levan, Macey
Segev, Dorry L.
Hamilton, James P.
Sung, Hannah C.
description Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient’s appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients’ perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation. We performed fourteen 30–45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021–5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes. Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation): (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients’ lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes. LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients. This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process. •1st patient-derived conceptual framework for patient engagement in liver transplant evaluation.•Patients described feeling overwhelmed & trying to make sense of transplant in their lives.•Patients wanted relevant information at relevant times and in their preferred method.•Patients appreciated providers who demonstrated empathy, not just clinical expertise.•Patients relied on personal support systems (e.g., family, friends), who took on multiple roles.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108346
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3070822164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0738399124002131</els_id><sourcerecordid>3070822164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-52da0fbde1ff8a25c3193478e2ad88f62ba16c9c899e32e5f8ea48994d60732c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gBfp0Utn_jVN9TSGOmGgBz2HLHkLGV3bJelg396MqkdPeV943h_5PQjdEjwnmIiH7bwHM6eY8rRLxsUZmhJZsrwgjJ-jKS6ZzFlVkQm6CmGLMRaCk0s0YVJWQlZsilYfOjpoY9aDDyktugOErGuzJg0-i163oW90AuCgmyHBXfuYLbL9oBsX9QnPQhzs8Rpd1LoJcPPzztDXy_PncpWv31_flot1bhguYl5Qq3G9sUDqWmpaGEYqxksJVFspa0E3mghTGVlVwCgUtQTN08KtSG2oYTN0P-b2vtsPEKLauWCgSX-EbgiK4RJLSongCSUjanwXgoda9d7ttD8qgtVJoNqqVFmdBKpRYLq5-4kfNjuwfxe_xhLwNAKQSh4ceBVMEmjAOp_0Kdu5f-K_AVv_gVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3070822164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Strauss, Alexandra T. ; Brundage, Janetta ; Sidoti, Carolyn N. ; Jain, Vedant ; Gurakar, Ahmet ; Mohr, Katlyn ; Levan, Macey ; Segev, Dorry L. ; Hamilton, James P. ; Sung, Hannah C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Alexandra T. ; Brundage, Janetta ; Sidoti, Carolyn N. ; Jain, Vedant ; Gurakar, Ahmet ; Mohr, Katlyn ; Levan, Macey ; Segev, Dorry L. ; Hamilton, James P. ; Sung, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><description>Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient’s appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients’ perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation. We performed fourteen 30–45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021–5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes. Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation): (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients’ lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes. LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients. This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process. •1st patient-derived conceptual framework for patient engagement in liver transplant evaluation.•Patients described feeling overwhelmed &amp; trying to make sense of transplant in their lives.•Patients wanted relevant information at relevant times and in their preferred method.•Patients appreciated providers who demonstrated empathy, not just clinical expertise.•Patients relied on personal support systems (e.g., family, friends), who took on multiple roles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-3991</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38896893</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Communication ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient engagement ; Patient Participation - psychology ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Qualitative Research</subject><ispartof>Patient education and counseling, 2024-10, Vol.127, p.108346, Article 108346</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-52da0fbde1ff8a25c3193478e2ad88f62ba16c9c899e32e5f8ea48994d60732c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124002131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38896893$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Alexandra T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brundage, Janetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidoti, Carolyn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Vedant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurakar, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Katlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levan, Macey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segev, Dorry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><title>Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study</title><title>Patient education and counseling</title><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><description>Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient’s appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients’ perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation. We performed fourteen 30–45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021–5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes. Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation): (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients’ lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes. LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients. This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process. •1st patient-derived conceptual framework for patient engagement in liver transplant evaluation.•Patients described feeling overwhelmed &amp; trying to make sense of transplant in their lives.•Patients wanted relevant information at relevant times and in their preferred method.•Patients appreciated providers who demonstrated empathy, not just clinical expertise.•Patients relied on personal support systems (e.g., family, friends), who took on multiple roles.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient engagement</subject><subject>Patient Participation - psychology</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4Mobk4_gBfp0Utn_jVN9TSGOmGgBz2HLHkLGV3bJelg396MqkdPeV943h_5PQjdEjwnmIiH7bwHM6eY8rRLxsUZmhJZsrwgjJ-jKS6ZzFlVkQm6CmGLMRaCk0s0YVJWQlZsilYfOjpoY9aDDyktugOErGuzJg0-i163oW90AuCgmyHBXfuYLbL9oBsX9QnPQhzs8Rpd1LoJcPPzztDXy_PncpWv31_flot1bhguYl5Qq3G9sUDqWmpaGEYqxksJVFspa0E3mghTGVlVwCgUtQTN08KtSG2oYTN0P-b2vtsPEKLauWCgSX-EbgiK4RJLSongCSUjanwXgoda9d7ttD8qgtVJoNqqVFmdBKpRYLq5-4kfNjuwfxe_xhLwNAKQSh4ceBVMEmjAOp_0Kdu5f-K_AVv_gVA</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Strauss, Alexandra T.</creator><creator>Brundage, Janetta</creator><creator>Sidoti, Carolyn N.</creator><creator>Jain, Vedant</creator><creator>Gurakar, Ahmet</creator><creator>Mohr, Katlyn</creator><creator>Levan, Macey</creator><creator>Segev, Dorry L.</creator><creator>Hamilton, James P.</creator><creator>Sung, Hannah C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study</title><author>Strauss, Alexandra T. ; Brundage, Janetta ; Sidoti, Carolyn N. ; Jain, Vedant ; Gurakar, Ahmet ; Mohr, Katlyn ; Levan, Macey ; Segev, Dorry L. ; Hamilton, James P. ; Sung, Hannah C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-52da0fbde1ff8a25c3193478e2ad88f62ba16c9c899e32e5f8ea48994d60732c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient engagement</topic><topic>Patient Participation - psychology</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strauss, Alexandra T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brundage, Janetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidoti, Carolyn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Vedant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurakar, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Katlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levan, Macey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segev, Dorry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hannah C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strauss, Alexandra T.</au><au>Brundage, Janetta</au><au>Sidoti, Carolyn N.</au><au>Jain, Vedant</au><au>Gurakar, Ahmet</au><au>Mohr, Katlyn</au><au>Levan, Macey</au><au>Segev, Dorry L.</au><au>Hamilton, James P.</au><au>Sung, Hannah C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>Patient education and counseling</jtitle><addtitle>Patient Educ Couns</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>127</volume><spage>108346</spage><pages>108346-</pages><artnum>108346</artnum><issn>0738-3991</issn><issn>1873-5134</issn><eissn>1873-5134</eissn><abstract>Liver transplant (LT) evaluation is a complex process for patients involving multi-step and parallel medical, surgical, and psychosocial assessments of a patient’s appropriateness for transplant. Patients may experience difficulties in navigating the evaluation process, potentially leading to disengagement and resulting in further health decline or death prior to completing evaluation. We aimed to identify and characterize patients’ perceptions of undergoing LT evaluation. We performed fourteen 30–45 min, semi-structured interviews between 3/2021–5/2021 with patients at a large LT center. Using the constant comparison method, we individually noted themes within and across interviews and codes. Our analysis generated 5 thematic dimensions related to patient engagement (i.e., patient involvement/activation): (1) psychological impact of evaluation on patients’ lives; (2) information received during evaluation; (3) prior medical experience of the patient; 4) communication between patients and transplant providers; and (5) support system of the patients. Among these dimensions, we identified 8 themes. LT patient engagement is a multi-dimensional component of LT evaluation that incorporates the psychological impact, information received, prior medical experience, communication, and support systems of patients. This work can inform targeted interventions for increasing patient engagement during the LT evaluation process. •1st patient-derived conceptual framework for patient engagement in liver transplant evaluation.•Patients described feeling overwhelmed &amp; trying to make sense of transplant in their lives.•Patients wanted relevant information at relevant times and in their preferred method.•Patients appreciated providers who demonstrated empathy, not just clinical expertise.•Patients relied on personal support systems (e.g., family, friends), who took on multiple roles.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38896893</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pec.2024.108346</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-3991
ispartof Patient education and counseling, 2024-10, Vol.127, p.108346, Article 108346
issn 0738-3991
1873-5134
1873-5134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3070822164
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Communication
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Patient engagement
Patient Participation - psychology
Physician-Patient Relations
Qualitative Research
title Patient perspectives on liver transplant evaluation: A qualitative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20perspectives%20on%20liver%20transplant%20evaluation:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=Patient%20education%20and%20counseling&rft.au=Strauss,%20Alexandra%20T.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=127&rft.spage=108346&rft.pages=108346-&rft.artnum=108346&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.eissn=1873-5134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3070822164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3070822164&rft_id=info:pmid/38896893&rft_els_id=S0738399124002131&rfr_iscdi=true