Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with substantial healthcare challenges, frequently resulting in enduring sensory and motor deficits alongside various chronic complications. While advanced regenerative therapies have shown promise in preclinical research, their translation into clinical applic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta biomaterialia 2024-07, Vol.183, p.50-60
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, Jooik, Park, So Hyeon, Choi, Jonghyuk, Han, Sun Mi, Kim, Hae-Won, Shim, Sung Ryul, Hyun, Jung Keun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue
container_start_page 50
container_title Acta biomaterialia
container_volume 183
creator Jeon, Jooik
Park, So Hyeon
Choi, Jonghyuk
Han, Sun Mi
Kim, Hae-Won
Shim, Sung Ryul
Hyun, Jung Keun
description Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with substantial healthcare challenges, frequently resulting in enduring sensory and motor deficits alongside various chronic complications. While advanced regenerative therapies have shown promise in preclinical research, their translation into clinical application has been limited. In response, this study utilized a comprehensive network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation across animal models of SCI. We analyzed 363 outcomes from 55 distinct studies, categorizing the treatments into NSPCs alone (cell only), NSPCs with scaffolds (cell + scaffold), NSPCs with hydrogels (cell + hydrogel), standalone scaffolds (scaffold), standalone hydrogels (hydrogel), and control groups. Our analysis demonstrated significant enhancements in motor recovery, especially in gait function, within the NSPC treatment groups. Notably, the cell only group showed considerable improvements (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.05; 95 % credible interval [CrI]: 1.08 to 3.10, p < 0.01), as did the cell + scaffold group (SMD, 3.73; 95 % CrI: 2.26 to 5.22, p < 0.001) and the cell + hydrogel group (SMD, 3.37; 95 % CrI: 1.02 to 5.78, p < 0.05) compared to controls. These therapeutic combinations not only reduced lesion cavity size but also enhanced neuronal regeneration, outperforming the cell only treatments. By integrating NSPCs with supportive biomaterials, our findings pave the way for refining these regenerative strategies to optimize their potential in clinical SCI treatment. Although there is no overall violation of consistency, the comparison of effect sizes between individual treatments should be interpreted in light of the inconsistency. This study presents a comprehensive network meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation, with and without biomaterials, in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI). We demonstrate that NSCs, particularly when combined with biomaterials like scaffolds or hydrogels, significantly enhance motor and histological recovery post-SCI. These findings underscore the potential of NSC-based therapies, augmented with biomaterials, to advance SCI treatment, offering new insights into regenerative strategies that could significantly impact clinical practices. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068754127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1742706124003167</els_id><sourcerecordid>3068754127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cdcd80b3adf42e54c800d0355006603c680490e6c80f74abe346a72930af06c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuOFCEUrRiNM47-gTEs3VTN5VFAuzDpTHwlk7jRNaHgltJ2QQvUTPov_GRpe3TpisvNeeTc03UvKQwUqLzeDdbVKaSBARMDyAEofdRdUq10r0apH7dZCdYrkPSie1bKDoBryvTT7oJrrSgDuOx-bUtJLtgaUiQT1nvESCKu2e5JqbhcH3L6hjHUlInD_b4QGz1ptoutmINtixBJOYTYCC5l3767NR9J_Y7ZHgKWN2RLyvGk1UwcyXgX8P6PSmx2Kf8gC1bb2yZwLKE8757MTRVfPLxX3df3777cfOxvP3_4dLO97R3TqvbOO69h4tbPguEonAbwwMcRQErgTmoQG0DZ9rMSdkIupFVsw8HOIN2GX3Wvz7ot4M8VSzVLKKeENmJai-EgtRoFZapBxRnqciol42wOOSw2Hw0Fc-rC7My5C3PqwoA0rYtGe_XgsE4L-n-kv8dvgLdnALac7SrZFBcwOvQho6vGp_B_h9_rY5-T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068754127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jeon, Jooik ; Park, So Hyeon ; Choi, Jonghyuk ; Han, Sun Mi ; Kim, Hae-Won ; Shim, Sung Ryul ; Hyun, Jung Keun</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jooik ; Park, So Hyeon ; Choi, Jonghyuk ; Han, Sun Mi ; Kim, Hae-Won ; Shim, Sung Ryul ; Hyun, Jung Keun</creatorcontrib><description>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with substantial healthcare challenges, frequently resulting in enduring sensory and motor deficits alongside various chronic complications. While advanced regenerative therapies have shown promise in preclinical research, their translation into clinical application has been limited. In response, this study utilized a comprehensive network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation across animal models of SCI. We analyzed 363 outcomes from 55 distinct studies, categorizing the treatments into NSPCs alone (cell only), NSPCs with scaffolds (cell + scaffold), NSPCs with hydrogels (cell + hydrogel), standalone scaffolds (scaffold), standalone hydrogels (hydrogel), and control groups. Our analysis demonstrated significant enhancements in motor recovery, especially in gait function, within the NSPC treatment groups. Notably, the cell only group showed considerable improvements (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.05; 95 % credible interval [CrI]: 1.08 to 3.10, p &lt; 0.01), as did the cell + scaffold group (SMD, 3.73; 95 % CrI: 2.26 to 5.22, p &lt; 0.001) and the cell + hydrogel group (SMD, 3.37; 95 % CrI: 1.02 to 5.78, p &lt; 0.05) compared to controls. These therapeutic combinations not only reduced lesion cavity size but also enhanced neuronal regeneration, outperforming the cell only treatments. By integrating NSPCs with supportive biomaterials, our findings pave the way for refining these regenerative strategies to optimize their potential in clinical SCI treatment. Although there is no overall violation of consistency, the comparison of effect sizes between individual treatments should be interpreted in light of the inconsistency. This study presents a comprehensive network meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation, with and without biomaterials, in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI). We demonstrate that NSCs, particularly when combined with biomaterials like scaffolds or hydrogels, significantly enhance motor and histological recovery post-SCI. These findings underscore the potential of NSC-based therapies, augmented with biomaterials, to advance SCI treatment, offering new insights into regenerative strategies that could significantly impact clinical practices. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7061</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38871200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Hydrogel ; Network meta-analysis ; Neural stem cells ; Scaffold ; Spinal cord injury</subject><ispartof>Acta biomaterialia, 2024-07, Vol.183, p.50-60</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cdcd80b3adf42e54c800d0355006603c680490e6c80f74abe346a72930af06c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5781-7706 ; 0000-0001-9254-4424 ; 0000-0002-8661-493X ; 0000-0003-4143-7383</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706124003167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38871200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jooik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, So Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jonghyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Sun Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Jung Keun</creatorcontrib><title>Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><title>Acta biomaterialia</title><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><description>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with substantial healthcare challenges, frequently resulting in enduring sensory and motor deficits alongside various chronic complications. While advanced regenerative therapies have shown promise in preclinical research, their translation into clinical application has been limited. In response, this study utilized a comprehensive network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation across animal models of SCI. We analyzed 363 outcomes from 55 distinct studies, categorizing the treatments into NSPCs alone (cell only), NSPCs with scaffolds (cell + scaffold), NSPCs with hydrogels (cell + hydrogel), standalone scaffolds (scaffold), standalone hydrogels (hydrogel), and control groups. Our analysis demonstrated significant enhancements in motor recovery, especially in gait function, within the NSPC treatment groups. Notably, the cell only group showed considerable improvements (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.05; 95 % credible interval [CrI]: 1.08 to 3.10, p &lt; 0.01), as did the cell + scaffold group (SMD, 3.73; 95 % CrI: 2.26 to 5.22, p &lt; 0.001) and the cell + hydrogel group (SMD, 3.37; 95 % CrI: 1.02 to 5.78, p &lt; 0.05) compared to controls. These therapeutic combinations not only reduced lesion cavity size but also enhanced neuronal regeneration, outperforming the cell only treatments. By integrating NSPCs with supportive biomaterials, our findings pave the way for refining these regenerative strategies to optimize their potential in clinical SCI treatment. Although there is no overall violation of consistency, the comparison of effect sizes between individual treatments should be interpreted in light of the inconsistency. This study presents a comprehensive network meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation, with and without biomaterials, in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI). We demonstrate that NSCs, particularly when combined with biomaterials like scaffolds or hydrogels, significantly enhance motor and histological recovery post-SCI. These findings underscore the potential of NSC-based therapies, augmented with biomaterials, to advance SCI treatment, offering new insights into regenerative strategies that could significantly impact clinical practices. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Hydrogel</subject><subject>Network meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Scaffold</subject><subject>Spinal cord injury</subject><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuOFCEUrRiNM47-gTEs3VTN5VFAuzDpTHwlk7jRNaHgltJ2QQvUTPov_GRpe3TpisvNeeTc03UvKQwUqLzeDdbVKaSBARMDyAEofdRdUq10r0apH7dZCdYrkPSie1bKDoBryvTT7oJrrSgDuOx-bUtJLtgaUiQT1nvESCKu2e5JqbhcH3L6hjHUlInD_b4QGz1ptoutmINtixBJOYTYCC5l3767NR9J_Y7ZHgKWN2RLyvGk1UwcyXgX8P6PSmx2Kf8gC1bb2yZwLKE8757MTRVfPLxX3df3777cfOxvP3_4dLO97R3TqvbOO69h4tbPguEonAbwwMcRQErgTmoQG0DZ9rMSdkIupFVsw8HOIN2GX3Wvz7ot4M8VSzVLKKeENmJai-EgtRoFZapBxRnqciol42wOOSw2Hw0Fc-rC7My5C3PqwoA0rYtGe_XgsE4L-n-kv8dvgLdnALac7SrZFBcwOvQho6vGp_B_h9_rY5-T</recordid><startdate>20240715</startdate><enddate>20240715</enddate><creator>Jeon, Jooik</creator><creator>Park, So Hyeon</creator><creator>Choi, Jonghyuk</creator><creator>Han, Sun Mi</creator><creator>Kim, Hae-Won</creator><creator>Shim, Sung Ryul</creator><creator>Hyun, Jung Keun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-7706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-4424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-493X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-7383</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240715</creationdate><title>Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</title><author>Jeon, Jooik ; Park, So Hyeon ; Choi, Jonghyuk ; Han, Sun Mi ; Kim, Hae-Won ; Shim, Sung Ryul ; Hyun, Jung Keun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cdcd80b3adf42e54c800d0355006603c680490e6c80f74abe346a72930af06c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Hydrogel</topic><topic>Network meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Scaffold</topic><topic>Spinal cord injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jooik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, So Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jonghyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Sun Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shim, Sung Ryul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyun, Jung Keun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeon, Jooik</au><au>Park, So Hyeon</au><au>Choi, Jonghyuk</au><au>Han, Sun Mi</au><au>Kim, Hae-Won</au><au>Shim, Sung Ryul</au><au>Hyun, Jung Keun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><date>2024-07-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>50</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>50-60</pages><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><eissn>1878-7568</eissn><abstract>Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with substantial healthcare challenges, frequently resulting in enduring sensory and motor deficits alongside various chronic complications. While advanced regenerative therapies have shown promise in preclinical research, their translation into clinical application has been limited. In response, this study utilized a comprehensive network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation across animal models of SCI. We analyzed 363 outcomes from 55 distinct studies, categorizing the treatments into NSPCs alone (cell only), NSPCs with scaffolds (cell + scaffold), NSPCs with hydrogels (cell + hydrogel), standalone scaffolds (scaffold), standalone hydrogels (hydrogel), and control groups. Our analysis demonstrated significant enhancements in motor recovery, especially in gait function, within the NSPC treatment groups. Notably, the cell only group showed considerable improvements (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.05; 95 % credible interval [CrI]: 1.08 to 3.10, p &lt; 0.01), as did the cell + scaffold group (SMD, 3.73; 95 % CrI: 2.26 to 5.22, p &lt; 0.001) and the cell + hydrogel group (SMD, 3.37; 95 % CrI: 1.02 to 5.78, p &lt; 0.05) compared to controls. These therapeutic combinations not only reduced lesion cavity size but also enhanced neuronal regeneration, outperforming the cell only treatments. By integrating NSPCs with supportive biomaterials, our findings pave the way for refining these regenerative strategies to optimize their potential in clinical SCI treatment. Although there is no overall violation of consistency, the comparison of effect sizes between individual treatments should be interpreted in light of the inconsistency. This study presents a comprehensive network meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation, with and without biomaterials, in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI). We demonstrate that NSCs, particularly when combined with biomaterials like scaffolds or hydrogels, significantly enhance motor and histological recovery post-SCI. These findings underscore the potential of NSC-based therapies, augmented with biomaterials, to advance SCI treatment, offering new insights into regenerative strategies that could significantly impact clinical practices. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38871200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.011</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-7706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-4424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-493X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-7383</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7061
ispartof Acta biomaterialia, 2024-07, Vol.183, p.50-60
issn 1742-7061
1878-7568
1878-7568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068754127
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Hydrogel
Network meta-analysis
Neural stem cells
Scaffold
Spinal cord injury
title Association between neural stem/progenitor cells and biomaterials in spinal cord injury therapies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A30%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20neural%20stem/progenitor%20cells%20and%20biomaterials%20in%20spinal%20cord%20injury%20therapies:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biomaterialia&rft.au=Jeon,%20Jooik&rft.date=2024-07-15&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=50-60&rft.issn=1742-7061&rft.eissn=1878-7568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068754127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068754127&rft_id=info:pmid/38871200&rft_els_id=S1742706124003167&rfr_iscdi=true