The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review
Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient's independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2024-07, Vol.39, p.398-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 398 |
container_title | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Jiryaei, Zahra Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar |
description | Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient's independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design overview of mechanisms and the efficacy of the soft hand robots to help researchers approach this field.
The literature research regarding such tools was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. We included peer-reviewed studies that considered a soft robot glove as an assistive device to provide function. The two investigators screened the titles and abstracts, then independently reviewed the full-text articles. Disagreements about inclusion were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.
A total of 15 articles were identified, describing 210 participants (23 healthy subjects). The tools were in three categories according to their actuation type (pneumatic system, cable-driven, another design). The most critical outcomes in studies included functional tasks (fourteen studies), grip strength (four studies), range of motion (ROM) (five studies), and user satisfaction (five studies).
Function and grip parameters are the most common critical parameters for tests of hand robots. Cable-driven transmission and soft pneumatic actuators are the most common choices for the actuation unit. Radder et al. study had the highest grade from other studies. That was the only RCT among studies.
Although few soft robotic gloves can be considered ready to reach the market, it seems these tools have the potential to be practical for people with a disability. But, we lack consistent evidence of comparing two or more soft robot gloves on the hand functions. Future research needs to assess the effect of soft robotic gloves on people with hand disorders with more populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068750624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1360859224000822</els_id><sourcerecordid>3068750624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a4f7e9f29d32ea3d4bbe15bd480530028d7527d27e063a79e817620c1d7099303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv3o4ly7JKLyH0CwK9pGchS2NWi21tNXJC_n20bNpjYUCDeN4X5mHsfQu7Ftr-02F3GJeyEyC6HYg66gW7bJUUjRGDfFl32UMzKCMu2BuiAwCYTpjX7EIOg-57NVyy7W6PfCOctnlFIp4m7ogilXiPnNJUeE5jKtETjysvFc64d2OcY3ElpvUUONYN10L8IZY937s18LgcXcxL_f3Mrzk9UsGlUr6m7yM-vGWvJjcTvnt-r9jvb1_vbn40t7--_7y5vm28BF0a100azSRMkAKdDN04YqvG0A2gJIAYglZCB6EReum0waHVvQDfBg3GSJBX7OO595jTnw2p2CWSx3l2K6aNrIR-0Ap60VVUnFGfE1HGyR5zXFx-tC3Yk257sCfd9qTbgqijaujDc_82Lhj-Rf76rcCXM4D1ynp5tuSrK48hZvTFhhT_1_8EgXaShA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068750624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiryaei, Zahra ; Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiryaei, Zahra ; Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</creatorcontrib><description>Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient's independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design overview of mechanisms and the efficacy of the soft hand robots to help researchers approach this field.
The literature research regarding such tools was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. We included peer-reviewed studies that considered a soft robot glove as an assistive device to provide function. The two investigators screened the titles and abstracts, then independently reviewed the full-text articles. Disagreements about inclusion were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.
A total of 15 articles were identified, describing 210 participants (23 healthy subjects). The tools were in three categories according to their actuation type (pneumatic system, cable-driven, another design). The most critical outcomes in studies included functional tasks (fourteen studies), grip strength (four studies), range of motion (ROM) (five studies), and user satisfaction (five studies).
Function and grip parameters are the most common critical parameters for tests of hand robots. Cable-driven transmission and soft pneumatic actuators are the most common choices for the actuation unit. Radder et al. study had the highest grade from other studies. That was the only RCT among studies.
Although few soft robotic gloves can be considered ready to reach the market, it seems these tools have the potential to be practical for people with a disability. But, we lack consistent evidence of comparing two or more soft robot gloves on the hand functions. Future research needs to assess the effect of soft robotic gloves on people with hand disorders with more populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38876658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Disability ; Equipment Design ; Exoskeleton ; Function ; Grip ; Hand ; Hand - physiology ; Hand - physiopathology ; Hand Strength - physiology ; Humans ; Orthosis ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Robotics - instrumentation ; Robotics - methods ; Self-Help Devices</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-07, Vol.39, p.398-409</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a4f7e9f29d32ea3d4bbe15bd480530028d7527d27e063a79e817620c1d7099303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1616-0928 ; 0000-0002-1222-8163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224000822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38876658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiryaei, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</creatorcontrib><title>The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient's independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design overview of mechanisms and the efficacy of the soft hand robots to help researchers approach this field.
The literature research regarding such tools was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. We included peer-reviewed studies that considered a soft robot glove as an assistive device to provide function. The two investigators screened the titles and abstracts, then independently reviewed the full-text articles. Disagreements about inclusion were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.
A total of 15 articles were identified, describing 210 participants (23 healthy subjects). The tools were in three categories according to their actuation type (pneumatic system, cable-driven, another design). The most critical outcomes in studies included functional tasks (fourteen studies), grip strength (four studies), range of motion (ROM) (five studies), and user satisfaction (five studies).
Function and grip parameters are the most common critical parameters for tests of hand robots. Cable-driven transmission and soft pneumatic actuators are the most common choices for the actuation unit. Radder et al. study had the highest grade from other studies. That was the only RCT among studies.
Although few soft robotic gloves can be considered ready to reach the market, it seems these tools have the potential to be practical for people with a disability. But, we lack consistent evidence of comparing two or more soft robot gloves on the hand functions. Future research needs to assess the effect of soft robotic gloves on people with hand disorders with more populations.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Exoskeleton</subject><subject>Function</subject><subject>Grip</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Hand - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hand Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthosis</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Robotics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Robotics - methods</subject><subject>Self-Help Devices</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpadK0f6CHomMv3o4ly7JKLyH0CwK9pGchS2NWi21tNXJC_n20bNpjYUCDeN4X5mHsfQu7Ftr-02F3GJeyEyC6HYg66gW7bJUUjRGDfFl32UMzKCMu2BuiAwCYTpjX7EIOg-57NVyy7W6PfCOctnlFIp4m7ogilXiPnNJUeE5jKtETjysvFc64d2OcY3ElpvUUONYN10L8IZY937s18LgcXcxL_f3Mrzk9UsGlUr6m7yM-vGWvJjcTvnt-r9jvb1_vbn40t7--_7y5vm28BF0a100azSRMkAKdDN04YqvG0A2gJIAYglZCB6EReum0waHVvQDfBg3GSJBX7OO595jTnw2p2CWSx3l2K6aNrIR-0Ap60VVUnFGfE1HGyR5zXFx-tC3Yk257sCfd9qTbgqijaujDc_82Lhj-Rf76rcCXM4D1ynp5tuSrK48hZvTFhhT_1_8EgXaShA</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Jiryaei, Zahra</creator><creator>Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1222-8163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review</title><author>Jiryaei, Zahra ; Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a4f7e9f29d32ea3d4bbe15bd480530028d7527d27e063a79e817620c1d7099303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Exoskeleton</topic><topic>Function</topic><topic>Grip</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Hand - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hand Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthosis</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Robotics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Robotics - methods</topic><topic>Self-Help Devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiryaei, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiryaei, Zahra</au><au>Jafarpisheh, Amir Salar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><spage>398</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>398-409</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient's independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design overview of mechanisms and the efficacy of the soft hand robots to help researchers approach this field.
The literature research regarding such tools was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. We included peer-reviewed studies that considered a soft robot glove as an assistive device to provide function. The two investigators screened the titles and abstracts, then independently reviewed the full-text articles. Disagreements about inclusion were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.
A total of 15 articles were identified, describing 210 participants (23 healthy subjects). The tools were in three categories according to their actuation type (pneumatic system, cable-driven, another design). The most critical outcomes in studies included functional tasks (fourteen studies), grip strength (four studies), range of motion (ROM) (five studies), and user satisfaction (five studies).
Function and grip parameters are the most common critical parameters for tests of hand robots. Cable-driven transmission and soft pneumatic actuators are the most common choices for the actuation unit. Radder et al. study had the highest grade from other studies. That was the only RCT among studies.
Although few soft robotic gloves can be considered ready to reach the market, it seems these tools have the potential to be practical for people with a disability. But, we lack consistent evidence of comparing two or more soft robot gloves on the hand functions. Future research needs to assess the effect of soft robotic gloves on people with hand disorders with more populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38876658</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.025</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1222-8163</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-8592 |
ispartof | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-07, Vol.39, p.398-409 |
issn | 1360-8592 1532-9283 1532-9283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068750624 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living Disability Equipment Design Exoskeleton Function Grip Hand Hand - physiology Hand - physiopathology Hand Strength - physiology Humans Orthosis Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Robotics - instrumentation Robotics - methods Self-Help Devices |
title | The usefulness of assistive soft robotics in the rehabilitation of patients with hand impairment: A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A26%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20usefulness%20of%20assistive%20soft%20robotics%20in%20the%20rehabilitation%20of%20patients%20with%20hand%20impairment:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=Jiryaei,%20Zahra&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=39&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=398-409&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068750624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068750624&rft_id=info:pmid/38876658&rft_els_id=S1360859224000822&rfr_iscdi=true |