Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting

Chronic pain affects 11% of the US population. Most patients who experience pain, particularly chronic musculoskeletal pain, seek care in primary care settings. Assessment of the patient pain experience is the cornerstone to optimal pain management; however, pain assessment remains a challenge for m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2024-07, Vol.39, p.50-56
Hauptverfasser: Callen, Elisabeth F., Lutgen, Cory B., Robertson, Elise, Loskutova, Natalia Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue
container_start_page 50
container_title Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
container_volume 39
creator Callen, Elisabeth F.
Lutgen, Cory B.
Robertson, Elise
Loskutova, Natalia Y.
description Chronic pain affects 11% of the US population. Most patients who experience pain, particularly chronic musculoskeletal pain, seek care in primary care settings. Assessment of the patient pain experience is the cornerstone to optimal pain management; however, pain assessment remains a challenge for medical professionals. It is unknown to what extent the assessment of pain intensity is considered in context of function and quality of life. To understand common practices related to assessment of pain and function in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Cross-sectional survey. A 42-item electronic survey was developed with self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to knowledge, beliefs, and current practices. All physicians and non-physician clinicians affiliated with the AAFP NRN and 2000 AAFP physician members were invited to participate. Primary care clinicians report that chronic joint pain assessment should be comprehensive, citing assessment elements that align with the comprehensive pain assessment models. Pain intensity remains the primary focus of pain assessment in chronic joint pain and the most important factor in guiding treatment decisions, despite well-known limitations. Clinicians also report that patients with osteoarthritis should be treated by Family Medicine. Pain assessment is primarily limited to pain intensity scales which may contribute to worse patient outcomes. Given that most respondents believe primary care/family medicine should be primary responsible for the care of patients with osteoarthritis, awareness of and comfort with existing guidelines, validated assessment instruments and the comprehensive pain assessment models could contribute to delivery of more comprehensive care. •Survey respondents' patients with chronic join pain mainly had osteoarthritis (88.8%) and fibromyalgia (51.5%).•When assessing pain, functioning, and emotions, survey respondents mainly relied on patient interviews.•Survey respondents (primary care clinicians) indicated they should be treating osteoarthritis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068750290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1360859224000913</els_id><sourcerecordid>3068750290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2dbe10b5c3143e5c6d93138dea6d2ceba9f4812b5028565282da6bb92215e2623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rFTEUhoNYbK3-AReSpZsZk5NJbgbclKJVKLjRdcjHmTbXmcw1yQj99831ti6FAzmB533hPIS846znjKuP-37vltoDg6Fn0DMxvCAXXAroRtDiZduFYp2WI5yT16XsGWPjAOMrci603im1kxfEXZWCpSyYKrUp0MUme4d_vwdbK-ZU6LRm6u_zmqKny1b8Nq_lF85Y7dygmGibeo90skucH-ghW1-jR1qw1pju3pCzyc4F3z69l-Tnl88_rr92t99vvl1f3XZesF3tIDjkzEkv-CBQehVGwYUOaFUAj86O06A5OMlASyVBQ7DKuRGASwQF4pJ8OPUe8vp7w1LNEovHebYJ160YwZTetfTIGgon1Oe1lIyTOeS42PxgODNHt2Zvjm7N0a1hYJrbFnr_1L-5BcO_yLPMBnw6Adiu_BMxm-IjJo8hZvTVhDX-r_8R3fyMIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068750290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Callen, Elisabeth F. ; Lutgen, Cory B. ; Robertson, Elise ; Loskutova, Natalia Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Callen, Elisabeth F. ; Lutgen, Cory B. ; Robertson, Elise ; Loskutova, Natalia Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic pain affects 11% of the US population. Most patients who experience pain, particularly chronic musculoskeletal pain, seek care in primary care settings. Assessment of the patient pain experience is the cornerstone to optimal pain management; however, pain assessment remains a challenge for medical professionals. It is unknown to what extent the assessment of pain intensity is considered in context of function and quality of life. To understand common practices related to assessment of pain and function in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Cross-sectional survey. A 42-item electronic survey was developed with self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to knowledge, beliefs, and current practices. All physicians and non-physician clinicians affiliated with the AAFP NRN and 2000 AAFP physician members were invited to participate. Primary care clinicians report that chronic joint pain assessment should be comprehensive, citing assessment elements that align with the comprehensive pain assessment models. Pain intensity remains the primary focus of pain assessment in chronic joint pain and the most important factor in guiding treatment decisions, despite well-known limitations. Clinicians also report that patients with osteoarthritis should be treated by Family Medicine. Pain assessment is primarily limited to pain intensity scales which may contribute to worse patient outcomes. Given that most respondents believe primary care/family medicine should be primary responsible for the care of patients with osteoarthritis, awareness of and comfort with existing guidelines, validated assessment instruments and the comprehensive pain assessment models could contribute to delivery of more comprehensive care. •Survey respondents' patients with chronic join pain mainly had osteoarthritis (88.8%) and fibromyalgia (51.5%).•When assessing pain, functioning, and emotions, survey respondents mainly relied on patient interviews.•Survey respondents (primary care clinicians) indicated they should be treating osteoarthritis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38876675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic Pain - therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cross-sectional survey ; Family Practice - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal pain ; Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy ; Osteoarthritis ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data ; primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-07, Vol.39, p.50-56</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2dbe10b5c3143e5c6d93138dea6d2ceba9f4812b5028565282da6bb92215e2623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6589-4557 ; 0000-0002-6989-2428</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224000913$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38876675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Callen, Elisabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutgen, Cory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loskutova, Natalia Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>Chronic pain affects 11% of the US population. Most patients who experience pain, particularly chronic musculoskeletal pain, seek care in primary care settings. Assessment of the patient pain experience is the cornerstone to optimal pain management; however, pain assessment remains a challenge for medical professionals. It is unknown to what extent the assessment of pain intensity is considered in context of function and quality of life. To understand common practices related to assessment of pain and function in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Cross-sectional survey. A 42-item electronic survey was developed with self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to knowledge, beliefs, and current practices. All physicians and non-physician clinicians affiliated with the AAFP NRN and 2000 AAFP physician members were invited to participate. Primary care clinicians report that chronic joint pain assessment should be comprehensive, citing assessment elements that align with the comprehensive pain assessment models. Pain intensity remains the primary focus of pain assessment in chronic joint pain and the most important factor in guiding treatment decisions, despite well-known limitations. Clinicians also report that patients with osteoarthritis should be treated by Family Medicine. Pain assessment is primarily limited to pain intensity scales which may contribute to worse patient outcomes. Given that most respondents believe primary care/family medicine should be primary responsible for the care of patients with osteoarthritis, awareness of and comfort with existing guidelines, validated assessment instruments and the comprehensive pain assessment models could contribute to delivery of more comprehensive care. •Survey respondents' patients with chronic join pain mainly had osteoarthritis (88.8%) and fibromyalgia (51.5%).•When assessing pain, functioning, and emotions, survey respondents mainly relied on patient interviews.•Survey respondents (primary care clinicians) indicated they should be treating osteoarthritis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cross-sectional survey</subject><subject>Family Practice - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal pain</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1rFTEUhoNYbK3-AReSpZsZk5NJbgbclKJVKLjRdcjHmTbXmcw1yQj99831ti6FAzmB533hPIS846znjKuP-37vltoDg6Fn0DMxvCAXXAroRtDiZduFYp2WI5yT16XsGWPjAOMrci603im1kxfEXZWCpSyYKrUp0MUme4d_vwdbK-ZU6LRm6u_zmqKny1b8Nq_lF85Y7dygmGibeo90skucH-ghW1-jR1qw1pju3pCzyc4F3z69l-Tnl88_rr92t99vvl1f3XZesF3tIDjkzEkv-CBQehVGwYUOaFUAj86O06A5OMlASyVBQ7DKuRGASwQF4pJ8OPUe8vp7w1LNEovHebYJ160YwZTetfTIGgon1Oe1lIyTOeS42PxgODNHt2Zvjm7N0a1hYJrbFnr_1L-5BcO_yLPMBnw6Adiu_BMxm-IjJo8hZvTVhDX-r_8R3fyMIg</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Callen, Elisabeth F.</creator><creator>Lutgen, Cory B.</creator><creator>Robertson, Elise</creator><creator>Loskutova, Natalia Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-2428</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting</title><author>Callen, Elisabeth F. ; Lutgen, Cory B. ; Robertson, Elise ; Loskutova, Natalia Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-2dbe10b5c3143e5c6d93138dea6d2ceba9f4812b5028565282da6bb92215e2623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cross-sectional survey</topic><topic>Family Practice - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal pain</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Callen, Elisabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutgen, Cory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loskutova, Natalia Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Callen, Elisabeth F.</au><au>Lutgen, Cory B.</au><au>Robertson, Elise</au><au>Loskutova, Natalia Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><spage>50</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>50-56</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>Chronic pain affects 11% of the US population. Most patients who experience pain, particularly chronic musculoskeletal pain, seek care in primary care settings. Assessment of the patient pain experience is the cornerstone to optimal pain management; however, pain assessment remains a challenge for medical professionals. It is unknown to what extent the assessment of pain intensity is considered in context of function and quality of life. To understand common practices related to assessment of pain and function in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Cross-sectional survey. A 42-item electronic survey was developed with self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to knowledge, beliefs, and current practices. All physicians and non-physician clinicians affiliated with the AAFP NRN and 2000 AAFP physician members were invited to participate. Primary care clinicians report that chronic joint pain assessment should be comprehensive, citing assessment elements that align with the comprehensive pain assessment models. Pain intensity remains the primary focus of pain assessment in chronic joint pain and the most important factor in guiding treatment decisions, despite well-known limitations. Clinicians also report that patients with osteoarthritis should be treated by Family Medicine. Pain assessment is primarily limited to pain intensity scales which may contribute to worse patient outcomes. Given that most respondents believe primary care/family medicine should be primary responsible for the care of patients with osteoarthritis, awareness of and comfort with existing guidelines, validated assessment instruments and the comprehensive pain assessment models could contribute to delivery of more comprehensive care. •Survey respondents' patients with chronic join pain mainly had osteoarthritis (88.8%) and fibromyalgia (51.5%).•When assessing pain, functioning, and emotions, survey respondents mainly relied on patient interviews.•Survey respondents (primary care clinicians) indicated they should be treating osteoarthritis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38876675</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.034</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6989-2428</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-8592
ispartof Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-07, Vol.39, p.50-56
issn 1360-8592
1532-9283
1532-9283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3068750290
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Chronic Pain - therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cross-sectional survey
Family Practice - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal pain
Musculoskeletal Pain - therapy
Osteoarthritis
Pain Management - methods
Pain Measurement - methods
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data
primary care
Primary Health Care
Quality of Life
Rheumatoid arthritis
title Assessment and management patterns for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the family practice setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A31%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20and%20management%20patterns%20for%20chronic%20musculoskeletal%20pain%20in%20the%20family%20practice%20setting&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=Callen,%20Elisabeth%20F.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=39&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=50-56&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068750290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068750290&rft_id=info:pmid/38876675&rft_els_id=S1360859224000913&rfr_iscdi=true