Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products

Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2024-09, Vol.200, p.106827, Article 106827
Hauptverfasser: Tiffner, Katrin I., Ramezanli, Tannaz, Boulgaropoulos, Beate, Birngruber, Thomas, Bodenlenz, Manfred, Lackner, Bettina C., Raml, Reingard, Jiang, Ying, Raney, Sam G., Sinner, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106827
container_title European journal of pharmaceutical sciences
container_volume 200
creator Tiffner, Katrin I.
Ramezanli, Tannaz
Boulgaropoulos, Beate
Birngruber, Thomas
Bodenlenz, Manfred
Lackner, Bettina C.
Raml, Reingard
Jiang, Ying
Raney, Sam G.
Sinner, Frank
description Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106827
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3066792095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928098724001398</els_id><sourcerecordid>3066792095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-64ae307e6933498439b71663224d491ed56ec829fce90271291f934f5c6d48953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRZ-gAPykUsG28n4gbisRryklbjA2XLsDnhw4qztDNpf4itxNgNHTla5q7pUXQi9pGRPCeVvTns4zXnPCOvqB5dMPEI7KoVqiGDkMdoRxWRDlBRX6FnOJ0IqSZCn6KqV8iAEkTv0-7gUM0FcMp5_mDQaG3_6CYq3uelNBod7H-Fu8WcTYLLwFt9gG_zkrQnYQRUEHGeY8BDiLzx6mypKw5J9nPAZkh8qs6wgl8Xd4zqYvuPgXbSm-mAzOTwnHy7QxrH30yYocX5wmVN0iy35OXoymJDhxeW9Rt8-vP96_NTcfvn4-Xhz21gmaWl4Z6AlArhq207JrlW9oJy3jHWuUxTcgYOVTA0WFGGCMkUH1XbDwXLXSXVor9HrbW81vlsgFz36bCGE7U66JZwLxcgDlW3UGjvnBIOuWUaT7jUleu1In_TakV470ltHVfTqsn_pR3D_JH9LqYR3GwFqyrOHpLP16_GdT2CLdtH_b_8fbHynHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066792095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tiffner, Katrin I. ; Ramezanli, Tannaz ; Boulgaropoulos, Beate ; Birngruber, Thomas ; Bodenlenz, Manfred ; Lackner, Bettina C. ; Raml, Reingard ; Jiang, Ying ; Raney, Sam G. ; Sinner, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiffner, Katrin I. ; Ramezanli, Tannaz ; Boulgaropoulos, Beate ; Birngruber, Thomas ; Bodenlenz, Manfred ; Lackner, Bettina C. ; Raml, Reingard ; Jiang, Ying ; Raney, Sam G. ; Sinner, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-0987</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106827</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38857708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bioequivalence ; Cutaneous pharmacokinetics ; Dermal open flow microperfusion ; Lidocaine ; Prilocaine ; Topical</subject><ispartof>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2024-09, Vol.200, p.106827, Article 106827</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-64ae307e6933498439b71663224d491ed56ec829fce90271291f934f5c6d48953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38857708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiffner, Katrin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramezanli, Tannaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulgaropoulos, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birngruber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodenlenz, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Bettina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raml, Reingard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raney, Sam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinner, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products</title><title>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Pharm Sci</addtitle><description>Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Bioequivalence</subject><subject>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dermal open flow microperfusion</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Prilocaine</subject><subject>Topical</subject><issn>0928-0987</issn><issn>1879-0720</issn><issn>1879-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRZ-gAPykUsG28n4gbisRryklbjA2XLsDnhw4qztDNpf4itxNgNHTla5q7pUXQi9pGRPCeVvTns4zXnPCOvqB5dMPEI7KoVqiGDkMdoRxWRDlBRX6FnOJ0IqSZCn6KqV8iAEkTv0-7gUM0FcMp5_mDQaG3_6CYq3uelNBod7H-Fu8WcTYLLwFt9gG_zkrQnYQRUEHGeY8BDiLzx6mypKw5J9nPAZkh8qs6wgl8Xd4zqYvuPgXbSm-mAzOTwnHy7QxrH30yYocX5wmVN0iy35OXoymJDhxeW9Rt8-vP96_NTcfvn4-Xhz21gmaWl4Z6AlArhq207JrlW9oJy3jHWuUxTcgYOVTA0WFGGCMkUH1XbDwXLXSXVor9HrbW81vlsgFz36bCGE7U66JZwLxcgDlW3UGjvnBIOuWUaT7jUleu1In_TakV470ltHVfTqsn_pR3D_JH9LqYR3GwFqyrOHpLP16_GdT2CLdtH_b_8fbHynHg</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Tiffner, Katrin I.</creator><creator>Ramezanli, Tannaz</creator><creator>Boulgaropoulos, Beate</creator><creator>Birngruber, Thomas</creator><creator>Bodenlenz, Manfred</creator><creator>Lackner, Bettina C.</creator><creator>Raml, Reingard</creator><creator>Jiang, Ying</creator><creator>Raney, Sam G.</creator><creator>Sinner, Frank</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products</title><author>Tiffner, Katrin I. ; Ramezanli, Tannaz ; Boulgaropoulos, Beate ; Birngruber, Thomas ; Bodenlenz, Manfred ; Lackner, Bettina C. ; Raml, Reingard ; Jiang, Ying ; Raney, Sam G. ; Sinner, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-64ae307e6933498439b71663224d491ed56ec829fce90271291f934f5c6d48953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bioequivalence</topic><topic>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dermal open flow microperfusion</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Prilocaine</topic><topic>Topical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiffner, Katrin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramezanli, Tannaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulgaropoulos, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birngruber, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodenlenz, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackner, Bettina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raml, Reingard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raney, Sam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinner, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiffner, Katrin I.</au><au>Ramezanli, Tannaz</au><au>Boulgaropoulos, Beate</au><au>Birngruber, Thomas</au><au>Bodenlenz, Manfred</au><au>Lackner, Bettina C.</au><au>Raml, Reingard</au><au>Jiang, Ying</au><au>Raney, Sam G.</au><au>Sinner, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharm Sci</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>200</volume><spage>106827</spage><pages>106827-</pages><artnum>106827</artnum><issn>0928-0987</issn><issn>1879-0720</issn><eissn>1879-0720</eissn><abstract>Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38857708</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106827</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-0987
ispartof European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2024-09, Vol.200, p.106827, Article 106827
issn 0928-0987
1879-0720
1879-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3066792095
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bioequivalence
Cutaneous pharmacokinetics
Dermal open flow microperfusion
Lidocaine
Prilocaine
Topical
title Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutaneous%20pharmacokinetics-based%20bioequivalence:%20A%20clinical%20dermal%20open%20flow%20microperfusion%20verification%20study%20using%20lidocaine%20and%20prilocaine%20combination%20topical%20products&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20sciences&rft.au=Tiffner,%20Katrin%20I.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=200&rft.spage=106827&rft.pages=106827-&rft.artnum=106827&rft.issn=0928-0987&rft.eissn=1879-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3066792095%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066792095&rft_id=info:pmid/38857708&rft_els_id=S0928098724001398&rfr_iscdi=true