Deferring diagnostic evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis using direct oral anticoagulant or low-molecular-weight heparin as a single dose anticoagulant: A prospective real-world study in a regionwide care pathway

Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are typically referred to the emergency department for immediate evaluation. To enhance efficiency, our hospital implemented a regional, general practitioner (GP)-driven DVT care pathway, deferring diagnostic evaluation to a scheduled outpatient DVT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thrombosis research 2024-08, Vol.240, p.109059, Article 109059
Hauptverfasser: Luu, Inge H.Y., Appelboom, Yael, Willems, Jeresa I.A., Gielen, Robbert-Jan C.A.M., Lobbes, Marc B.I., Külcü, Kemal, ten Cate, Hugo, Peeters, Jos, Palmen, Jan, Buijs, Jacqueline, Jie, Kon-Siong G., van Kampen, Roel J.W., Mostard, Guy J.M., van Twist, Daan J.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are typically referred to the emergency department for immediate evaluation. To enhance efficiency, our hospital implemented a regional, general practitioner (GP)-driven DVT care pathway, deferring diagnostic evaluation to a scheduled outpatient DVT clinic appointment the following day. Patients receive a single dose anticoagulant from their GP to prevent thrombosis progression while awaiting diagnostic workup. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient preferences regarding the DVT care pathway and the type of single dose anticoagulant (low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs. direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)). Patients enrolled in the DVT care pathway between June 2021 and July 2023 were eligible. Until July 2022, LMWH was administered, and thereafter, the protocol recommended DOAC as the single dose anticoagulant. Patients completed questionnaires, incorporating patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs), during their DVT clinic visit and after five days. The primary endpoint was bleeding events within 72 h of receiving the single dose anticoagulant. Of 460 included patients, 229 received LMWH and 231 received DOAC as the single dose anticoagulant. DVT was confirmed in 24.8 % of patients. No major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were reported. LMWH was associated with more minor bleedings (22.3 % vs. DOAC 13.4 %), primarily attributed to injection site hematomas. Patients reported high satisfaction with the DVT care pathway (96.5 %) and generally preferred DOAC over LMWH. Deferring diagnostic evaluation for DVT using a single dose of either LMWH or DOAC in a real-world population is deemed safe. Considering practical advantages, patient preferences, and fewer skin hematomas, we favor DOACs as the single dose anticoagulant in this care pathway. •Deferring DVT evaluation using a single dose anticoagulant is not associated with major or clinically relevant bleedings.•Minor bleedings occur more frequently in the LMWH group compared to DOAC, primarily due to injection site hematomas.•Overall patient satisfaction with the care pathway for deferred DVT evaluation is high.
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109059