Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors

Although descended from orb weavers, spiders in the family Theridiidae spin cobwebs whose sticky prey capture gumfoot lines extend from a silk tangle to a surface below. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets at the bottom of a gumfoot line, the line's weak pyriform anchor releases, caus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta biomaterialia 2024-07, Vol.183, p.191-200
Hauptverfasser: Opell, Brent D., Kelly, Sean D., Morris, Sarah A., Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue
container_start_page 191
container_title Acta biomaterialia
container_volume 183
creator Opell, Brent D.
Kelly, Sean D.
Morris, Sarah A.
Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.
description Although descended from orb weavers, spiders in the family Theridiidae spin cobwebs whose sticky prey capture gumfoot lines extend from a silk tangle to a surface below. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets at the bottom of a gumfoot line, the line's weak pyriform anchor releases, causing the taut line to contract, pulling the insect from the surface and making its struggles to escape ineffective. To determine if this change in prey capture biomechanics was accompanied by a change in the material properties of theridiid glue, we characterized the elastic modulus and toughness of the glue droplet proteins of four theridiid species at 20–90 % relative humidity and compared their properties with those of 13 orb weaving species in the families Tetragnathidae and Araneidae. Compared to orb weavers, theridiid glue proteins had low extensions per protein volume and low elastic modulus and toughness values. These differences are likely explained by the loss of tension on a gumfoot line when its anchor fails, which may prioritize glue droplet adhesion rather than extension. Similarities in theridiid glue droplet properties did not reflect these species’ evolutionary relationships. Instead, they appear associated with differences in web architecture. Two species that had stiffer gumfoot support lines and longer and more closely spaced gumfoot lines also had stiffer glue proteins. These lines may store more energy, and, when their anchors release, require stiffer glue to resist the more forceful upward thrust of a prey. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets on a theridiid cobweb's gumfoot line, this taut line's anchor fails and the insect is hoisted upward, rendering its struggles to escape ineffective. This strategy contrasts with that of orb weaving ancestors, which rely on more closely spaced prey capture threads to intercept and retain flying insects. A comparison of the elastic modulus and toughness of gumfoot and orb web glue proteins shows that this change in prey capture biomechanics is associated with reductions in the stiffness and toughness of cobweb glue. Unlike orb web capture threads, whose droplets extend in a coordinated fashion to sum adhesive forces, gumfoot lines become untethered, which prioritizes glue droplet adhesive contact over glue droplet extension. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065276168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1742706124002939</els_id><sourcerecordid>3065276168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fabeecd018809929083bfe30b7ba6b9dcf03ffeffab6de3411359fa2b84632083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXtGyDkJZsEO04cZ4OERvxJlbopa8s_1zMeJXGwnan6UjwjDjOwZGVL9zv33HsPQm8pqSmh_MOxViZrH-qGNG1Nupq07AW6pqIXVd9x8bL8-7apesLpFXqT0pEQJmgjXqMrJgQTA-mv0a_dQc17SNjPOB8ATypD9GrESwwLxOxLKTicFm8h4v24AralMkLeiAx-TlgZE6ZFzR4sTgfv8p9uS4RnbNSS1wi4zDmBKVbeFD5hE_QT6EvbhK0_QdwXuYth2ubwEYeo8ROok5_3WM0GUg4x3aJXTo0J7i7vDfrx5fPj7lt1__D1--7TfWWalubKKQ1gLKFCkGFoBiKYdsCI7rXierDGEeYcuMJxC6yllHWDU40WLWdNoW_Q-3PfsuTPtXjLyScD46hmCGuSjPCu6TnlG9qeURNDShGcXKKfVHyWlMgtKXmU56TklpQknSxJFdm7i8OqJ7D_RH-jKcDHMwBlz5OHKJPxUA5hfQSTpQ3-_w6_ASUPrD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065276168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Opell, Brent D. ; Kelly, Sean D. ; Morris, Sarah A. ; Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Opell, Brent D. ; Kelly, Sean D. ; Morris, Sarah A. ; Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>Although descended from orb weavers, spiders in the family Theridiidae spin cobwebs whose sticky prey capture gumfoot lines extend from a silk tangle to a surface below. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets at the bottom of a gumfoot line, the line's weak pyriform anchor releases, causing the taut line to contract, pulling the insect from the surface and making its struggles to escape ineffective. To determine if this change in prey capture biomechanics was accompanied by a change in the material properties of theridiid glue, we characterized the elastic modulus and toughness of the glue droplet proteins of four theridiid species at 20–90 % relative humidity and compared their properties with those of 13 orb weaving species in the families Tetragnathidae and Araneidae. Compared to orb weavers, theridiid glue proteins had low extensions per protein volume and low elastic modulus and toughness values. These differences are likely explained by the loss of tension on a gumfoot line when its anchor fails, which may prioritize glue droplet adhesion rather than extension. Similarities in theridiid glue droplet properties did not reflect these species’ evolutionary relationships. Instead, they appear associated with differences in web architecture. Two species that had stiffer gumfoot support lines and longer and more closely spaced gumfoot lines also had stiffer glue proteins. These lines may store more energy, and, when their anchors release, require stiffer glue to resist the more forceful upward thrust of a prey. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets on a theridiid cobweb's gumfoot line, this taut line's anchor fails and the insect is hoisted upward, rendering its struggles to escape ineffective. This strategy contrasts with that of orb weaving ancestors, which rely on more closely spaced prey capture threads to intercept and retain flying insects. A comparison of the elastic modulus and toughness of gumfoot and orb web glue proteins shows that this change in prey capture biomechanics is associated with reductions in the stiffness and toughness of cobweb glue. Unlike orb web capture threads, whose droplets extend in a coordinated fashion to sum adhesive forces, gumfoot lines become untethered, which prioritizes glue droplet adhesive contact over glue droplet extension. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7061</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38838907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioadhesive ; Gumfoot line ; Material properties ; Soft matter ; Theridiidae</subject><ispartof>Acta biomaterialia, 2024-07, Vol.183, p.191-200</ispartof><rights>2024 Acta Materialia Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fabeecd018809929083bfe30b7ba6b9dcf03ffeffab6de3411359fa2b84632083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6815-8558 ; 0009-0000-3258-2971 ; 0000-0002-1830-0752 ; 0000-0002-6889-2688</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38838907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Opell, Brent D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors</title><title>Acta biomaterialia</title><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><description>Although descended from orb weavers, spiders in the family Theridiidae spin cobwebs whose sticky prey capture gumfoot lines extend from a silk tangle to a surface below. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets at the bottom of a gumfoot line, the line's weak pyriform anchor releases, causing the taut line to contract, pulling the insect from the surface and making its struggles to escape ineffective. To determine if this change in prey capture biomechanics was accompanied by a change in the material properties of theridiid glue, we characterized the elastic modulus and toughness of the glue droplet proteins of four theridiid species at 20–90 % relative humidity and compared their properties with those of 13 orb weaving species in the families Tetragnathidae and Araneidae. Compared to orb weavers, theridiid glue proteins had low extensions per protein volume and low elastic modulus and toughness values. These differences are likely explained by the loss of tension on a gumfoot line when its anchor fails, which may prioritize glue droplet adhesion rather than extension. Similarities in theridiid glue droplet properties did not reflect these species’ evolutionary relationships. Instead, they appear associated with differences in web architecture. Two species that had stiffer gumfoot support lines and longer and more closely spaced gumfoot lines also had stiffer glue proteins. These lines may store more energy, and, when their anchors release, require stiffer glue to resist the more forceful upward thrust of a prey. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets on a theridiid cobweb's gumfoot line, this taut line's anchor fails and the insect is hoisted upward, rendering its struggles to escape ineffective. This strategy contrasts with that of orb weaving ancestors, which rely on more closely spaced prey capture threads to intercept and retain flying insects. A comparison of the elastic modulus and toughness of gumfoot and orb web glue proteins shows that this change in prey capture biomechanics is associated with reductions in the stiffness and toughness of cobweb glue. Unlike orb web capture threads, whose droplets extend in a coordinated fashion to sum adhesive forces, gumfoot lines become untethered, which prioritizes glue droplet adhesive contact over glue droplet extension. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Bioadhesive</subject><subject>Gumfoot line</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Soft matter</subject><subject>Theridiidae</subject><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXtGyDkJZsEO04cZ4OERvxJlbopa8s_1zMeJXGwnan6UjwjDjOwZGVL9zv33HsPQm8pqSmh_MOxViZrH-qGNG1Nupq07AW6pqIXVd9x8bL8-7apesLpFXqT0pEQJmgjXqMrJgQTA-mv0a_dQc17SNjPOB8ATypD9GrESwwLxOxLKTicFm8h4v24AralMkLeiAx-TlgZE6ZFzR4sTgfv8p9uS4RnbNSS1wi4zDmBKVbeFD5hE_QT6EvbhK0_QdwXuYth2ubwEYeo8ROok5_3WM0GUg4x3aJXTo0J7i7vDfrx5fPj7lt1__D1--7TfWWalubKKQ1gLKFCkGFoBiKYdsCI7rXierDGEeYcuMJxC6yllHWDU40WLWdNoW_Q-3PfsuTPtXjLyScD46hmCGuSjPCu6TnlG9qeURNDShGcXKKfVHyWlMgtKXmU56TklpQknSxJFdm7i8OqJ7D_RH-jKcDHMwBlz5OHKJPxUA5hfQSTpQ3-_w6_ASUPrD8</recordid><startdate>20240715</startdate><enddate>20240715</enddate><creator>Opell, Brent D.</creator><creator>Kelly, Sean D.</creator><creator>Morris, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-8558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3258-2971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-0752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-2688</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240715</creationdate><title>Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors</title><author>Opell, Brent D. ; Kelly, Sean D. ; Morris, Sarah A. ; Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-fabeecd018809929083bfe30b7ba6b9dcf03ffeffab6de3411359fa2b84632083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bioadhesive</topic><topic>Gumfoot line</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Soft matter</topic><topic>Theridiidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Opell, Brent D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Opell, Brent D.</au><au>Kelly, Sean D.</au><au>Morris, Sarah A.</au><au>Correa-Garhwal, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors</atitle><jtitle>Acta biomaterialia</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomater</addtitle><date>2024-07-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>183</volume><spage>191</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>191-200</pages><issn>1742-7061</issn><issn>1878-7568</issn><eissn>1878-7568</eissn><abstract>Although descended from orb weavers, spiders in the family Theridiidae spin cobwebs whose sticky prey capture gumfoot lines extend from a silk tangle to a surface below. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets at the bottom of a gumfoot line, the line's weak pyriform anchor releases, causing the taut line to contract, pulling the insect from the surface and making its struggles to escape ineffective. To determine if this change in prey capture biomechanics was accompanied by a change in the material properties of theridiid glue, we characterized the elastic modulus and toughness of the glue droplet proteins of four theridiid species at 20–90 % relative humidity and compared their properties with those of 13 orb weaving species in the families Tetragnathidae and Araneidae. Compared to orb weavers, theridiid glue proteins had low extensions per protein volume and low elastic modulus and toughness values. These differences are likely explained by the loss of tension on a gumfoot line when its anchor fails, which may prioritize glue droplet adhesion rather than extension. Similarities in theridiid glue droplet properties did not reflect these species’ evolutionary relationships. Instead, they appear associated with differences in web architecture. Two species that had stiffer gumfoot support lines and longer and more closely spaced gumfoot lines also had stiffer glue proteins. These lines may store more energy, and, when their anchors release, require stiffer glue to resist the more forceful upward thrust of a prey. When a crawling insect contacts glue droplets on a theridiid cobweb's gumfoot line, this taut line's anchor fails and the insect is hoisted upward, rendering its struggles to escape ineffective. This strategy contrasts with that of orb weaving ancestors, which rely on more closely spaced prey capture threads to intercept and retain flying insects. A comparison of the elastic modulus and toughness of gumfoot and orb web glue proteins shows that this change in prey capture biomechanics is associated with reductions in the stiffness and toughness of cobweb glue. Unlike orb web capture threads, whose droplets extend in a coordinated fashion to sum adhesive forces, gumfoot lines become untethered, which prioritizes glue droplet adhesive contact over glue droplet extension. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38838907</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.043</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-8558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3258-2971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-0752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-2688</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7061
ispartof Acta biomaterialia, 2024-07, Vol.183, p.191-200
issn 1742-7061
1878-7568
1878-7568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065276168
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bioadhesive
Gumfoot line
Material properties
Soft matter
Theridiidae
title Changes in the material properties of spider glue droplet proteins accompanied shifts in prey capture biomechanics as cobweb spiders diverged from their orb weaving ancestors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A49%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20the%20material%20properties%20of%20spider%20glue%20droplet%20proteins%20accompanied%20shifts%20in%20prey%20capture%20biomechanics%20as%20cobweb%20spiders%20diverged%20from%20their%20orb%20weaving%20ancestors&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biomaterialia&rft.au=Opell,%20Brent%20D.&rft.date=2024-07-15&rft.volume=183&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=191-200&rft.issn=1742-7061&rft.eissn=1878-7568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065276168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065276168&rft_id=info:pmid/38838907&rft_els_id=S1742706124002939&rfr_iscdi=true