Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study

Background Until now, the management of psoriatic nails has not been satisfactory. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) have been evaluated separately for the management of psoriatic nails and proved to be effective. Aim This study aimed to measure and compare the usefulness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology venereology, and leprology, 2024-11, Vol.90 (6), p.713-721, Article 713
Hauptverfasser: Morsy, Eman El, Mohamed, Raneen, Omar, Shaimaa Ismail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 721
container_issue 6
container_start_page 713
container_title Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology
container_volume 90
creator Morsy, Eman El
Mohamed, Raneen
Omar, Shaimaa Ismail
description Background Until now, the management of psoriatic nails has not been satisfactory. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) have been evaluated separately for the management of psoriatic nails and proved to be effective. Aim This study aimed to measure and compare the usefulness as well as the safety of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for the management of psoriatic nails. Methods The psoriatic fingernails of 20 patients were managed using intense pulsed light on one hand and pulsed dye laser on the other. Two to three psoriatic nails were left without treatment as controls. The therapeutic sessions were conducted monthly for a period of 6 months. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes was assessed by a blinded dermatologist depending on the total, nail bed, nail matrix, modified and target NAPSI scores. Patient global assessment, in addition to Nail Psoriasis Quality of Life (NPQL10), was performed to assess the response to the therapy. Results A significant reduction in the total, target and modified NAPSI scores from baseline to the end of the study was detected, but no significant differences were detected between the two treatments. The responses of the nail matrix and bed lesions to both modalities were nearly the same. All patients stated that the two devices were efficient and improved their quality of life. The intense pulsed light treatment was more painful. Complete clearance of nail lesions was not obtained. Limitations Lack of long-term follow-up of cases and preset laser parameters were the major limitations of this study. Conclusion Intense pulsed light, like pulsed dye laser, is safe and efficient in treating nail psoriasis; however, the former is more painful. Dermoscopy had an additive function in analysing the response of nail psoriasis to therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.25259/IJDVL_429_2023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065272918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3065272918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-ed0785bffafcfbaf7076518b4cecee4fdfe352d39961440506fa2f7e1c3c87563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw5oZ85BLq2EmccEM8iypxAa6W66xpkBMH26nUn8C_xvSBxGlHu9_OSIPQeUquaE7zajp7vnufi4xWghLKDtCYVJwlrKL0MGrGy6RglI3QifefhNCsYOkxGrGyzNKqYGP0PesCdB5wPxgPNTbNxzLgFTg_-P2uXgM20oPDTYfDEnBwIEMLXcBW4042Bvfeukb6xl_jaOhk0svQ_AIGdMDBYrfxVbbtpYunFUQdQWtMDPBhqNen6EjLmHe2mxP09nD_evuUzF8eZ7c380RRSkMCNeFlvtBaaqUXUnPCizwtF5kCBZDpWgPLac2qqkizjOSk0JJqDqliquR5wSbocuvbO_s1gA-ibbwCY2QHdvCCkSKnnFZpGdHpFlXOeu9Ai941rXRrkRKx6V_87z9-XOzMh0UL9R-_L5z9AJtahSs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065272918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Morsy, Eman El ; Mohamed, Raneen ; Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</creator><creatorcontrib>Morsy, Eman El ; Mohamed, Raneen ; Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</creatorcontrib><description>Background Until now, the management of psoriatic nails has not been satisfactory. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) have been evaluated separately for the management of psoriatic nails and proved to be effective. Aim This study aimed to measure and compare the usefulness as well as the safety of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for the management of psoriatic nails. Methods The psoriatic fingernails of 20 patients were managed using intense pulsed light on one hand and pulsed dye laser on the other. Two to three psoriatic nails were left without treatment as controls. The therapeutic sessions were conducted monthly for a period of 6 months. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes was assessed by a blinded dermatologist depending on the total, nail bed, nail matrix, modified and target NAPSI scores. Patient global assessment, in addition to Nail Psoriasis Quality of Life (NPQL10), was performed to assess the response to the therapy. Results A significant reduction in the total, target and modified NAPSI scores from baseline to the end of the study was detected, but no significant differences were detected between the two treatments. The responses of the nail matrix and bed lesions to both modalities were nearly the same. All patients stated that the two devices were efficient and improved their quality of life. The intense pulsed light treatment was more painful. Complete clearance of nail lesions was not obtained. Limitations Lack of long-term follow-up of cases and preset laser parameters were the major limitations of this study. Conclusion Intense pulsed light, like pulsed dye laser, is safe and efficient in treating nail psoriasis; however, the former is more painful. Dermoscopy had an additive function in analysing the response of nail psoriasis to therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-6323</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0973-3922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-3922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25259/IJDVL_429_2023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38841963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods ; Lasers, Dye - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nail Diseases - radiotherapy ; Psoriasis - radiotherapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2024-11, Vol.90 (6), p.713-721, Article 713</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-ed0785bffafcfbaf7076518b4cecee4fdfe352d39961440506fa2f7e1c3c87563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38841963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morsy, Eman El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Raneen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</creatorcontrib><title>Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study</title><title>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</title><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><description>Background Until now, the management of psoriatic nails has not been satisfactory. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) have been evaluated separately for the management of psoriatic nails and proved to be effective. Aim This study aimed to measure and compare the usefulness as well as the safety of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for the management of psoriatic nails. Methods The psoriatic fingernails of 20 patients were managed using intense pulsed light on one hand and pulsed dye laser on the other. Two to three psoriatic nails were left without treatment as controls. The therapeutic sessions were conducted monthly for a period of 6 months. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes was assessed by a blinded dermatologist depending on the total, nail bed, nail matrix, modified and target NAPSI scores. Patient global assessment, in addition to Nail Psoriasis Quality of Life (NPQL10), was performed to assess the response to the therapy. Results A significant reduction in the total, target and modified NAPSI scores from baseline to the end of the study was detected, but no significant differences were detected between the two treatments. The responses of the nail matrix and bed lesions to both modalities were nearly the same. All patients stated that the two devices were efficient and improved their quality of life. The intense pulsed light treatment was more painful. Complete clearance of nail lesions was not obtained. Limitations Lack of long-term follow-up of cases and preset laser parameters were the major limitations of this study. Conclusion Intense pulsed light, like pulsed dye laser, is safe and efficient in treating nail psoriasis; however, the former is more painful. Dermoscopy had an additive function in analysing the response of nail psoriasis to therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Lasers, Dye - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nail Diseases - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Psoriasis - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0378-6323</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtPwzAQhC0EoqVw5oZ85BLq2EmccEM8iypxAa6W66xpkBMH26nUn8C_xvSBxGlHu9_OSIPQeUquaE7zajp7vnufi4xWghLKDtCYVJwlrKL0MGrGy6RglI3QifefhNCsYOkxGrGyzNKqYGP0PesCdB5wPxgPNTbNxzLgFTg_-P2uXgM20oPDTYfDEnBwIEMLXcBW4042Bvfeukb6xl_jaOhk0svQ_AIGdMDBYrfxVbbtpYunFUQdQWtMDPBhqNen6EjLmHe2mxP09nD_evuUzF8eZ7c380RRSkMCNeFlvtBaaqUXUnPCizwtF5kCBZDpWgPLac2qqkizjOSk0JJqDqliquR5wSbocuvbO_s1gA-ibbwCY2QHdvCCkSKnnFZpGdHpFlXOeu9Ai941rXRrkRKx6V_87z9-XOzMh0UL9R-_L5z9AJtahSs</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Morsy, Eman El</creator><creator>Mohamed, Raneen</creator><creator>Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study</title><author>Morsy, Eman El ; Mohamed, Raneen ; Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-ed0785bffafcfbaf7076518b4cecee4fdfe352d39961440506fa2f7e1c3c87563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Lasers, Dye - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nail Diseases - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Psoriasis - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morsy, Eman El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Raneen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morsy, Eman El</au><au>Mohamed, Raneen</au><au>Omar, Shaimaa Ismail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>713-721</pages><artnum>713</artnum><issn>0378-6323</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><eissn>0973-3922</eissn><abstract>Background Until now, the management of psoriatic nails has not been satisfactory. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) have been evaluated separately for the management of psoriatic nails and proved to be effective. Aim This study aimed to measure and compare the usefulness as well as the safety of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser for the management of psoriatic nails. Methods The psoriatic fingernails of 20 patients were managed using intense pulsed light on one hand and pulsed dye laser on the other. Two to three psoriatic nails were left without treatment as controls. The therapeutic sessions were conducted monthly for a period of 6 months. Evaluation of the clinical outcomes was assessed by a blinded dermatologist depending on the total, nail bed, nail matrix, modified and target NAPSI scores. Patient global assessment, in addition to Nail Psoriasis Quality of Life (NPQL10), was performed to assess the response to the therapy. Results A significant reduction in the total, target and modified NAPSI scores from baseline to the end of the study was detected, but no significant differences were detected between the two treatments. The responses of the nail matrix and bed lesions to both modalities were nearly the same. All patients stated that the two devices were efficient and improved their quality of life. The intense pulsed light treatment was more painful. Complete clearance of nail lesions was not obtained. Limitations Lack of long-term follow-up of cases and preset laser parameters were the major limitations of this study. Conclusion Intense pulsed light, like pulsed dye laser, is safe and efficient in treating nail psoriasis; however, the former is more painful. Dermoscopy had an additive function in analysing the response of nail psoriasis to therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38841963</pmid><doi>10.25259/IJDVL_429_2023</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-6323
ispartof Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2024-11, Vol.90 (6), p.713-721, Article 713
issn 0378-6323
0973-3922
0973-3922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3065272918
source MEDLINE; Bioline International; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods
Lasers, Dye - therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Nail Diseases - radiotherapy
Psoriasis - radiotherapy
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser in the treatment of nail psoriasis: Intra-patient left to right comparative controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A57%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intense%20pulsed%20light%20versus%20pulsed%20dye%20laser%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20nail%20psoriasis:%20Intra-patient%20left%20to%20right%20comparative%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dermatology,%20venereology,%20and%20leprology&rft.au=Morsy,%20Eman%20El&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=713-721&rft.artnum=713&rft.issn=0378-6323&rft.eissn=0973-3922&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259/IJDVL_429_2023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3065272918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065272918&rft_id=info:pmid/38841963&rfr_iscdi=true