Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients
This study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients. This secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h bef...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intensive & critical care nursing 2024-12, Vol.85, p.103716, Article 103716 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103716 |
container_title | Intensive & critical care nursing |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Bernardes, Simone Stello, Bruna Barbosa Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim Razzera, Elisa Loch Silva, Flávia Moraes |
description | This study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients.
This secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h before data collection. We evaluated RFS risk based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), stratifying it into four categories (no, low, high, and very-high risk).
Five adult ICUs in Brazil.
ICU/in-hospital mortality and LOS and ICU readmission data were obtained from electronic medical records analysis, following patients until discharge (alive or not).
The study involved 447 patients, categorized into no (19.2 %), low (28.6 %), high (48.8 %), and very-high (3.4 %) RFS risk groups. No significant differences emerged between the two groups (at RFS risk and no RFS risk) regarding the ICU death ratio (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) and LOS (5 versus 4 days), respectively. In contrast, patients at RFS risk experienced higher in-hospital mortality rates (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) prolonged hospital LOS (21 days versus 17 days), and increased ICU readmission rates (15 % versus 8.4 %) than patients without RFS risk. After adjusting for age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, we found no association between RFS risk and increased mortality in the ICU or hospital. Also, there was no significant association between RFS risk and prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital setting. However, patients identified as at risk of RFS showed nearly double the odds of ICU readmission (Odds ratio, 1.90; 95 % CI 1.02–3.43).
This study found no significant association between RFS risk and increased mortality in both the ICU and hospital settings, nor was there a significant association with prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital among critically ill patients. However, patients at risk of RFS exhibited nearly double the odds of ICU readmission.
Our findings may contribute to understanding risks associated with ICU readmissions, highlighting the complexity of discharge decision-making through comprehensive assessments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103716 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064921858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964339724001010</els_id><sourcerecordid>3064921858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-4e589fb0bd6d0a791945f98d08209f45a73202f2cb73fc7111b01351a5a5200b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNtTeVpH7AjTT-DAwMiLMOqSQ1pq1KyiSl9DvNQ85te1RwMZsbcvnOuck9hLxksGXAmrf7rTcmbGuoBTZ4y5pHZMMkrysBvHlMNtA3ouK8b8_Is5z3ANDzTj4lZ7zruBACNuT2ixudsz7c0HwINsXZ0eTzd6oLvdhdU21nn7OPgfpMNdZg3eKwhEKXhEJTYqJx_A0n9w8f1kJ9OapCLFTnHI3XxVn6y5dvdI6p6MmXA0X15MIN9tAkF33AEdQkX7zR04S3aaKLLh4H5ufkyain7F7cn-fk-uOHr7vP1eXVp4vd-8vK1I0slXCy68cBBttY0G3PeiHHvrPQ1dCPQuqW487G2gwtH03LGBuAccm01LIGGPg5eXPyXVL8sbpcFP7KuGnSwcU1Kw6N6GvWyQ7R1_-h-7imgK9THENqO9lIQKo-USbFnJMb1ZL8rNNBMVDHLNVeHbNUxyzVKUsUvbq3XofZ2b-SP-Eh8O4EONzFT--Sygb3ZDCV5ExRNvqH_O8Arm2xKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3101785650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bernardes, Simone ; Stello, Bruna Barbosa ; Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim ; Razzera, Elisa Loch ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Simone ; Stello, Bruna Barbosa ; Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim ; Razzera, Elisa Loch ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients.
This secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h before data collection. We evaluated RFS risk based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), stratifying it into four categories (no, low, high, and very-high risk).
Five adult ICUs in Brazil.
ICU/in-hospital mortality and LOS and ICU readmission data were obtained from electronic medical records analysis, following patients until discharge (alive or not).
The study involved 447 patients, categorized into no (19.2 %), low (28.6 %), high (48.8 %), and very-high (3.4 %) RFS risk groups. No significant differences emerged between the two groups (at RFS risk and no RFS risk) regarding the ICU death ratio (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) and LOS (5 versus 4 days), respectively. In contrast, patients at RFS risk experienced higher in-hospital mortality rates (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) prolonged hospital LOS (21 days versus 17 days), and increased ICU readmission rates (15 % versus 8.4 %) than patients without RFS risk. After adjusting for age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, we found no association between RFS risk and increased mortality in the ICU or hospital. Also, there was no significant association between RFS risk and prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital setting. However, patients identified as at risk of RFS showed nearly double the odds of ICU readmission (Odds ratio, 1.90; 95 % CI 1.02–3.43).
This study found no significant association between RFS risk and increased mortality in both the ICU and hospital settings, nor was there a significant association with prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital among critically ill patients. However, patients at risk of RFS exhibited nearly double the odds of ICU readmission.
Our findings may contribute to understanding risks associated with ICU readmissions, highlighting the complexity of discharge decision-making through comprehensive assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-3397</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-4036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103716</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38834440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Clinical medicine ; Cohort analysis ; Computerized medical records ; Critical illness ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Electrolytes ; High risk ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; ICU readmission ; Intensive care ; Length of stay ; Malnutrition ; Medical records ; Metabolism ; Mortality ; Mortality rates ; Nutrition therapy ; Patient admissions ; Patients ; Phosphorus ; Potassium ; Readmission ; Refeeding syndrome ; Risk assessment ; Starvation ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Intensive & critical care nursing, 2024-12, Vol.85, p.103716, Article 103716</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-4e589fb0bd6d0a791945f98d08209f45a73202f2cb73fc7111b01351a5a5200b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0498-5305</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103716$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,30980,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38834440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stello, Bruna Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzera, Elisa Loch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><title>Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients</title><title>Intensive & critical care nursing</title><addtitle>Intensive Crit Care Nurs</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients.
This secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h before data collection. We evaluated RFS risk based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), stratifying it into four categories (no, low, high, and very-high risk).
Five adult ICUs in Brazil.
ICU/in-hospital mortality and LOS and ICU readmission data were obtained from electronic medical records analysis, following patients until discharge (alive or not).
The study involved 447 patients, categorized into no (19.2 %), low (28.6 %), high (48.8 %), and very-high (3.4 %) RFS risk groups. No significant differences emerged between the two groups (at RFS risk and no RFS risk) regarding the ICU death ratio (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) and LOS (5 versus 4 days), respectively. In contrast, patients at RFS risk experienced higher in-hospital mortality rates (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) prolonged hospital LOS (21 days versus 17 days), and increased ICU readmission rates (15 % versus 8.4 %) than patients without RFS risk. After adjusting for age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, we found no association between RFS risk and increased mortality in the ICU or hospital. Also, there was no significant association between RFS risk and prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital setting. However, patients identified as at risk of RFS showed nearly double the odds of ICU readmission (Odds ratio, 1.90; 95 % CI 1.02–3.43).
This study found no significant association between RFS risk and increased mortality in both the ICU and hospital settings, nor was there a significant association with prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital among critically ill patients. However, patients at risk of RFS exhibited nearly double the odds of ICU readmission.
Our findings may contribute to understanding risks associated with ICU readmissions, highlighting the complexity of discharge decision-making through comprehensive assessments.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Critical illness</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>ICU readmission</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality rates</subject><subject>Nutrition therapy</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Refeeding syndrome</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Starvation</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0964-3397</issn><issn>1532-4036</issn><issn>1532-4036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNtTeVpH7AjTT-DAwMiLMOqSQ1pq1KyiSl9DvNQ85te1RwMZsbcvnOuck9hLxksGXAmrf7rTcmbGuoBTZ4y5pHZMMkrysBvHlMNtA3ouK8b8_Is5z3ANDzTj4lZ7zruBACNuT2ixudsz7c0HwINsXZ0eTzd6oLvdhdU21nn7OPgfpMNdZg3eKwhEKXhEJTYqJx_A0n9w8f1kJ9OapCLFTnHI3XxVn6y5dvdI6p6MmXA0X15MIN9tAkF33AEdQkX7zR04S3aaKLLh4H5ufkyain7F7cn-fk-uOHr7vP1eXVp4vd-8vK1I0slXCy68cBBttY0G3PeiHHvrPQ1dCPQuqW487G2gwtH03LGBuAccm01LIGGPg5eXPyXVL8sbpcFP7KuGnSwcU1Kw6N6GvWyQ7R1_-h-7imgK9THENqO9lIQKo-USbFnJMb1ZL8rNNBMVDHLNVeHbNUxyzVKUsUvbq3XofZ2b-SP-Eh8O4EONzFT--Sygb3ZDCV5ExRNvqH_O8Arm2xKA</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Bernardes, Simone</creator><creator>Stello, Bruna Barbosa</creator><creator>Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim</creator><creator>Razzera, Elisa Loch</creator><creator>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-5305</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients</title><author>Bernardes, Simone ; Stello, Bruna Barbosa ; Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim ; Razzera, Elisa Loch ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-4e589fb0bd6d0a791945f98d08209f45a73202f2cb73fc7111b01351a5a5200b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Critical illness</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>ICU readmission</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality rates</topic><topic>Nutrition therapy</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Refeeding syndrome</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Starvation</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernardes, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stello, Bruna Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzera, Elisa Loch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive & critical care nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernardes, Simone</au><au>Stello, Bruna Barbosa</au><au>Milanez, Danielle Silla Jobim</au><au>Razzera, Elisa Loch</au><au>Silva, Flávia Moraes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients</atitle><jtitle>Intensive & critical care nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Crit Care Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>103716</spage><pages>103716-</pages><artnum>103716</artnum><issn>0964-3397</issn><issn>1532-4036</issn><eissn>1532-4036</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the association between refeeding syndrome (RFS) risk and intensive care unit (ICU)/in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and ICU readmission in critically ill patients.
This secondary analysis of a cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at ICU 24 h before data collection. We evaluated RFS risk based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), stratifying it into four categories (no, low, high, and very-high risk).
Five adult ICUs in Brazil.
ICU/in-hospital mortality and LOS and ICU readmission data were obtained from electronic medical records analysis, following patients until discharge (alive or not).
The study involved 447 patients, categorized into no (19.2 %), low (28.6 %), high (48.8 %), and very-high (3.4 %) RFS risk groups. No significant differences emerged between the two groups (at RFS risk and no RFS risk) regarding the ICU death ratio (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) and LOS (5 versus 4 days), respectively. In contrast, patients at RFS risk experienced higher in-hospital mortality rates (34.3 % versus 23.4 %) prolonged hospital LOS (21 days versus 17 days), and increased ICU readmission rates (15 % versus 8.4 %) than patients without RFS risk. After adjusting for age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, we found no association between RFS risk and increased mortality in the ICU or hospital. Also, there was no significant association between RFS risk and prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital setting. However, patients identified as at risk of RFS showed nearly double the odds of ICU readmission (Odds ratio, 1.90; 95 % CI 1.02–3.43).
This study found no significant association between RFS risk and increased mortality in both the ICU and hospital settings, nor was there a significant association with prolonged LOS in the ICU or hospital among critically ill patients. However, patients at risk of RFS exhibited nearly double the odds of ICU readmission.
Our findings may contribute to understanding risks associated with ICU readmissions, highlighting the complexity of discharge decision-making through comprehensive assessments.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38834440</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103716</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-5305</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-3397 |
ispartof | Intensive & critical care nursing, 2024-12, Vol.85, p.103716, Article 103716 |
issn | 0964-3397 1532-4036 1532-4036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064921858 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Body mass index Clinical medicine Cohort analysis Computerized medical records Critical illness Data collection Decision making Electrolytes High risk Hospitalization Hospitals ICU readmission Intensive care Length of stay Malnutrition Medical records Metabolism Mortality Mortality rates Nutrition therapy Patient admissions Patients Phosphorus Potassium Readmission Refeeding syndrome Risk assessment Starvation Variables |
title | Refeeding syndrome risk at ICU admission is an independent predictor of ICU readmission but it is not associated with mortality or length of stay in critically ill patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Refeeding%20syndrome%20risk%20at%20ICU%20admission%20is%20an%20independent%20predictor%20of%20ICU%20readmission%20but%20it%20is%20not%20associated%20with%20mortality%20or%20length%20of%20stay%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20&%20critical%20care%20nursing&rft.au=Bernardes,%20Simone&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=103716&rft.pages=103716-&rft.artnum=103716&rft.issn=0964-3397&rft.eissn=1532-4036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064921858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3101785650&rft_id=info:pmid/38834440&rft_els_id=S0964339724001010&rfr_iscdi=true |