Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation
Introduction Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2024-08, Vol.39 (11), p.2079-2086 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2086 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2079 |
container_title | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Melzer, Anne C. Campbell, Megan E. Hagedorn, Hildi J. Fu, Steve S. |
description | Introduction
Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.
Methods
Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.
Results
Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.
Conclusions
Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064579962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064579962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3baccb01be768d24c9cd0b3d951f2c0911a927aeeeba520f2918e9b82fe21f0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4Ah6k4MVLdfLoI95k8QWCCqvXkKZT6dI2mrQrfntT6wM8eMqQ-c1_hh8hBxROKEB26ilNIY2BiRjynIuYb5A5TVgSUyGzTTIPvyLOMy5mZMf7FQDljOXbZMYDTpnI5uRh0dRdbWrdRU81vvnIVtG9s9r09RqjpS20MTZaOtR9i10_9p6dbv1ZdB49DLqpe_1JXqx1M4TSdntkq9KNx_2vd5c8Xl4sF9fx7d3VzeL8NjYsSfuYj8kF0AKzNC-ZMNKUUPBSJrRiBiSlWrJMI2KhEwYVkzRHWeSsQkYrMHyXHE-5L86-Duh71dbeYNPoDu3gFYdUJJmUKQvo0R90ZQfXhesCJQGkFGKk2EQZZ713WKkXV7favSsKahSuJuEqCFefwhUPQ4df0UPRYvkz8m04AHwCfGh1z-h-d_8T-wEv2Ysy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Melzer, Anne C. ; Campbell, Megan E. ; Hagedorn, Hildi J. ; Fu, Steve S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Melzer, Anne C. ; Campbell, Megan E. ; Hagedorn, Hildi J. ; Fu, Steve S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.
Methods
Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.
Results
Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.
Conclusions
Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38831247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Content analysis ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Lung diseases ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Research: Qualitative Research ; Outreach services ; Patients ; Program Evaluation ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy ; Qualitative Research ; Smoke ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2024-08, Vol.39 (11), p.2079-2086</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024</rights><rights>2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3baccb01be768d24c9cd0b3d951f2c0911a927aeeeba520f2918e9b82fe21f0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6966-7848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38831247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melzer, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, Hildi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Steve S.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Introduction
Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.
Methods
Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.
Results
Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.
Conclusions
Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Research: Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Outreach services</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4Ah6k4MVLdfLoI95k8QWCCqvXkKZT6dI2mrQrfntT6wM8eMqQ-c1_hh8hBxROKEB26ilNIY2BiRjynIuYb5A5TVgSUyGzTTIPvyLOMy5mZMf7FQDljOXbZMYDTpnI5uRh0dRdbWrdRU81vvnIVtG9s9r09RqjpS20MTZaOtR9i10_9p6dbv1ZdB49DLqpe_1JXqx1M4TSdntkq9KNx_2vd5c8Xl4sF9fx7d3VzeL8NjYsSfuYj8kF0AKzNC-ZMNKUUPBSJrRiBiSlWrJMI2KhEwYVkzRHWeSsQkYrMHyXHE-5L86-Duh71dbeYNPoDu3gFYdUJJmUKQvo0R90ZQfXhesCJQGkFGKk2EQZZ713WKkXV7favSsKahSuJuEqCFefwhUPQ4df0UPRYvkz8m04AHwCfGh1z-h-d_8T-wEv2Ysy</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Melzer, Anne C.</creator><creator>Campbell, Megan E.</creator><creator>Hagedorn, Hildi J.</creator><creator>Fu, Steve S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-7848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation</title><author>Melzer, Anne C. ; Campbell, Megan E. ; Hagedorn, Hildi J. ; Fu, Steve S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3baccb01be768d24c9cd0b3d951f2c0911a927aeeeba520f2918e9b82fe21f0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Research: Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Outreach services</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melzer, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, Hildi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Steve S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melzer, Anne C.</au><au>Campbell, Megan E.</au><au>Hagedorn, Hildi J.</au><au>Fu, Steve S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2079</spage><epage>2086</epage><pages>2079-2086</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.
Methods
Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.
Results
Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.
Conclusions
Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38831247</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-7848</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8734 |
ispartof | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2024-08, Vol.39 (11), p.2079-2086 |
issn | 0884-8734 1525-1497 1525-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064579962 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Content analysis Female Health services Humans Internal Medicine Lung diseases Male Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Research: Qualitative Research Outreach services Patients Program Evaluation Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy Qualitative Research Smoke Smoking Cessation - methods Tobacco |
title | Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A24%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinician%20Views%20of%20Proactive%20Tobacco%20Treatment%20Programs:%20A%20Qualitative%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Melzer,%20Anne%20C.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2079&rft.epage=2086&rft.pages=2079-2086&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064579962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099442&rft_id=info:pmid/38831247&rfr_iscdi=true |