An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data

The development of models using deep learning (DL) to assess pressure injuries from wound images has recently gained attention. Creating enough supervised data is important for improving performance but is time-consuming. Therefore, the development of models that can achieve high performance with li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tissue viability 2024-08, Vol.33 (3), p.387-392
Hauptverfasser: Ikuta, Kento, Fukuoka, Kohei, Kimura, Yuka, Nakagaki, Makoto, Ohga, Makoto, Suyama, Yoshiko, Morita, Maki, Umeda, Ryunosuke, Konishi, Mamoru, Nishikawa, Hiroyuki, Yagi, Shunjiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 3
container_start_page 387
container_title Journal of tissue viability
container_volume 33
creator Ikuta, Kento
Fukuoka, Kohei
Kimura, Yuka
Nakagaki, Makoto
Ohga, Makoto
Suyama, Yoshiko
Morita, Maki
Umeda, Ryunosuke
Konishi, Mamoru
Nishikawa, Hiroyuki
Yagi, Shunjiro
description The development of models using deep learning (DL) to assess pressure injuries from wound images has recently gained attention. Creating enough supervised data is important for improving performance but is time-consuming. Therefore, the development of models that can achieve high performance with limited supervised data is desirable. This retrospective observational study utilized DL and included patients who received medical examinations for sacral pressure injuries between February 2017 and December 2021. Images were labeled according to the DESIGN-R® classification. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models for assessing pressure injury depth were created with a convolutional neural network (Categorical, Binary, and Combined classification models) and performance was compared among the models. A set of 414 pressure injury images in five depth stages (d0 to D4) were analyzed. The Combined classification model showed superior performance (F1-score, 0.868). The Categorical classification model frequently misclassified d1 and d2 as d0 (d0 Precision, 0.503), but showed high performance for D3 and D4 (F1-score, 0.986 and 0.966, respectively). The Binary classification model showed high performance in differentiating between d0 and d1–D4 (F1-score, 0.895); however, performance decreased with increasing number of evaluation steps. The Combined classification model displayed superior performance without increasing the supervised data, which can be attributed to use of the high-performance Binary classification model for initial d0 evaluation and subsequent use of the Categorical classification model with fewer evaluation steps. Understanding the unique characteristics of classification methods and deploying them appropriately can enhance AI model performance. •A large amount of data is required to improve the evaluation performance of artificial intelligence, but data collection is a time-consuming task.•By devising a classification method, highly accurate pressure injury evaluation could be achieved without increasing the amount of data.•To efficiently utilize artificial intelligence, a variety of innovations are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0965206X24000718</els_id><sourcerecordid>3064142461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-3be8ebac48ff2566ddf7af0031011b1bc85adf6097590a8dc9180fd58c97f3643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhnNQ3PXjB3iRHL1snbRNNsXTIn7BghcF8RLSZKIp3bYm7Yr_3siqR09hwjMv8z6EnDLIGDBx0WTNuM1yyMsMeAZQ7ZE5VIIvchDPM3IYYwMgADg7ILNCypyXZTEnL6uO-u4VO99PkVrEgbaoQ5f-qB6G0GvzRl0f6BAwxilgopspfCZ0GN8obnU76dH3Hf3waW79xo9oqdWjPib7TrcRT37eI_J0c_14dbdYP9zeX63WC5MXfFwUNUqstSmlczkXwlq31A6gSLVYzWojubZOQLXkFWhpTcUkOMulqZauEGVxRM53uena9wnjqDY-Gmxb3WEqpQoQJSvzUrCEsh1qQh9jQKeG4Dc6fCoG6lujalTSqL41KuAqaUw7Zz_xU71B-7fx6zABlzsAU8mtx6Ci8dgZtD6gGZXt_T_xX94Zho8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064142461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ikuta, Kento ; Fukuoka, Kohei ; Kimura, Yuka ; Nakagaki, Makoto ; Ohga, Makoto ; Suyama, Yoshiko ; Morita, Maki ; Umeda, Ryunosuke ; Konishi, Mamoru ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Yagi, Shunjiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ikuta, Kento ; Fukuoka, Kohei ; Kimura, Yuka ; Nakagaki, Makoto ; Ohga, Makoto ; Suyama, Yoshiko ; Morita, Maki ; Umeda, Ryunosuke ; Konishi, Mamoru ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Yagi, Shunjiro</creatorcontrib><description>The development of models using deep learning (DL) to assess pressure injuries from wound images has recently gained attention. Creating enough supervised data is important for improving performance but is time-consuming. Therefore, the development of models that can achieve high performance with limited supervised data is desirable. This retrospective observational study utilized DL and included patients who received medical examinations for sacral pressure injuries between February 2017 and December 2021. Images were labeled according to the DESIGN-R® classification. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models for assessing pressure injury depth were created with a convolutional neural network (Categorical, Binary, and Combined classification models) and performance was compared among the models. A set of 414 pressure injury images in five depth stages (d0 to D4) were analyzed. The Combined classification model showed superior performance (F1-score, 0.868). The Categorical classification model frequently misclassified d1 and d2 as d0 (d0 Precision, 0.503), but showed high performance for D3 and D4 (F1-score, 0.986 and 0.966, respectively). The Binary classification model showed high performance in differentiating between d0 and d1–D4 (F1-score, 0.895); however, performance decreased with increasing number of evaluation steps. The Combined classification model displayed superior performance without increasing the supervised data, which can be attributed to use of the high-performance Binary classification model for initial d0 evaluation and subsequent use of the Categorical classification model with fewer evaluation steps. Understanding the unique characteristics of classification methods and deploying them appropriately can enhance AI model performance. •A large amount of data is required to improve the evaluation performance of artificial intelligence, but data collection is a time-consuming task.•By devising a classification method, highly accurate pressure injury evaluation could be achieved without increasing the amount of data.•To efficiently utilize artificial intelligence, a variety of innovations are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-206X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38825443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Artificial intelligence ; Deep Learning ; Female ; Humans ; Machine learning ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neural networks ; Pressure injuries ; Pressure Ulcer - classification ; Pressure Ulcer - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of tissue viability, 2024-08, Vol.33 (3), p.387-392</ispartof><rights>2024 Tissue Viability Society / Society of Tissue Viability</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Tissue Viability Society / Society of Tissue Viability. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-3be8ebac48ff2566ddf7af0031011b1bc85adf6097590a8dc9180fd58c97f3643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4871-4681 ; 0000-0002-9642-6000 ; 0000-0003-1871-9534</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38825443$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ikuta, Kento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuoka, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohga, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyama, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Maki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Ryunosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Shunjiro</creatorcontrib><title>An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data</title><title>Journal of tissue viability</title><addtitle>J Tissue Viability</addtitle><description>The development of models using deep learning (DL) to assess pressure injuries from wound images has recently gained attention. Creating enough supervised data is important for improving performance but is time-consuming. Therefore, the development of models that can achieve high performance with limited supervised data is desirable. This retrospective observational study utilized DL and included patients who received medical examinations for sacral pressure injuries between February 2017 and December 2021. Images were labeled according to the DESIGN-R® classification. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models for assessing pressure injury depth were created with a convolutional neural network (Categorical, Binary, and Combined classification models) and performance was compared among the models. A set of 414 pressure injury images in five depth stages (d0 to D4) were analyzed. The Combined classification model showed superior performance (F1-score, 0.868). The Categorical classification model frequently misclassified d1 and d2 as d0 (d0 Precision, 0.503), but showed high performance for D3 and D4 (F1-score, 0.986 and 0.966, respectively). The Binary classification model showed high performance in differentiating between d0 and d1–D4 (F1-score, 0.895); however, performance decreased with increasing number of evaluation steps. The Combined classification model displayed superior performance without increasing the supervised data, which can be attributed to use of the high-performance Binary classification model for initial d0 evaluation and subsequent use of the Categorical classification model with fewer evaluation steps. Understanding the unique characteristics of classification methods and deploying them appropriately can enhance AI model performance. •A large amount of data is required to improve the evaluation performance of artificial intelligence, but data collection is a time-consuming task.•By devising a classification method, highly accurate pressure injury evaluation could be achieved without increasing the amount of data.•To efficiently utilize artificial intelligence, a variety of innovations are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Pressure injuries</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - classification</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0965-206X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhnNQ3PXjB3iRHL1snbRNNsXTIn7BghcF8RLSZKIp3bYm7Yr_3siqR09hwjMv8z6EnDLIGDBx0WTNuM1yyMsMeAZQ7ZE5VIIvchDPM3IYYwMgADg7ILNCypyXZTEnL6uO-u4VO99PkVrEgbaoQ5f-qB6G0GvzRl0f6BAwxilgopspfCZ0GN8obnU76dH3Hf3waW79xo9oqdWjPib7TrcRT37eI_J0c_14dbdYP9zeX63WC5MXfFwUNUqstSmlczkXwlq31A6gSLVYzWojubZOQLXkFWhpTcUkOMulqZauEGVxRM53uena9wnjqDY-Gmxb3WEqpQoQJSvzUrCEsh1qQh9jQKeG4Dc6fCoG6lujalTSqL41KuAqaUw7Zz_xU71B-7fx6zABlzsAU8mtx6Ci8dgZtD6gGZXt_T_xX94Zho8</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Ikuta, Kento</creator><creator>Fukuoka, Kohei</creator><creator>Kimura, Yuka</creator><creator>Nakagaki, Makoto</creator><creator>Ohga, Makoto</creator><creator>Suyama, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Morita, Maki</creator><creator>Umeda, Ryunosuke</creator><creator>Konishi, Mamoru</creator><creator>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Yagi, Shunjiro</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4871-4681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-6000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1871-9534</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data</title><author>Ikuta, Kento ; Fukuoka, Kohei ; Kimura, Yuka ; Nakagaki, Makoto ; Ohga, Makoto ; Suyama, Yoshiko ; Morita, Maki ; Umeda, Ryunosuke ; Konishi, Mamoru ; Nishikawa, Hiroyuki ; Yagi, Shunjiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-3be8ebac48ff2566ddf7af0031011b1bc85adf6097590a8dc9180fd58c97f3643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Pressure injuries</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - classification</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ikuta, Kento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuoka, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagaki, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohga, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyama, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Maki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Ryunosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Mamoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Shunjiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of tissue viability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ikuta, Kento</au><au>Fukuoka, Kohei</au><au>Kimura, Yuka</au><au>Nakagaki, Makoto</au><au>Ohga, Makoto</au><au>Suyama, Yoshiko</au><au>Morita, Maki</au><au>Umeda, Ryunosuke</au><au>Konishi, Mamoru</au><au>Nishikawa, Hiroyuki</au><au>Yagi, Shunjiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tissue viability</jtitle><addtitle>J Tissue Viability</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>387-392</pages><issn>0965-206X</issn><abstract>The development of models using deep learning (DL) to assess pressure injuries from wound images has recently gained attention. Creating enough supervised data is important for improving performance but is time-consuming. Therefore, the development of models that can achieve high performance with limited supervised data is desirable. This retrospective observational study utilized DL and included patients who received medical examinations for sacral pressure injuries between February 2017 and December 2021. Images were labeled according to the DESIGN-R® classification. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models for assessing pressure injury depth were created with a convolutional neural network (Categorical, Binary, and Combined classification models) and performance was compared among the models. A set of 414 pressure injury images in five depth stages (d0 to D4) were analyzed. The Combined classification model showed superior performance (F1-score, 0.868). The Categorical classification model frequently misclassified d1 and d2 as d0 (d0 Precision, 0.503), but showed high performance for D3 and D4 (F1-score, 0.986 and 0.966, respectively). The Binary classification model showed high performance in differentiating between d0 and d1–D4 (F1-score, 0.895); however, performance decreased with increasing number of evaluation steps. The Combined classification model displayed superior performance without increasing the supervised data, which can be attributed to use of the high-performance Binary classification model for initial d0 evaluation and subsequent use of the Categorical classification model with fewer evaluation steps. Understanding the unique characteristics of classification methods and deploying them appropriately can enhance AI model performance. •A large amount of data is required to improve the evaluation performance of artificial intelligence, but data collection is a time-consuming task.•By devising a classification method, highly accurate pressure injury evaluation could be achieved without increasing the amount of data.•To efficiently utilize artificial intelligence, a variety of innovations are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38825443</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4871-4681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9642-6000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1871-9534</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-206X
ispartof Journal of tissue viability, 2024-08, Vol.33 (3), p.387-392
issn 0965-206X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142461
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Artificial intelligence
Deep Learning
Female
Humans
Machine learning
Male
Middle Aged
Neural networks
Pressure injuries
Pressure Ulcer - classification
Pressure Ulcer - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
title An ingenious deep learning approach for pressure injury depth evaluation with limited data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20ingenious%20deep%20learning%20approach%20for%20pressure%20injury%20depth%20evaluation%20with%20limited%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tissue%20viability&rft.au=Ikuta,%20Kento&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=387-392&rft.issn=0965-206X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064142461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064142461&rft_id=info:pmid/38825443&rft_els_id=S0965206X24000718&rfr_iscdi=true