Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications
In 2013, afatinib was approved for non–small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non–small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous lite...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical therapeutics 2024-06, Vol.46 (6), p.e107-e113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e107 |
container_title | Clinical therapeutics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Hunter Hall, Rafe Wright, Carson L. Hughes, Griffin K. Peña, Andriana M. Ladd, Chase Gardner, Brooke McIntire, Ryan Ferrell, Matt Rubenstein, Jane Tuia, Jordan Haslam, Alyson Prasad, Vinay Vassar, Matt |
description | In 2013, afatinib was approved for non–small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non–small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous literature demonstrates excessive patient burden and limited benefit as afatinib has spread into more indications. A trial analysis is needed to establish efficacy and risk.
In this investigation, we screened literature databases and clinical trial registries for trials of afatinib as monotherapy or in combination interventions for cancer treatment. We extracted participant demographics, adverse event characteristics, as well as clinical and surrogate endpoints for each trial. Studies were deemed positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their achieving of primary endpoints as well as their safety.
Our search yielded 2444 articles; we excluded 2352 articles for a final inclusion of 92 trials of 8859 patients. Our sample had 49 (53%) positive trials, 27 (29%) negative trials, and 16 (17%) indeterminate trials. The most common off-label indications for afatinib were breast cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The median OS for all trials was 8.4 months, median PFS 3.4 months, and the total ORR was 29.6%. Our study found that trials performed in disease states beyond the initial indications were largely negative with little patient benefit. The adverse events within our trial sample appear to be in line with expectations for toxicity.
These results are consistent with other studies that present similar findings, such as in Carlisle et al which indicate limited efficacy in nonapproved indications. Future trials should keep this potential evidence and patient burden in mind before initiation of those trials. This study contributes to the understanding of afatinib's risk-benefit profile across many clinical applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.04.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149291824000870</els_id><sourcerecordid>3064142364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-f70d23a68073f6f30774f23315e812d9798bac8d829c1e026870d9d5852d97e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8ASFw7d4I_98HJbEgqVKhWhInGzHHs2ddj1Bo83Er-BP41DSg9ckEaag5_39cy8hLzibMkZr9_ulnbwId1BNEvBRLlkuVj9iCy4atqC8_LbY7JgvGwL0XJ1Rp4h7hhjsq3EU3ImlRJVVckF-dUhAqIPW_rZJA8h0S8ev1_Q9xCg9-mCmuDozZzsNAJSH-g6zlu6hgMM037M_Dt6FdBv7xLSyziNtOuzT_AbusoTemsGehu9GZB2Nk6IdO0PEBHoygQLMYtdhpKfAj4nT_oMwov7fk6-Xn64XX0qrm8-Xq2668KKpkpF3zAnpKkVa2Rf95I1TdkLKXkFigvXNq3aGKucEq3lwEStsqB1laqOj1DJc_Lm5LuP048ZMOnRo4VhMAGmGbVkdclLIesyo6__QXfTHEOeLlOqlJwzwTLVnKg_G0bo9T760cSfmjN9zEvv9ENe-piXZrlYnZUv7_3nzQjuQfc3oAx0JwDyQQ4eokabU7LgfASbtJv8fz_5DTDnqnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084311020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hunter Hall, Rafe ; Wright, Carson L. ; Hughes, Griffin K. ; Peña, Andriana M. ; Ladd, Chase ; Gardner, Brooke ; McIntire, Ryan ; Ferrell, Matt ; Rubenstein, Jane ; Tuia, Jordan ; Haslam, Alyson ; Prasad, Vinay ; Vassar, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunter Hall, Rafe ; Wright, Carson L. ; Hughes, Griffin K. ; Peña, Andriana M. ; Ladd, Chase ; Gardner, Brooke ; McIntire, Ryan ; Ferrell, Matt ; Rubenstein, Jane ; Tuia, Jordan ; Haslam, Alyson ; Prasad, Vinay ; Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>In 2013, afatinib was approved for non–small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non–small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous literature demonstrates excessive patient burden and limited benefit as afatinib has spread into more indications. A trial analysis is needed to establish efficacy and risk.
In this investigation, we screened literature databases and clinical trial registries for trials of afatinib as monotherapy or in combination interventions for cancer treatment. We extracted participant demographics, adverse event characteristics, as well as clinical and surrogate endpoints for each trial. Studies were deemed positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their achieving of primary endpoints as well as their safety.
Our search yielded 2444 articles; we excluded 2352 articles for a final inclusion of 92 trials of 8859 patients. Our sample had 49 (53%) positive trials, 27 (29%) negative trials, and 16 (17%) indeterminate trials. The most common off-label indications for afatinib were breast cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The median OS for all trials was 8.4 months, median PFS 3.4 months, and the total ORR was 29.6%. Our study found that trials performed in disease states beyond the initial indications were largely negative with little patient benefit. The adverse events within our trial sample appear to be in line with expectations for toxicity.
These results are consistent with other studies that present similar findings, such as in Carlisle et al which indicate limited efficacy in nonapproved indications. Future trials should keep this potential evidence and patient burden in mind before initiation of those trials. This study contributes to the understanding of afatinib's risk-benefit profile across many clinical applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38825553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Afatinib ; Breast cancer ; Breast carcinoma ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical trials ; ClinicalTrials.gov ; Cross-sectional study ; Drug development ; Drug dosages ; Effectiveness ; FDA approval ; Head & neck cancer ; Head and neck carcinoma ; Indication ; Labels ; Lung cancer ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Response rates ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Small cell lung carcinoma ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Statistical analysis ; Toxicity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2024-06, Vol.46 (6), p.e107-e113</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-f70d23a68073f6f30774f23315e812d9798bac8d829c1e026870d9d5852d97e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9544-6739</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824000870$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38825553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunter Hall, Rafe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Carson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Griffin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, Andriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Chase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntire, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrell, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuia, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Alyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>In 2013, afatinib was approved for non–small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non–small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous literature demonstrates excessive patient burden and limited benefit as afatinib has spread into more indications. A trial analysis is needed to establish efficacy and risk.
In this investigation, we screened literature databases and clinical trial registries for trials of afatinib as monotherapy or in combination interventions for cancer treatment. We extracted participant demographics, adverse event characteristics, as well as clinical and surrogate endpoints for each trial. Studies were deemed positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their achieving of primary endpoints as well as their safety.
Our search yielded 2444 articles; we excluded 2352 articles for a final inclusion of 92 trials of 8859 patients. Our sample had 49 (53%) positive trials, 27 (29%) negative trials, and 16 (17%) indeterminate trials. The most common off-label indications for afatinib were breast cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The median OS for all trials was 8.4 months, median PFS 3.4 months, and the total ORR was 29.6%. Our study found that trials performed in disease states beyond the initial indications were largely negative with little patient benefit. The adverse events within our trial sample appear to be in line with expectations for toxicity.
These results are consistent with other studies that present similar findings, such as in Carlisle et al which indicate limited efficacy in nonapproved indications. Future trials should keep this potential evidence and patient burden in mind before initiation of those trials. This study contributes to the understanding of afatinib's risk-benefit profile across many clinical applications.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Afatinib</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>ClinicalTrials.gov</subject><subject>Cross-sectional study</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Head & neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and neck carcinoma</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Small cell lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwF8ASFw7d4I_98HJbEgqVKhWhInGzHHs2ddj1Bo83Er-BP41DSg9ckEaag5_39cy8hLzibMkZr9_ulnbwId1BNEvBRLlkuVj9iCy4atqC8_LbY7JgvGwL0XJ1Rp4h7hhjsq3EU3ImlRJVVckF-dUhAqIPW_rZJA8h0S8ev1_Q9xCg9-mCmuDozZzsNAJSH-g6zlu6hgMM037M_Dt6FdBv7xLSyziNtOuzT_AbusoTemsGehu9GZB2Nk6IdO0PEBHoygQLMYtdhpKfAj4nT_oMwov7fk6-Xn64XX0qrm8-Xq2668KKpkpF3zAnpKkVa2Rf95I1TdkLKXkFigvXNq3aGKucEq3lwEStsqB1laqOj1DJc_Lm5LuP048ZMOnRo4VhMAGmGbVkdclLIesyo6__QXfTHEOeLlOqlJwzwTLVnKg_G0bo9T760cSfmjN9zEvv9ENe-piXZrlYnZUv7_3nzQjuQfc3oAx0JwDyQQ4eokabU7LgfASbtJv8fz_5DTDnqnc</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Hunter Hall, Rafe</creator><creator>Wright, Carson L.</creator><creator>Hughes, Griffin K.</creator><creator>Peña, Andriana M.</creator><creator>Ladd, Chase</creator><creator>Gardner, Brooke</creator><creator>McIntire, Ryan</creator><creator>Ferrell, Matt</creator><creator>Rubenstein, Jane</creator><creator>Tuia, Jordan</creator><creator>Haslam, Alyson</creator><creator>Prasad, Vinay</creator><creator>Vassar, Matt</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-6739</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications</title><author>Hunter Hall, Rafe ; Wright, Carson L. ; Hughes, Griffin K. ; Peña, Andriana M. ; Ladd, Chase ; Gardner, Brooke ; McIntire, Ryan ; Ferrell, Matt ; Rubenstein, Jane ; Tuia, Jordan ; Haslam, Alyson ; Prasad, Vinay ; Vassar, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-f70d23a68073f6f30774f23315e812d9798bac8d829c1e026870d9d5852d97e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Afatinib</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>ClinicalTrials.gov</topic><topic>Cross-sectional study</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Head & neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and neck carcinoma</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Small cell lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter Hall, Rafe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Carson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Griffin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, Andriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Chase</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntire, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrell, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubenstein, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuia, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Alyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassar, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter Hall, Rafe</au><au>Wright, Carson L.</au><au>Hughes, Griffin K.</au><au>Peña, Andriana M.</au><au>Ladd, Chase</au><au>Gardner, Brooke</au><au>McIntire, Ryan</au><au>Ferrell, Matt</au><au>Rubenstein, Jane</au><au>Tuia, Jordan</au><au>Haslam, Alyson</au><au>Prasad, Vinay</au><au>Vassar, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e107</spage><epage>e113</epage><pages>e107-e113</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>In 2013, afatinib was approved for non–small-cell lung cancer with subsequent indication expansion. We investigated published afatinib clinical trials to assess risk and benefit profiles for the drug in its approved indication of non–small-cell lung cancer as well as in off-label uses. Previous literature demonstrates excessive patient burden and limited benefit as afatinib has spread into more indications. A trial analysis is needed to establish efficacy and risk.
In this investigation, we screened literature databases and clinical trial registries for trials of afatinib as monotherapy or in combination interventions for cancer treatment. We extracted participant demographics, adverse event characteristics, as well as clinical and surrogate endpoints for each trial. Studies were deemed positive, negative, or indeterminate based on their achieving of primary endpoints as well as their safety.
Our search yielded 2444 articles; we excluded 2352 articles for a final inclusion of 92 trials of 8859 patients. Our sample had 49 (53%) positive trials, 27 (29%) negative trials, and 16 (17%) indeterminate trials. The most common off-label indications for afatinib were breast cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The median OS for all trials was 8.4 months, median PFS 3.4 months, and the total ORR was 29.6%. Our study found that trials performed in disease states beyond the initial indications were largely negative with little patient benefit. The adverse events within our trial sample appear to be in line with expectations for toxicity.
These results are consistent with other studies that present similar findings, such as in Carlisle et al which indicate limited efficacy in nonapproved indications. Future trials should keep this potential evidence and patient burden in mind before initiation of those trials. This study contributes to the understanding of afatinib's risk-benefit profile across many clinical applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38825553</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.04.006</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-6739</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2918 |
ispartof | Clinical therapeutics, 2024-06, Vol.46 (6), p.e107-e113 |
issn | 0149-2918 1879-114X 1879-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142364 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adverse events Afatinib Breast cancer Breast carcinoma Cancer therapies Clinical trials ClinicalTrials.gov Cross-sectional study Drug development Drug dosages Effectiveness FDA approval Head & neck cancer Head and neck carcinoma Indication Labels Lung cancer Patient safety Patients Pharmaceutical industry Response rates Risk analysis Risk assessment Small cell lung carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Statistical analysis Toxicity Tumors |
title | Assessing Patient Risk, Benefit, and Outcomes in Drug Development: Insights From Afatinib Clinical Trials Across Diverse Cancer Indications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Patient%20Risk,%20Benefit,%20and%20Outcomes%20in%20Drug%20Development:%20Insights%20From%20Afatinib%20Clinical%20Trials%20Across%20Diverse%20Cancer%20Indications&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Hunter%20Hall,%20Rafe&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e107&rft.epage=e113&rft.pages=e107-e113&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064142364%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084311020&rft_id=info:pmid/38825553&rft_els_id=S0149291824000870&rfr_iscdi=true |