Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study

Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389
Hauptverfasser: González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos, Benito‐González, Tomas, Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco, Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier, Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo, Pascual, Isaac, Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire, Díez‐Gil, José Luis, Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal, Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 2
container_start_page 378
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 104
creator González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos
Benito‐González, Tomas
Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco
Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier
Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo
Pascual, Isaac
Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire
Díez‐Gil, José Luis
Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal
Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.
description Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year. Results A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). Conclusions Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.31115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064142224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIiFhkQsgS2zIYhKX7f4xOzQJECkSWUwkdi23XT1x1N1ubDdodskNOCMnwcNMWCCxqSqpvnqqp0fICbAzYIyfG2PPBAAUz8ghFJwvKl5-fb6fQcnygLyK8Z4xpkquXpIDUddcQSUPyeNN8OvRx-QMdcOkTaK-o9919FPAGH2gCWOibqQp6DEane4wYaBo1_jr4WfyuWxnGnDSLmyPIxo_Wh02dHD5qM-r9RzWLunk_Pieru6Q3lyurlY0ptlujsmLTvcRX-_7Ebn9eLlafl5cf_l0tfxwvTACRLGQlRZGdqaURat0oaAAqLWoLbes5aaoEFlXGmuYbWulQSphu0owgaJlZQniiLzb6U7Bf5uzqWZw0WDf6xH9HBvBSgmScy4z-vYf9N7PYczfZUoBq1hRb6nTHWWCjzFg10zBDdl3A6zZ5tLkXJo_uWT2zV5xbge0f8mnIDJwvgN-uB43_1dqlsuLneRvWRmZyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3091070584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creator><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year. Results A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). Conclusions Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38829174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects ; Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Congestive heart failure ; Female ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - mortality ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; inotropic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mitral regurgitation ; Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve - physiopathology ; Mitral Valve - surgery ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Mortality ; Patient Readmission ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Registries ; Regurgitation ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair ; Treatment Outcome ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use ; vasopressor test ; Ventricle ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3639-1416 ; 0000-0001-5841-5514 ; 0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.31115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.31115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38829174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito‐González, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year. Results A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). Conclusions Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>inotropic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mitral regurgitation</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Regurgitation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>vasopressor test</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIiFhkQsgS2zIYhKX7f4xOzQJECkSWUwkdi23XT1x1N1ubDdodskNOCMnwcNMWCCxqSqpvnqqp0fICbAzYIyfG2PPBAAUz8ghFJwvKl5-fb6fQcnygLyK8Z4xpkquXpIDUddcQSUPyeNN8OvRx-QMdcOkTaK-o9919FPAGH2gCWOibqQp6DEane4wYaBo1_jr4WfyuWxnGnDSLmyPIxo_Wh02dHD5qM-r9RzWLunk_Pieru6Q3lyurlY0ptlujsmLTvcRX-_7Ebn9eLlafl5cf_l0tfxwvTACRLGQlRZGdqaURat0oaAAqLWoLbes5aaoEFlXGmuYbWulQSphu0owgaJlZQniiLzb6U7Bf5uzqWZw0WDf6xH9HBvBSgmScy4z-vYf9N7PYczfZUoBq1hRb6nTHWWCjzFg10zBDdl3A6zZ5tLkXJo_uWT2zV5xbge0f8mnIDJwvgN-uB43_1dqlsuLneRvWRmZyw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creator><creator>Benito‐González, Tomas</creator><creator>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creator><creator>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creator><creator>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Pascual, Isaac</creator><creator>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creator><creator>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creator><creator>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creator><creator>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-1416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-5514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><author>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>inotropic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mitral regurgitation</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Regurgitation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>vasopressor test</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito‐González, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</au><au>Benito‐González, Tomas</au><au>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</au><au>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</au><au>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</au><au>Pascual, Isaac</au><au>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</au><au>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</au><au>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</au><au>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>378-389</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year. Results A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371). Conclusions Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38829174</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.31115</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-1416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-5514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142224
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects
Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation
Cardiovascular diseases
Congestive heart failure
Female
Heart Failure - diagnosis
Heart Failure - mortality
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality
Hemodynamics
Humans
Hypotension
inotropic
Male
Middle Aged
mitral regurgitation
Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve - physiopathology
Mitral Valve - surgery
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Mortality
Patient Readmission
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Registries
Regurgitation
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair
Treatment Outcome
Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use
vasopressor test
Ventricle
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
Ventricular Function, Left
title Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A19%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20impact%20of%20vasopressor%20test%20in%20transcatheter%20edge%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90edge%20repair%20of%20secondary%20mitral%20regurgitation:%20The%20PETIT%20study&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez%E2%80%90Guti%C3%A9rrez,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Carlos&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=378-389&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.31115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064142224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3091070584&rft_id=info:pmid/38829174&rfr_iscdi=true