Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study
Background Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Aims We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT. Methods MR treated with TEER were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 389 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos Benito‐González, Tomas Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo Pascual, Isaac Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire Díez‐Gil, José Luis Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J. |
description | Background
Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER).
Aims
We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.
Methods
MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year.
Results
A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).
Conclusions
Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.31115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3064142224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIiFhkQsgS2zIYhKX7f4xOzQJECkSWUwkdi23XT1x1N1ubDdodskNOCMnwcNMWCCxqSqpvnqqp0fICbAzYIyfG2PPBAAUz8ghFJwvKl5-fb6fQcnygLyK8Z4xpkquXpIDUddcQSUPyeNN8OvRx-QMdcOkTaK-o9919FPAGH2gCWOibqQp6DEane4wYaBo1_jr4WfyuWxnGnDSLmyPIxo_Wh02dHD5qM-r9RzWLunk_Pieru6Q3lyurlY0ptlujsmLTvcRX-_7Ebn9eLlafl5cf_l0tfxwvTACRLGQlRZGdqaURat0oaAAqLWoLbes5aaoEFlXGmuYbWulQSphu0owgaJlZQniiLzb6U7Bf5uzqWZw0WDf6xH9HBvBSgmScy4z-vYf9N7PYczfZUoBq1hRb6nTHWWCjzFg10zBDdl3A6zZ5tLkXJo_uWT2zV5xbge0f8mnIDJwvgN-uB43_1dqlsuLneRvWRmZyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3091070584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creator><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER).
Aims
We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.
Methods
MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year.
Results
A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).
Conclusions
Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38829174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects ; Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Congestive heart failure ; Female ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - mortality ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; inotropic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mitral regurgitation ; Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve - physiopathology ; Mitral Valve - surgery ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Mortality ; Patient Readmission ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Registries ; Regurgitation ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair ; Treatment Outcome ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use ; vasopressor test ; Ventricle ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3639-1416 ; 0000-0001-5841-5514 ; 0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.31115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.31115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38829174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito‐González, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Background
Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER).
Aims
We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.
Methods
MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year.
Results
A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).
Conclusions
Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>inotropic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mitral regurgitation</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Regurgitation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>vasopressor test</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIiFhkQsgS2zIYhKX7f4xOzQJECkSWUwkdi23XT1x1N1ubDdodskNOCMnwcNMWCCxqSqpvnqqp0fICbAzYIyfG2PPBAAUz8ghFJwvKl5-fb6fQcnygLyK8Z4xpkquXpIDUddcQSUPyeNN8OvRx-QMdcOkTaK-o9919FPAGH2gCWOibqQp6DEane4wYaBo1_jr4WfyuWxnGnDSLmyPIxo_Wh02dHD5qM-r9RzWLunk_Pieru6Q3lyurlY0ptlujsmLTvcRX-_7Ebn9eLlafl5cf_l0tfxwvTACRLGQlRZGdqaURat0oaAAqLWoLbes5aaoEFlXGmuYbWulQSphu0owgaJlZQniiLzb6U7Bf5uzqWZw0WDf6xH9HBvBSgmScy4z-vYf9N7PYczfZUoBq1hRb6nTHWWCjzFg10zBDdl3A6zZ5tLkXJo_uWT2zV5xbge0f8mnIDJwvgN-uB43_1dqlsuLneRvWRmZyw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creator><creator>Benito‐González, Tomas</creator><creator>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creator><creator>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creator><creator>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Pascual, Isaac</creator><creator>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creator><creator>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creator><creator>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creator><creator>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-1416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-5514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</title><author>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos ; Benito‐González, Tomas ; Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco ; Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier ; Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo ; Pascual, Isaac ; Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire ; Díez‐Gil, José Luis ; Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal ; Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-47a3c4fc645b9a5915118a38d2d0b2c57ee0f6cdc0db89a1493df7303e3b06613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>inotropic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mitral regurgitation</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Regurgitation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>vasopressor test</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benito‐González, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González‐Gutiérrez, José Carlos</au><au>Benito‐González, Tomas</au><au>Bosa‐Ojeda, Francisco</au><au>Freixa‐Rofastes, Xavier</au><au>Estevez‐Loureiro, Rodrigo</au><au>Pascual, Isaac</au><au>Andraka‐Ikazuriaga, Leire</au><au>Díez‐Gil, José Luis</au><au>Urbano‐Carrillo, Cristobal</au><au>Amat‐Santos, Ignacio J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>378-389</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Background
Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA‐FR‐like patients) during transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER).
Aims
We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.
Methods
MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1‐year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1‐year.
Results
A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1‐year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all‐cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).
Conclusions
Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all‐cause mortality at 1‐year follow‐up. However, 1‐year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA‐FR‐like patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38829174</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.31115</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-1416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-5514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-4129</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2024-08, Vol.104 (2), p.378-389 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3064142224 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation Cardiovascular diseases Congestive heart failure Female Heart Failure - diagnosis Heart Failure - mortality Heart Failure - physiopathology Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality Hemodynamics Humans Hypotension inotropic Male Middle Aged mitral regurgitation Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging Mitral Valve - physiopathology Mitral Valve - surgery Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging Mitral Valve Insufficiency - mortality Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology Mitral Valve Insufficiency - surgery Mortality Patient Readmission Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Recovery of Function Registries Regurgitation Risk Assessment Risk Factors Time Factors transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair Treatment Outcome Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use vasopressor test Ventricle Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology Ventricular Function, Left |
title | Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A19%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20impact%20of%20vasopressor%20test%20in%20transcatheter%20edge%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90edge%20repair%20of%20secondary%20mitral%20regurgitation:%20The%20PETIT%20study&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez%E2%80%90Guti%C3%A9rrez,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Carlos&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=378-389&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.31115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3064142224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3091070584&rft_id=info:pmid/38829174&rfr_iscdi=true |